On 26.08.2011 03:08, dsimcha wrote:
I'm working on a parallel array ops implementation for
std.parallel_algorithm. (For the latest work in progress see
https://github.com/dsimcha/parallel_algorithm/blob/master/parallel_algorithm.d
).
To make it (somewhat) pretty, I need to be able to tokenize
As part of a necessary rewrite to better support wxWidgets 3.0 and D2,
the wxD development is moving from SourceForge (cvs) to GitHub (git).
As an interim step the existing source repository has been converted,
the details at: http://sourceforge.net/scm/?type=git&group_id=133831
Besides updating
It's been five months since I last ask for dynamic lib support of
linux , I want to know when this can be achieved .
A rough schedule time will be very help, thank in advance .
On 22 March 2011 11:31, Long Chang wrote:
>
> Hello ,
>
> The DMD will support shared lib for linux in future, But
I have explain here: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/4 how to get
shared lib for ldc2 compiler
Am 26.08.2011, 10:10 Uhr, schrieb Anders F Björklund :
I am also stepping down as a maintainer, including the pre-built GDC
distribution (gdcwin/gdcgnu/gdcmac) and the Code::Blocks support for D.
Hopefully the new wxD project will have better luck of accomplishing a
open-source cross-platform G
Walter:
Here you are essentially asking for a more global view of the D design, to see
if we are using too much "plastic surgery". To have such global view we need to
look at many unrelated things. So sorry if this looks like a lot of meat on the
fire, there is no other way.
> We've already p
> And there are few more special cases where I'd like to see
> changes/improvements on (there are other improvements that I'd like to see,
> but they aren't special cases):
>
> 3878 Arguments and attributes with the same name
> 4407 Catch wrong argument<->attribute assignments in methods
> 5187
Am 26.08.2011, 11:32 Uhr, schrieb bearophile :
There is one more special case that we plan to disallow, that's not in
DMD yet:
5409 Disallow (!x & y)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5409
Is (!x & y) an issue or is it rather people omitting spaces in their code
!x&y ? I can't
Marco Leise:
> Is (!x & y) an issue or is it rather people omitting spaces in their code
> !x&y ?
This topic was already discussed in past, in two threads, this one of them:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=135741
The Coccinelle tool has foun
Marco Leise wrote:
I am also stepping down as a maintainer, including the pre-built GDC
distribution (gdcwin/gdcgnu/gdcmac) and the Code::Blocks support for D.
Hopefully the new wxD project will have better luck of accomplishing a
open-source cross-platform GUI and IDE for the D programming lang
I wonder if anybody has brought up the idea of using or expanding the SafeD
features to cover a user-defined kind of safety? Right now, @safe means
memory safe and it is defined by the language. However, there are many kinds
of safety that benefit from being layered in a manner similar to how
s
wow, been looking for this since a long time, only found for gdc.
2011/8/26 bioinfornatics
> I have explain here: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/4 how to
> get shared lib for ldc2 compiler
>
Am 26.08.2011, 13:10 Uhr, schrieb bearophile :
Marco Leise:
Is (!x & y) an issue or is it rather people omitting spaces in their
code
!x&y ?
This topic was already discussed in past, in two threads, this one of
them:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmar
Am 26.08.2011, 13:47 Uhr, schrieb Anders F Björklund :
Marco Leise wrote:
That are some good projects you were working on. We've got the
precompiled DMD, Eclipse DDT and GtkD, but I would have tried wxWidgets
in Code::Blocks with D. And while building GDC from source is possible,
the Windows f
My pet feature request could do this too. User defined attributes
combined with a list of functions called by a function.
===
@custom("mysafe") void foo() {}
void bar() {}
@custom("mysafe") void main() {
foo();
bar();
}
CheckCustomSafety!("mysafe", main);
template CheckCustomSafety(strin
Marco Leise wrote:
Would have ? Well, you can still use the existing stuff* for D(1).
It was mostly that focus has shifted to D2, since four years ago...
