On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 05:31:05 UTC, Mitchell wrote:
I've seen a few posts similar to this but they were quite old
and probably have outdated information, so I'd like to ask
again - what is the situation with D on the major mobile
platforms?
Not really concerned with C#/Obj-C/Java intero
I've seen a few posts similar to this but they were quite old and
probably have outdated information, so I'd like to ask again -
what is the situation with D on the major mobile platforms?
Not really concerned with C#/Obj-C/Java interop, more just if you
can compile a hello world using Phobos
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:10:02 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the
implementation, and a more formal specification, as well as a
discussion of backwards com
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 01:22:47 UTC, cym13 wrote:
HINT 2: it took me about a month and a good tutorial on
templates (btw, thanks G.Willoughby) to start understanding the
full prototypes of standard functions. I really recommend
putting the constraint part in slight grey so that it is sti
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 01:22:47 UTC, cym13 wrote:
It is anecdotic but after reading everywhere about how fast is
compiling D, I was very surprised to see it taking 2s for a
regular "Hello World". I understand it better now but at the
time I was disapointed.
It would be interesting to k
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 01:52:57 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
And if you need a more concrete reason - a code formatter
should be able to act as a filter - put code in STDIN, get
formatted code from STDOUT.
There are probably some languages where this will work, such as
Lua, but this will never
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:15:35 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
First, a disclaimer: I am an idiot for starting this thread.
Moving on...
I'm working on a list of configuration options for dfmt - a
formatter for D source code.
So far I have the following:
* Insert spaces between if, while,
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 00:13:58 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/03/2015 8:08 a.m., Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/14/2015 8:32 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of
DDOC
comments for
symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce before e.g.
If stories are wanted, I might as well tell mine.
It is not a success story but as a newcommer to D I feel like
writing it down somewhere before forgetting my first impressions.
But first, a bit of background.
I'm a CS student and an autodidact before that. I grew up with
GNU/Linux and never
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:45:28 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 04:32:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
Using /+ +/ regularly.
Very useful to comment out large areas of code.
I like /
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 05:12:55PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 3/15/2015 4:06 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= "
> wrote:
> >This I agree with. Their usefulness is also greatly diminished by
> >them being strings, instead of byte (ubyte?) arrays. When would you
> >actually
On 3/15/2015 7:46 AM, Sativa wrote:
Um, This is wrong. You already have simple languages. People are not going to
choose D no matter how much you dumb it down. What sets D apart is it's advanced
features... remove them or stop such enhancements and it won't be able to
compete with any other langu
On Monday, 16 March 2015 at 00:11:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's the drip-drip-drip of a thousand features that adds up.
Anyhow, it obviously isn't going anywhere.
It mostly a problem when features are not orthogonals.
On 3/15/2015 4:02 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= " wrote:
Nope, that requires the commented-out part to be syntactically correct. My
primary use-case for /+ +/ is during development, when I quickly need to disable
specific parts of code. These frequently don't coincide with syntactic
boundar
On 16/03/2015 8:08 a.m., Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/14/2015 8:32 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC
comments for
symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce before e.g. committing that
everything has been explained.
Autogeneration of d
On 3/15/2015 4:06 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= " wrote:
This I agree with. Their usefulness is also greatly diminished by them being
strings, instead of byte (ubyte?) arrays. When would you actually want to write
a string (= text) using hex notation?
1. test data
2. strings that aren't in
On 3/15/2015 1:09 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 07:44:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
"const ref" can tell the optimizer that that path for a ref counted object
cannot alter its ref count.
That is not clear why. const ref is supposed to protect against escaping when
ref does no
On 3/15/2015 4:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's what nice about library artifacts vs. language artifacts: you can add
more of the former! Define hexBytes and hexString. -- Andrei
Yup. Should resist the urge to "fix" hexString, just make it a dropin
replacement.
On 3/15/15 2:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/15/2015 1:38 PM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= "
wrote:
Can we make it so it returns a ubyte[]?
Unfortunately, it needs to be a dropin replacement for x"...", which
returns a string/wstring/dstring.
That's what nice about library artifacts vs. l
Andrei Alexandrescu:
hexString and hexBytes. -- Andrei
Can you show me one or two different use cases of hexString?
Bye,
bearophile
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 3/15/15 12:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >HexStrings:
> >
> > http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
> >
> >They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the octal
> >literals have shown, they
On 3/15/15 12:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the octal
literals have shown, they can be easily replaced with a library template:
x"00 FBCD 32FD 0A"
becomes:
hex!"00 FBCD 32FD
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:32:04PM +0100, FG via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 2015-03-15 at 22:41, bearophile wrote:
> >Walter Bright:
> >
> >>Unfortunately, it needs to be a dropin replacement for x"...", which
> >>returns a string/wstring/dstring.
