On 04/08/2012 06:19 PM, nrgyzer wrote:
Thanks for DMagick... works great, except toBlob(). When I try the following:
Image example = new Image(Geometry(100, 100), new ColorRGB(0, 255, 0));
example.toBlob();
I get an access violation. Do I anything wrong or is it a bug? (I'm using
Imagick
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/Panel-Native-Languages?format=html5
Andrei
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:59:27PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/6/2012 8:05 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:08:07PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
Alright. It's time to introduce D-man version 2! (Or is that D2-man?
:-P)
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:48:53PM -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
[...]
Really, I'd like to see all TypeInfo generated by template code in
druntime.
Will that also solve the current weirdness with TypeInfo_Aya and
TypeInfo_Aa being used for string and char[], respectively, but
TypeInfo_Array being
Le 08/04/2012 16:18, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:01:56PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I think it's been ages since I meant to ask why nobody (as in
compiler vendors) does what I think is rather simple optimization.
In the short term the plan is to introduce a link-time
On Sunday, 8 April 2012 at 17:59:28 UTC, Timo Westkämper wrote:
Does someone know why the lib (.a) packaging instead of objects
(.o) works better in this case?
Didn't work after all with -lib. I mixed up outputs.
08.04.2012 21:31, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
On 4/8/12 11:59 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Very good but minimum isn't a best guess. Personally I (and there will
be a lot of such maniacs I suppose) will think that this (minimum) time
can be significantly smaller than average time.
I've
On 09.04.2012 5:11, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Dmitry Olshanskydmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:jlsmka$22ce$1...@digitalmars.com...
The refinement is merging prefixes and suffixes of course.
And for that one needs to calculate hashes for all of prefixes and all of
suffixes. I will define
On 08.04.2012 07:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For this to happen, we need to start an effort of migrating built-in
arrays into runtime, essentially making them templates that the compiler
lowers to. So I have two questions:
vote -= real.infinity.
That would kill D.
On 9 April 2012 04:09, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/9/12, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't follow. Can you give an example that shows this insecurity?
I mean escaping references to locals:
ref int xref;
void foo() {
int x;
xref = x;
}
or
ref int
Am Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:08:52 +0200
schrieb Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com:
I got asked whether there are any porting hints for phobos on
other architectures the other day from the debian GCC
maintainers. So I gathered this must be at least a dedicated
wiki or article to be written up on
On 04/09/2012 10:24 AM, Don wrote:
On 08.04.2012 07:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For this to happen, we need to start an effort of migrating built-in
arrays into runtime, essentially making them templates that the compiler
lowers to. So I have two questions:
vote -= real.infinity.
That
On 9 April 2012 11:24, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
On 08.04.2012 07:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For this to happen, we need to start an effort of migrating built-in
arrays into runtime, essentially making them templates that the compiler
lowers to. So I have two questions:
vote -=
On 2012-04-09 02:21, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/9/12, Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
and pass-by-alias
Speaking of alias, one killer feature would be to enable using alias
for expressions. E.g.:
struct Window { struct Point { int x, y; } Point point; }
void test()
On 2012-04-09 02:24, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Google likes to invent random useless languages. See: Dart. Both
languages are solutions looking for problems. ;)
Actually I like the idea behind Dart, to replace JavaScript. But that's
basically the only think I like about it.
--
/Jacob
On 2012-04-09 11:05, Johannes Pfau wrote:
* Adapting the core.stdc bindings to something different than the
currently supported C libraries sucks: The version blocks are
sometimes completely wrong. For example Android's bionic is a C
library based on BSD code, but running on Linux. As
On 04/09/12 02:21, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/9/12, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
and pass-by-alias
Speaking of alias, one killer feature would be to enable using alias
for expressions. E.g.:
struct Window { struct Point { int x, y; } Point point; }
void
On 4/9/12 7:26 AM, Kevin Cox wrote:
I was wondering about the foreach statement and when you implement
opApply() for a class it is implemented using closures. I was wondering
if this is just how it is expressed or if it is actually syntatic
sugar. The reason I aski is because if you have a
On 9 April 2012 10:35, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-09 11:05, Johannes Pfau wrote:
* Adapting the core.stdc bindings to something different than the
currently supported C libraries sucks: The version blocks are
sometimes completely wrong. For example Android's bionic is a
On 04/09/12 08:21, Somedude wrote:
Le 08/04/2012 16:18, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:01:56PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I think it's been ages since I meant to ask why nobody (as in
compiler vendors) does what I think is rather simple optimization.