I updated most of it for better 64-bit support last year, and there
was a new Code::Blocks 10.05 but that was about it for development.
When
On 08/26/2011 02:38 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
My pet feature request could do this too. User defined attributes
combined with a list of functions called by a function.
===
@custom("mysafe") void foo() {}
void bar() {}
@custom("mysafe") void main() {
foo();
bar();
}
CheckCustomSafety!("mys
On 8/25/11 9:13 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/25/2011 6:30 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/25/11 6:10 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/25/2011 6:04 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Oh god no, don't ban that. I *like* to do that sort of thing:
Unusual, but legitimate. I think I'll shelve the idea.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:03:21 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's a legitimate concern, and there's no right response to it. My point
is that the argument is weak and caving to it would be a mistake. In
essence Nick claims he can't be bothered to change:
if (long_expression_one)
if (lo
Do you mean you're stepping down as the maintainer of wxd, or just the
GDC/CodeBlocks stuff?
wxWidgets look very interesting to me, lots of documentation available
from what I can tell. Plus it seems it's easy to grab a device context
out of a wxWidget frame, so I could use Cairo with that (e.g.
h
On 8/26/11 8:48 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:03:21 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's a legitimate concern, and there's no right response to it. My
point is that the argument is weak and caving to it would be a
mistake. In essence Nick claims he can't be bothered
I've used this a few times:
foreach (dir; dirs)
foreach (string file; dirEntries(dir, SpanMode.shallow))
{
if (file.isFile)
// do something..
}
And I only use this in short loops like this. It's more compact, I
dislike having to create too much indentation.
I don't see what banning t
Andrej Mitrovic:
> I don't see what banning this buys us.
That's not banned.
Bye,
bearophile
On 8/26/11, bearophile wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic:
>
>> I don't see what banning this buys us.
>
> That's not banned.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
>
Ok, I thought this was included.
Marco Leise:
> Does your enhancement include other operators like '&&' or is it
> practically just for the 'check if flag is disabled' case?
My enhancement request regards just a narrow case.
(But the actual implementation of it may add some other related cases, I don't
know).
Bye,
bearophil
> we might as well get rid of the semicolon as well.
You can have my semicolons when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
*correction: It's not just the samples, it's the library code too. I
don't understand, why the blank lines?
I can see the problem now. The code uses CR followed by CRLF on every
line. This was probably some kind of unix -> windows EOL conversion
bug. Either CRLF or CR's should be killed (personally I'm ok with unix
endlines).
Andrej Mitrovic:
> Ok, I thought this was included.
It wasn't included in my original enhancement request. But now I don't exactly
know what situations Andrei wants to disallow.
Bye,
bearophile
On 8/26/11, Adam Ruppe wrote:
>> we might as well get rid of the semicolon as well.
>
> You can have my semicolons when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
>
I'd kill them (the semicolons, not your hands :p) in places they're
not needed anymore. And we already have that in struct, class, enum
On 26.08.2011 17:03, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/25/11 9:13 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
But I worry that we might wind up tarting up the language with too many
a boatload of them, to the point where it becomes a confusing mass. At
what point should Meg Ryan stop with the plastic surgery? :-)
== Quote from Rainer Schuetze (r.sagita...@gmx.de)'s article
> The lexer used by Visual D is also CTFE capable:
> http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald/browser/trunk/vdc/lexer.d
> As Timon pointed out, it will separate into D tokens, not the more
> combined elements in your array.
> Here's my sma
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I can see the problem now. The code uses CR followed by CRLF on every
line. This was probably some kind of unix -> windows EOL conversion
bug. Either CRLF or CR's should be killed (personally I'm ok with unix
endlines).
The code uses CRLF, must be some kind of bug with y
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Do you mean you're stepping down as the maintainer of wxd, or just the
GDC/CodeBlocks stuff?
All three. Mostly wxD, but also the others - not using.
