On 4/3/2013 10:51 PM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
I and Kenji are happy to announce TDPL Japanese edition will be published on
April 8th in Japan. We are translation supervisor of this book.
どうもありがとう
On 2013-04-03 21:07, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
I don't see what to simplify in markup like this:
@Entity
class User {
@Generated
long id;
@Column
string name;
@ManyToOne
Customer customer;
@ManyToMany
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 19:07:39 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
I don't see what to simplify in markup like this:
...
You may implement approach similar to one used in vibe.d
http.rest and http.form modules. Some specific examples are
described by Jacob, but, in general, in results in 3
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 09:01:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Is the attributes necessary at all? I would just go with:
class User
{
long id; // always assume auto increment, primary key, not
null and so on
string name;
Customer customer; // infer @ManyToOne
@ManyToMany
On 4/4/13 1:51 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
Hi guys,
I and Kenji are happy to announce TDPL Japanese edition will be
published on April 8th in Japan. We are translation supervisor of this
book.
This is an awesome surprise to wake up to. Congratulations, and many
thanks to Masahiro, Kenji,
The changes for std.process are under review at:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gclsbrghhjitnfder...@forum.dlang.org
std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a
complete change to the API. The original API remains but these
will be going through deprecation.
The major change
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 15:30:53 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
I've not seen any mention about that under the Documentation
category and I've only found posts about that after explicitly
searching for that problem right now. I'm sorry for not knowing
about that, but if that is such a
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 05:51:03 UTC, Masahiro Nakagawa
wrote:
Hi guys,
I and Kenji are happy to announce TDPL Japanese edition will be
published on April 8th in Japan. We are translation supervisor
of this book.
すばらしい！
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 18:31:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 15:30:53 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
I've not seen any mention about that under the Documentation
category and I've only found posts about that after explicitly
searching for that problem right now. I'm
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 23:04:05 UTC, Stephen Jones wrote:
There is a general problem to do with the dlls themselves.
While Derelict3 compiles its own .lib files they still require
native .dll files on the path. For openGL it is not an issue
This isn't a problem. It's the nature of
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 16:09:49 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 04/03/2013 05:18 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Were you at CERN by any chance?
I worked on the Atlas HLT project between 2003-2004.
Nothing so posh, I'm afraid. :-) I was at Fribourg University
in the
interdisciplinary
After some thinking on topic I come to conclusion that rvalue
refs _should_ be scope ref and stuff like ref int f(@temp ref
int x) { return x; } is invalid. I can see no valid use case for
such an error-prone case. Contrary, scope ref feels just like
it was designed for this task, also a good
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 14:54:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:33:05 -0400, Don
turnyourkidsintoc...@nospam.com wrote:
Yeah, but I think that what this is, is demonstrating what a
useful concept a positive integer type is. There's huge value
in statically
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 20:22:10 UTC, Namespace wrote:
So you were against the introduction of ravalue references or
do you just have a problem with the syntax?
I am against whole ref design in D and consider it a mistake :)
But within current specification requirements - against hacky
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 21:44:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The main issue I have with the wrapper is the fact that you're
then forced to
overload your function if you want it to test the argument for
validity if
it's not wrapped and not test if it's wrapped. So, you're
creating an
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:11 PM, gonzo2020 gonzo2...@o2.pl wrote:
http://www.loadingartist.com/**2011/01/10/programming/http://www.loadingartist.com/2011/01/10/programming/
Most likely it will still be relevant 5-10 years from now. Sad but true.
Hi guys!
In my research on what is the fastest and safest way to build D programs
for dub, I found this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3274
it is marked as WONTFIX, but I am not able to reproduce it. Is it fixed
after all?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Robert
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 09:43:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Naturally, the biggest reason to have size_t be unsigned is so
that you can
access the whole address space
Length exists to limit access to memory. If you want unlimited
access, use just a pointer.
