This is really impressive work.
I gave it a try, compilation worked fine with a few hickups (mainly due
to taking some random (almost compatible) stdint.h/inttypes.h and
placing it into mago/include, so a few projects needed to have an
additional include search path).
Still, I think it is a
I attached a log for a debug session of a sample D debuggee. You can use
that as a reference for seeing where LaunchDebugTargets is supposed to end
up in the debug engine.
With respect to loading an executable as a project and having a few
problems... Were you using Windows XP? I saw those
Hi,
Here are two .bat files that help converting an entire folder
of .lib files in omf format. A subfolder omf will be created in the
current folder.
coffimplib needs to be in the current folder, too.
The batch file convert_all.bat is destined to be run in the C:
Still, I think it is a bit troublesome for people to build MaGo from
source if they are not used to work with the Visual Studio
Extensibility, so you should consider providing some precompiled
binaries.
votes++;
Hello,
Here is (attachement) a translation of file mwdebug.h
(matd.c.mwdebug).
There is a line commented out, specifically:
//extern FILE* matGetFp_d(MATFile* ph, const(char)* file, int
linenum);
since I don't know how to replace the C FILE structure.
In principle, module matd.c.mwdebug
Here is (attachement) a translation of file mwdebug.h
(matd.c.mwdebug).
Thanks for your work but unfortunately I already converted mwdebug.h in
the first place. The reason why it isn't committed yet is these functions
aren't provided by Matlab's dlls. mwdebug.cpp contains the
I don't know if there is a way to handle all this without string mixins.
i.e. something along the lines of
mixin(foo(
...
/**
* Get pointer to dimension array
*/
const(mwSize)* mxGetDimensions(const(mxArray)* pa);
...
));
and foo replaces the function defs with func(...){return
Aldo Nunez wrote:
I attached a log for a debug session of a sample D debuggee. You can use
that as a reference for seeing where LaunchDebugTargets is supposed to
end up in the debug engine.
Thanks. That helped me finding that Visual D used quotes on the
executable name. Without these, it
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:05:34 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://www.drdobbs.com/blog/archives/2010/08/c_compilation_s.html
I'll be doing a followup on why D compiles fast.
Very interesting stuff.
I'd like to have an article describing how to diagnose slow D
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:11:35 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's something from TDPL, page 292:
string process(string input) { return input; };
string s1 = blah;
string s2 = process(s1);
assert(s1 == blah); // never fails
I've added the return in process(), it
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:11:26 -0400, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com
wrote:
On 8/18/2010 20:37, dsimcha wrote:
I've been hacking in Phobos and parallelfuture and I've come to the
conclusion
that having typeof(c) in the expression foreach(c; string.init) not be
a dchar
is simply
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:34:01 -0400, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Kagamin (s...@here.lot)'s article
dsimcha Wrote:
Hmm, lately I've been focusing my hacking efforts on
debugging/polishing/removing
annoying inconsistencies in Phobos. Maybe std.string should be my
next
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:25:15 -0400, Adam Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is brought up somewhat often on this group. Problem with throwing
an exception in a segfault is that it is undefined behavior in POSIX.
So? Are we worried about damaging our well-running program after it
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:07:03 -0400, Adam B cru...@gmail.com wrote:
Walter has refused to put in null checks on the theory that the OS does
it for
you - hence the segfault. Of course, then the only way to get a
stacktrace is to
either have a segfault handler which prints one or to look at a
I forgot to add DayClock to get the local and UTC date:
http://ideone.com/SkKkP
(line 805)
--
Yao G.
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:07:03 -0400, Adam B cru...@gmail.com wrote:
Walter has refused to put in null checks on the theory that the OS
does it for
you - hence the segfault. Of course, then the only way to get a
stacktrace is to
either
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:05:34 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://www.drdobbs.com/blog/archives/2010/08/c_compilation_s.html
I'll be doing a followup on why D compiles fast.
Very interesting stuff.
I'd like to have an article describing
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:44:50 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:05:34 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://www.drdobbs.com/blog/archives/2010/08/c_compilation_s.html
I'll be doing a followup
Hello all,
currently, DMD accepts the following code, but the resulting binary
bus-errors at runtime:
---
import std.stdio;
void foo( string str ) () {
writefln( str );
}
void bar( string text ) {
foo!( text );
}
void main() {
bar( asdf );
}
---
Shouldn't this be a
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I get a long list of functions proceeding at a reasonable rate. I've
done that in the past, I feel it's some sort of inner loop problem.