I'll leave it up as-is, but won't be adding D2 features.
--anders
On 2011/08/27 1:52, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Of course they're still needed in other places, but to be
honest I'm tired of "found foo, expected bla" errors due to missing
semicolons.
You can have both semi-colons and nice error messages if you put some
effort into the parser. Clang manages this
I can see the problem now. The code uses CR followed by CRLF on every
line. This was probably some kind of unix -> windows EOL conversion
bug. Either CRLF or CR's should be killed (personally I'm ok with unix
endlines).
The code uses CRLF, must be some kind of bug with your
git setup - looks "OK
On 8/26/11, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> The code uses CRLF, must be some kind of bug with your
> git setup - looks "OK" from here (with the ^M that is).
Sorry I've downloaded the tarball, not the git repo. The git repo
doesn't have these problems, thanks.
s/tarball/zip file
The zipped source has the duplicate newlines, but that probably
doesn't show up based on what editor you use. But anyway, the git
version works fine.
When I try to build via DMC's make I get:
D:\dev\projects\wxd>make
cd wxc
make
Error on line 181: can't read makefile '/build/msw/config.dmc'
I don't see a build folder anywhere. Are these build instructions
outdated on http://wxd.sourceforge.net/#installation ?
Cool stuff! DMD is almost there but it reports the line number of
whatever comes next, even if there was only whitespace, e.g.:
void main()
{
int foo = 2
} <- error line here instead of above
The algorithms in std.algorithm are great. They operate the same on
arrays/slices and generic ranges. But they return their own range-types.
Often this ok but sometimes you need a T[]. You may say to just use
array() but this allocates a new array! I think you sometimes want to
get a slice to
On 08/26/2011 08:24 PM, Mafi wrote:
The algorithms in std.algorithm are great. They operate the same on
arrays/slices and generic ranges. But they return their own range-types.
Often this ok but sometimes you need a T[]. You may say to just use
array() but this allocates a new array! I think you
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
When I try to build via DMC's make I get:
D:\dev\projects\wxd>make
cd wxc
make
Error on line 181: can't read makefile '/build/msw/config.dmc'
I don't see a build folder anywhere. Are these build instructions
outdated on http://wxd.sourceforge.net/#installation ?
If you
On 26.08.2011 22:24, Mafi wrote:
The algorithms in std.algorithm are great. They operate the same on
arrays/slices and generic ranges. But they return their own range-types.
Often this ok but sometimes you need a T[]. You may say to just use
array() but this allocates a new array! I think you som
Hi,
I seem to remember that someone not too long ago mentioned he was
working on a web browser written in D as a pet project. I cannot locate
that post. Does anyone remember this and maybe have a link to the
project by chance?
Thanks
Jonas
jdrewsen wrote:
> I seem to remember that someone not too long ago mentioned he was
> working on a web browser written in D as a pet project.
I started one, but haven't had a chance to come back to it since
that first weekend.
It does not currently compile since I've changed the libraries
without
"jdrewsen" wrote in message
news:j38su2$evo$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Hi,
>
> I seem to remember that someone not too long ago mentioned he was
> working on a web browser written in D as a pet project. I cannot locate
> that post. Does anyone remember this and maybe have a link to the proje
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:24:43 +0200, Mafi wrote:
> The algorithms in std.algorithm are great. They operate the same on
> arrays/slices and generic ranges. But they return their own range-types.
> Often this ok but sometimes you need a T[].
I have a feeling that std.range.inputRangeObject() will be
On Friday, August 26, 2011 11:49 Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 08:24 PM, Mafi wrote:
> > The algorithms in std.algorithm are great. They operate the same on
> > arrays/slices and generic ranges. But they return their own range-types.
> > Often this ok but sometimes you need a T[]. You may say t
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote:
> Hm... the only problem I see with simply disallowing if(a) if(b) is this:
>
> if(a)
> while(condition)
> if(b)
> statement;
> else // oops! this goes with if(b)
> statement;
>
> Or would this be disallowed as well? This could not be combined into a
kennytm:
> I've created a patch* for dangling else checking.
