We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle,
Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel,
Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!!
email = yshows...@???
email = yshowsoft at gmail.com
ecm2001 titanium download
ecm2001 titanium rapidshare
titanium
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that it's a
french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more productive without a demotool. Still,
Why is my post duplicated ? I use Web-News.
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that it's a
french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more productive without a demotool. Still,
#ponce wrote...
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that
it's a french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more productive
#ponce wrote:
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that it's a
french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more productive without a
在 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:07:49 +0800，#ponce alil...@gmail.com 写道:
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that
it's a french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D
#ponce wrote:
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that it's a
french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more productive without a
On 12.10.2009 03:07, #ponce wrote:
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that it's a
french party so it's not Breakpoint.
D clearly allowed us to be more
*droo*
Good trip man. Thanks for that.
Neat to see D getting use in the demoscene.
#ponce alil...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hatvh5$gq...@digitalmars.com...
Hi,
We won another demo compo with a D entry (at MAIN demoparty)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=53942
We tried to make a bigger and more impressive entry this time. Note that
it's a french party so it's
Folding in patches to compiler faults from bugzilla.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.049.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.034.zip
Many thanks to the numerous people who contributed to this
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
What already? Seems like 2.033 was only a week ago.. oh wait.
It was only a week ago!
torhu wrote:
I only get a black screen, but with music. Can't see any errors in the
log. I've got a Radeon mobility hd 3650. Is my gfx card no up to it?
That's what happens when you cross AMD/ATI with OpenGL.
--
Tomasz Stachowiak
http://h3.team0xf.com/
h3/h3r3tic on #D freenode
Tom S wrote:
torhu wrote:
I only get a black screen, but with music. Can't see any errors in
the log. I've got a Radeon mobility hd 3650. Is my gfx card no up to it?
That's what happens when you cross AMD/ATI with OpenGL.
Strange, my first steps in OpenGL years ago were on my 'old'
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
The IDE usually keeps the files in memory and could therefore just call
something like getSemantics(char** fileBuffers, int* fileSizes, int
nFiles, ParseNode* parseTree) and have its parse nodes already allocated
in process memory ready for use.
Considering a lot of
Walter Bright wrote:
Experience also suggests that using fork/exec rather than a shared dll
approach is much more robust and easier to develop. The reason is that
the former uses separate processes, which cannot step on each other. The
latter puts everything in one process space, where you've
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
The official JSON website has tons of bindings, here's the C one:
http://fara.cs.uni-potsdam.de/~jsg/json_parser/
I'm gonna try and get it converted to D over the weekend.
It has a test suite with it!
Walter Bright:
but we are operating under severe manpower
constraints. I don't have a 100 million dollar budget!
And sometimes this is even an advantage, because it forces to keep things
simple and not over-engineered :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Walter Bright дµ½:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity gains of D's
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:06:30 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-10-10 19:01:35 -0400, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com said:
Overall, the point is that there should be a well-defined process for
getting
code into Phobos and a well-defined
Walter Bright дµ½:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity gains of D's
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:06:30 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-10-10 19:01:35 -0400, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com said:
Overall, the point is that there should be a well-defined process
for getting
code into
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sorry. I occasionally scan the bug reports and work on the
Phobos-related ones, but I missed yours. I just assigned to myself four
bugs you submitted.
I think it should be fine to give you write and other regulars write
access to Phobos. I'll ask Walter and Don.
digited wrote:
Walter Bright �:
The nice thing about an xml file is while D is relatively easy to parse,
xml is trivial.
Why file? An IDE can call compiler process and get output with info from
stdout, that will be much faster, and if IDE will need to store the info,
it will, or will
Walter Bright wrote:
...
Think of what it provides as very similar to what ddoc does, except that
instead of being in a human-readable format it would be a
machine-readable one.
In other words, for each module you'll be able to get
. all the symbols in that module, and the members of
Walter Bright wrote:
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
The IDE usually keeps the files in memory and could therefore just
call something like getSemantics(char** fileBuffers, int* fileSizes,
int nFiles, ParseNode* parseTree) and have its parse nodes already
allocated in process memory ready for use.
