On 2013-08-13 02:42, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Is is possible from a licensing standpoint to just distribute a copy of
gmake built by gnuwin?
I don't see why we couldn't do that. It's a completely separate tool and
shouldn't "infect" anything else. We might need to accompany it with a
licen
On 8/12/2013 10:41 PM, luminousone wrote:
The original license of Xlib I am pretty sure is the x11 license, any idea who
the maintainer of the libx11 deimos project is,
The contributors to each commit are listed on github - you should be able to
contact them.
The Deimos project files should
2013/8/13 monarch_dodra
> Related: I have encountered this problem, and I can't seem to work around
> it; *other* than non-parameterized templates. Basically, I have this pred
> function, we'll call it "foo". This pred function can itself be
> parameterized to take its own (optional) pred. This b
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:08:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which
I guess has a checkoutable (Subversi
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 05:03:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 05:53:50 luminousone wrote:
I finely got around to checking the libx11 deimos project for
updates, i haven't updated in ages, and the github has a LGPL
license file included with it, is this intention
On Monday, August 12, 2013 21:56:09 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:12:21 +0200
>
> "Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 01:09:41 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > > ex, really long output, or a unix vm without X,
> >
> > Tip: try hitting shift + page up and shi
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 05:53:50 luminousone wrote:
> I finely got around to checking the libx11 deimos project for
> updates, i haven't updated in ages, and the github has a LGPL
> license file included with it, is this intentional?, The opengl
> deimos library does not contain this, are all o
I finely got around to checking the libx11 deimos project for
updates, i haven't updated in ages, and the github has a LGPL
license file included with it, is this intentional?, The opengl
deimos library does not contain this, are all of the deimos
projects LGPL, or is their some sort of error i
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:28:41 UTC, michaelc37 wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:47:02 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2.
However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending to co
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 01:56:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Whoa, even in text-mode?
yep. You should try using text mode only for a while - it is
amazingly usable.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:00:10 +0200
"deadalnix" wrote:
> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 18:57:12 UTC, Chris wrote:
> > On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 17:23:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> >> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >>> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:12:21 +0200
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 01:09:41 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > ex, really long output, or a unix vm without X,
>
> Tip: try hitting shift + page up and shift + page down. Works in
> xterm and the text mode linux console to scro
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:42:26 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> Is is possible from a licensing standpoint to just distribute a copy
> of gmake built by gnuwin?
>
I don't even pretend to understand one word of any version of the GPL,
so I couldn't say. However, if it were my own project, what
Woops disregard that, I thought Jonathan was talking about a new
build system, not just for DMD.
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 01:27:28 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote:
Sorry if I missed the point, but wouldn't yet another build
system be rewriting the wheel in D?
CMake allows to do alot more than co
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:34:53 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
You're correct. I forgot to do a push last night. Unfortunately
I won't be able to get this fixed for another 5 hours or so.
It's checked in now.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:44:35 -0700
Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 5:19 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >> 5. Do we really want D to be restricted to only platforms that have
> >> the latest Python up on them?
> >
> > I think that's a bit of hyperbole. It's the same as saying "do we
> > want D to be
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:44:35PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 5:19 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >>5. Do we really want D to be restricted to only platforms that have
> >>the latest Python up on them?
> >
> >I think that's a bit of hyperbole. It's the same as saying "do we
> >want D to be
Sorry if I missed the point, but wouldn't yet another build
system be rewriting the wheel in D?
CMake allows to do alot more than compiling, all in a cross
platform way and is very fast when coupled with Ninja instead of
Make.
Even though D is nicer than the CMake language wouldn't it take
On 08/12/2013 09:44 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> You really should post that somewhere as a "blog" article.
Probably will write something up on academic publishing in the near future --
bug me if I don't follow up on that ... :-)
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 at 01:09:41 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
ex, really long output, or a unix vm without X,
Tip: try hitting shift + page up and shift + page down. Works in
xterm and the text mode linux console to scroll the terminal.
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:03:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
D has introduced a pretty cool tool: templates. These are
basically namespaces that can be instantiated by a type/alias.
Mixing with them the notion of "eponymous" allows to do some
seriously cool things with them.