For some people though, it
On 4/3/13 11:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:42:12 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
+1
Stylistic nit:
When writing a one-liner post like this, please do not quote the
entire preceding post,
Hello,
A response to the static if proposal for C++ was made recently
which was a rather severe critique. Has there been a response to
this critique or are the conclusions of the article generally
considered to be justified? I shall be attending the ACCU meeting
this April and would like to
Hello,
I have decided to take on Review Manager for std.process and
hopefully will keep it up and get through the review queue. This
is slightly ignoring a first come, first serve approach, but
that is mostly because I didn't want to look into it. (So don't
be too upset).
std.process has
On 2013-04-03 23:44, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The main issue I have with the wrapper is the fact that you're then forced to
overload your function if you want it to test the argument for validity if
it's not wrapped and not test if it's wrapped. So, you're creating an extra
overload with every
On 2013-04-03 22:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was referring to the repeatability of the code used in testing, which
is language-independent.
I think the first one is far more readable then the one using the loop.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Oops, forgot the project description:
std.process is improvements to the existing std.process and is a
complete change to the API. The original API remains but these
will be going through deprecation.
The major change is support for redirecting stdin/stdout/stderr
For those interested I
On 2013-04-03 21:28, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Removed all comments, unittests, and empty lines from std.datetime. File
went from 34070 to 5843 lines.
Heheh, that's more reasonable. That's also why I don't like to have unit
tests inline.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:01:17 UTC, dominic jones wrote:
Hello,
A response to the static if proposal for C++ was made
recently which was a rather severe critique. Has there been a
response to this critique or are the conclusions of the article
generally considered to be justified? I
On 2013-04-04 03:47, Jesse Phillips wrote:
cloc doesn't support /+ comments... But using your number, cloc, and
some math
std.datetime contains mostly /+ and // comments. It only contains a
single /* comment.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 07:52:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
After some thinking on topic I come to conclusion that rvalue
refs _should_ be scope ref and stuff like ref int f(@temp
ref int x) { return x; } is invalid. I can see no valid use
case for such an error-prone case. Contrary, scope ref
'scope ref': The only existing documentation on scope
parameters: http://dlang.org/function.html suggests that
references to them simply cannot leave the function they find
themselves in. But this is *not* what the temp ref feature is
about. Say you have this temp ref function:
ref int
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:01:17 UTC, dominic jones wrote:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3613.pdf
As I understand, they just asked to not rush with static if and
give them time to come up with an alternative proposal.
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:31:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-04-04 03:47, Jesse Phillips wrote:
cloc doesn't support /+ comments... But using your number,
cloc, and
some math
std.datetime contains mostly /+ and // comments. It only
contains a single /* comment.
I realize
On 4/4/13 10:26 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-04-03 22:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was referring to the repeatability of the code used in testing, which
is language-independent.
I think the first one is far more readable then the one using the loop.
I understand. And I think you
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 16:19:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
auto myFile = some.tmp;
scope(exit) remove(myFile);
// setup code here
manipulateFileRange(range);
We are in agreement that it would be impossible to prove one
way or the other whether removing the file
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 14:43:26 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 07:52:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
After some thinking on topic I come to conclusion that rvalue
refs _should_ be scope ref and stuff like ref int f(@temp
ref int x) { return x; } is invalid. I can see no valid
People use PDF files may often feel frustrated by the difficulty
of editing PDF files. PDF, as we know, is very easy to create and
share, but it is very hard to edit. Generally speaking, Windows
users have more choices to edit PDF as there are multiple
Windows-based PDF editors can be found on
I don't know. My opinion has no value here.
I know. But I wanted to hear just your personal opinion about the
code and if you have any suggestions or anything.
I may advice to write a DIP that makes more accent on
theoretical side of problem - what scope currently is, how it
combines with
I also think writing DIP would be better.
I can tell some reasonable points about 'scope ref'.
- 'in ref' has been allowed from 2.060 (
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8105)
- 'scope ref' is still disallowed. (Error: scope cannot be ref or out)
- 'scope' means the reference cannot
2013/4/5 Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com
Hmm, I don't know if I could write a long and good text for the DIP. My
english is very limited and not free of failures.
