Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> This is all based on your opinion. And unfortunately it's all wrong -- I
> know what is good and what is bad, you should just stop posting.
>
We both know, what is good, so we both should stop posting.
bearophile Wrote:
>But enums are not integers
??
Where did you get it?
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
easier to search for them.
These bugs have high priority.
Also note that all new bugs should have version marked as "D1", "D2" or
"D1&D2", depending on whe
On 8/31/2010 19:46, bearophile wrote:
> But you can use const for constants that are known at run-time only.
> While you can't use enum for constant known at run-time.
In C++, const is used for both run-time and compile-time constants. In
practice, this works out fine. It its value can only be k
Rainer Deyke wrote:
On 8/31/2010 19:46, bearophile wrote:
But you can use const for constants that are known at run-time only.
While you can't use enum for constant known at run-time.
In C++, const is used for both run-time and compile-time constants. In
practice, this works out fine. It its
Kagamin:
> >But enums are not integers
>
> ??
> Where did you get it?
The whole point of this discussion about my enhancement request 3999 is to turn
a certain subset of enums into "not integers" (or "not bytes", "not longs",
etc).
Bye,
bearophile
On 28/08/10 06:45, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I like this idea. I don't know about showing off "superiority" of D,
but it would be a good way to learn from each other. E.g. one could
submit a solution to a challenge, and then others can refine it to be
safer/faster/better in some regards if they want
TDPL says it should work for any type.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3382
2010/9/1 Nick Sabalausky :
> "dsimcha" wrote in message
> news:i5jtdn$1g4...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> Isn't this a core language feature that's in the spec but is only
>> currently
>> implemented for arrays?
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:59:42 -0400, Kagamin wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
This is all based on your opinion. And unfortunately it's all wrong --
I
know what is good and what is bad, you should just stop posting.
We both know, what is good, so we both should stop posting.
I was jus
IIRC std.contracts has been deprecated and replaced by std.exception,
enforce and friends. The latter are runtime things, correct(?).
Is there a valid use case for compile-time (i.e. subject to static
analysis) design-by-contract (DBC) enforce-like machinery?
For example, and perhaps not the be
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:03:39 -0400, Justin Johansson wrote:
IIRC std.contracts has been deprecated and replaced by std.exception,
enforce and friends. The latter are runtime things, correct(?).
Is there a valid use case for compile-time (i.e. subject to static
analysis) design-by-contract (DB
Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I also have a template that gets the list of all members of an aggregate
type (classes, structs and, well, modules, in a way), even the
constructors,
even the overloaded members, separated by type, and list them with their
names and associated type. It even gets the ty
Whilst one admirable aspiration of D is to make for better
meta-programming capability in a PL, IMHO one seemingly-lacking
aspiration of D is in the area of improving OO inheritance models
over and above that provisioned for in C++ and Java.
Maybe I'm ill-informed though I'd say that D, C++ and J
On 01/09/10 22:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compile time checks are only available for compile time values. If you
have a function like this:
void foo(int[] x)
There is no way at compile time to check whether x has a maximum or
minimum number of elements. But if you have something like this:
I know this is completely off topic and surely shows my age,
but I wonder if anyone else on this ng has seen this movie.
I couldn't remember the name of this movie but googling for
movie star "bomb bay" "I think"
found it for me first pop.
Dark Star (1974) - Memorable quotes
http://www.imdb.com/
Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
"Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
news:i5kbpr$24t...@digitalmars.com...
bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Gibson:
Why not use the non-fictional const keyword? "The const attribute
declares constants that can be evaluated at compile time."[1]
But you can use const for constan
> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
> easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority.
> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
> compiler -- please inc
== Quote from user (ad...@net.net)'s article
> Tell me about another language which is so much work in progress after 10
> years
of development.
Python circa 2001? Lisp circa 1968? C++ circa 1993? C circa 1982? You're a
funny, funny guy.
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:46 -0500, user wrote:
Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you fail
at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why not be
more honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic foundations
but its still a amateurish
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:16:15 +0930, Justin Johansson wrote:
> Whilst one admirable aspiration of D is to make for better
> meta-programming capability in a PL, IMHO one seemingly-lacking
> aspiration of D is in the area of improving OO inheritance models over
> and above that provisioned for in C++ a
Justin,
Just remember that if you teach bombs phenomenology bad things tend to
happen.
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 23:56 +0930, Justin Johansson wrote:
> I know this is completely off topic and surely shows my age,
> but I wonder if anyone else on this ng has seen this movie.
