There was a bug in my use of VirtualProtect and in my testing. I apologize to
anyone who took the trouble to download it.
There's a new zip file now that fixes it.
Walter Bright wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
For lectures I basically have a choice between two options:
1. Take notes and not remember a darn thing that was said.
2. Not take any notes and remember the lecture.
Eh, I found that the physical act of taking notes tended to fix it in my
brain.
For Ruby extensions written in D (mostly an idea still):
http://tomash.wrug.eu/2009/05/08/rudy-on-euruko-last-thoughts-before-the-takeoff.html
Bye,
bearophile
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
When your class' dtor is called, you CANNOT say whether any of the
references into GC-controlled memory you hold are still valid.
You forgot to add: unless you know for a *fact* they're referenced from
a GC root, for example from a global
On Thu, 07 May 2009 03:02:16 +0400, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi, I apologise if this has already been asked, but I haven't gone and
DLed a news reader yet, so Firefox keeps complaining every time I try to
use the search box.
I was planning to include some C source into a D
There was a bug in my use of VirtualProtect and in my testing. I apologize to
anyone who took the trouble to download it.
There's a new zip file now that fixes it.
Daniel Keep wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
When your class' dtor is called, you CANNOT say whether any of the
references into GC-controlled memory you hold are still valid.
You forgot to add: unless you know for a *fact* they're referenced from
a GC root, for example from
在 Thu, 07 May 2009 13:04:22 +0800，Du Liang duliang...@163.com 写道:
import std.stdio;
void main(){
enum ee0:int{a=1000} writeln(ee0.a);
enum ee1:long{a=1000} ;
writeln(ee1.a); //(DMD2.029)error, but (DMD2.028)OK!
enum ee2:byte{a=125} writeln(ee2.a);
enum
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 03:02:16 +0400, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi, I apologise if this has already been asked, but I haven't gone and
DLed a news reader yet, so Firefox keeps complaining every time I try to
use the search box.
I was planning to
On Wed, 6 May 2009 21:02:58 + (UTC), BCS wrote:
Reply to Georg,
D made the May headline on Tiobe: Programming language D suffers
sharp fall. You can say that again, D went down 5 places, to below
languges like RPG(OS/400) and ABAP!
D's loss seems unbelievable. D now has a 0.628%
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
D1 has complete open sources now, submit patches, make it more
stable.
That's what people are actually doing.
From dmd.2.029/dmd/src/dmd/backendlicense.txt
The Software is copyrighted and comes with a single user license,
and may not be redistributed. If you wish to
Steve Teale steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote in message
news:gttvve$eo...@digitalmars.com...
There was a bug in my use of VirtualProtect and in my testing. I apologize
to anyone who took the trouble to download it.
There's a new zip file now that fixes it.
Can we please keep announcements
davidl Wrote:
If I remember correctly, I reported a similar bug to the bugzilla.
You can take a look at the bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
Thank you for your reply !!
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from JC (jcrapuchet...@gmail.com)'s article
I am considering trying NetBeans for all of my development. I have been using
Eclipse, but have found that I am only using it because of its project interface
and its language highlight support (which sometimes doesn't work).
Du Liang wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 06 May 2009 19:33:03 +0400, Jarrett Billingsley
jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Du Liang duliang...@163.com wrote:
int[] arrB = [2,2,2]; // arrB is static in[] or bug ?
Declaring
superdan wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
You're offending me. Please stop this immediately.
Thank you.
wut happened to `flame on', hercules?
expletives deleted
When it comes to everyone being better off, what about stopping
talking like a 16 year old rapper on a hormone trip? Grow up.
Thank
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
When your class' dtor is called, you CANNOT say whether any of the
references into GC-controlled memory you hold are still valid.
You forgot to add: unless you know for a *fact* they're referenced from
a
grauzone Wrote:
superdan wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
You're offending me. Please stop this immediately.
Thank you.
wut happened to `flame on', hercules?
expletives deleted
When it comes to everyone being better off, what about stopping
talking like a 16 year old rapper on a
superdan wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
superdan wrote:
grauzone Wrote:
You're offending me. Please stop this immediately.
Thank you.
wut happened to `flame on', hercules?
expletives deleted
When it comes to everyone being better off, what about stopping
talking like a 16 year old rapper on a
grauzone wrote:
I'm just thinking that what D actually needs, is a stable
implementation, and not more features.
+1
And... i think grauzone is right, Superdan, your language seems offensive
to me too. Please stop a not needed flame.
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
grauzone wrote:
I'm just thinking that what D actually needs, is a stable
implementation, and not more features.
+1
I think you'll like the next DMD release g.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Vincenzo Ampolo wrote:
grauzone wrote:
I'm just thinking that what D actually needs, is a stable
implementation, and not more features.
+1
I think you'll like the next DMD release g.
Oman, will it be another 0.178? I can
Derek Parnell wrote:
On the surface, it seems that the Tiobe figures a very rubbery, if not
outright dishonest.
I sent an email to Tiobe, and received a nice reply from Paul Jansen,
who runs the index. He showed me his numbers, and the biggest factor in
the drop in D's ranking was a large
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the deprecation
date would result in a *warning*.
Compiling the deprecated declaration OR any reference to it *after* the date
would result in an *error*.
== Quote from Leandro Lucarella (llu...@gmail.com)'s article
(from the bottom up, in chronological order, of course)
If you want to know why you don't have ordering guarantees, it's because
when the garbage is swept, you don't do it by following the connectivity
graph (as you do when you mark
On Thu, 07 May 2009 20:57:36 +0400, Tomasz Sowi#324 wrote:
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
deprecation date would result in a *warning*.