In the short term
On 08/04/2012 02:08, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I have a pull request up to remove the big misfeature
of embedded html in ddoc, and it is pending action,
from me, to answer some of Walter's concerns.
What have you done - just made it convertin documentation
comments to lt; gt; amp; before
On Apr 9, 2012 5:59 AM, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
In this video you can see what foreach with opApply gets translated to
(at about minute 1):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAhrFQVnsrY
Thanks, that's perfect. I'm definitely going to try out decent.
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:25:23 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
DIP15 doesn't fix the explicit path problem though. You can't change
std/algorithm.d into std/algorithm/ (with sorting.d, search.d, etc.)
without
breaking code. You could make std/algorithm.d publicly import
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:59:27 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-06 19:36, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
so now I must define a type for every attribute? I'd rather just define
a function.
What if I have 20 string attributes, I must define a new attribute type
for each one? This
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:21:08AM +0200, Somedude wrote:
Le 08/04/2012 16:18, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:01:56PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I think it's been ages since I meant to ask why nobody (as in
compiler vendors) does what I think is rather simple
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:40:29 -0400, Piotr Szturmaj bncr...@jadamspam.pl
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Unused function do not make it into the EXE.
Are unused structs compiled into EXE?
Their TypeInfo_Struct is. If they are compiled in their own module, then
I think it's
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:00:19 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-06 19:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:53:51 -0400, Piotr Szturmaj
struct Author { string name = empty; }
// struct Author { string name; } - this works too
I think the point is, we should
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 07:26:26 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 06/04/2012 22:46, Mafi a écrit :
Also, if I see:
@square(5) int foo();
How do I know that I have to use __traits(getAttribute, foo, Area)?
Another possibility:
@attribute Area area(int w, int h) { return Area(w,
OMG, DO WANT! :P
Who wrote this? I wonder if they'd be interested in adapting it to VisualD
+ MonoDevelop?
On 9 April 2012 12:56, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
On 4/9/12 7:26 AM, Kevin Cox wrote:
I was wondering about the foreach statement and when you implement
opApply() for a
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:11:16 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-06 20:52, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Also, if I see:
@square(5) int foo();
How do I know that I have to use __traits(getAttribute, foo, Area)?
Isn't square the name of the attribute? In that case you would
On 4/9/12 2:06 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Why will recording the average produce so much noise?
As I explained, the average takes noise and outliers (some very large,
e.g. milliseconds in a benchmark that takes microseconds) into account.
The minimum is shielded from this issue. In the
On 4/9/12 3:24 AM, Don wrote:
On 08.04.2012 07:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For this to happen, we need to start an effort of migrating built-in
arrays into runtime, essentially making them templates that the compiler
lowers to. So I have two questions:
vote -= real.infinity.
That would
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:48:00 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-07 05:29, Kapps wrote:
I slightly prefer this function method over the struct method because:
1) No need to generate a custom struct for everything. Plenty of things
are just a true or false, or a string. Saves a
On Apr 9, 2012 9:19 AM, Manu turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
OMG, DO WANT! :P
Who wrote this? I wonder if they'd be interested in adapting it to
VisualD + MonoDevelop?
On 9 April 2012 12:56, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
On 4/9/12 7:26 AM, Kevin Cox wrote:
I was wondering about the
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 11:05:10 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
What have you done - just made it convertin
documentation comments to lt; gt; amp; before processing?
In ddoc's source code, there was a macro called ESCAPES
already, but it wasn't actually used.
My patch enables the use of
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:03:25 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 07, 2012 15:59:57 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Whenever I use TickDuration.to, I need to add the pesky second argument,
e.g. TickDuration.to!(nsecs, uint). Would a default make sense there?
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 13:19:32 UTC, Manu wrote:
OMG, DO WANT! :P
Who wrote this? I wonder if they'd be interested in adapting it
to VisualD
+ MonoDevelop?
On 9 April 2012 12:56, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
On 4/9/12 7:26 AM, Kevin Cox wrote:
I was wondering about the
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:56:09 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Of course, many of us have been thinking about this for a looong time,
and what is the best way to go about it. The usual technique is for the
compiler to emit some sort of table for each TypeInfo giving
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.1518.1333937643.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Why is it so important to have unique addresses for functions?
Just because I can't think of a use case doesn't mean nobody is relying on
it!
But I guess there really isn't
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:33:01 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
APPENDABLE is, IIRC, mostly an internal attribute used for the array
append cache. You can ignore it entirely (we should document this).