Essentially, something takes way longer to compile than it should, but
way longer on the order of .05 seconds instead of .005
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I get a long list of functions proceeding at a reasonable rate. I've
done that in the past, I feel it's some sort of inner loop problem.
Essentially, something takes way
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I get a long list of functions proceeding at a reasonable rate. I've
done that in the past, I feel it's some sort of inner loop problem.
Essentially,
klickverbot wrote:
Hello all,
currently, DMD accepts the following code, but the resulting binary
bus-errors at runtime:
---
import std.stdio;
void foo( string str ) () {
writefln( str );
}
void bar( string text ) {
foo!( text );
}
void main() {
bar( asdf );
}
---
klickverbot s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:i4ualh$1qh...@digitalmars.com...
Hello all,
currently, DMD accepts the following code, but the resulting binary
bus-errors at runtime:
---
import std.stdio;
void foo( string str ) () {
writefln( str );
}
void bar( string text
On 8/23/10 5:14 CDT, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:48:51 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:i4kv18$14q...@digitalmars.com...
Is execv known to
trick the windows command-line into giving control back to the user?
Ok
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:29:32 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
klickverbot s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:i4ualh$1qh...@digitalmars.com...
Hello all,
currently, DMD accepts the following code, but the resulting binary
bus-errors at runtime:
---
import std.stdio;
void foo(
Sweet! Thanks, Sean. I was fully expecting this to be one of those
threads where a lot of noise gets made but, in the end, nobody can
agree on a solution. Printing a stack trace is a big step in the
right direction.
Ok I can do this.
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:i4s1ft$2fe...@digitalmars.com...
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:50:10 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:i4rqp4$1eg...@digitalmars.com...
Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:50:06 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Quake 2 is
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.467.1282518397.13841.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Sunday 22 August 2010 14:04:24 Walter Bright wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
This also means if you merely translate a program from Java to D, don't
expect it to
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:23:33PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
The compiler is exhibiting correct behavior.
I think there should be an extra note in there: version specifications only
apply to the module in which they appear.
can be tested by the importer with static if. These declarations can
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:op.vhwolemleav...@localhost.localdomain...
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:29:32 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
klickverbot s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:i4ualh$1qh...@digitalmars.com...
Hello all,
currently, DMD
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:11:52 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:41:07 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I get a long list of functions proceeding at a reasonable rate.
The Matlab C headers provide some kind of hand-crafted contracts by
defining extra functions with suffix _d that check all the arguments and
then detouring the calls to the original functions via the preprocessor
(#define foo foo_d)
Of course I could do it the same way, but wouldn't it be
Adam B:
char[] foo()
{
if (some condition)
return yada;
else
return null; //compiler makes note that foo() might return
null
}
void bar()
{
char[] s = foo();
printf(s); //compiler issues warning because 's' has not been
extern(C) int foo(int i)
in { assert(i 7); }
out (result) { assert(result 1); }
A nice idea to remember (regardless the syntax used to do it).
At least that's the interface contracts syntax (wonder why there's no ';')
Yes, that would most certainly help a lot.
cemiller ch...@dprogramming.com wrote in message
news:op.vhu594gqycw...@christop...
Would the problems be resolved with the following changes?
Add a Socket class constructor:
this(socket_t sock, AddressFamily af)
{
assert(sock != socket_t.init);
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea, I agree. Back in my C/C++ days, I actively avoided doing any string
processing whenever I could, just because it was such a PITA.
I've done an awful lot of C/C++ programming that involved handling strings. It
was always a lot of tedious work, and I was always
OT: I guess that's one of the reasons why I was so appalled when I was
reading C++ Primer many years ago. The author spent almost the entire
book explaining the difference between C and C++, and half of his book
with a guide on how to create your own string processing functions in
C++. On the
== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article
The gentle and a-lot-working David Simcha has converted one of my bug reports
into an enhancement request:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4264
Currently (SVN) only array() is able to digest iterables that define
BCS:
How much of safeD is formalizable? Is there anything in it that is hoplessly
impractical to create formal semantics for?
And it needs something like this too ^_^
http://pascal-central.com/images/pascalposter.jpg
Bye,
bearophile
Hello bearophile,
BCS:
How much of safeD is formalizable? Is there anything in it that is
hoplessly impractical to create formal semantics for?
And it needs something like this too ^_^
http://pascal-central.com/images/pascalposter.jpg
And that's just the grammer. BTW, at one point I
Bob Cowdery Wrote:
Thanks, that's an honest opinion. The first project I have in mind is a
personal one but it's quite large. My hope would be to move a lot of the
C code into D eventually. I don't think I would risk it on a commercial
project until the toolchain is sorted and its a bit more
22.08.2010 23:36, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
There's an example of a module constructor in TDPL. I don't think it's supossed
to compile as it is, but I wanted to try it out anyway.
