Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:59:42 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com:
On 15 July 2014 00:32, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:15:01 +1000
schrieb Manu via
On 15.07.2014 04:06, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 15 July 2014 07:37, Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 14.07.2014 16:17, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I've
On 15.07.2014 04:02, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 15 July 2014 04:27, Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 14.07.2014 08:22, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 15.07.2014 04:35, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 15 July 2014 04:27, Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 14.07.2014 08:22, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 11.07.2014 20:15, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 11 July 2014 16:48, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Upvote!!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2afm4x/dconf_2014_day_2_talk_6_debugging_in_d_by_iain/
Am Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:17:26 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aoqov/dconf_2014_day_2_talk_7_tiny_ubiquitous_machines/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/884725944874421
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 05:40:29 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Yes, performance is not a goal, because we are intentionally
not targeting scenarios where that is the first concern. I
understand that a lot of people want Aurora to be a
high-performance graphics API with a focus on games, but that
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aruaf/dconf_2014_keynote_high_performance_code_using_d/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/885322668148082
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/489081312297635840
Andrei
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:20:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aruaf/dconf_2014_keynote_high_performance_code_using_d/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/885322668148082
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/489081312297635840
The talk was nice, and it's the chance I was waiting to ask a
question to the speaker.
I've read a very nice paper (+ slides) about using some
specialized but simple type system rules to make less bug-prone
the bit-twiddling kind of code, Bit-Level Types for High-Level
Reasoning by Ranjit
So are those things a good addition to Phobos for your kind of
programming? (additions to the language can be discussed later).
You can look at the slides for a quicker overview, or you can ask
me here for a summary, if necessary.
Bye,
bearophile
On 7/15/2014 11:28 AM, John wrote:
At the end of this video, it sounds like it ends abruptly..
While answering a question, Walter says.. 'it turns out..' and the video ends
there.
That's when my time ran out and I vanished in a puff of greasy black smoke.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:28:34 +, John wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:20:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aruaf/
dconf_2014_keynote_high_performance_code_using_d/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/885322668148082
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:20:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2aruaf/dconf_2014_keynote_high_performance_code_using_d/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/885322668148082
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/489081312297635840
Will
On 7/15/2014 12:36 PM, Justin Whear wrote:
The sentence was it turns out the simple compiler enhancement I am about
to reveal makes all code run 5x faster.
That does it. You're on the hook for writing my next material!
The v2.066.0-b4 binaries are now available. The review period for beta 4
will run until 0700 UTC ( PDT, 0300 EDT, 1600 JST) on 21 July 2014,
at which time binaries for B5 will be produced and released. Due
diligence in identifying regressions as early as possible is requested
and
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 22:40:02 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Outstanding regressions impeding release are:
It would be nice if back-end issues got some attention prior to
releases.
For example:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9465
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435
bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your
report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result
will be the same.
i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in
compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation
to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:12:01 -0700, Kapps opantm2+s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 05:40:29 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Yes, performance is not a goal, because we are intentionally not
targeting scenarios where that is the first concern. I understand that
a lot of people want
On 14/07/14 18:16, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Mine is here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Quickfur/DIP_scope
From the DIP:
The 'scope' keyword has been around for years, yet it is barely
implemented and it's unclear just what it's supposed to mean
I don't know if it's worth
On 07/15/2014 08:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 14/07/14 18:16, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Mine is here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Quickfur/DIP_scope
From the DIP:
The 'scope' keyword has been around for years, yet it is barely
implemented and it's unclear just what
On 15/07/14 01:48, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes, but since the extent of this scope is unknown from inside the
function body, it doesn't easily lend itself nicely to check things like
this:
int* ptr;
void func(scope int* arg) {
ptr = arg; // should
On 14/07/14 23:26, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Ah I see now. It looks like AST macros are going to open up alot of new
paradigms, I'm excited to see how they progress and what they can do.