I still had hoped that Kenji or some other find the time, to see over my
code and to make a DIP/Pull Request.
Timely guess. I
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:21:50 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I don't know. My opinion has no value here.
I know. But I wanted to hear just your personal opinion about
the code and if you have any suggestions or anything.
I may advice to write a DIP that makes more accent on
theoretical side
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Source:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process2.d
Dead link.
Docs:
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process.html
quote
Unless a directory is specified in args[0] or
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Docs:
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process.html
quote
Win32-specific warning: The mechanisms for process termination are
incredibly badly specified in Win32. This function may therefore
produce
Actual Code location.
Source:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process.d
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:50:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Source:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process2.d
Dead link.
This is either posted to the wrong group or is spam.
I nominate it for removal...
-Steve
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:04:52PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:50:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Source:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This is either posted to the wrong group or is spam.
I nominate it for removal...
[...]
+1. It looked like spam to me.
T
--
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:50:15 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
quote
Unless a directory is specified in args[0] or program,
spawnProcess
will search for the program in the directories listed in the
PATH
environment variable. To run an executable in the current
directory,
use
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 23:11:30 UTC, gonzo2020 wrote:
http://www.loadingartist.com/2011/01/10/programming/
I'm pretty sure same thing could happen if the languages were
Java and C++.
Do you know Java? I know C++
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:25:30 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 4/3/13 11:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:42:12 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/3/2013 9:49 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
+1
Stylistic nit:
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:57:58 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Docs:
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process.html
quote
Win32-specific warning: The mechanisms for process termination
are
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 15:20:26 Kagamin wrote:
I'm afraid, those applications are not tied to 32-bit ints. They
just want a lot of memory because they have a lot of data. It
means they want more than 4 gigs, so uint won't help in the
slightest: it can't address more than 4 gigs, and
On 4/4/13, Lars T. Kyllingstad pub...@kyllingen.net wrote:
Did you read the article?
I did some years ago.
There seem to be /some/ workarounds in various places on the web, with
alternatives to TerminateProcess, but it's usually hacky.
I don't see this as a blocker personally, we can
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 21:44:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The main issue I have with the wrapper is the fact that you're
then forced to
overload your function if you want it to test the argument for
validity if
it's not wrapped and not test if it's wrapped. So, you're
creating an
Well, I doubt there are that many native speakers here which
will be shocked by bad English :) But if you gather all data
mentioned (see also Kenji's comment), I can write DIP itself
for you. Type system changes should be studied in smallest
details as those have have very long term
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:31:06 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
2013/4/5 Namespace rswhi...@googlemail.com
Hmm, I don't know if I could write a long and good text for
the DIP. My
english is very limited and not free of failures.
I still had hoped that Kenji or some other find the time, to
see
On 2013-04-04 20:03, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Do you know Java? I know C++
And C# and Java.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 4/2/2013 8:10 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:32:21 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
For example, with a signed array index, a bounds check is two comparisons
rather than one.
Why?
struct myArr
{
int length;
int opIndex(int idx) {
On 04/04/2013 08:47 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 16:19:25 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
auto myFile = some.tmp;
scope(exit) remove(myFile);
// setup code here
manipulateFileRange(range);
We are in agreement that it would be impossible to
I'm afraid, a factor of 2 is too small. If an application needs
gigabytes, you'll have hard time trying to convince it to not use
more than 4 gigs. Or more specifically between 2 and 4 gigs.
Your examples don't specify if those applications needed large
contiguous allocations (which is
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:10:28 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/2/2013 8:10 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:32:21 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
For example, with a signed array index, a bounds check is two
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:10:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-04-04 20:03, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Do you know Java? I know C++
And C# and Java.
I think you guys are missing the joke.
Question: You know C++? (interpreted as a programming question, what's
the result
I am currently investigating
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9571 and after
brief exploration of symbols emitted to object file as well as
code that emits them I can't rid of an idea that I am missing
something about module system.
