== Quote from bioinfornatics (bioinfornat...@gmail.com)'s article
where is software source?
is available for linux?
if is a frre software and avaible on linux, i would like package
your project for
fedora
thanks
best regards
So far, all I can guarantee is that it is freeware, I haven't
I've seeded the D tag's page from the D front page. If anyone wants to improve
it but doesn't have access, send me the text.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged?sort=infotagnames=d
--
... IXOYE
I've been kindly invited by the ACCU Silicon Valley Chapter to give a
talk on D at their next meeting. The talk starts at 7:00pm on Wednesday,
August 11 and takes place in Mountain View. Attendance is free and
opened to everyone. For details:
bearophile wrote:
But simple asserts sometimes are not enough to test more complex things. So
other more serious contract systems allow for asserts that contain forall,
max, min, sets, and few more simple things, this is an example from a system
for Java:
/*@ assert (\forall int i; 0 = i i n;
BCS wrote:
I once had a fire hydrant installed on my property. The city required
an engineering analysis, which ran to quite a stack of paper. After
approval, the workers came by to install it. They never looked at the
analysis, or even the drawings, they just dug up the water main and
stuck a
Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into gdb?
I've got a small diff that fixes a critical problem with it's demangler:
diff --git a/gdb/d-lang.c b/gdb/d-lang.c
index 6db521b..f17431b 100644
--- a/gdb/d-lang.c
+++ b/gdb/d-lang.c
@@ -37,8 +37,9 @@
A few hours ago, in a thread on D contracts, KennyTM~ said:
BTW, there should be an 'all = reduce!ab' and 'any = reduce!a||b' in
std.algorithm, but short-circuited.
I agree. all() and any/some() are both easy to code, I think, and useful in
many situations.
In D, they could work on any input
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:17 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
Has anyone except the almighty
Andrei ever even downloaded a theorem prover?
Yes, ACL2.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/backmath
Now I know why that sort of thing isn't done more often.
Learning how to
On 01/08/10 10:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into gdb?
I've got a small diff that fixes a critical problem with it's demangler:
diff --git a/gdb/d-lang.c b/gdb/d-lang.c
index 6db521b..f17431b 100644
--- a/gdb/d-lang.c
+++
Walter Bright:
It is not easier to statically analyze a forall rather than a foreach.
The problem is that you can put any kind of code inside D contracts, this will
make them them very to analyse automatically. The restricted semantics is a way
to avoid this.
I also see no evidence that
Jonathan M Davis:
IIRC TDPL, specifically mentions that contracts
allow for I/O for debugging purposes.
I have not yet read that part. I see print statements (and exceptions) inside
contracts as something to kill with fire in my code. What's the purpose of
printing stuff in contracts? Maybe
The purpose of a static language compiler is to help the programmer spot the
bugs in the code very well and to compile it. It's not the job of a compiler to
create nice HTML/XML documentation files.
So I suggest to:
1) DMD can copy all documentation strings inside the JSON file generated with
bearophile Wrote:
because the built-in ones are not designed in a serious way, all three of
them are just toys :-)
That's blasphemy! I thought you believed in D :-(
Hello retard,
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:17 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
Has anyone except the almighty
Andrei ever even downloaded a theorem prover?
Yes, ACL2.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/backmath
Now I know why that sort of thing isn't done more often.
godworshipper:
That's blasphemy! I thought you believed in D :-(
I think I lost my temper a bit while answering Jonathan, I am sorry Jonathan.
Bye,
bearophile
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 16:02, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
[flat / nested]
Please, no. This is why I hate Tango and Java. It's too hard to find what
you
need, and you have to write too much import declaration boilerplate.
I agree that Java pushed that too far for my taste also.
I agree that contracts offer too much liberty. However, I would actually
go one step further than bearophile:
I find the need for assert statements not only superfluous but
actually misleading. A contract violation is something conceptionally
different from a broken assertion. Assertions and
Dnia 01-08-2010 o 16:32:50 Philippe Sigaud philippe.sig...@gmail.com
napisał(a):
I have to use Adam Ruppe's find D keyword website (very handy)
regularly...
Link, please. ;)
On 8/1/10, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
Link, please. ;)
http://dpldocs.info
If any tried to use it last week, you would have noticed it was down:
my motherboard died, and the parts to fix it didn't arrive until
Friday. It should be up most the time now.