It doesn't get us all the way there in this example but its a very good
alternative without having to add
On 15/07/14 04:21, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Not being usable in an IDE is a pretty big cost IMO. (Even though I
myself don't even use IDE's!) Maybe you might stand a chance of
convincing Walter to do it. Probably after the upcoming release, since
right now the focus is to get that
On 15/07/14 01:14, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
Hello !
I'm starting to look at the d compiler sources and I'm using netbeans to
navigate through the sources, netbeans is very good at showing
warnings/errors with it's own internal parser, but because all the c++
source files use .c as file
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 23:22:54 UTC, John Carter wrote:
I have been digesting every dconf2014 video posted so far.
See the 2013 ones too:
http://dconf.org/2013/schedule/index.html
+1 for not having the conditional log
Not so sure about that. -- Andrei
I agree that the conditional could be useful. But I think that
the current API definition where we already have some strange
letter combinations ('l', 'c', 'f') is an one-way street, that
throws away some good
Ary Borenszweig wrote in message news:lq199i$1312$1...@digitalmars.com...
I can't seem to learn anything about this language without paying first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forth_(programming_language)
It allows you to edit syntax as you go!
1 2 3 + + . (prints 6)
: 1 2 ;
: 2 3 ;
1 2 3
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 07:31:39 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
+1 for not having the conditional log
Not so sure about that. -- Andrei
I agree that the conditional could be useful. But I think that
the current API definition where we already have some strange
letter combinations ('l', 'c',
Spot the bug:
template flattenedType(R, uint depth = uint.max)
if (isInputRange!R)
{
static if (depth 0)
{
static if (!isInputRange!(typeof(R.init.front)))
{
alias flattenedType = typeof(R.init.front, depth - 1);
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 23:14:52 UTC, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
wrote:
Hello !
I'm starting to look at the d compiler sources and I'm using
netbeans to navigate through the sources, netbeans is very good
at showing warnings/errors with it's own internal parser, but
because all the c++ source
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
I'll give you a hint: the bug causes flattenedType!R to always
returned uint.
What is unexpected about that ?
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:20:34 UTC, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
I'll give you a hint: the bug causes flattenedType!R to always
returned uint.
What is unexpected about that ?
It makes the behaviour of the template that's unexpected.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 02:16:37 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 23:14:52 UTC, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
wrote:
It's fine that D is innovating in the programming language
field but not all conventions are bad ones.
Cheers !
Legacy, pretty sure the early C++ days used
Meta:
Spot the bug:
We can start killing those commas in D 2.067 :-)
Bye,
bearophile
To illustrate point on D complexity:
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*_gRpHqzB-1zbG17jdxGPaQ.png
It appears that it mission is to be Java, vs a system lang.
hth
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 03:55:02 UTC, Vic wrote:
snip
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 03:22:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 20:45:29 UTC, Jeremy Powers via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The logging API in the standard library needs to be able to
support this
kind of thing. Doesn't mean it actually needs to be included
in the
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 09:24:14 UTC, Vic wrote:
To illustrate point on D complexity:
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*_gRpHqzB-1zbG17jdxGPaQ.png
It appears that it mission is to be Java, vs a system lang.
hth
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 03:55:02 UTC, Vic wrote:
snip
On 15/07/14 08:46, simendsjo wrote:
Isn't both 1 and 2 deprecated?
Depends on what you mean by deprecated. People are keep saying that
but it's not. Nothing, except for people saying that, indicates that. No
deprecation message, no warning, nothing about it in the documentation.
Even
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 00:41:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute to
one.
This is my question, what do you expect people
What does 'errorlcf' mean?
You specify log level 'error' and then you specify another log
level ('l):
which log level wins?
The order of these modifier letters has to be 'lcf', not 'cfl',
...?
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:12 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
I wouldn't call them
On 7/15/2014 7:17 PM, Joakim wrote:
I've offered to administer it. That means either just technically
setting the app up and maintaining it or managing and generating posts,
or both, whatever's necessary.
The question is whether others think we need an official blog, and if
so, would they
On 07/07/2014 11:35 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 03/07/2014 8:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/3/2014 4:40 AM, Alix Pexton wrote:
I agree!