It's used to flag that the block of GC data is actually an appendable
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
all noise is additive (there's no noise that may make a benchmark
appear to run faster)
This is in doubt, because you yourself wrote the machine itself has
complex interactions. This complex interactions might lower the time
needed for an operation of the
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:45:44 -0400, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
wrote:
On 4/6/2012 6:20 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 06/04/2012 18:07, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
A few more samples of people's perception of the two languages:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3805302
Andrei
I
Added to trello.
-Steve
Am Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:13:51 -0400
schrieb Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:00:19 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-04-06 19:37, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:53:51 -0400, Piotr Szturmaj
struct Author { string name =
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:58:01PM +1000, Daniel Murphy wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.1518.1333937643.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Why is it so important to have unique addresses for functions?
Just because I can't think of a use case
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 01:56:38 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Walter and I discussed today about using the small string optimization
in string and other arrays of immutable small objects.
On 64 bit machines, string occupies 16 bytes. We could use the first
On 4/9/12 4:21 AM, Manu wrote:
After thinking on it a bit, I'm becoming a little worried about this
move for 2 rarely considered reasons:
Using lowering to a template, debug(/unoptimised) performance will
probably get a lot slower, which is really annoying. And
debugging/stepping might become
On 2012-04-09 15:19, Manu wrote:
OMG, DO WANT! :P
Who wrote this? I wonder if they'd be interested in adapting it to
VisualD + MonoDevelop?
That would be Ary Manzana. I think one of the reasons why he stopped
working on this was that he ported the DMD frontend to Java and it's
just a pain to
On 2012-04-09 15:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The argument was to use the name of the type returned as the attribute
name instead of the function. That is not my proposal. The suggested
case is to be able to use a different name to build the same attribute,
to be more intuitive.
i.e. both
On 2012-04-09 15:29, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think the struct approach is fine for some attributes, and I think it
should be doable to @attribute either functions or structs. I just want
the most generic, basic feature possible. I think Timon has the best
idea that any callable CTFE
On 4/8/12 7:41 AM, Jonas H. wrote:
Hi everyone,
I decided to give D a try yesterday and had quite some trouble with the
documentation. I want to help improve the docs on dlang.org.
I'm generally in favor of simplifying the sidebar navigation, since I
already did a bunch of that under the
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 14:55:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
3. There are patterns that attempt to optimize by e.g. using
.ptr, but end up pessimizing code because they trigger multiple
memory allocations.
Andrei
It's important to note that this pattern is probably most common
in
Well, if you're really hankering for a shared lib, try ldc. I have
gotten it to compile working shared libs in the past.
On 04/09/2012 01:24 AM, Timo Westkämper timo.westkam...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2012 at 17:59:28 UTC, Timo Westkämper wrote:
Does someone know why the lib (.a)
On 2012-04-09 15:44, Kapps wrote:
That was Descent, a plugin for Eclipse. They did it by porting
DMD, with changes, to Java. A horribly painful task I'd imagine.
I wonder if it'd be easier by just creating bindings for DMD for
the language of choice.
That would be horribly painful as well.
Why is there so much emphasis on printBenchmarks()?
benchmark() and runBenchmarks() are clearly the core of this
library, and yet they are relegated to second-class citizen: Oh,
I guess you can use this. Normally, I wouldn't be so picky, but
this is a standard library. Focus should be on
On 4/9/12 10:23 AM, Francois Chabot wrote:
Why is there so much emphasis on printBenchmarks()?
benchmark() and runBenchmarks() are clearly the core of this library,
and yet they are relegated to second-class citizen: Oh, I guess you can
use this. Normally, I wouldn't be so picky, but this is a
On 4/9/12, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com wrote:
It's also common to avoid the `toStringz` function for strings
you know are zero-terminated, using `.ptr` directly instead.
Yup. E.g. WinAPI text drawing functions take a wchar* and a length. I
don't have to call toUTF16z but just pass a
On 4/9/12 9:25 AM, Manfred Nowak wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
all noise is additive (there's no noise that may make a benchmark
appear to run faster)
This is in doubt, because you yourself wrote the machine itself has
complex interactions. This complex interactions might lower the time
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 15:37:37 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/9/12, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com wrote:
The one taking (const(char)[] s) does this, but not the other
overload
taking (string s). Whether or not that's safe I don't really
know.
I've had an argument over this on github,
Le 09/04/2012 02:24, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 09-04-2012 02:18, Manu wrote:
On 9 April 2012 02:24, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/8/2012 3:57 PM, Manu wrote:
What do you base that statistic on? I'm not arguing that fact,
just
On 4/9/12, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com wrote:
With all the focus on manual memory
management and pluggable allocators going on, I think the
optimization must be removed or the documentation for the
`string` overload changed.
