On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 10:39 -0500, Ian wrote:
> My last status update from Dan was on Oct 14th and was as-follows:
>
> Just wanted to give you a status update. The design is 95% done, I
> have a
> > few tweaks to make, and all of the existing english content is
> > ported. The
> > translation situ
My last status update from Dan was on Oct 14th and was as-follows:
Just wanted to give you a status update. The design is 95% done, I have a
> few tweaks to make, and all of the existing english content is ported. The
> translation situation remains problematic, however. I do have a plan, but
> it
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 18:48 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I agree, provided that this doesn't bog down the process, I would hope
> to have
> the new site up in 2 weeks or less.
> Ian.
>
That was 8 weeks ago; have we made any progress?
Florent
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
I believe it's investing in work that will cut cost in the short and
long term, while we lose a convenient feature.
Best regards,
On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 18:53 +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> DC* writes:
>
> >
> > I think manual language selection doesn't represent a huge issue
> > for
> >
DC* writes:
> I think manual language selection doesn't represent a huge issue for
> users.
> If we also take into account that to offer this feature *alone* would
> require us to run our own web infrastructure (which represent cost in
> money and volunteer time) I think from a cost-benefit pe
I think manual language selection doesn't represent a huge issue for
users.
If we also take into account that to offer this feature *alone* would
require us to run our own web infrastructure (which represent cost in
money and volunteer time) I think from a cost-benefit perspective it
does seem
On Friday, September 09, 2016 12:50:51 PM DC* wrote:
> Effectively Github does *not* support Content-negotiation. If we don't want
> to adopt another strategy to serve pages we'll need to stay away from
> Github Pages.
> Otherwise we'll need to add links to access the site in different
> languages.
The designer said that she would work on it this weekend, so unfortunately
I don't think the timing will work :( I do appreciate your enthusiasm
though!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
> Is there any chance I can get some sort of preliminary PSD today? I'd
> really like to w
Is there any chance I can get some sort of preliminary PSD today? I'd
really like to work on it over the weekend, come Monday I think I can
showcase enough progress to justify going volunteer-only (but I'm not
asking for a commitment to that decision)
I also think our translation needs will make
Didn't know Google would do that. That's actually quite good as would serve
users with the appropiate content without any intervention server or client
side from our part.
I would not add any JavaScript prompting or redirecting users at all, I'd
rather just have a language selection menu/dropdown,
Op 9 sep. 2016 14:51 schreef "DC*" :
>
> Effectively Github does *not* support Content-negotiation. If we don't
want
> to adopt another strategy to serve pages we'll need to stay away from
> Github Pages.
> Otherwise we'll need to add links to access the site in different
> languages. Thus serving
Effectively Github does *not* support Content-negotiation. If we don't want
to adopt another strategy to serve pages we'll need to stay away from
Github Pages.
Otherwise we'll need to add links to access the site in different
languages. Thus serving content from URLs such
/{de,es,fr}/documentation.
For l10n there are two different problems:
1) getting the translation from the translators
I don't know much about that part so I'll defer to those who know (I
think we use transifex).
2) serving the right translation to the user
The current website generates pages for all languages... and uses
Hi everyone,
I'm more concerned about translations and a clean and quick setup/deploy
workflow rather than who would implement the design changes.
Choosing the right tool for the job would make a huge difference for the
developer who takes the job of implementing the new design.
In that regard a
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 7:21 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com
wrote:> What is your timeline for the whole site, or was two weeks your target?
We
> have a massive amount of copy to rewrite (and translations to redo?), and
> pages to restructure, or do you plan for us to get up and running with
On 09/08/2016 02:13 AM, Dan Roberts wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm a groomsman in a wedding next saturday, but I still have
Congratulations! I hope that goes well!
> full availability on other weekends if planned ahead, and a few hours a day
> (depending). If we get the design (or maybe the prelimina
Unfortunately I'm a groomsman in a wedding next saturday, but I still have
full availability on other weekends if planned ahead, and a few hours a day
(depending). If we get the design (or maybe the preliminary design psd,
just something better than cutting things out of an unlayered png) before
th
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 10:13 PM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can tell from your email though, that you place a high value on
turnaround time, so on the other hand what are the competing bids in time
and money for this work? If there's an external deadline I'm unaware of,
that certainly
Hi Ian,
I just want to contribute where I can to ensure we stretch these funds the
best we can. Since we have the ability to do it for free (unlike the design
work), I think we should.
I've done similar conversions for a good number of one-off event landing
pages (+0-2 auxiliary pages) for my pre
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 19:46 +0200, Florent Daigniere wrote:
> An alternative would be to deploy CI tools along github-pages; that
> will do all of the above for us (at which point I don't care about
> the language or technology picked)... but that needs to be budgeted
> for too.
>
Scratch that, a
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 09:51 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 2:19 AM, Florent Daigniere nextgens@freenetprojec
> t.org
> wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> >
> > After that, I have identified a number of coders who can take these
>
> >
> > files,
>
On Sunday, September 04, 2016 06:25:48 PM Ian Clarke wrote:
> After that, I have identified a number of coders who can take these files,
> convert to HTML, and then publish them on Github using
> https://jekyllrb.com/. Note that the text of the site will all be editable
For translations we've been
Here is the designers mock-up of the non-landing page
template: https://redpen.io/bqa828f66f6b08ec18
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: i...@freenetproject.org
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 1:25 PM, Ian Clarke i...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
Based on everyone's feedback, I have selected t
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 1:04 PM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com
wrote:
> The designer will now need feedback as she works to create a final set of
> Photoshop files, which will include both the landing page, and a "detail"
page
> which will serve as a template for other pages on the site.
> After
On Sep 4, 2016 11:26 AM, "Ian Clarke" wrote:
>
> Based on everyone's feedback, I have selected the winning design:
> https://99designs.com/web-design/contests/reimagine-
freenet-website-branding-647851/entries/114
Great! I'm happy with this one.
> The designer will now need feedback as she works
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 2:19 AM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> After that, I have identified a number of coders who can take these
> files,
> convert to HTML, and then publish them on Github using https://jekyll
> rb.com/
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:25 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> After that, I have identified a number of coders who can take these
> files,
> convert to HTML, and then publish them on Github using https://jekyll
> rb.com/.
Any particular reason for that ruby-based tool? We're using python
everywhere else.
Based on everyone's feedback, I have selected the winning design:
https://99designs.com/web-design/contests/reimagine-freenet-website-branding-647851/entries/114
The designer will now need feedback as she works to create a final set of
Photoshop files, which will include both the landing page, and
28 matches
Mail list logo