I started working on this little document last night while angry and
tired,
maybe it should find its way to the wiki.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 10:17:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 00:41:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute
I've been researching what is necessary to transfer the copyright of the
D logo to Digital Mars, which is complicated by international issues.
It seems that the term copyright is often aliased to the German
Deutsches Urheberrecht which is what we call the moral rights of the
author in the UK.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 10:33:24 UTC, linkrope wrote:
What does 'errorlcf' mean?
You specify log level 'error' and then you specify another log
level ('l):
which log level wins?
The order of these modifier letters has to be 'lcf', not 'cfl',
...?
good point one l to much its errorcf
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 06:42:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
1. Allocate classes on the stack: scope bar = new Bar()
4. Scope parameters. This is the part that is unclear what is
means/is supposed to mean in the current language
These are actually the same thing: if something is stack
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 23:22:54 UTC, John Carter wrote:
So pointers to sound reasoned analysis of the problems of
C/C++/Java are welcome too.
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/
I don't know if FQA is really in the spirit of sound reasoned
analysis, but it's certainly thorough!
-Wyatt
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 15:30:59 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Any news on this?
I haven't messed around with it since the winter and probably
won't be able to for a while. (The current setup works well
enough for me anyway...)
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 09:24:14 UTC, Vic wrote:
To illustrate point on D complexity:
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*_gRpHqzB-1zbG17jdxGPaQ.png
It appears that it mission is to be Java, vs a system lang.
hth
Maybe I misunderstand the term, but it seems to me that a
Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com writes:
On 7/13/14, 7:39 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 13 July 2014 at 01:49:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
So I have some questions: What is the magic number that will
trigger the release? What happens if we never reach that number?
Do we just continue
On 15/07/14 14:47, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
These are actually the same thing: if something is stack allocated, it
must not allow the reference to escape to remain memory safe... and if
the reference is not allowed to escape, stack allocating the object
becomes an obvious automatic optimization.
On 7/14/2014 10:09 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Google aren't really in the high-end gamedev business. I'm sure I could
make Angry Birds run without dropping frames with a GC that took no more
than 6ms... a real game, not so simple.
Just nitpicking on terminology here, but a lot of the
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:19:34AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 15/07/14 01:48, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes, but since the extent of this scope is unknown from inside the
function body, it doesn't easily lend itself nicely to check things
like this:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:42:17AM +, bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Meta:
Spot the bug:
We can start killing those commas in D 2.067 :-)
[...]
Is that the agreed-on schedule? I'd love to see the comma operator go,
too, but I don't recall the core devs agreeing on a deprecation
On 7/15/2014 5:24 AM, Vic wrote:
To illustrate point on D complexity:
https://d262ilb51hltx0.cloudfront.net/max/800/1*_gRpHqzB-1zbG17jdxGPaQ.png
It appears that it mission is to be Java, vs a system lang.
hth
I'll take that remote over a highly-modal one, or worse, a highly-modal
one that I
On 2014-07-15 16:58, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
But what if 'ptr' is declared in a private binary-only module, and only
the signature of 'func' is known? Then what should 'scope' mean to the
compiler when 'func' is being called from another module?
Hmm, I didn't think of that :(
--
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
Spot the bug:
template flattenedType(R, uint depth = uint.max)
if (isInputRange!R)
{
static if (depth 0)
{
static if (!isInputRange!(typeof(R.init.front)))
{
alias
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:01:37 UTC, Frustrated wrote:
This isn't a bug! It's a logic mistake.
Why the heck would you have such a line anyways?
alias flattenedType = typeof(R.init.front, depth - 1);
The 2nd argument to typeof makes no sense. It shouldn't be on
that line at all. Total
On 7/15/14, Frustrated via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
The 2nd argument to typeof makes no sense. It shouldn't be on
that line at all. Total fail by the programmer.
Well yeah, real world programmers make mistakes.
On 16 July 2014 00:45, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 7/14/2014 10:09 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'm particularly worried about libraries. I can do whatever I have to with
memory that I control.