> >
> >This is bad. 99% of the times you don't want
On 3/15/2015 2:44 PM, Baz wrote:
Yes, i'll send a PR tomorrow of tuesday.
Good!
Am 15.03.2015 um 15:16 schrieb "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
":
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:21:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
My proposal would be to make "scope" (with strong recursive
guarantees) the default instead to achieve that goal. That would give
the compiler a lot of optimization pote
On 2015-03-15 at 22:41, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Unfortunately, it needs to be a dropin replacement for x"...", which returns a
string/wstring/dstring.
This is bad. 99% of the times you don't want a string/wstring/dstring out of a
hex string:
Then maybe hex!"..." should produce th
On 3/15/2015 1:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
but I hate
it when I have to format code in ways that I don't like. It's like walking
around with a pebble in your shoe. It may not stop you from getting any work
done, but it's a constant point of pain.
I fully understand your poi
Walter Bright:
Unfortunately, it needs to be a dropin replacement for x"...",
which returns a string/wstring/dstring.
This is bad. 99% of the times you don't want a
string/wstring/dstring out of a hex string:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.c
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 21:34:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/15/2015 2:18 PM, Baz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:47:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the
octal literals
have
On 3/15/2015 2:29 PM, bearophile wrote:
There is an enhancement request on this (for the built in hex strings).
A link would be helpful!
On 3/15/2015 2:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
P.S. Also need to include all the examples in the dlang reference as unittest
cases.
Also, HexStrings can handle w and d postfixes. Use the lexer.c code for
TOK::hexStringConstant() as a guide to be sure all the permutations are covered.
On 3/15/2015 1:38 PM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= " wrote:
Can we make it so it returns a ubyte[]?
Unfortunately, it needs to be a dropin replacement for x"...", which returns a
string/wstring/dstring.
On 3/15/2015 2:18 PM, Baz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:47:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the octal literals
have shown, they can be easily replaced with a library template:
Marc Schütz:
Can we make it so it returns a ubyte[]?
There is an enhancement request on this (for the built in hex
strings).
Bye,
bearophile
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:47:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the
octal literals have shown, they can be easily replaced with a
library template:
x"00 FBCD 32FD 0A"
becomes:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:23:09 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Yes, sorry. Forcing is too strong a word. However, if we're putting out
> an official formatting tool which has no configurability, unless we're
> telling folks that it's specifically for the official source code
and
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:46:39 +, Kagamin wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:39:06 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> wow! i wrote an excellect optimizer yesterday. it optimizes any code to
>> `nop`...
>
> Why, rm didn't work for you?
no. it removes code, and i want to optimize code.
signature.asc
De
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:55:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0f63623cc262a ?
Wrong link? Or wrong thread?
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:47:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the
octal literals have shown, they can be easily replaced with a
library template:
x"00 FBCD 32FD 0A"
becomes:
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 03:02:53 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Haven't we all got better things to do than argue about formatting styles?
Sure, like we have better things than to argue about vim vs emacs. But I
wouldn't want to be forced to use emacs (or micro-emacs) just because that
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 02:10:13 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > Let's _please_ not try and force any particular style on the D community.
>
> Forcing is a little strong. dfmt is an optional tool, not the core language.
Yes, sorry. Forcing is too strong a word. However, if we're putt
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 07:44:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
"const ref" can tell the optimizer that that path for a ref
counted object cannot alter its ref count.
That is not clear why. const ref is supposed to protect against
escaping when ref does not ?
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:59:22 UTC, Sativa wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:15:18 UTC, disme wrote:
do you people really want to see this language be more
popular? do you? doesnt look like it at all to me, the only
few people in those 18+ pages that are actually telling you
the real
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:01:00 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
I prefer to get rid of /* */ instead :-) Because /++/ can do
things /**/ can't.
Bye,
bearophile
/*
...
/*/
...
//*/
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 08:45:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 15:35:24 Ali Çehreli via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 03/14/2015 03:23 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> But, for some reason, the topic come up again and again
from C++ devs
> that have no idea the optimization gu
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:48:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The motivation for this came from a post by deadalnix.
And I'm obviously all for it :)
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0f63623cc262a ?
HexStrings:
http://dlang.org/lex.html#HexString
They're rarely used, but very useful when needed. But, as the octal literals
have shown, they can be easily replaced with a library template:
x"00 FBCD 32FD 0A"
becomes:
hex!"00 FBCD 32FD 0A"
It'll simplify the core language sligh
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 19:39:06 UTC, ketmar wrote:
wow! i wrote an excellect optimizer yesterday. it optimizes any
code to
`nop`...
Why, rm didn't work for you?