>
> I couldn't remember t
On 9/1/10 11:12 CDT, Yao G. wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:49:46 -0500, user wrote:
Thats ridiclous. The only purpose for prioriting these bugs is- you
fail at compiler construction. The language is so full of shit.. why
not be more honest? you had over 10 years of time to develop basic
foundat
Justin Johansson wrote:
> returning to bomb bay
Please remember, that leaving the bomb bay was faulty already---and may
raise the question why after so many years you are still committing errors.
-manfred
ok, Justin "Bomb #20" Johansson, point taken.
Great movie, beside.
On 01/09/2010 16:26, Justin Johansson wrote:
I know this is completely off topic and surely shows my age,
but I wonder if anyone else on this ng has seen this movie.
I couldn't remember the name of this movie but googling for
mo
Justin Johansson wrote in news:i5lnr4$1cm...@digitalmars.com:
> I know this is completely off topic and surely shows my age,
> but I wonder if anyone else on this ng has seen this movie.
Perhaps of interest, a new DVD release is sceduled for late October.
"Justin Johansson" wrote in message
news:i5lnr4$1cm...@digitalmars.com...
>I know this is completely off topic and surely shows my age,
> but I wonder if anyone else on this ng has seen this movie.
>
> I couldn't remember the name of this movie but googling for
> movie star "bomb bay" "I think"
>
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:06:51 +0300, Rainer Deyke
wrote:
On 8/31/2010 19:46, bearophile wrote:
But you can use const for constants that are known at run-time only.
While you can't use enum for constant known at run-time.
In C++, const is used for both run-time and compile-time constants. I
"Torarin" wrote in message
news:mailman.31.1283345570.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>2010/9/1 Nick Sabalausky :
>> "dsimcha" wrote in message
>> news:i5jtdn$1g4...@digitalmars.com...
>>>
>>> Isn't this a core language feature that's in the spec but is only
>>> currently
>>> implemented for
"Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
news:i5lrkr$1ij...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky schrieb:
>> "Daniel Gibson" wrote in message
>> news:i5kbpr$24t...@digitalmars.com...
>>> bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Gibson:
> Why not use the non-fictional const keyword? "The const attribute
(I hope that example of bearophile is just a bug.)
This one.
void main(string[] args) {
enum int n = args.length;
}
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Never heard of it, but it sounds like something I'll have to check out :)
Yes, you do. It's a classic.
so:
> (I hope that example of bearophile is just a bug.)
I have added it as bug 4786
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:58:39 so wrote:
> I have never had troubles with C++ compile/runtime "const" difference,
> and don't think it is a problem in C++. With this in mind "enum" is a
> great keyword
> of choice to express compile-time types, as long as it is forbidden for
> run-time c
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I was just employing irony and sarcasm to demonstrate why your arguments
were meaningless :) The only measurable factor for "good" art is how
many people use it/buy it. For-sale software, books, movies do rather
well, so I'm inclined to believe they are pretty good
ctconst is a fictional keyword that denotes compile-time constants. Now
you are probably able to see that there is no correlation between the n
and Color.
In D they are using the same keyword by accident, probably because
Walter thinks that saving a keyword is more important than keeping th
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:01 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Never heard of it, but it sounds like something I'll have to check out :)
>
> Yes, you do. It's a classic.
Extremely serious low budget though -- everyone needs to remember that
when watching (1974, so pre Star W
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:15:24 Walter Bright wrote:
> Someone once told me that "capitalism doesn't support the arts". I asked
> him how the Beatles got rich. Oops!
Capitalism is going to tend to support what is generally popular or what is
popular with the affluent crowd. Anything tha
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.victz4b5eav...@localhost.localdomain...
> The only measurable factor for "good" art is how many people use it/buy
> it.
That's not a bad point - I can't think of many other metrics for art.
Quality certainly can positively influence popularity.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:59:15 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Daniel Gibson:
Then there still is the consistency-issue (anon. enums are treated
differently then named enums).
Look at this:Se
enum int n = 10;
enum Color { Red, Green, Blue }
Color color;
if (color == Color.Red) { ...
Color is a seq
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 20:59, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Torarin" wrote in message>TDPL says it should work
> for any type.
> >http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3382
>
> /me squeals with excitement like a schoolgirl
>
>
> Any type, really? Even the basic built-in types, not only class
It says: "If a.fun(b, c, d) is seen but fun is not a member of a's
type, D rewrites that as fun(a, b, c, d) and tries that as well."
So I guess it's possible it won't work with numerical types because
they can never have members.