Why does dmd emits horde of symbols from
BTW don't we already have a hungry application *with* unsigned
integers?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4236
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6498
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3719
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4984 - and who
On 4/4/13 3:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:10:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-04-04 20:03, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Do you know Java? I know C++
And C# and Java.
I think you guys are missing the joke.
Question: You know C++? (interpreted
04-Apr-2013 18:22, Jesse Phillips пишет:
Hello,
I have decided to take on Review Manager for std.process and hopefully
will keep it up and get through the review queue. This is slightly
ignoring a first come, first serve approach, but that is mostly
because I didn't want to look into it. (So
On 3/18/2013 7:41 PM, deadalnix wrote:
I guess black to mix nicely with the black sky of the picture on it.
Definitely black.
On 4/2/13 4:59 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/2/13 6:04 AM, bearophile wrote:
Jonas Drewsen:
Article about the expressiveness of languages with D included as one
of the contestants.
http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2013/03/25/programming-languages-ranked-by-expressiveness/
I think D is
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.comwrote:
I think you guys are missing the joke.
Question: You know C++? (interpreted as a programming question, what's
the result of C++)
Answer: is it D?
-Steve
No, I didn't miss the joke, but I was tyring to say
On Wednesday, 3 April 2013 at 23:11:30 UTC, gonzo2020 wrote:
http://www.loadingartist.com/2011/01/10/programming/
I did all interview for my current job in D. I like how that
comic can be understood in different ways, this is smart and
funny.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
I did all interview for my current job in D.
What company, and in what part of the world If I may ask?
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:28:11 -0400, Caligo iteronve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.comwrote:
I think you guys are missing the joke.
Question: You know C++? (interpreted as a programming question, what's
the result of C++)
Answer:
On 04/04/2013 12:16 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
core.exception.RangeError@deneme(125887): Range violation
I have realized something: Maybe some of the confusion here is due to
range violation being an Error.
I think that it should be an Exception. The rationale is, some function
is told to
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 14:13:55 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/04/2013 12:16 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
core.exception.RangeError@deneme(125887): Range violation
I have realized something: Maybe some of the confusion here is due to
range violation being an Error.
I think that it should be an
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 21:25:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 14:13:55 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/04/2013 12:16 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
core.exception.RangeError@deneme(125887): Range violation
I have realized something: Maybe some of the confusion here is
due
escapeShellCommand, escapeWindowsArgument, escapeShellFileName -
in which way differ and why it's not one function? Why
escapeWindowsArgument exists without posix counterpart?
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 21:59:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
escapeShellCommand, escapeWindowsArgument, escapeShellFileName
- in which way differ and why it's not one function?
Because they do different things. The escaping rules are
different.
See the example on escapeShellCommand for how to
Recently I studied the performance of building a vibe.d example:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/208
I wrote a few tools in the process, perhaps someone might find
them useful as well.
However, I'd also like to discuss a related matter:
I noticed that compiling D programs
On 02/04/2013 19:32, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 10:44:05 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
the compare feature in Notepad++
Would *love* scintilla-based compare tool. Where's the feature? Can't find it.
It's a plugin - I think whether it comes pre-installed depends on which
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 19:24:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I think you guys are missing the joke.
Question: You know C++? (interpreted as a programming
question, what's the result of C++)
Answer: is it D?
-Steve
Yeah, I did miss that.
On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 20:18:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/1/13 3:53 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Life has gotten a lot easier for me trying to manage multiple
branches
of D since I've been using file compare/merge tools.
I use winmerge for Windows, and meld for Linux. They are both
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 07:52:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
After some thinking on topic I come to conclusion that rvalue
refs _should_ be scope ref and stuff like ref int f(@temp
ref int x) { return x; } is invalid. I can see no valid use
case for such an error-prone case.