The motivation for this came from a post by deadalnix.
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:34:11 +, Kagamin wrote:
> Optimizer optimizes any code, it doesn't matter, what the code does.
wow! i wrote an excellect optimizer yesterday. it optimizes any code to
`nop`...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 08:45:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
cost you anything, and you can't rely on the compiler's ability
to optimize
If you want performance and can't rely on optimizations, you can
only use assembler.
because the C++ standards committee didn't restrict the
overload
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:31:17 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 15/03/2015 14:10, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?=
" wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the
implementation,
and a mor
On 3/14/2015 8:32 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC comments for
symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce before e.g. committing that
everything has been explained.
Autogeneration of documentation is by definition useless. Document
On 3/15/2015 10:37 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
The thing is - gofmt was where from the very beginning of Go(or at least from
r56, the first stable release. I didn't dig any deeper...). This means that any
Go project was using the one true style from the beginning. dfmt, on the other
hand, comes out when
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 18:02:30 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
The documentation seems to be screwed here:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_format.html
Already fixed, just waiting for the release:
http://dlang.org/phobos-prerelease/std_format.html
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
On 3/15/2015 3:12 AM, Dicebot wrote:
It is also matter of expectation. Until now D was very un-opinionated language,
probably even closer to language construction set. If this changes for one case,
one may fear more similar decisions may follow.
That's not entirely correct. For example, the rul
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:15:35 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
First, a disclaimer: I am an idiot for starting this thread.
Moving on...
I'm working on a list of configuration options for dfmt - a
formatter for D source code.
So far I have the following:
* Insert spaces between if, while,
On 03/15/2015 12:48 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/14/2015 4:15 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
>> What am I missing?
>
> I suggest defining "The One True Way" and have no configuration options.
It's a bit late to enforce a particular D code style on all the existing
code and people already using D.
Som
The documentation seems to be screwed here:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_format.html
On 3/15/15 10:49 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:13:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 19:34 +, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I thought DMD wasn't included in free distros because of licensing
issues?
Well it's about time the licences changed t
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:51:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/15/15 10:49 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:13:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 19:34 +, weaselcat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I thought DMD wasn't included in free distros beca
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:52:45 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 17:51:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/15/15 10:49 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:13:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 19:34 +, weaselcat via
Digitalmars-d wr
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 15:55:51 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Are the suggested changes also related to the possibility of
making `ref` a type?
Are there plans to do this? I remember Walter suggested `ref`
for non-parameters, i.e. local variables, but as a storage
class, not a type modifier.
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:13:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 19:34 +, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
I thought DMD wasn't included in free distros because of
licensing issues?
Well it's about time the licences changed then.
It would be nice if Walter com
On 3/15/15 5:25 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 14/03/15 18:31, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I was looking at easy installation of dmd on ubuntu, and found this:
http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/
Should we make it part of the official distribution?
It woul
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 09:10:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/15/2015 1:12 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Which would instantly make it useless for many users, because
many of them
will disagree with the "One True Way" regardless of what it
is. Tabs vs
spaces, BSD Allman br
On 15/03/2015 14:10, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= "
wrote:
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the implementation,
and a more formal specification, as well as a discussion of backwards
compa
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:01:00 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
I prefer to get rid of /* */ instead :-) Because /++/ can do
things /**/ can't.
+1
And on my keyboard, /++/ is easier tha
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:15:18 UTC, disme wrote:
do you people really want to see this language be more popular?
do you? doesnt look like it at all to me, the only few people
in those 18+ pages that are actually telling you the real
problems are mostly being ignored for futile python, go
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 05:06:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/13/2015 2:20 PM, bearophile wrote:
I have used languages that did not have implicit casting
(Pascal) and didn't have a positive experience with it. It
didn't detect a single actual bug, and managed to be quite
annoying.
I'
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:15:18 UTC, disme wrote:
do you people really want to see this language be more popular?
do you? doesnt look like it at all to me, the only few people
in those 18+ pages that are actually telling you the real
problems are mostly being ignored for futile python, go
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 14:15:18 UTC, disme wrote:
do you people really want to see this language be more popular?
do you? doesnt look like it at all to me, the only few people
in those 18+ pages that are actually telling you the real
problems are mostly being ignored for futile python, go
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 03:24:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/12/2015 5:20 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Golang: simple!
D1 was the simple version of D. People wanted more.
Java was originally sold as, and got a great of adoption
because, it was a C++ like language with all that ann
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:49:35 +0100, Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> but One True Way would just lead to fork
exactly!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 12:57:42 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/03/2015 1:49 a.m., Steve Teale wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 12:32:31 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 16/03/2015 1:28 a.m., Steve Teale wrote:
I'm trying to build my app after upgrading to DMD2.66 and
the latest
GtkD.