2010/9/1 Philippe Sigaud :
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 20:59, Nick Saba
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:36:04 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> AFAIK, enum meaning manifest constant was Andrei's request. And I think
> if you have an idea to try and "fix" it, you might as well know now, it
> will never happen. See this quote from Andrei in a bug report of mine
> (bug
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.35.1283369617.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:15:24 Walter Bright wrote:
>> There's a subgroup of the theater crowd around here who regard producers
>> as
>> "sellouts" if their plays actually attract an au
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 15:25, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>
> I also have a template that gets the list of all members of an aggregate
>> type (classes, structs and, well, modules, in a way), even the
>> constructors,
>> even the overloaded members, separated by type, and lis
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 21:47, Torarin wrote:
> It says: "If a.fun(b, c, d) is seen but fun is not a member of a's
> type, D rewrites that as fun(a, b, c, d) and tries that as well."
> So I guess it's possible it won't work with numerical types because
> they can never have members.
>
>
I just tri
"Russel Winder" wrote in message
news:mailman.34.1283369300.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:01 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> > Never heard of it, but it sounds like something I'll have to check out
>> > :)
>>
>> Yes, you do. It's a classic.
On 01/09/10 16:49, user wrote:
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority.
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and t
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.33.1283368612.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> Personally, I don't really care about using enum the way it is. Having
> enums
> freely converting to and from their base type is more of a concern, though
> I'm
> not sure how much that really
2010/9/1 Philippe Sigaud :
> I just tried this:
>
>
> int i;
> writeln(i.max); // writes int.max !
>
> So it seems you can access the type properties through a value of that type.
> Man, I learnt two new things in two minutes...
>
Yay, looks pretty good, then! :)
Hey, this question on SO makes for a good challenge:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3608834/is-it-possible-to-generically-implement-the-amb-operator-in-d
The amb operator does this:
amb([1, 2]) * amb([3, 4, 5]) == amb([3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10])
amb(["hello", "world"]) ~ amb(["qwerty"]) == amb(["he
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:34:00 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.victz4b5eav...@localhost.localdomain...
The only measurable factor for "good" art is how many people use it/buy
it.
That's not a bad point - I can't think of many other metrics for ar
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.38.1283370572.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> You can think of it a bit like static. Static is used for different things
> in
> different contexts (even though most contexts are quite similar - IIRC,
> there's a
> way to define static in C
Static is a little bit better in that the uses of it at least have some
connection to the dictionary meaning of "static", even if perhaps a
little
distant. But there's just no way to stretch the dictionary meaning of
"enumeration" to include manifest constants. Like everyone else, I can at
leas
"Torarin" wrote in message
news:mailman.37.1283370434.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> It says: "If a.fun(b, c, d) is seen but fun is not a member of a's
> type, D rewrites that as fun(a, b, c, d) and tries that as well."
> So I guess it's possible it won't work with numerical types because
>
user wrote:
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority.
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
compiler -- plea
If they were clever they wouldn't target an audience of programmers. :)
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
> user wrote:
>>>
>>> To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
>>> compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
>>>
"so" wrote in message news:op.videg00w7dt...@so-pc...
>> Static is a little bit better in that the uses of it at least have some
>> connection to the dictionary meaning of "static", even if perhaps a
>> little
>> distant. But there's just no way to stretch the dictionary meaning of
>> "enumeratio
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 16:28, Justin Johansson wrote:
> On 01/09/10 22:49, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
>> Compile time checks are only available for compile time values.
>>
>
Yes, Steve is right. Also, you cannot throw exceptions at CT.
But you can use 'static assert(...)' to force the evaluat
so:
> Another taste discussion?
Nope.
-
Steven Schveighoffer:
>And I think if you have an idea to try and "fix" it, you might as well know
>now, it will never happen.<
There I was explaining something better to Daniel Gibson. The purpose of the
enhancement request 3999 has not
Philippe Sigaud:
> Yes, Steve is right. Also, you cannot throw exceptions at CT.
This is a temporary limitation :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:59:01 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
> news:mailman.33.1283368612.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> > Personally, I don't really care about using enum the way it is. Having
> > enums
> > freely converting to and from their bas
Float (short for "floating point"): The decimal point can "float" around
as
the value changes (not a literal use of "float", but there's nothing
wrong
with metaphoric uses of words, even in ordinary speech). This type is
named
in contrast to the fixed-point arithmetic that was often used as
Stanislav Blinov schrieb:
user wrote:
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's book and the
compiler -- please include TDPL or [tdpl] in the bug title, to make it
easier to search for them. These bugs have high priority.