You can put in a search term to
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:24:18 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. From what I can tell, it seems to be a recurring pattern with
threads that
it's useful to spawn a thread, have it do some work, and then have it
return the
result and terminate. The appropriate way to do
On 08/01/2010 02:35 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I once had a fire hydrant installed on my property. The city required
an engineering analysis, which ran to quite a stack of paper. After
approval, the workers came by to install it. They never looked at the
analysis, or even the drawings,
I've reread the relevant TDPL chapter and I still don't quite understand the
following:
1. What is shared? Is it simply a piece of syntactic salt to make it hard to
share data across threads by accident, or is there more to it?
2. Is it fully or mostly implemented?
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
I've reread the relevant TDPL chapter and I still don't quite understand the
following:
1. What is shared? Is it simply a piece of syntactic salt to make it hard to
share data across threads by accident, or is there more to it?
2. Is it
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
Okay. From what I can tell, it seems to be a recurring pattern with threads
that
it's useful to spawn a thread, have it do some work, and then have it return
the
result and terminate. The appropriate way to do that seems to
On 01/08/2010 21:25, awishformore wrote:
On 01/08/2010 19:17, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
Okay. From what I can tell, it seems to be a recurring pattern with
threads that
it's useful to spawn a thread, have it do some work, and then have it
On 01/08/2010 19:17, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
Okay. From what I can tell, it seems to be a recurring pattern with threads that
it's useful to spawn a thread, have it do some work, and then have it return the
result and terminate. The
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
It is not easier to statically analyze a forall rather than a foreach.
The problem is that you can put any kind of code inside D contracts, this
will make them them very to analyse automatically. The restricted semantics
is a way to avoid this.
All it means
On 08/01/2010 05:25 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
On 8/1/10, Tomek Sowińskij...@ask.me wrote:
Link, please. ;)
http://dpldocs.info
If any tried to use it last week, you would have noticed it was down:
my motherboard died, and the parts to fix it didn't arrive until
Friday. It should be up most the
Norbert Nemec wrote:
I agree that contracts offer too much liberty. However, I would actually
go one step further than bearophile:
I find the need for assert statements not only superfluous but
actually misleading. A contract violation is something conceptionally
different from a broken
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
/*@ assert (\forall int i; 0 = i i n; a[i] != null);
This does not make it simpler, it just makes things more complicated by now
having two ways to do a foreach.
The point here is to restrict a lot the kind of code and instructions you can
put inside
On 08/01/2010 09:28 PM, awishformore wrote:
On 01/08/2010 21:25, awishformore wrote:
On 01/08/2010 19:17, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
Okay. From what I can tell, it seems to be a recurring pattern with
threads that
it's useful to spawn a
bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
IIRC TDPL, specifically mentions that contracts allow for I/O for debugging
purposes.
I have not yet read that part. I see print statements (and exceptions) inside
contracts as something to kill with fire in my code. What's the purpose of
printing stuff in
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:02:43 -0400, Pelle pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/01/2010 09:28 PM, awishformore wrote:
import core.thread;
You don't have to use the message passing interface if you don't want to.
Or use shared classes; you can pass those around too.
Walter Bright:
There are very good reasons why ddoc is part of dmd.
Thank you for your many answers. I think you can even add them to the D2 FAQ :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On 8/1/2010 1:53 PM, bearophile wrote:
I think you can...
Bye,
bearophile
I've been avoiding saying this for a while, but I suspect a lot of people have
thought it at one time or another. You probably ought to find a word other than
'can' to use. Of course he's capable of... whatever.
On 8/1/2010 3:49 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 01/08/10 10:01, Brad Roberts wrote:
Who was it that has the appropriate paperwork on file to get patches into
gdb?
snip
Thanks,
Brad
If I recall correctly all you need to do is send a message to the gdb patches
mailing list[1] - you
On 07/30/2010 08:02 AM, Justin Johansson wrote:
To what degree do the author and advocates of the D(2) Programming
Language believe that it is axiomatically pure and to what degree
to the naysayers believe that it is conversely impure. Further,
does axiomatic purity in a PL really matter?
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 17:24, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.comwrote:
I think there really is some bug here. I tried to use your template helper
function, and it seems the order in which I put two constraints in a
template signature changes the way dmd compiles the code. Consider
On 08/01/2010 07:04 AM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
/*@ assert (\forall int i; 0= i i n; a[i] != null);
This does not make it simpler, it just makes things more
complicated by now having two ways to do a foreach.