One of the thi
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:37:51 -0700
Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 4:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Perhaps surprisingly though, I don't actually use ls on windows -
> > but that's only because the win version doesn't give much (any?)
> > visual distinction of directories vs files. Instead
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 18:57:12 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 17:23:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
wher
On 8/12/2013 5:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
From these two paragraphs above it seems that distributing a statically-linked
version of gmake instead of the current make would be a possible solution. It is
bigger but that shouldn't matter.
Then we get to build on all supported OSs with posix
On 8/12/2013 5:19 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
5. Do we really want D to be restricted to only platforms that have
the latest Python up on them?
I think that's a bit of hyperbole. It's the same as saying "do we want D
to be restricted to only platforms that have g++/make installed?"
No, I don't thin
On 8/12/13 4:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:06:37 -0700
Sean Kelly wrote:
On Aug 10, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Things can be wonky from a vanilla windows command prompt, which is
why I never use any Linux tools there. MSYS makes all those
problems go away.
On 8/12/13 4:18 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
3. Make doesn't come preinstalled on Windows. But we have a make we can
throw in the bin directory without issues. It's only 50K. Nobody goes
out of their way - it's there on the same path as dmd. It's always the
right version of make to use with our makef
On 8/12/2013 4:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Perhaps surprisingly though, I don't actually use ls on windows - but
that's only because the win version doesn't give much (any?)
visual distinction of directories vs files. Instead, I stuck an
"ls.bat" in my windows directory that invokes "dir /w %*"
On Monday, August 12, 2013 15:48:54 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Which is why I proposed writing the build system in D. Ideally, build
> scripts would themselves be D programs... dogfooding ftw. :)
I would not want to make any attempt to make dmd, druntime, and Phobos build
with a "standard D build tool"
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 12:53:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 12:07:26 UTC, eles wrote:
,,,
You seem to miss the key point - burden of proof is one someone
who does not spend efforts. Idea costs nothing. Proposals costs
nothing. If JS would have come with done pull r
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 3:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >Objectively speaking, though, this is no different from being
> >required to install make in order to compile dmd. You still have to
> >go out of the way to install a 3rd party program before
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:06:37 -0700
Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
>
> > Things can be wonky from a vanilla windows command prompt, which is
> > why I never use any Linux tools there. MSYS makes all those
> > problems go away. I use git exclusively on window
On 8/12/2013 3:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Objectively speaking, though, this is no different from being required
to install make in order to compile dmd. You still have to go out of the
way to install a 3rd party program before you can build dmd. The only
difference is that make tends to be preinst
On 08/12/2013 10:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'd agree a lot more with what follows if it weren't for workshops, symposia,
> and journals, which together complete quite a large spectrum of publication
> and
> debate venues, all with different tradeoffs.
I agree that there are other avenue
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/12/2013 11:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >I'm hanging a general comment here for a lack of a better place.
> >
> >We're far from being enamored to make and we have no vested interest
> >in keeping it. At the same time its p
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:18:26 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:53:44AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:01:27 -0700
> > "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> > >
> > > I personally prefer single-column with no more than about 40 ems
> > > in width or thereabouts. An
W dniu 12.08.2013 23:10, monarch_dodra pisze:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:06:16 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi D community!
What do you think of such templated aliases:
template SomeTemplate(T1, T2) { }
alias Partial(T) = SomeTemplate!(int, T);
alias Specialized = Partial!float; // equiva
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:44:12 UTC, Meta wrote:
That's a neat idea. I don't know much about the compiler, so
I'm not sure how easy to implement it would be, but something
tells me that it wouldn't be trivial.
Hmm, Dodra is right, I misunderstood.
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:06:16 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi D community!
What do you think of such templated aliases:
template SomeTemplate(T1, T2) { }
alias Partial(T) = SomeTemplate!(int, T);
alias Specialized = Partial!float; // equivalent to
SomeTemplate!(int, float)
I think th
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:58:32 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Do you mean like:
template Foo ()
{
int a;
}
Unfortunately this doesn't work:
Foo.a = 3;
But this does:
Foo!().a = 3;
class Foo
{
static int a;
}
template Foo()
{
int a = 0;
}
void main()
{
Foo.a = 0;
}
Wou
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:33:46 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I always feel so sad when awesome irony usage gets totally
unnoticed because is it just too awesome to be obvious.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:06:16 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hi D community!