To everyone reporting inconsistencies between Andrei's bo
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:18, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Regression(2.020) Array member call syntax can't find matches in current
> class"
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4525
>
> When I converted some D1 code to D2 recently, I actually had to *remove*
> many of my array-member-cal
I thought to!string(Enum) already does this? This was the example I
posted in bug report 4261:
import std.conv : to;
import std.stdio: writeln;
void main()
{
enum Foo { Zero, One }
Foo f = Foo.One;
writeln(to!string(f));
}
Prints: One
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan M Davis
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:37, bearophile wrote:
> Philippe Sigaud:
> > Yes, Steve is right. Also, you cannot throw exceptions at CT.
>
> This is a temporary limitation :-)
>
>
Really? That means being able to create reference types at CT, that'd be
interesting, to say the least. And what code wou
Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?
You call that clever? O_o
For a bot. It almost seems as there is some intelligence behind this.
Well, a little too almost, maybe.
Why not?
There are many examples of operating systems with
garbage collector built-in.
"Era Scarecrow" wrote in > to use delete. Also since
this is a OS building language, i wouldn't expect a garbage
> > collector in that instance at all.
>
> So, Delete should just be discouraged, not removed
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:13, retard wrote:
>
> Have you taken a loot at Scala & traits already? It would be a great
> starting point.
>
Scala's traits are great! Implicits in Scala are quite interesting too.
Also, Haskell typeclasses
I wonder if D can have part of Scala traits functionality wi
On 2010-08-31 03:04, dsimcha wrote:
I've been toying for a long time with the idea of a std.mixins for Phobos that
would contain meta-implementations of commonly needed boilerplate code for
mixing into classes and and structs. I've started to prototype it
(http://dsource.org/projects/scrapple/br
Float (short for "floating point"): The decimal point can "float" around
as
the value changes (not a literal use of "float", but there's nothing
wrong
with metaphoric uses of words, even in ordinary speech). This type is
named
in contrast to the fixed-point arithmetic that was often used as
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 13:54:15 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:37, bearophile wrote:
> > Philippe Sigaud:
> > > Yes, Steve is right. Also, you cannot throw exceptions at CT.
> >
> > This is a temporary limitation :-)
>
> Really? That means being able to create refer
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 13:53:51 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I thought to!string(Enum) already does this? This was the example I
> posted in bug report 4261:
>
> import std.conv : to;
> import std.stdio: writeln;
> void main()
> {
> enum Foo { Zero, One }
> Foo f = Foo.One;
> wri
On 9/1/10 15:35 CDT, bearophile wrote:
so:
Another taste discussion?
Nope.
-
Steven Schveighoffer:
And I think if you have an idea to try and "fix" it, you might as well know now,
it will never happen.<
There I was explaining something better to Daniel Gibson. The purpose
Philippe Sigaud:
> Really? That means being able to create reference types at CT, that'd be
> interesting, to say the least. And what code would catch them? Aren't they
> caught by the runtime?
I think in Bugzilla there is a patch to use exceptions at CT, but it probably
doesn't work and has prob
On 2010-09-01 14:52, Torarin wrote:
TDPL says it should work for any type.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3382
2010/9/1 Nick Sabalausky:
"dsimcha" wrote in message
news:i5jtdn$1g4...@digitalmars.com...
Isn't this a core language feature that's in the spec but is only
currently
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.vidd20ldeav...@localhost.localdomain...
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:34:00 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> PHP is wildly popular, but for anyone actually familiar
>> with a variety of languages, the quality is undeniably poor, so again, we
>> have t
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:i5mg57$2sh...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2010-09-01 14:52, Torarin wrote:
>> TDPL says it should work for any type.
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3382
>>
>> 2010/9/1 Nick Sabalausky:
>>> "dsimcha" wrote in message
>>> news:i5jtdn$1g4...@digi
On 2010-09-01 22:44, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:13, retard wrote:
Have you taken a loot at Scala & traits already? It would be a great
starting point.
Scala's traits are great! Implicits in Scala are quite interesting too.
Also, Haskell typeclasses
I wonder if
You mean like this?:
module add_virtual_functions;
import std.stdio : writeln;
void main()
{
test();
}
mixin template Foo()
{
void func()
{
writeln("Foo.func()");
}
}
class Bar
{
void func()
{
writeln("Bar.func()");
}
}
class Code : Bar
{
mixin F
"Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
news:mailman.49.1283374449.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>I thought to!string(Enum) already does this? This was the example I
> posted in bug report 4261:
>
> import std.conv : to;
> import std.stdio: writeln;
> void main()
> {
>enum Foo { Zero, One }
>
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:i5mfji$2qt...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I think it's a good enhancement. C++'s good old enum has been instrumental
> in finding a few bugs and clarifying a few interfaces in a project at
> work. Based on that experience I'd say that there's a chance more
Disregard the module name declaration. The original example had the
template mixin create a virtual method, and then you can override it
in the inheriting class.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
> You mean like this?:
> module add_virtual_functions;
>
> import std.stdio : w
Ah nevermind. I didn't realize you've said "overload".