The point here is to restrict a lot the kind of code and instructions
On 08/01/2010 05:44 AM, retard wrote:
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:17 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
Has anyone except the almighty
Andrei ever even downloaded a theorem prover?
Yes, ACL2.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/backmath
Now I know why that sort of thing isn't
Walter Bright Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Removing that HTML ddoc parsing HTML generation from DMD allows such code
to evolve faster and to be debugged more efficiently. Today some people are
using
There are very good reasons why ddoc is part of dmd.
1. Being a defined part of D means
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 00:58, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.comwrote:
could you please try this out with your new object.di if you have any
time?). I hope Andrei won't mind for pasting this here:
(snip)
unittest {
double[] d1 = [6.0, 1.5, 2.4, 3];
float[] d2 = [1.5,
On 08/01/2010 09:32 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 16:02, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com
mailto:dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
[flat / nested]
Please, no. This is why I hate Tango and Java. It's too hard to
find what you
need, and you have to write too much import
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Philippe Sigaud
philippe.sig...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 17:24, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think there really is some bug here. I tried to use your template helper
function, and it seems the order in which I put two
On Sunday 01 August 2010 14:13:40 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Most languages have not been proven sound. I know ML has been, and there
is a reduced version of Java (Featherweight Java) that has been proven
sound. I know that Java with generics has been shown unsound a long time
ago
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 08/01/2010 05:44 AM, retard wrote:
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:17 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
Has anyone except the almighty
Andrei ever even downloaded a theorem prover?
Yes, ACL2.
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scrapple/browser/trunk/backmath
Now I know
On Sunday 01 August 2010 07:32:50 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
But, what about putting all() and some() in std.algorithm?
An enhancement request already exists for these:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4405
- Jonathan M Davis
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
lurker wrote:
Justin Johansson Wrote:
To what degree do the author and advocates of the D(2) Programming
Language believe that it is axiomatically pure and to what degree
to the naysayers believe that it is conversely impure. Further,
does axiomatic purity in a PL
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:02:56 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2010 14:13:40 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Most languages have not been proven sound. I know ML has been, and
there is a reduced version of Java (Featherweight Java) that has been
proven sound. I know that Java with
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:33:38 +, retard wrote:
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:02:56 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2010 14:13:40 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Most languages have not been proven sound. I know ML has been, and
there is a reduced version of Java (Featherweight Java)
Hello retard,
the brick wall book by B.P.
link?
--
... IXOYE
BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
the brick wall book by B.P.
link?
I think the OP means Types and programming languages
By Benjamin C. Pierce
Andrei posted the link earlier in this thread.
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:42:55 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
the brick wall book by B.P.
link?
The link was on another reply in this thread:
http://books.google.com/books?id=ti6zoAC9Ph8Cpg=PA95lpg=PA95dq=safety+%
3D+progress+%2B
FWIW, I posted an enhancement request on the subject:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4566
- Jonthan M Davis
On 8/1/10 5:07 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
I got an email from someone who got an interest in D following my talk
at Google. He tried to install dmd on OSX, but got turned off (and
rightly so) for the unnecessary difficulties of that process and the
lack of documentation. Nicely of
Hello retard,
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:42:55 +, BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
the brick wall book by B.P.
link?
The link was on another reply in this thread:
Added to the reading list...
--
... IXOYE
Ryan W Sims wrote:
On 8/1/10 5:07 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I got an email from someone who got an interest in D following my talk
at Google. He tried to install dmd on OSX, but got turned off (and
rightly so) for the unnecessary difficulties of that process and the
lack of documentation.
On 08/01/2010 07:22 PM, Ryan W Sims wrote:
On 8/1/10 5:07 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ideally we'd have a one-click OSX installer for dmd - a .dmg file. Is
someone able and willing to own this project? I think improving the
out-of-the-box experience is important and urgent.
I don't know
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I explained how D works (which I
think is a very solid design, probably the best I've seen),
The D module system has some holes, most of them are already reported in
Bugzilla (some of them are more than just implementation bugs).
From your words I presume you have never
On 08/01/2010 08:16 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I explained how D works (which I
think is a very solid design, probably the best I've seen),
The D module system has some holes, most of them are already reported in
Bugzilla (some of them are more than just implementation bugs).