What do you think of such templated aliases:
template SomeTemplate(T1, T2) { }
alias Partial(T) = SomeTemplate!(int, T);
alias Specialized = Partial!float; // equivalent to
SomeTemplate!(int, float)
I think th
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 20:13:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
*ahem* How is column width in PDF articles related to whether
or not D
is the answer to the One vs. Two Language High Performance
Computing
Dilemma? ;)
I always feel so sad when awesome irony usage gets totally
unnoticed becau
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:51:39 +0200
"Dicebot" wrote:
> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:28:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Yea. (And for vertical sh'mups!) That's also the reason 4:3
> > monitors
> > would have to be pryed from my cold dead hands. 16:9 is fine
> > for videos
> > and games, but
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:23:17 +0200
"Idan Arye" wrote:
> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
> >> unless it's a very specific thing like web development
> >> where PHP etc are handier.
> >
> > D rox for webdev
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:34:22 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
>
> But this is only the least of PHP's problems. I'm not going to repeat
> what people have said about PHP's flaws, but you can read all about it
> here:
>
> http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/
>
Ever s
Hi D community!
What do you think of such templated aliases:
template SomeTemplate(T1, T2) { }
alias Partial(T) = SomeTemplate!(int, T);
alias Specialized = Partial!float; // equivalent to SomeTemplate!(int,
float)
I think they could be pretty helpful and they should be relatively easy
to
On 8/12/13 4:45 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 08/12/2013 05:57 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/11/13 4:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 23:37:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's an odd thing to say seeing as a lot of CS academic research is
t
On 2013-08-12 21:03, monarch_dodra wrote:
D has introduced a pretty cool tool: templates. These are basically
namespaces that can be instantiated by a type/alias. Mixing with them
the notion of "eponymous" allows to do some seriously cool things with
them.
One of the things I find strange though
On 2013-08-12 15:27, Dicebot wrote:
Jacob, it is probably worth creating a pull request with latest rebased
version of your proposal to simplify getting a quick overview of
changes.
I don't think a pull request should be made before a module has gone
through the review queue and is approved.
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:34:53 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:16:34 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Since the `EnumBody` class is defined in Dscanner, I'm gonna
take a wild guess and say you need to do some pushing to
Dscanner.
You're correct. I forgot to do a push last
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:45:02 +0200
Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 05:57 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 8/11/13 4:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 23:37:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> >> wrote:
> >>> That's an odd thing to say seeing as
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Chris wrote:
> On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 17:23:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> >On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >>On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
> >>>unless it's a very specific thing like web developm
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:16:34 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Since the `EnumBody` class is defined in Dscanner, I'm gonna
take a wild guess and say you need to do some pushing to
Dscanner.
You're correct. I forgot to do a push last night. Unfortunately I
won't be able to get this fixed for ano
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 19:08:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which
I guess has a checkoutable (Subversi
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:47:02 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2.
However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending to cope with ldc2 in a
user
defined place :-(
I haven't tried l
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
where PHP etc are handier.
D rox for webdev too :) Only downside is it isn't pre-installed
like php tends to be, but
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 06:41:10 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
I've been making some progress on a project called DCD[1],
which is D's answer to Go's Gocode[2]. It's a command-line
client/server autocompletion program for D built off the same
lexer/parser/ast code that powers DScanner.
I'd lik
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 15:28:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
repository)
clearly points to http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd – which I
guess has a checkoutable (Subversion) repository.
It's a Mercurial repository. QtD moved to BitBuck
D has introduced a pretty cool tool: templates. These are
basically namespaces that can be instantiated by a type/alias.
Mixing with them the notion of "eponymous" allows to do some
seriously cool things with them.
One of the things I find strange though is that they *must* be
parameterized.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:43 AM, "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:08:18AM -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On the subject of friction, I believe we make a mistake by making a
>>> dependency on libcurl, a library over which we
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 17:23:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
where PHP etc are handier.