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
> You mean like this?:
> module add_virtual_functions;
>
> import std.stdio : writeln;
>
> void main()
> {
> test();
> }
>
> mixin template Foo()
> {
> void func()
> {
>
On 1/09/10 9:08 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Peter, can we discuss your solution here?
Sure, I'd be interested to hear any improvements. Like I said in my
answer, I'm still learning D so I'm sure there's many issues. For
example, I made no attempt for const-correctness or anything like that
(m
That's how it's described in TDPL, and yes it works.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Andrej Mitrovic" wrote in message
> news:mailman.49.1283374449.858.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>>I thought to!string(Enum) already does this? This was the example I
>> posted in bug
"so" wrote in message news:op.vidgxic47dt...@so-pc...
>> Float (short for "floating point"): The decimal point can "float" around
>> as
>> the value changes (not a literal use of "float", but there's nothing
>> wrong
>> with metaphoric uses of words, even in ordinary speech). This type is
>> na
On 9/1/10 16:39 CDT, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:i5mfji$2qt...@digitalmars.com...
I think it's a good enhancement. C++'s good old enum has been instrumental
in finding a few bugs and clarifying a few interfaces in a project at
work. Based on that experien
Nick Sabalausky:
> But I also remember a certain someone (me!...plus some others) saying that
> .1 and 1. float literals are completely worthless and in the face of
> ambiguity with *useful* things, they need to DIE DIE DIE!!!
See the second part of this (closed) enhancement request of mine :-)
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:30:08 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2010-09-01 22:44, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:13, retard wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have you taken a loot at Scala & traits already? It would be a
>> great starting point.
>>
>>
>> Scala's traits are great! Implicits
On 9/1/10 16:56 CDT, retard wrote:
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:30:08 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-09-01 22:44, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:13, retard wrote:
Have you taken a loot at Scala& traits already? It would be a
great starting point.
Scala's traits a
Andrei:
> I think it's a good enhancement.
Good :-)
> C++'s good old enum has been
> instrumental in finding a few bugs and clarifying a few interfaces in a
> project at work. Based on that experience I'd say that there's a chance
> more restrictive is better.
There is also the experience o
Is it possible to try to replace (or just perform experiments) the D GC with
this one?
http://developers.sones.de/2010/09/01/taking-the-new-and-shiny-mono-simple-generational-garbage-collector-mono-sgen-for-a-walk/
Delegating the creation and management of the D GC to someone else (the Mono
tea
Russel Winder wrote:
Extremely serious low budget though -- everyone needs to remember that
when watching (1974, so pre Star Wars, and a very, very low budget).
Dark Star and the Star Wars prequels prove that big budgets aren't what make a
movie, a plot and good writing is.
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:05:53 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Russel Winder wrote:
Extremely serious low budget though -- everyone needs to remember that
when watching (1974, so pre Star Wars, and a very, very low budget).
Dark Star and the Star Wars prequels prove that big budgets aren't what
On 01/09/10 21:50, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Is it just me, or spam bots suddenly became incredibly clever?
You call that clever? O_o
For a bot. It almost seems as there is some intelligence behind this.
Well, a little too almost, maybe.
I checked and bug #1 isn't actually "give up already",
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 16:17:42 so wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:05:53 +0300, Walter Bright
>
> wrote:
> > Russel Winder wrote:
> >> Extremely serious low budget though -- everyone needs to remember that
> >> when watching (1974, so pre Star Wars, and a very, very low budget).
> >
>
Hello Walter,
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I was just employing irony and sarcasm to demonstrate why your
arguments were meaningless :) The only measurable factor for "good"
art is how many people use it/buy it. For-sale software, books,
movies do rather well, so I'm inclined to believe they
Hello Jonathan,
Capitalism definitely supports
them. However, if you're dealing with less well-known, less
generally-liked stuff, then capitalism isnt't really going to support
it.
Amazon.com enters, stage right.
There's a subgroup of the theater crowd around here who regard
producers as "s
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 18:56:03 BCS wrote:
> OTOH try and write a play that no one will watch. I'd be very surprised if
> it can be done.
LOL. There would always be someone who would want to watch it simply because no
one else wants to.
- Jonathan M Davis
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
