On 26 May 2015 at 07:05, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
@Manu - if by that you mean do game jams without you - that horse has
already bolted the stable :p
I would be happy to a try the October Game Jam again this year and I
thoroughly recommend the global (much
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 20:23:11 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP78 - Proposal for a macro system
without syntactical extensions to the language. Hence it
doesn't allow arbitrary syntax.
If this proposal is considered, it is required to propose to look
at the implementation of
This sounds like a fun idea, I might be interested if I can find
the time.
I dabble in pixel art and music, though I'm just barely past the
point of programmer art: http://opengameart.org/users/rcorre
Currently I've been hacking away at dtiled, working on
general-purpose tilemap
I am writing a echoclient, as below:
Ptr!Conn conn = connect(127.0.0.1,8881);
ubyte[100] buf;
for(int i=0; iN; i++)
{
scope string str = format(%s,i);
conn.write((cast(ubyte*)str.ptr)[0..str.length]);
conn.read(buf[0..str.length]);
n++;
}
conn.close();
When it
I noticed that the cpu% falls from 99% down to 4% as well when
the throughput falls down.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 05:54:11 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Something like this appears to work:
import std.typetuple : allSatisfy;
enum implicityConvertibleToBool(T) = is(T : bool);
bool tok_and(Args...)(lazy Args terms)
if(allSatisfy!(implicitlyConvertibleToBool, Args))
{
auto
On 2015-05-25 21:40, bitwise wrote:
So then I think I have a full solution:
1) _dyld_register_func_for_add_image should be taken care of with the
above two fixes
2) __attribute__((constructor/destructor)) can be added to druntime when
building for osx like in the file dylib_fixes.c [1]
3) copy
On 2015-05-25 22:58, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 19:40:52 UTC, bitwise wrote:
1) _dyld_register_func_for_add_image should be taken care of with the
above two fixes
You still cannot unregister the callback, so it can't be used for
dynamically loading druntime. Last time we
On 2015-05-25 23:33, FreeSlave wrote:
What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of
bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings.
E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even
fixes issues in these bindings time by time,
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 08:35:46 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 07:43:59 +0200, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
p.s.
I suspect the most common beginner bugs occurs when using
right accessor
on the wrong tree causes an ICE at runtime in 'some obscure
location'.
Incase you
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 22:24:40 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The compiler
situation feels odd, LDC and GDC have very few contributors
despite being
better than dmd at optimizing and providing a lot of extra
perks
I find the situation being like at university looking for
grants or funding, and
weaselcat:
I feel like I could write a book on why I use D, so I'm going to
stop now : )
Actually, kidding aside, I do believe that it would make sense to
collect some personal warts-and-all accounts of the experience of
individuals working in academe, the corporate sector, and
elsewhere in
On Tue, 26 May 2015 04:07:40 +, weaselcat wrote:
while I agree with your ideological standpoint on GPL, gcc is virtually
inaccessible to anyone who isn't already familiar with the codebase in
comparison to llvm. At least it seems gcc is interested in changing
this.
funny, that movement
On Tue, 26 May 2015 07:43:59 +0200, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
p.s.
I suspect the most common beginner bugs occurs when using right accessor
on the wrong tree causes an ICE at runtime in 'some obscure location'.
Incase you intend to dabble again in the future as more parts move
On 26/05/2015 7:24 p.m., ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:51:20 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Really what needs to happen is getting Derelict-Util into phobos. And
some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted).
From there its just port the derelict libraries and
On Tue, 26 May 2015 07:43:59 +0200, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 26 May 2015 00:30, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
thank you for the info. ah, if only i have a time freezing device to
make my days longer... ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:51:20 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Really what needs to happen is getting Derelict-Util into phobos. And
some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted).
From there its just port the derelict libraries and deimos ones to it
and PR for phobos.
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 04:09:09 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Please no, derelict bindings are incredibly heavyweight. I cut
my application's size from ~6mb to 200kb by using glad openGL
loader over derelict GL3.
One of my goals for the current iteration of DerelictGL was to
keep the size down,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #18 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #17)
How about server platforms? Those are less conservative than desktop.
So we release two Windows DMD builds, one for client version
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 21:35:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 20:36:47 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Without wishing to dwell on the negatives of alternatives,
might I ask what made you decide to settle on D? Do you have
collaborators who write code and, if so, how did the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #19 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #18)
Makes no sense.
Already done: 64-bit executables are incompatible with 32-bit systems. I think,
it fits D ideology good by
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #19)
Already done: 64-bit executables are incompatible with 32-bit systems.
Except that:
- We do not actually release separate 32-bit
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 12:43:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in
a
given scope? If not where could this information be extracted
(in
which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if so,
be stored?
Reason: After having read
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #17 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #16)
But we can't require Windows 8 for D.
How about server platforms? Those are less conservative than desktop.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14606
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com ---
Err, confirmed, thanks. I got the original reduction result on Linux but now I
can't reproduce it.
--
On 05/26/2015 06:35 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of C's design mistakes is to make assignments expressions and not
statements.
I think it is more about returning void vs. returning the lvalue. The
expression/statement distinction is
On 05/26/2015 02:55 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 00:07:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I'm fine with RTL for assignment expressions, and LTR everywhere else.