D rox for webdev too :) Only dow
On Aug 9, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov wrote:
>
> With std.concurrency we could have a number of asynchronously operating
> routines doing job "linearly", for instance, reading from socket and sending
> received data to consumer thread. that ok. but what if socket or generally
> hand
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:08:18AM -0700, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> > On the subject of friction, I believe we make a mistake by making a
> > dependency on libcurl, a library over which we don't have control.
>
> Absolutely. As much as I like libc
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> On 8/12/13 11:08 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On the subject of friction, I believe we make a mistake by making a
>>> dependency on libcurl, a library over which we don't have con
On 8/12/13 11:08 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
On the subject of friction, I believe we make a mistake by making a
dependency on libcurl, a library over which we don't have control.
Absolutely. As much as I like libcurl, I was kind of surprised when
On 8/12/2013 11:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm hanging a general comment here for a lack of a better place.
We're far from being enamored to make and we have no vested interest in keeping
it. At the same time its place in the dmd foodchain is relatively modest (i.e.
it's not a big hindran
On 8/12/13 11:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
SCons is not perfect, it has many problem. The biggest of which is no
resource for development.
I'm hanging a general comment here for a lack of a better place.
We're far from being enamored to make and we have no vested interest in
keeping it. At the
On Aug 11, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Sunday, August 11, 2013 14:43:13 Walter Bright wrote:
>> That said, as soon as the D *package* starts to depend on
>> non-default-installed libraries, trouble happens. With libcurl, the only
>> solution so far seems to be to BUILD OUR OWN
On Aug 11, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Oh, I forgot to mention, licensing.
>
> We want Phobos to be free of any restrictive licensing. GPL is restrictive,
> and so is LGPL.
Yep. And while LGPL is theoretically fine in most situations, a lot of legal
teams still run screaming fro
On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On the subject of friction, I believe we make a mistake by making a
> dependency on libcurl, a library over which we don't have control.
Absolutely. As much as I like libcurl, I was kind of surprised when it was
bundled with DMD.
On Aug 10, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
> Things can be wonky from a vanilla windows command prompt, which is why I
> never use any Linux tools there. MSYS makes all those problems go away. I use
> git exclusively on windows, but via gitbash, which is built on top of MSYS.
>
> Of cour
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 19:48 +0200, Wyatt wrote:
[…]
> I don't care as long as you're willing to maintain whatever you
> choose. But SCons? Granted it's been a few years since I
> deigned to look at it, but it's historically caused a lot of
> packaging headaches.
And Make hasn't ;-)
[…]
> Do
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:29:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What do you say? Let's throw together an SConstruct for DMD,
druntime,and phobos, and submit a pull for it?
I don't care as long as you're willing to maintain whatever you
choose. But SCons? Granted it's been a few years since I
d
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 17:03:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It's not my fault, it's the mailman/NNTP interface that's
causing
problems. I use the mailing list interface.
Btw was anyone planning to fix this on server side? I dream of
the day when bunch of mail-based responses won't render web
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
where PHP etc are handier.
D rox for webdev too :) Only downside is it isn't pre-installed
like php tends to be, but
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:58:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
where PHP etc are handier.
D rox for webdev too :) Only downside is it isn't pre-installed
like php tends to be, but
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:49:08PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
> H. S. Teoh:
>
> Just a note, you are somehow breaking most threads you answer to.
[...]
It's not my fault, it's the mailman/NNTP interface that's causing
problems. I use the mailing list interface.
T
--
What do you call optometrist
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:45:52 UTC, Chris wrote:
unless it's a very specific thing like web development
where PHP etc are handier.
D rox for webdev too :) Only downside is it isn't pre-installed
like php tends to be, but it still rox.
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 16:28:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea. (And for vertical sh'mups!) That's also the reason 4:3
monitors
would have to be pryed from my cold dead hands. 16:9 is fine
for videos
and games, but my computer isn't a glorified TV
...
It has bugged me too in laptop scr
H. S. Teoh:
Just a note, you are somehow breaking most threads you answer to.
