* Ian Clarke [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
> > rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
>
> Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> * Ian Clarke [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
> > wrote:
> > > As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
> conversion
> > > rate - that is, 40% of our unique
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:30, Michael T?nzer wrote:
> Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> >
> > IMHO the bigger problem is user retention. And how do we get better user
> > retention?
> > - More content.
> > - Better performance.
> > - A usable chat client. (Whether or not we choose to spend project
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:40, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael T?nzer
> wrote:
> > I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
> > directly
>
> Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
> the number of users, and
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daigni?re
>> wrote:
>>> Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
>>> send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than mine)?
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
> > As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
> > rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
>
> Firstly, I don't buy that stat,
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daigni?re
> wrote:
> > Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
> > send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than mine)?
> >
> > Shall I forget about
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael T?nzer
wrote:
> I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
> directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of users, and the number of users is proportional to the
number of people
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
> rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and secondly, the inference you draw
from it is wrong.
I
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than mine)?
Shall I forget
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and secondly, the inference you draw
from it is
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael Tänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of users, and the number of users is proportional to the
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:40, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael Tänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:30, Michael Tänzer wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
IMHO the bigger problem is user retention. And how do we get better user
retention?
- More content.
- Better performance.
- A usable chat client. (Whether or not we choose to spend project
resources
on
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 19:50:38]:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
rate - that is, 40% of
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
19 matches
Mail list logo