Daniel, if you could work this out at front end level so it goes the
same way for all backends, that would be fantastic. --
On 05/26/2015 02:51 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
int a=0,b=0;
(b++,a)=b; // ltr gives a==1, rtl gives a==0, caching irrelevant
This should have said that caching _on the lhs_ is irrelevant.
On 25/05/15 10:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm arriving in SLC on Tue at 11:39 pm. Anyone up for sharing a ride?
I'm thinking http://www.expressshuttleutah.com/. -- Andrei
I took the Green TRAX (light rail) from airport to downtown for $2.50.
From there you can apparently take the train or
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14606
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
Introduced in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3979
The broken executable has been generated since 2.065, which and it was
introduced in:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #21 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com ---
I mean, D compiler can compile 64-bit programs, which are incompatible with
32-bit systems. And I believe 64-bit linux can be set up without ability to run
32-bit executables.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #22 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com ---
Vladimir pointed out a mechanism to make the decision at runtime. That's the
only option I see here. I'm not sure how it's done, but it seems it would incur
some runtime cost. But I
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 12:54:27 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/26/2015 06:35 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of C's design mistakes is to make assignments expressions
and not
statements.
I think it is more about returning void vs.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14606
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, wrong-code
---
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 12:51:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I guess overloaded operators could be made to cache the old
value. (As they do in CTFE, apparently. :o))
However, this seems like overkill. Any other ideas?
They can but it wouldn't fix anything. The rvalue is already
evaluated by
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14622
Issue ID: 14622
Summary: documented unit test that follows an undocumented
symbol silently ignored
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
On 05/26/2015 06:13 PM, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/15 14:54, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/2015 06:35 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of C's design mistakes is to make assignments expressions and not
On 05/26/15 14:54, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/2015 06:35 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of C's design mistakes is to make assignments expressions and not
statements.
I think it is more about returning void vs.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP78 - Proposal for a macro system without
syntactical extensions to the language. Hence it doesn't allow
arbitrary syntax.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9110
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:06 PM, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Furthermore, I strongly dislike that Rust has made it completely
impossible to opt out of bounds checking without annotating your code with
unsafe.
Using iterators should cause bounds checking
Random question for anyone who knows, when does the conference
end each day? Like 5pm? 5:30pm?
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 15:21:04 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 14:59:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
Sad news - Martin missed his flight and found no viable alternative to
make it to DConf.
For his slot at 10:00 AM on Thursday, we'll look into teleconferencing
options for him. Alternatively, we're now taking applications from the
other speakers and attendees to fill his slot. Please email
If worse comes to worst, I can probably improvise something to
fill the time...
don't expect slides though :P
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope3#.40safe-ty_violations_with_borrowing
There's at least a plan. Nice!
One thing, though. I'm lacking a section in the document linked
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 06:04:59 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 05:54:11 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Something like this appears to work:
import std.typetuple : allSatisfy;
enum implicityConvertibleToBool(T) = is(T : bool);
bool tok_and(Args...)(lazy Args terms)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
Issue ID: 14621
Summary: ICE: Assertion failure: 'global.gaggedErrors ||
global.errors' on line 752 in file 'statement.c'
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 14:59:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope3#.40safe-ty_violations_with_borrowing
There's at least a plan. Nice!
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9110
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14621
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 5/25/15 11:53 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 05:43:59 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 05:22:26 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Actually the code seems to compile on 2.067.1 but definitely does not
work as expected.
...
I guess it stems from the fact that its lazy
On 05/26/2015 07:48 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 12:51:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I guess overloaded operators could be made to cache the old value. (As
they do in CTFE, apparently. :o))
However, this seems like overkill. Any other ideas?
They can but it wouldn't fix
On 05/26/15 18:16, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/2015 06:13 PM, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/15 14:54, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 05/26/2015 06:35 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
One of C's
On Tue, 26 May 2015 18:16:57 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
Sure, but there is no incentive to do this. a[i=j+1]=3; makes the code
shorter.
and harder to read. it is considered bad practice anyway, and will hardly
pass any serious code review.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:07:08 +, Chris wrote:
With Go I have the sinking feeling that it won't be able to contend with
C++ - or D for that matter. It took off due to Google and a fool-proof,
easy-to-use infrastructure. But it is way too limited and limiting to be
useful for more
On 2015-05-25 9:39 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm arriving in SLC on Tue at 11:39 pm. Anyone up for sharing a ride?
I'm thinking http://www.expressshuttleutah.com/. -- Andrei
Sorry... I'm arriving about 4:15 PM
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11870
Maurice van der Pot griffo...@kfk4ever.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Tue, 26 May 2015 02:28:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2015-05-25 22:58, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 19:40:52 UTC, bitwise wrote:
1) _dyld_register_func_for_add_image should be taken care of with the
above two fixes
You still cannot unregister the
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:45:01 +, weaselcat wrote:
that's why i have mixed feelings about C++ code in GCC. although i
really like it being C only, compile-time checking is very valuable.
just convince the gcc dev team to port it to D ;)
ah, that would be *ideal*... but ok, let my Secret
60 matches
Mail list logo