Bye,
bearophile
The authors of that article sum it up quite well. I used D for
the same reasons and I don't see why I should use any other
language for new projects, unless it's a very specific thing like
web development where PHP etc are handier. For years I had been
dreaming of something like D.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:50:19 +0200
"Wyatt" wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 17:20:37 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > rare few who have a monitor that swivels vertically or some
>
> Once you go vertical, you never go back!
>
> No, really, considering how much nicer it is for _every kind of
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 15:41 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 09:26:11AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 14:27 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > > […]
> > > > is discovering and dealing with
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:53:44AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 20:01:27 -0700
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> >
> > I personally prefer single-column with no more than about 40 ems in
> > width or thereabouts. Anything more than that, and it becomes
> > uncomfortable to read.
> >
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
I have cloned you qtd-experimental to try a build with ldc2. However it
seems cmake/FindD.cmake needs amending to cope with ldc2 in a user
defined place :-(
--
Russel.
===
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:59 +0200, michaelc37 wrote:
> for anyone still interested.
>
> after some itch scratching i finally got this to compile with dmd
> 2.063.2 on ubuntu 64bit -
> https://bitbucket.org/michaelc37/qtd-experimental
Hummm…
https://code.google.com/p/qtd/ (which has a Subversion
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 11:45:31 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 08/12/2013 05:57 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/11/13 4:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 23:37:28 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
First, it means people write to the submission de
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 15:49:25 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 15:42:24 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:22:34 -0700
Walter Bright wrote:
http://elrond.informatik.tu-freiberg.de/papers/WorldComp2012/PDP3426.pdf
Holy crap those two-column PDFs
Mike,
Thanks for picking up on this and helping out. Much appreciated.
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 15:26 +0200, Mike Wey wrote:
[…]
> Unfortunately that doesn't make it obvious. Could you check the exact
> name of the ModuleInfo in the library?
>
> nm --defined-only libgtkd-2.a | grep ModuleInfo | gr
On 08/12/2013 09:12 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of focus here on the printed page. People can do
> whatever the heck they want when they go print handouts and such.
> But that doesn't mean they have to, or should, shoehorn their
> electronic publications into a form that's poorly
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 at 15:42:24 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Holy crap those two-column PDFs are hard to read!
Hehe, "Introduction to the DWARF debugging format" by Michael
Eager is a 3-column pdf: down, up, down, up, down, left, right,
A, B, Instant Kill.
Stepping up to act as a Review Manager for Jacob Carlborg
std.serialization
Input
Code: https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/phobos/tree/serialization
Documentation:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18386187/docs/std.serialization/index.html
Previous review thread:
http://forum.d
On 08/08/2013 18:30, H. S. Teoh wrote:
After the latest Phobos update, I can't run the Phobos unittests
anymore; std.algorithm runs out of memory.
It seems ok here (on Windows, building with the new snn.lib), but it's
taking measurably longer to compile the algorithm unit tests than it was
l
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 12:07:26 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 18:28:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 05:29:05 JS wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
Um, not re
On Monday, 12 August 2013 at 12:07:26 UTC, eles wrote:
,,,
You seem to miss the key point - burden of proof is one someone
who does not spend efforts. Idea costs nothing. Proposals costs
nothing. If JS would have come with done pull request for this -
it would have been my job to provide co
On Wednesday, 31 July 2013 at 10:20:57 UTC, Chris wrote:
This is only losely related to D, but I don't fully understand
the separation of component programming and OOP
What the wikipedia entry is saying, in a roundabout way is:
All objects are components, but not all components are objects.
w
On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 18:28:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 05:29:05 JS wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
Um, not really..
[snip]
Actually, that is how it works. If you w
On 2013-08-11 06:30, JS wrote:
Can we get the version of implementation/addition of a feature in the
docs. e.g., if X feature/method/library is added into dmd version v,
then the docs should display that feature.
For example, when I go to http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html I see
tsize. When I t
On 8/12/13, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> It does work, at least when I added it:
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ks1brj$1l6c$1...@digitalmars.com
Hmm that does work! Looks like I must have hit some kind of bug
somewhere, but I lost the sample code that failed. I'll report it if I
run into it again.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