You can't approach a modern ambitious project
You may have seen Mike's talk about D on embedded systems and were
surprised about Iain's comment that using 'shared' as a replacement for
'volatile' is actually only possible because of a bug in gdc.
DIP62 describes how to solve this problem and make embedded programming
a first-class citizen in
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:16:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/15/14, Frustrated via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
The 2nd argument to typeof makes no sense. It shouldn't be on
that line at all.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
Spot the bug:
template flattenedType(R, uint depth = uint.max)
if (isInputRange!R)
{
static if (depth 0)
{
static if (!isInputRange!(typeof(R.init.front)))
{
alias
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:45:02 UTC, Jane Doe wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 16:16:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/15/14, Frustrated via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 08:01:40 UTC, Meta wrote:
The 2nd argument to
Jane Doe:
So, you wanna nerf everything that could produce the wrong
behavior?
A smarter question is: How to reduce the number of bugs in D code
decreasing the language functionality only very little, and
keeping the language handy (or making it even more handy)?
There is nothing in this
Funny how when people send big smiles, they always mention D?
:-D
:D
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp:
On 07/15/14 18:25, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d wrote:
here again: We need _first-class_ support for embedded programming in
D. Workarounds might be available (peek/poke, inline asm) but it will
be obvious to most C programmers that C has got the better solution
with the volatile
The reason for getting rid of it is because it's borderline
useless. It causes more accidental bugs than it enables
deliberate uses.
I find the comma op useful somemtimes. This example shows
absolutely nothing of comma wrongdoing. If anything, there could
be a warning for passing signed
On 7/15/14, Jane Doe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Should be reduce the speed limit to 5mph because cars
can kill people?
No but maybe we should reduce the number of different accounts a
single person can use to troll around these forums.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:52:34PM +, Israel Rodriguez via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
Nuh uh...The comma operator is too valuable to loose...
Please cite an example where it is valuable?
T
--
Without outlines, life would be pointless.
Artur Skawina:
You can already express
all the described volatile semantics in GDC's D dialect, in a
completely portable way and without using a single asm
instruction.
What's GDC syntax?
Bye,
bearophile
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:07:26 +
schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Artur Skawina:
You can already express
all the described volatile semantics in GDC's D dialect, in a
completely portable way and without using a single asm
instruction.
What's GDC syntax?
Bye,
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 14:19:49 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
However, I would say that it is not recommended. Very large
heaps aren't conducive to good GC performance (especially with
D's current GC). I now use a hybrid approach where the body of
my data is on the C heap - managed manually -
Martin Krejcirik:
I find the comma op useful somemtimes.
Please shows us all the cases you can think of (or coming from
your own code, or coming from the Web) where you think it's
useful.
This example shows absolutely nothing of comma wrongdoing.
See my precedent answer.
If
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:03:52 +0200
schrieb Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
Compiler barriers are not workarounds. volatile is not a better
solution. It's used in C only because it's defined and reasonably
portable; barriers are a language extension, hence dialect
On 15 July 2014 17:25, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
You may have seen Mike's talk about D on embedded systems and were
surprised about Iain's comment that using 'shared' as a replacement for
'volatile' is actually only possible because of a bug in gdc.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 05:03:21PM +, Martin Krejcirik via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
The reason for getting rid of it is because it's borderline useless.
It causes more accidental bugs than it enables deliberate uses.
I find the comma op useful somemtimes.
Example?
T
--
Don't drink and
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 13:54:51 UTC, Vic wrote:
Xeon CPU lets you use 128Gig, 386 gig, 512 gig, etc. It has
become cheap to do that.
Java can't hog gigs? Unbelievable.
On 07/15/14 19:07, bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Artur Skawina:
You can already express
all the described volatile semantics in GDC's D dialect, in a
completely portable way and without using a single asm instruction.
What's GDC syntax?