I need a way to call the windows c function GetVersionEx. A grep through the
source files doesn't find it (except
Oops, sorry, Thunderbird inserted second lpVersionInfo as a hyperlink :)
Am 22.08.2010 21:45, schrieb bearophile:
(...)
import std.stdio: writeln;
import std.typecons: Tuple, tuple;
import std.traits: ReturnType, ParameterTypeTuple;
struct Memoize(alias F) {
ReturnType!F opCall(ParameterTypeTuple!F args) {
alias ReturnType!F ResultType;
static
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has suggestions on performing arbitrary
initialization of static arrays, size of which is arbitrary at compile time.
Consider this:
template StaticArray(T,int N,T v) if (N 0)
{
static if (N == 1)
{
enum T[N] StaticArray = cast(T[N])[v];
Stanislav Blinov:
I was wondering if anyone has suggestions on performing arbitrary
initialization of static arrays, size of which is arbitrary at compile time.
Please explain your purposes a bit better.
Bye,
bearophile
23.08.2010 16:31, bearophile wrote:
Stanislav Blinov:
I was wondering if anyone has suggestions on performing arbitrary
initialization of static arrays, size of which is arbitrary at compile time.
Please explain your purposes a bit better.
I have a struct template (let's call it S) that
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:47:45 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, should I skip trying to use inout at all for now? I've read some
posts saying that it's awfully broken, and the example of inout in TDPL
doesn't work..
Yes. I have expressed the cases that inout
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:08:33 -0400, Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote:
Hi, I wrote some unittests using the built-in d unittest and a came
across 2 problems:
1) I have some code that accepts both delegates and functions. How can a
unittest explicitly check the function part? Whenever I add
On 22/08/2010 22:16, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
bearophile
Works if I paste it but not
On 23/08/2010 20:24, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 22:16, Bob Cowdery wrote:
On 22/08/2010 20:57, bearophile wrote:
Bob Cowdery:
Well, the link still works but the download is 0 bytes so I guess its
not available. Thanks for the thought.
That links works for me :-)
Be happy, bye,
I haven't read the specifics of your problem yet, but have you tried using the
newer TDM port of MinGW? The MinGW binaries are still using an older port of
GCC, but the TDM version is much newer, so it might be worth trying it out.
Get it from here: http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/
Hope that
I like this, and I love the way you install it, this is the way a compiler
has to be installed:
http://nuwen.net/mingw.html
Uhm... The last version (6.6 that is gcc 4.5.1) seems to produce very large
binaries, and the precedent version seems not available. Not good for you.
Bye and sorry,
I think it might be this one:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA028375/d/windows.h.html
But those are old as well. Not a big deal, c linkage seems really easy from D.
I don't think I'll have any problems using MSDN samples with a few aliases
sprinkled here and there. :)
Yao G. Wrote:
I
Relevant links:
http://dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi
http://dsource.org/projects/bindings/browser/trunk/win32
--
Yao G.
Very cool! Thanks, Yao.
Yao G. Wrote:
snip
For my projects, I rolled my own headers. They are based (like the ones
on
dsource) on the MinGW32 project. But mine target Windows 2000 as minimal
O.S. and use exclusively UTF-32 (the ASCI versions are not defined).
Also,
Replace UTF-32 with UTF-16 :D
--
Using Opera's revolutionary
This a part of std.bitmanip.BitArray:
void init(void[] v, size_t numbits)
in
{
assert(numbits = v.length * 8);
assert((v.length 3) == 0);
}
body
{
ptr = cast(uint*)v.ptr;
len = numbits;
}
But it seems this program works with no
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
faithful aercjk...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aercjk...@yahoo.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4716
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-23 05:14:22 PDT ---
Improved code. Both IsType() and IsString() may be useful to add to std.traits,
if something similar is not already present.
import std.string: chomp;
import std.stdio:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Johannes Pfau johannesp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516
SHOO zan77...@nifty.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4717
Summary: std.bitmanip.BitArray changes
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4717
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-23 17:38:53 PDT ---
As alternative flipAll() may be named flip() (with no arguments).
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4718
Summary: Few Phobos modules renames
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4718
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4718
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-23 18:10:39 PDT ---
Although I agree, this would invalidate pretty much all of the examples in
TDPL
I think Andrei agrees with me about this change. I think Walter doesn't agree.
I have
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4718
Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
69 matches
Mail list logo