Or add a compile-time argument:
toStringz(bool ForceAllocate =
Which is great, unless the program wants to measure the cache
memory itself, in which case it would use special assembler
instructions or large memset()s. (We do such at Facebook.)
I disagree. If a regression suddenly causes a function to become
heavily cache-bound, it should show up in
(IMO) one of the biggest obstacles for truly broad adoption of D
currently is the weak platform support on end user platforms. The two
mobile platforms that came up recently (iOS and Android) are two
examples. And indeed I think that support for mobile platforms could be
a real stepping stone
Le 09/04/2012 17:23, Francois Chabot a écrit :
Why is there so much emphasis on printBenchmarks()?
benchmark() and runBenchmarks() are clearly the core of this library,
and yet they are relegated to second-class citizen: Oh, I guess you can
use this. Normally, I wouldn't be so picky, but
On Monday, April 09, 2012 09:36:45 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:03:25 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 07, 2012 15:59:57 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Whenever I use TickDuration.to, I need to add the pesky second argument,
e.g.
On Monday, April 09, 2012 08:55:27 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:25:23 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
DIP15 doesn't fix the explicit path problem though. You can't change
std/algorithm.d into std/algorithm/ (with sorting.d, search.d, etc.)
without
On 09.04.2012 20:39, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
(IMO) one of the biggest obstacles for truly broad adoption of D
currently is the weak platform support on end user platforms. The two
mobile platforms that came up recently (iOS and Android) are two
examples. And indeed I think that support for mobile
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:05:09 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Monday, April 09, 2012 09:36:45 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think what Andrei is asking for is to change this:
T to(string units, T)() @safe const pure nothrow
Into this:
T to(string units, T = long)()
On 4/9/12 12:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We could add that, but why? td.msecs already does what td.to!msecs() would
do if to defaulted to long. I don't see any reason to use to directly unless
you're using something other than long. And if you use a type of than long,
you're going to have to
On 4/9/12 11:29 AM, Francois Chabot wrote:
Which is great, unless the program wants to measure the cache memory
itself, in which case it would use special assembler instructions or
large memset()s. (We do such at Facebook.)
I disagree. If a regression suddenly causes a function to become
On 4/9/12 11:44 AM, Somedude wrote:
It helps benchmarking being as standard as unit testing.
We don't want to have to write again and again the same boilerplate code
for such trivial uses.
Yes, I had unittest in mind when writing the library. If one needs more
than one statement to get an
On 09-04-2012 16:16, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:33:01 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
APPENDABLE is, IIRC, mostly an internal attribute used for the array
append cache. You can ignore it entirely (we should document this).
It's used to flag that
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:39:10 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
In MCI, I can't provide finalization support when programs running in
the VM use the D GC, because that *requires* me to use the Object layout
for runtime objects. That's just not nice, since it adds (IIRC)
On 2012-04-09 18:39, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
(IMO) one of the biggest obstacles for truly broad adoption of D
currently is the weak platform support on end user platforms. The two
mobile platforms that came up recently (iOS and Android) are two
examples. And indeed I think that support for mobile
Le 08/04/2012 14:02, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 08-04-2012 11:42, Manu wrote:
On 8 April 2012 11:56, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/08/2012 10:45 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
That actually sounds like a pretty awesome idea.
Make sure that the compiler does
Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org wrote in message
news:jlv3c2$10rn$1...@digitalmars.com...
(IMO) one of the biggest obstacles for truly broad adoption of D currently
is the weak platform support on end user platforms. The two mobile
platforms that came up recently (iOS and Android) are
Le 08/04/2012 03:56, Walter Bright a écrit :
Of course, many of us have been thinking about this for a looong time,
and what is the best way to go about it. The usual technique is for the
compiler to emit some sort of table for each TypeInfo giving the layout
of the object, i.e. where the
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
For example by running more than one instance of the benchmarked
program in paralell and use the thereby gathered statistical
routines to spread T into the additiv components A, Q and N.
I disagree with running two benchmarks in parallel because that
exposes them
On 9 April 2012 21:20, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 08/04/2012 14:02, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 08-04-2012 11:42, Manu wrote:
On 8 April 2012 11:56, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
mailto:timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/08/2012 10:45 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
That actually
Woks perfectly! Thanks a lot!
What's the reason the following code doesn't compile?
struct S {
const(int)[4] data;
this(const(int)[4] d) {
data = d; // this is line 4
}
}
void main() {
S s;
}
On 09/04/2012 14:34, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 11:05:10 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Create LT, GT and AMP macros and use them in your code examples.