Perhaps they
Vladimir Panteleev:
D code already compiles pretty quickly, but here's an
opportunity to nearly halve that time (for some cases) - by
moving some of rdmd's basic functionality into the compiler.
Make the D compiler search for its modules was one of the first
(unwritten) enhancement
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 00:39:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
D code already compiles pretty quickly, but here's an
opportunity to nearly halve that time (for some cases) - by
moving some of rdmd's basic functionality into the compiler.
Make the D compiler search for its
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 00:39:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
D code already compiles pretty quickly, but here's an
opportunity to nearly halve that time (for some cases) - by
moving some of rdmd's basic functionality into the compiler.
Make the D compiler search for its
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:49:08 +0200
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
Recently I studied the performance of building a vibe.d example:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/issues/208
I wrote a few tools in the process, perhaps someone might find
them useful as
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:25:52 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
I can tell some reasonable points about 'scope ref'.
- 'in ref' has been allowed from 2.060 (
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8105)
- 'scope ref' is still disallowed. (Error: scope cannot be ref
or out)
- 'scope' means
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 23:50:25 deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 21:25:18 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There are obviously exceptions to that (e.g. the in operator),
but as far as
indexing, slicing, and popFront go, it should be considered a
programming bug
if they're
On Thursday, April 04, 2013 21:39:35 Kagamin wrote:
BTW don't we already have a hungry application *with* unsigned
integers?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4236
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6498
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3719
Andrei Alexandrescu:
The suggestions included (such as enumerate()) are also very
worth
looking into.
I think the enumerate() was discussed mostly elsewhere.
Pinging bearophile on this again - do you want to adapt this
into a blog entry? It may be worth posting the link to reddit
as is,
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 01:55:06 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Pinging bearophile on this again - do you want to adapt this
into a blog entry? It may be worth posting the link to reddit
as is, but one adaptation pass for a larger audience shouldn't
hurt.
Let us know!
Thank you, I'd like to say I agree with you on this error should
not run cleanup and your definition for when we don't want to run
cleanup code is spot on. I'm also not looking to change the
language spec. I'm still struggling with convincing myself that
this thrown error more likely indicates
On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 01:26:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
But I would point out that the bugs that you listed are not at
really related
to this discussion. They're about dmd running out of memory
when compiling,
and it's running out of memory not because it needs 64-bit to
have enough
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 17:04:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:50:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
Source:
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 23:55:19 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 at 17:33:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/2/2013 2:53 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I also have a strong feeling that LOC per commit reflects too
many different
factors to be really reliable as a
The following is a message posted by Johannes Pfau to the other
(pre-)review thread which didn't seem to get noticed, along with
an edited version of my reply.
On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 13:14:52 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Reposted from github:
I think it would be nice if the high level
Sorry but if this is the intent then dmd's help message should make this clear:
-o- do not write object file
= -o- do not write object file nor executable
Intended. No object files = no way to link the executable.
I was thinking in that case the object files were created in a temp
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 01:06:45 UTC, Steve Kucera wrote:
Hi,
I am using DMD 2.062 on Windows 7 64-bit.
I am writing performance critical functions that need switch
statements to use an indirect jump table... current I'm
analysing the assembly dump, and the code is compiled to nested
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 09:51:15 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 01:06:45 UTC, Steve Kucera wrote:
Hi,
I am using DMD 2.062 on Windows 7 64-bit.
I am writing performance critical functions that need switch
statements to use an indirect jump table... current I'm
On 04/04/2013 05:50 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Actually, it looks like pyd is working just fine with gdc built from master
That's what I wondered -- I was guessing that it's frontend version that
matters, not backend.
so have some randomly diced NetworkX Quick Example:
Really nice of you to
on win7 64 bits using dmd 2.062 32 bits this code http://dpaste.dzfl.pl
/6cca43b5 failed with assert failure:
core.exception.AssertError@std.range(5288): Assertion failure
but on ubuntu 12.04 64 bits, dmd 2.062 64 bit it compiles and works
rather well. May be I missed something important with
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