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:22:10 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2010 08:55:54 Robert Jacques wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
It sounds like what you really want is a task-based parallel programming
library, as opposed to concurrent thread. I'd recommend Dave
A nice article found through Reddit, Design by Contract (DbC) for Embedded
Software by Miro Samek, 2009:
http://www.netrino.com/Embedded-Systems/How-To/Design-by-Contract-for-Embedded-Software
It says nothing new, but it says such old things in a nice way, and I like how
it compares assertions
On 2010-08-01 20:07:10 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Ideally we'd have a one-click OSX installer for dmd - a .dmg file. Is
someone able and willing to own this project? I think improving the
out-of-the-box experience is important and urgent.
I agree too.
On 7/28/10 7:44 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 05:50, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com mailto:andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I won't comment on the double/float issue, I do not anything about it.
T[] find(T, E)(T[] haystack, E needle)
if
Hello bearophile,
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I explained how D works (which I think is a very solid design,
probably the best I've seen),
The D module system has some holes, most of them are already reported
in Bugzilla (some of them are more than just implementation bugs).
From your words I
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I explained how D works (which I
think is a very solid design, probably the best I've seen),
The D module system has some holes, most of them are already reported in
Bugzilla (some of them are more than just
On 08/01/2010 10:06 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2010-08-01 20:07:10 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Ideally we'd have a one-click OSX installer for dmd - a .dmg file. Is
someone able and willing to own this project? I think improving the
out-of-the-box experience
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:06:26 +0100, div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
On 31/07/2010 03:50, Justin Spahr-Summers wrote:
Yes, thank you. I misworded my original question. I was hoping to host
on Google Code, because it's been the most reliable and functional
(free) project hosting I've
Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 08/01/2010 02:35 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
BCS wrote:
I once had a fire hydrant installed on my property. The city required
an engineering analysis, which ran to quite a stack of paper. After
approval, the workers came by to install it. They never looked at the
dsimcha wrote:
I absolutely despise using qualified names because they are both syntactic noise
and extra typing. D lets me just import tons of stuff and skip the qualified
names in most cases. Most of the time it does what I mean, and it complains if
and only if there's ambiguity about what I
bearophile Wrote:
This is a paper that shows why DbC can not enough in some situations, by Ken
Garlington, 1998:
http://home.flash.net/~kennieg/ariane.html
In the situation like the one of the Ariane I think the good solution is the
introduce a fuzzy control system that has a degradation
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 20:07, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+s...@com.gmail wrote:
Consider the familiar functional idiom map (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_%28higher-order_function%29)
What would you call such a function parameter (either for map or just
generally).
What parameter?
== Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
Pluto pl...@planets.not wrote:
== Quote from Simen kjaeraas (simen.kja...@gmail.com)'s article
Pluto pl...@planets.not wrote:
This part has always bothered me. Could somebody please explain to me
the
rationale behind
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
On Saturday 31 July 2010 20:15:58 Jason Spencer wrote:
== Quote from Dmitry Olshansky (dmitry.o...@gmail.com)'s article
[...snip]
Just a thought.
Jason
I honestly don't think that exception handling is a particularly
Ok,
OPTLINK is the problem. Without linking SDL, it complains about missing
symbol (good) and creates a corrupt executable (so-so). With linking SDL
in any way (explicitly or with pragma(lib)) it shows no errormessage
(really bad) and does not create any executable (bad).
Should I fill a bug
Jason Spencer Wrote:
Unless D has made great strides in exception
performance (which is entirely possible),
From my tests dmd exceptions are more than ten times slower than Oracle-Java
ones. I have test code.
Bye,
bearophile
Mafi wrote:
When I comment out the pragma(lib) optlink fails (correctly) and xfbuild
crashes (:-(). Then I call optlink myself with libsdl.dll.a and it
creates a corrupt exe without errormessages.
Please help me. It seems that there are bugs over bugs. I don't konw
what to do.
I use
Bruno Medeiros Wrote:
What would you call such a function parameter (either for map or just
generally). That is, what would you call a function that takes one
parameter of some type, and produces another object/data from that input?
transform
Andrej Mitrovic:
I'm getting normal newlines here (XP):
Thank you for your test. Then maybe it's a problem that comes out on Windows
Vista only, I don't know.
-
Jonathan M Davis:
So, while Wnidows is arguably more correct, it causes
problems and is arguably inferior.
libSDL.dll.a is a MingW- or Cygwin-compiled link library. That's not
going to work on Windows with DMD and may very likely be the source of
your problem. If you want to link with a DLL link lib, then you need to
get the tool coff2omf[1] (part of the Extended Utilities Package[2]) run
it on
On 01/08/2010 13:12, bearophile wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic:
The point is that probably there is a newline-related bug somewhere in Phobos
and I'd like to find it.