Walter Bright wrote:
Think of what it provides as very similar to what ddoc does, except that
instead of being in a human-readable format it would be a
machine-readable one.
In other words, for each module you'll be able to get
. all the symbols in that module, and the members of those
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
I'm all for accepting additions to Phobos, and for putting in place a
process to do so. I suggest we follow a procedure used to great effect
by Boost. They have a formal process in place that consists of a
preliminary submission, a refinement period, a
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard work to
add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to column.
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
. all the symbols in that module, and the members of those symbols
(recursively)
Including local variables for functions?
That seems pointless, as they'll be inaccessible outside of the scope of
the function.
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity gains of D's
Walter Bright schrieb:
They say that the productivity gains of D's improvements are
overbalanced by the loss of productivity by moving away from an IDE. And
what is it about an IDE that is so productive?
If you use Eclipse for Java, you have:
- Debugger in place
- Automatic builder, compile on
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:has92u$1vu...@digitalmars.com...
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard work
to add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to column.
So the IDE knows where it is and can
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:has947$1vu...@digitalmars.com...
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
. all the symbols in that module, and the members of those symbols
(recursively)
Including local variables for functions?
That seems pointless, as they'll be
On 10/11/09 11:56, Frank Benoit wrote:
Walter Bright schrieb:
They say that the productivity gains of D's improvements are
overbalanced by the loss of productivity by moving away from an IDE. And
what is it about an IDE that is so productive?
If you use Eclipse for Java, you have:
- Debugger
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:19:56 -0700, Walter Bright thusly wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They
language_fan wrote:
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:19:56 -0700, Walter Bright thusly wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
On 2009-10-11 03:56:55 -0400, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com said:
I submitted a few Phobos bugs to bugzilla. They are still not
addressed. Having 2-3 people with write access to Phobos is clearly
not enough - there is not enough human power. That's bugzilla entries
are left without
On 2009-10-11 01:57:08 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
You're certainly welcome to take the compiler front end and try and
make a dll out of it or integrate it directly into an IDE. But what I
suggested would probably get a lot of results for a minimal investment
in the
We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle,
Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel,
Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!!
email = yshows...@???
email = yshowsoft at gmail.com
ecm2001 titanium download
ecm2001 titanium rapidshare
titanium
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
But if you want to contribute, how about a JSON parser for phobos?
You'll need one anyway for your IDE.
BTW, JSON parsing comes for free with javascript. Why not incorporate
dmdscript into your IDE as its extension language?
The official JSON
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sorry. I occasionally scan the bug reports and work on the
Phobos-related ones, but I missed yours. I just assigned to myself four
bugs you submitted.
Phobos should probably use trac tickets. It would make it easier to
range query phobos bugs.
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity gains of D's
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
So, while I'm not going to be writing an IDE, I
Lutger wrote:
digited wrote:
Walter Bright �:
The nice thing about an xml file is while D is relatively easy to parse,
xml is trivial.
Why file? An IDE can call compiler process and get output with info from
stdout, that will be much faster, and if IDE will need to store the info,
it
Lutger wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
I'm all for accepting additions to Phobos, and for putting in place a
process to do so. I suggest we follow a procedure used to great effect
by Boost. They have a formal process in place that consists of a
preliminary submission, a refinement period,
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:has92u$1vu...@digitalmars.com...
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard work
to add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to column.
So the IDE knows
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
There are several core features that I absolutely must have (because I
want them):
1. autocompletion. everywhere. for everything. including local
variables. And that's not just the *pop* this symbol is a type that
does ddoc. It includes the completion part. When I type foreach
Ctrl+Space, I get a
On 11/10/2009 03:19, Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
If anyone is interested and is willing to test and/or help, I will
gladly share my code.
Oooo.. You should put that on dsource or somewhere. Hacking D sounds
like a lot more fun than
On 2009-10-11 14:13:22 +0200, Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com said:
On 2009-10-11 03:56:55 -0400, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com said:
I submitted a few Phobos bugs to bugzilla. They are still not
addressed. Having 2-3 people with write access to Phobos is clearly
not enough -
BLS wrote:
...
Our Options :
1) Force Decent.. (Java/SWT)
2) Use gtkD, create the IDE in D. (the only usable platform independent
GUI atm.)