I have not yet compiled and tried your code, but from what I see all the design
decisions you have taken are good, including the error message (I think it
doesn't need to contain "dangling else" because that's a different thing), the
FYI I just bumped into this 10 minutes ago: https://github.com/bayun/SQLite3-D/
I don't know the quality of code or how well it works though.
dsimcha Wrote:
> I was looking through the Phobos source code and was reminded that
> there's an SQLite binding in there now. Is there a wrapper for this in
> the works/in the review queue?
Andrej found the wrapper. This was the place the bindings came from. As for a
wrapper in Phobos, I figu
Hey,
firstly - i'm sorry that i'm not posting it directly to bugtracker but i highly
care about this issue.
So, on my Linux x64 dmd 2.53 & 2.54, while hunting another bug (i already
highly doubt it's my) - i've found this one:
private import std.stdio;
class T {
@property {
Mariusz G.:
> So, on my Linux x64 dmd 2.53 & 2.54, while hunting another bug (i already
> highly doubt it's my) - i've found this one:
I can't reproduce the problem on 2.055head on 32 bit Windows.
DMD 64 bit is relatively recent, it contains several bugs still.
> Another problem i'm searching
Bear, you keep creating new threads when you reply to other peoples posts..
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 05:44:24 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Bear, you keep creating new threads when you reply to other peoples
posts..
My newsreader (Opera) threads Bearophile's posts fine. Let's have a look:
Marius' post has:
Message-ID:
Bearophile's post has:
Message-ID:
References:
I'm using gmail.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:51:03 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
I'm using gmail.
That's not very helpful.
If you post the e-mail headers for Mariusz' and bearophile's posts, as you
received them, it'd probably be possible to point out whether the problem
is with Gmail or the mailing list ga
Mariusz Gliwiński: http://codepad.org/9uZf3E1N
bearophile: http://codepad.org/j84TLFC8
It happens 90% of the time when bear replies.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:08:45 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Mariusz Gliwiński: http://codepad.org/9uZf3E1N
bearophile: http://codepad.org/j84TLFC8
It happens 90% of the time when bear replies.
That doesn't mean it's his fault.
I think I see the problem:
1. Mariusz posts via the mailing-li
On Friday, August 26, 2011 9:29:47 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:08:45 +0300, Andrej Mitrovic
> wrote:
>
>> Mariusz Gliwiński: http://codepad.org/9uZf3E1N
>> bearophile: http://codepad.org/j84TLFC8
>>
>> It happens 90% of the time when bear replies.
>
> That doesn't mea
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:44:16 +0300, Brad Roberts
wrote:
I don't think the mailing list software is what's at fault. There's
_tons_ of people who use it, myself included obviously. If it was a
general problem with the list software (mailman, probably the most
popular list management software
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:44:16 +0300, Brad Roberts
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think the mailing list software is what's at fault. There's
>> _tons_ of people who use it, myself included obviously. If it was a
>> general problem with the list software (mailman, probably the
bearophile wrote:
> Mariusz G.:
>
>> So, on my Linux x64 dmd 2.53 & 2.54, while hunting another bug (i already
>> highly doubt it's my) - i've found this one:
>
> I can't reproduce the problem on 2.055head on 32 bit Windows.
> DMD 64 bit is relatively recent, it contains several bugs still.
More
On 8/26/2011 10:29 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:44:16 +0300, Brad Roberts wrote:
>
>> I don't think the mailing list software is what's at fault. There's
>> _tons_ of people who use it, myself included obviously. If it was a
>> general problem with the list software (m
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:01:21 +0300, Brad Roberts
wrote:
On 8/26/2011 10:29 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:44:16 +0300, Brad Roberts
wrote:
I don't think the mailing list software is what's at fault. There's
_tons_ of people who use it, myself included obviously.
67 matches
Mail list logo