Bye,
bearophile
Yeah there is.
I get doubled new lines as well when passing a handle opened with fopen
to a CFile thingy.
On 01/08/2010 18:22, div0 wrote:
On 01/08/2010 13:12, bearophile wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic:
The point is that probably there is a newline-related bug somewhere in
Phobos and I'd like to find it.
Bye,
bearophile
Yeah there is.
I get doubled new lines as well when passing a handle opened with
On 01/08/2010 16:22, Mafi wrote:
libSDL.dll.a is a MingW- or Cygwin-compiled link library. That's not
going to work on Windows with DMD and may very likely be the source of
your problem. If you want to link with a DLL link lib, then you need to
get the tool coff2omf[1] (part of the Extended
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 21:17, Lutger lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote:
Jason Spencer wrote:
== Quote from Philippe Sigaud (philippe.sig...@gmail.com)'s article
--0016e6d58a039d35e2048c9aa7e2
I thought they could only be symbols. That is, an alias is a 'link',
a sort
of pointer to
Hi,
as per Nick's advice, I was reading on Goldie's GenDocs template documentation
system:
http://www.semitwist.com/goldiedocs/v0.3/Docs/Tools/GenDocs/TemplateFormat/
That's a nice work, and I saw there something I'd like to do with Ddocs:
sections. As in, document sections.
Ideally there
Hi all,
I was wondering how I would go about initializing a static array
without explicitly specifying how big it is, given I lay out the
contents.
For example, if I do:
int[] a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
auto a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
both statements would result in a heap allocated array (slice). If I
On Sunday 01 August 2010 07:36:27 Jason Spencer wrote:
== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisp...@gmail.com)'s article
For logic errors, efficiency isn't really an issue, since they
shouldn't be happening. If they are, go fix your code and it won't
be an issue.
That gets less true as
On Sunday 01 August 2010 05:12:04 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
So, while Wnidows is arguably more correct, it causes
problems and is arguably inferior.
The point is that probably there is a newline-related bug somewhere in
Phobos and I'd like to find it.
Oh, I don't disagree. I'm
Ziad:
Is there a way to let the compiler automatically determine the size
based on the argument list?
I don't know a clean way to do it. See the related enhancement here:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3849
With other people I have proposed the syntax:
int[$] a = [1, 2, 3];
But
Time ago an automatic tool has said that in a line of C code similar to:
int r = x / y * z;
a division operator followed by a mult is confusing, and to add parentheses to
improve the code:
int r = (x / y) * z;
When values are integral the position of parentheses can change the value of
the
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:22:42 -0400, bearophile wrote:
Turning 'x / y * z' into a D syntax error (as done in bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4077 ) looks excessive to
me. A warning seems enough, but Walter is not a lover of warnings (and
sometimes I agree, I'd like to turn
mwarning:
Turning it into a syntax error sounds to be the right way to do to me.
From a mathematical syntax pov, it's undefined behavior.
Thank you for your answer. You may be right, but this a hard sell :-)
I'd like to know what others think about it. Eventually if the conditions are
fit I
Can you tell me why std.file.read() returns a void[] instead of something like
a ubyte[]?
(Performing a cast(ubyte[]) in SafeD can be a problem. I presume in SafeD I
have to use other safer functions to load binary data, like slurp() or
something similar.)
Bye,
bearophile
Mafi wrote:
The tool sounds cool but it seems that I have to buy it, so that's no
option for me. So I tried to compile SDL myself. I have to say I'm to
stupid for it. I tried to do the same thing as the makefile in
powershell. After I hacked together some solution that worked dmc
complained
The following code fails with a Bus error (OSX speak for Segfault,
if I understand correctly).
// types.d
import std.stdio;
class A {
int x = 42;
}
void fail_sometimes(int n) {
A a;
if (n == 0) {
a = new A; // clearly a contrived example
}
assert(a.x == 42, Wrong
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
Summary: typedef circular definition and ICE
Product: D
Version: D1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-08-01 05:33:11 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
According to Andrei 'typedef' will be removed from the language.
Is an 'alias' there giving the same troubles?
That it does not. Also, I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-01 06:19:10 PDT ---
You are right, typedef will be removed from D2 only.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-01 06:18:10 PDT ---
You are right, typedef will be removed from D1 only.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