On 15 Mar 2015 13:45, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/03/15 14:11, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> Experience tells us that Launchpad PPAs are fine for Ubuntu and no use
>> for Debian.
>
>
> Ack, that's a shame. I have no dir
Bokeh is a very cool charting library that is distinguished by a
focus on interactivity in the browser. Each chart is an html
file with an embedded bokeh javascript library - the server
generates JSON from the object model and the client take this and
renders it. There are ways to register ca
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 13:21:11 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
My proposal would be to make "scope" (with strong recursive
guarantees) the default instead to achieve that goal. That
would give the compiler a lot of optimization potential (much
more than just for RC), and would at the same time m
do you people really want to see this language be more popular?
do you? doesnt look like it at all to me, the only few people in
those 18+ pages that are actually telling you the real problems
are mostly being ignored for futile python, go and rust talk,
seriously?
let me go ahead and say tha
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 12:52:37 UTC, Chris wrote:
Apart from performance issues, for language processing, string
handling etc., Python quickly becomes a nightmare (UTF-8). Then
there are issues like the one that classes cannot really have
private variables.
[I am by no means expert in Py
Here's the new version of my scope proposal:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope2
It's still missing real-life examples, a section on the
implementation, and a more formal specification, as well as a
discussion of backwards compatibility. But I thought I'd show
what I have, so that it ca
Walter Bright:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
I prefer to get rid of /* */ instead :-) Because /++/ can do
things /**/ can't.
Bye,
bearophile
Sorry for the mistakes in the above message (and in this one). I
didnt gave earlier my personnal opinion on the matter but
essentially if I like the syntax of type classes very much, you
can do much more with templates constraint and D meta programming
abilities...But you still have to fix some
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:47:26 +, ketmar wrote:
> on the other side, i can see a sense in generating "stubs" for functions
> and templates, as it's somewhat boring to copypaste argument names. not
> that it's a big deal, but... ;-)
i mean ddoc stubs, of course. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: P
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 10:53:21 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I hope you'll get better!
Thanks. On the mend, but it takes time...
3. I have said so before (the GroupBy docs) - standard library
documentation is 'perfectly clear' if you have a technical
mindset and are used to reading formalis
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:37:46 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 2:33 a.m., ketmar wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:19:08 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/03/2015 2:16 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:32:25 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> This might b
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 04:32:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd
be more useful than they are.
Using /+ +/ regularly.
Very useful to comment out large areas of code.
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 10:40:17 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 08:29:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Observe:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3054
Is this change the partial proof of another failure of a part
of D language design? What's the point of templat
2015-03-15 13:56 GMT+01:00 ketmar via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:
>
> maybe it's time to fix the compiler, so it will simply reject the UnTrue
> Sources? why relay to external tool for such fundamental task?
That would be terrible. They are thing the compiler should enforce (IM
On 15/03/15 14:11, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Experience tells us that Launchpad PPAs are fine for Ubuntu and no use
for Debian.
Ack, that's a shame. I have no direct experience from the Debian side, but I'd
thought the PPAs did allow for creating package builds for Debian release
On 16/03/2015 2:33 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:19:08 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/03/2015 2:16 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:32:25 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC
comments for symbols would
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 02:19:08 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 2:16 a.m., ketmar wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:32:25 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>>
>>> This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC
>>> comments for symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 02:00:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 00:20:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I'd love us to derive a few action items from this and other
feedback.
I think the front page focuses too much on the language itself
at the moment. Perhaps
Am 15.03.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Walter Bright:
On 3/14/2015 10:23 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 05:08:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/14/2015 8:50 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Const is the inconvenience of immutability without its benefit. That
would be a
poor default, IMO.
It's
Am 15.03.2015 um 06:55 schrieb Dicebot:
On Sunday, 15 March 2015 at 01:45:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/14/2015 4:59 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:49:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I suggest defining "The One True Way" and have no configuration
options.
I hope you
On 16/03/2015 2:16 a.m., ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:32:25 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC
comments for symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce before e.g.
committing that everything has been explained.
this never
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:32:25 +1300, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> This might be a bit of a out of scope, but auto generating of DDOC
> comments for symbols would be nice. Basically to enforce before e.g.
> committing that everything has been explained.
this never helps. what sense of having "document
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 22:12 +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
>
> When it come to concurrency, Rust is. None of the other are.
That would imply Rust has the possibility of replacing Spark Ada then?
> Now you can double down on trying to make me prove a negative,
> but that only make
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 06:05 +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
>
> You can't "distribute" repository. It could be good to move it to
> "dlang.org" domain though and suggest using it in "downloads"
> section instead of plain .deb package.
It would be a good first step to move d-apt from
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