Compiling the deprecated declaration OR
std.metastrings.Format of D 2.029 is broken, I think.
The following doesn't work, the pragma isn't seen as an instruction, I guess
this is normal, but I don't like it much:
static if (true)
pragma(msg, true);
else
pragma(msg, false);
D2
dsimcha, el 7 de mayo a las 16:57 me escribiste:
== Quote from Leandro Lucarella (llu...@gmail.com)'s article
(from the bottom up, in chronological order, of course)
If you want to know why you don't have ordering guarantees, it's because
when the garbage is swept, you don't do it by
Reply to bearophile,
std.metastrings.Format of D 2.029 is broken, I think.
The following doesn't work, the pragma isn't seen as an instruction, I
guess this is normal, but I don't like it much:
static if (true)
pragma(msg, true);
else
pragma(msg, false);
Tomasz Sowi#324; ski tomeksowi.remove.t...@gmail.and.this.com wrote
in message news:gtv3u0$2q0...@digitalmars.com...
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
deprecation date would result
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:38 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
The following doesn't work, the pragma isn't seen as an instruction, I guess
this is normal, but I don't like it much:
static if (true)
pragma(msg, true);
else
pragma(msg, false);
Funny, I just ran into that
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:02:52 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Once again: 'much' and 'too much' can never.
modify.
adjectives.
They are not adverbs.
Really? Have consulted the superdan on that?
Also, I note that you have some sentences written without subject or verb,
or object, and
Derek Parnell Wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:02:52 -0400, Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
Once again: 'much' and 'too much' can never.
modify.
adjectives.
They are not adverbs.
Really? Have consulted the superdan on that?
huh? wut? wut about me?
if i type in vernacular doesn't
Jarrett Billingsley:
If you add braces, for some reason it works.
I think that if you don't put braces the compiler sees:
static if (true) else
If you put them it sees:
static if (true) {} else {}
The first isn't correct D code.
But I'd like the pragma to be seen as an instruction anyway by the
Among the new things done for Python 2.7 (currently in alpha) they have
improved the GC:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4074
http://bugs.python.org/issue4688
There they have shown a small Python program named tuple_gc_hell.py, this is
a reduced version:
import time, gc
def list_of_tuples(n):
The slides from my keynote at BoostCon 2009 (www.boostcon.com) are now
available from:
http://www.boostcon.com/site-media/var/sphene/sphwiki/attachment/2009/05/08/iterators-must-go.pdf
The talk went so well, the urge to brag is too mighty to resist. I mean
it's not everyday that several
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Tomasz Sowi#324; ski tomeksowi.remove.t...@gmail.and.this.com wrote
in message news:gtv3u0$2q0...@digitalmars.com...
This phrase gave me an idea for a small feat:
deprecated(2009-4-19) void foo();
Compiling references to the deprecated declaration *before* the
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The slides from my keynote at BoostCon 2009 (www.boostcon.com) are now
available from:
http://www.boostcon.com/site-media/var/sphene/sphwiki/attachment/2009/05/08/iterators-must-go.pdf
The talk went so well, the urge to brag is too mighty to resist. I mean
it's
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8isiw/author_of_modern_c_design_stl_iterators_must_die/
Hi all.
When I last used D a couple years ago, 2.0 was the experimental branch and
1.0 was stable. Now that I have a little time on my hands I'm wondering:
what is the current landscape? Is 2.0 approaching any sort of stability? Are
there still two competing runtime libraries or have they been
Matt wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Thu, 07 May 2009 03:02:16 +0400, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi, I apologise if this has already been asked, but I haven't gone and
DLed a news reader yet, so Firefox keeps complaining every time I try to
use the search box.
I was planning to
Hello Ameer,
Hi all.
When I last used D a couple years ago, 2.0 was the experimental branch and
1.0 was stable.
still true
Now that I have a little time on my hands I'm wondering:
what is the current landscape? Is 2.0 approaching any sort of stability?
the const system is stable and now
Can someone with knowledge of the DMD source code please explain this
error message for me?
dmd: glue.c:652: virtual void FuncDeclaration::toObjFile(int): Assertion
`!v-csym' failed.
I had a look at the DMD source to try and make some sense of it myself,
but didn't succeed. I am using the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1586
--- Comment #4 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-05-07 02:21 ---
Fixed in DMD2.028; not yet in D1.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2808
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
--- Comment #5 from nick.barbal...@gmail.com 2009-05-07 03:11 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Because your solution doesn't solve even your problem.
Perhaps you would like to propose a better solution ?
My original request was have
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
--- Comment #1 from g...@nwawudu.com 2009-05-07 03:32 ---
*** Bug 2948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
Summary: array.length not an lvalue
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
g...@nwawudu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2950
Summary: Switch for enum : string fails
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=808
dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ghaec...@idworld.net
---
import std.stdio;
class A{
int x;
struct AS{int y;}
}
class B:A{ }
void main(){
B:A.AS as1; /// : : : : ? ? ? B : A . AS ??
as1.y = 100;
writeln(as1.y);
A.AS as2;
as2.y = 200;
writeln(as2.y);
readln();
}
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1544
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Du Liang duliang...@163.com wrote:
B:A.AS as1; /// : : : : ? ? ? B : A . AS ??
B: is a label.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2951
Summary: std.random.dice() should be templated on proportions.
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2952
Summary: Segfault on exit when using array ops with arrays of
doubles larger than 8 elements
Product: D
Version: 2.029
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2249
crist...@zerobugs.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crist...@zerobugs.org
58 matches
Mail list logo