3) Use QT and C++. Let's re-use and adapt QT Creator.
Having QT as standard GUI toolkit for D means that we can also reuse the
QT Designer.
Brad Roberts wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sorry. I occasionally scan the bug reports and work on the
Phobos-related ones, but I missed yours. I just assigned to myself four
bugs you submitted.
I think it should be fine to give you write and other regulars write
access to Phobos. I'll
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
If anyone is interested and is willing to test and/or help, I will
gladly share my code.
Oooo.. You should put that on dsource or somewhere. Hacking D sounds
like
Walter Bright wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
. all the symbols in that module, and the members of those symbols
(recursively)
Including local variables for functions?
That seems pointless, as they'll be inaccessible outside of the scope of
the function.
The point would be for smart
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:10:42 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
If anyone is interested and is willing to test and/or help, I will
On 11/10/2009 16:54, Lutger wrote:
BLS wrote:
...
Our Options :
1) Force Decent.. (Java/SWT)
2) Use gtkD, create the IDE in D. (the only usable platform independent
GUI atm.)
3) Use QT and C++. Let's re-use and adapt QT Creator.
Having QT as standard GUI toolkit for D means that we can
On 11/10/2009 17:43, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:10:42 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
If anyone is interested
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:has92u$1vu...@digitalmars.com...
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard
work to add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to
Walter Bright Wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the productivity gains of D's
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
They say that the
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 10/11/09 11:56, Frank Benoit wrote:
Walter Bright schrieb:
They say that the productivity gains of D's improvements are
overbalanced by the loss of productivity by moving away from an IDE. And
what is it about an IDE that is so productive?
If you use Eclipse for
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:03:16 +0400, BLS windev...@hotmail.de wrote:
On 11/10/2009 17:43, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:10:42 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400,
language_fan wrote:
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:19:56 -0700, Walter Bright thusly wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:49:52 +0200, BLS windev...@hotmail.de wrote:
On 11/10/2009 16:54, Lutger wrote:
BLS wrote:
...
Our Options :
1) Force Decent.. (Java/SWT)
2) Use gtkD, create the IDE in D. (the only usable platform independent
GUI atm.)
3) Use QT and C++. Let's re-use and adapt
I've been thinking about where a Rational struct could lead, and realized that
the next step is to give D some capabilities for dealing with symbols. For
example, it would be nice to have something like:
auto foo = symRational!SomeBigInt(1 / e + pi / 2 + G);
// Do a whole bunch of manipulations
Denis Koroskin ïèøåò:
If anyone is interested and is willing to test and/or help, I will
gladly share my code.
You can write a note on dprogramming ru about the epic thing you're working on,
i'm sure we'll help to test at least.
Michel Fortin wrote:
It's not clear to me how much getting supplementary data from the
compiler could help. If I only get what I can see through Ddoc, it's
only half useful. I can already parse and get character ranges for the
the high-level constructs (classes, tempaltes, functions, etc.).
dsimcha wrote:
I've been thinking about where a Rational struct could lead, and realized that
the next step is to give D some capabilities for dealing with symbols. For
example, it would be nice to have something like:
auto foo = symRational!SomeBigInt(1 / e + pi / 2 + G);
// Do a whole bunch
Denis Koroskin wrote:
In fact, that's what I do right now.
I think that's great. But it requires a lot of work (as of course you know).
Robert Clipsham wrote:
How well will this work with partially parsable files?
Probably not very well. This would work best with getting information
from modules other than the one being edited.
Frank Benoit wrote:
I think Descent is the right way. But here, a port of DMD is directly
integrated into the plugin. To put more manpower in this project would
be the best way imo.
Eclipse is probably, along with VS, one of the two most powerful IDEs.
But the JSON approach would also make
On 11/10/2009 18:29, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:03:16 +0400, BLS windev...@hotmail.de wrote:
On 11/10/2009 17:43, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:10:42 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Denis Koroskin
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s article
dsimcha wrote:
I've been thinking about where a Rational struct could lead, and realized
that
the next step is to give D some capabilities for dealing with symbols. For
example, it would be nice to have
On 11/10/2009 15:23, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
So,
digited Wrote:
Denis Koroskin ïèøåò:
If anyone is interested and is willing to test and/or help, I will
gladly share my code.