Some examples:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 14:09:22 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I don't think ARC would work in D. You'd need support for
controlling the
reference count in certain situations. You'd need type
signatures for
different reference types. You'd have to remove the GC.malloc
function, as
it
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:13:46 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 14:19:49 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
However, I would say that it is not recommended. Very large
heaps aren't conducive to good GC performance (especially with
D's current GC). I now use a hybrid approach where the
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:09:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:52:34PM +, Israel Rodriguez via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Nuh uh...The comma operator is too valuable to loose...
Please cite an example where it is valuable?
T
Yes please, I
Johannes Pfau wrote in message news:lq3nf4$rbp$1...@digitalmars.com...
Did you even read the section that explains why volatility is a property
of the memory address and not of the access (4.2.3)? What's your
response to that?
This is true, and it's the ideal I guess, but I'm not sure that
Will you then be able to get fully inlined low overhead ringbuffer logging
throughout the application and used frameworks? E.g. do low level logging
to a ringbuffer that is only saved/mailed upon fatal crashes. This is
useful for online services.
Yes, apart from the inlined part, I'm not
On 07/15/14 19:11, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:03:52 +0200
schrieb Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
Compiler barriers are not workarounds. volatile is not a better
solution. It's used in C only because it's defined and reasonably
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:13:09 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Why do shared variables have the privilege to prevent accessing
shared
memory in inappropriate ways but it's fine to place the burden
of
checking that all accesses to volatile memory are backed by
compiler
barriers to the user?
On 7/15/14, 9:56 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Funny how when people send big smiles, they always mention D?
:-D
:D
I seem to recall that at some point someone proposed a larger version of
:D as a logo for dlang. It even preserves the two moons :D
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:42:47 +
schrieb Kagamin s...@here.lot:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:13:09 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Why do shared variables have the privilege to prevent accessing
shared
memory in inappropriate ways but it's fine to place the burden
of
checking that all
Am 15.07.2014 19:15, schrieb Kagamin:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 13:54:51 UTC, Vic wrote:
Xeon CPU lets you use 128Gig, 386 gig, 512 gig, etc. It has become
cheap to do that.
Java can't hog gigs? Unbelievable.
Sure it can.
http://www.azulsystems.com/
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:50:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
And that's why I say first class support: We don't have
shared!(T) we
have shared T. And volatile should get it's own qualifier as
well.
Also some things will just not work with Volatile!T, for example
volatile/nonvolatile member
Example?
For loop with multiple variables and various one liners of
questionable utility aside:
import std.stdio;
bool funk()
{
static int count;
return ++count 1 ? true : false;
}
void main()
{
bool flag = false;
if (flag funk)
writeln(a);
else if
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:26:12 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Yes please, I legitimately can't think of any use case. I don't
understand why was this was ever introduced to D? What is the
use?
C compatibility as far as I know.
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:50:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Then we have a templated struct. Which generates TypeInfo for
every
instance. Which might generate an Initializer for every
instance and
it might generate extended debug info for every instance.
These are exactly the kind of
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 05:26:11PM +, Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 17:09:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:52:34PM +, Israel Rodriguez via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Nuh uh...The comma operator is too valuable to
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 18:08:15 UTC, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
Example?
For loop with multiple variables and various one liners of
questionable utility aside:
import std.stdio;
bool funk()
{
static int count;
return ++count 1 ? true : false;
}
void main()
{
bool flag =
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:47:15AM -0700, David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/15/14, 9:56 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Funny how when people send big smiles, they always mention D?
:-D
:D
I seem to recall that at some point someone proposed a larger version
of :D
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:44:51 +0200
schrieb Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
On 07/15/14 19:11, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:03:52 +0200
schrieb Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
Compiler barriers
On 07/15/2014 11:08 AM, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
Example?
For loop with multiple variables and various one liners of questionable
utility aside:
import std.stdio;
bool funk()
{
static int count;
return ++count 1 ? true : false;
}
void main()
{
bool flag = false;
if
On 7/15/2014 9:56 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Funny how when people send big smiles, they always mention D?
:-D
:D
Even more amazing, Germans all have D plastered on their cars!
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