There's two problems with that: 1) it is hideous
and 2) what if the user wants some format other
than html?
Then
On 9 April 2012 17:55, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.orgwrote:
On 4/9/12 4:21 AM, Manu wrote:
After thinking on it a bit, I'm becoming a little worried about this
move for 2 rarely considered reasons:
Using lowering to a template, debug(/unoptimised) performance will
It's possible to use D with WinRT, as someone posted in an other thread:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/ow7qc
But that does not suffice to make a Metro app. For desktop apps there
shouldn't be a problem, but the Metro side poses more restrictions on
the app.
Am 09.04.2012 19:12, schrieb Dmitry Olshansky:
Not true at all, in every talk I've seen on WinRT so far C++ CRT is
still shipped side by side with WinRT. Basically every language has his
own runtime. It wouldn't be Microsoft if they haven't got a solid
reserve of backwards compatibility. Simply
Am 09.04.2012 20:21, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from the Win8 stuff (only because I have a hard time believing Win32
won't work on Win8), I strongly agree will all of this.
No, sorry for the confusion, Win32 will work in general! Just Metro apps
may not use Win32 and other libraries
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 15:14:45 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Well, if you're really hankering for a shared lib, try ldc. I
have gotten it to compile working shared libs in the past.
On 04/09/2012 01:24 AM, Timo Westkämper
timo.westkam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2012 at 17:59:28
On 2012-04-09 19:20:49 +, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org said:
I've got my information directly from Microsoft Metro guys. Not totally
sure how good their knowledge actually is, but for _Metro_ apps they
said that because of sandboxing it is only allowed to access functions
of the
H. S. Teoh:
struct S {
const(int)[4] data;
this(const(int)[4] d) {
data = d; // this is line 4
}
}
void main() {
S s;
}
I think this used to work (do you have an
On 2012-04-09 16:39:30 +, Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org said:
Right now, if we don't catch up here, D will slowly degrade to a pure
server and command line application language which surely wouldn't do
it justice.
I share your feeling. In fact, I'm not using D anywhere right now
On 9 April 2012 20:37, Timo Westkämper\
timo.westkam...@gmail.com@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 15:14:45 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Well, if you're really hankering for a shared lib, try ldc. I have gotten
it to compile working shared libs in the past.
On 04/09/2012 01:24
i guess this might be of interest to some.
http://fpcomplete.com/the-downfall-of-imperative-programming/
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s112h/the_downfall_of_imperative_programming_functional/
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 19:59:18 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 9 April 2012 20:37, Timo Westkämper\
timo.westkam...@gmail.com@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 15:14:45 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Well, if you're really hankering for a shared lib, try ldc. I
have gotten
it to
On 2012-04-09 21:20, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I've got my information directly from Microsoft Metro guys. Not totally
sure how good their knowledge actually is, but for _Metro_ apps they
said that because of sandboxing it is only allowed to access functions
of the WinRT - the C++ runtime is an
On 2012-04-09 21:23, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
It's possible to use D with WinRT, as someone posted in an other thread:
http://www.reddit.com/tb/ow7qc
But that does not suffice to make a Metro app. For desktop apps there
shouldn't be a problem, but the Metro side poses more restrictions on
the
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 20:31:44 UTC, Timo Westkämper wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 19:59:18 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 9 April 2012 20:37, Timo Westkämper\
timo.westkam...@gmail.com@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2012 at 15:14:45 UTC, Ellery Newcomer
wrote:
Well, if you're
Le 09/04/2012 20:33, Manu a écrit :
Eh?
Not sure what you mean. The idea is the template would produce a
struct/table of data instead of being a pointer to a function, this way
the GC could work without calling anything. If the GC was written to
assume GC info in a particular format/structure,
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:28:01 +0200
Mirko Pilger pil...@cymotec.de wrote:
i guess this might be of interest to some.
Yes, it is...and I wonder if D's FP features are good enough? Author
mentions D, but says:...This is all good, but not enough...
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Everyone is forced to act
On 4/9/2012 3:28 PM, Mirko Pilger wrote:
i guess this might be of interest to some.
http://fpcomplete.com/the-downfall-of-imperative-programming/
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s112h/the_downfall_of_imperative_programming_functional/
I would counter a flow based programming
On 4/9/2012 11:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
In the other hand, TLS can be collected independently and only influence the
thread that own the data. Both are every powerfull improvement, and the design
you propose « as this » cannot provide any mean to handle that. Which is a big
missed opportunity,
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