You can write a note on dprogramming ru about the epic thing you're working
on, i'm sure we'll help to test at least.
I'm all for it.
In C++ I see a lot of defining an enum, struct, or other values before
#including another header which then uses these values. I understand why this
works in C++, but does the same thing work in D? I'd assume not, since the
import mechanism is a little more advanced than C++'s copy this file
digited, el 10 de octubre a las 22:19 me escribiste:
Walter Bright ?:
The nice thing about an xml file is while D is relatively easy to parse,
xml is trivial.
Why file? An IDE can call compiler process and get output with info from
stdout, that will be much faster, and if IDE will
Walter Bright wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
In fact, that's what I do right now.
I think that's great. But it requires a lot of work (as of course you
know).
Good things require a lot of work. :)
Walter Bright, el 10 de octubre a las 18:19 me escribiste:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are
important.
It's the IDE.
They say
Walter Bright, el 11 de octubre a las 02:38 me escribiste:
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work /
hard work to add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to column.
See Clang error messages:
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
That's *nice*
On 2009-10-11 14:19:52 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
Michel Fortin wrote:
It's not clear to me how much getting supplementary data from the
compiler could help. If I only get what I can see through Ddoc, it's
only half useful. I can already parse and get character
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
In fact, that's what I do right now.
I think that's great. But it requires a lot of work (as of course you
know).
Good things require a lot of work. :)
Of course. But getting something done and available in a short amount
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think you've got that answer because they are not using D alread. When
they start using D, they will start complaining about Phobos vs. Tango,
debugger support, librararies, bugs, etc. ;) (maybe not DMD being GPL
though, even when I think it's important).
I've heard
Walter Bright, el 11 de octubre a las 12:40 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think you've got that answer because they are not using D alread. When
they start using D, they will start complaining about Phobos vs. Tango,
debugger support, librararies, bugs, etc. ;) (maybe not DMD being
On 10/11/09 16:32, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:19:56 +0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs,
On 10/11/09 15:23, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
So, while
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Matt webwra...@fastmail.fm wrote:
In C++ I see a lot of defining an enum, struct, or other values before
#including another header which then uses these values. I understand why this
works in C++, but does the same thing work in D? I'd assume not, since the
On 10/11/09 16:38, BLS wrote:
On 11/10/2009 03:19, Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although those are important.
It's the IDE.
On 10/11/09 21:38, Walter Bright wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
In fact, that's what I do right now.
I think that's great. But it requires a lot of work (as of course you
know).
Good things require a lot of work. :)
Of course. But getting
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:36:01 +0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
4)
Port entire eclipse to D, Frank Benoit (who started DWT, the tango
version) was thinking of this.
Bjoern
What's the benefit? I believe it'll become even slower. Much slower.
On 10/11/09 20:58, Yigal Chripun wrote:
On 11/10/2009 15:23, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In my discussions with companies about adopting D, the major barrier
that comes up over and over isn't Tango vs Phobos, dmd being GPL,
debugger support, libraries, bugs, etc., although
Why do some messages show up both in d.D.ide and d.D?
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:hasodv$dg...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:has92u$1vu...@digitalmars.com...
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this
On 10/11/09 22:37, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:36:01 +0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
4)
Port entire eclipse to D, Frank Benoit (who started DWT, the tango
version) was thinking of this.
Bjoern
What's the benefit? I believe it'll become even slower. Much slower.
language_fan f...@bar.com.invalid wrote in message
news:hasd5u$1fg...@digitalmars.com...
Well since there is already a project working on an Eclipse plugin, I see
little use for other IDEs at the moment. The D community is rather small
and only a small amount of people are capable of
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:44:48 +0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Why do some messages show up both in d.D.ide and d.D?
Because the Walter decided to post the topic to both newsgroups at once,
and all the replies follow it (take a look at message header).
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 11 de octubre a las 02:38 me escribiste:
Lutger wrote:
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work /
hard work to add?
file/line of course, but I don't see a point to column.
See Clang error messages:
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
