On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[ ... ]
Hey Guys I just fixed an ABI issue concerning slices and structs.
This issue took 2.5 weeks to find and fix.
So let me describe what was going on.
As you may know newCTFE defines it's own ABI (since it is a
platform in
On 12.07.2017 01:18, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/10/17 4:53 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
As promised, since there has been zero feedback on DIP 1010, "Static
foreach", in either the Draft or Preliminary review rounds, I'm going
to skip the normal two-week feedback cycle on the Formal review. If
On 12.07.2017 03:50, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/11/17 4:29 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10.07.2017 18:23, Meta wrote:
...
problems with stuff like typeof(null)* etc. because for the most part
it's just a regular type, unlike Bottom.
Bottom is just a regular type.
Wouldn't the fact that it
On 11.07.2017 19:27, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 08:29:12 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10.07.2017 18:23, Meta wrote:
...
problems with stuff like typeof(null)* etc. because for the most part
it's just a regular type, unlike Bottom.
Bottom is just a regular type.
It's a regular typ
On 09.07.2017 23:45, Meta wrote:
...
Another case that we should probably just statically disallow:
... > This obviously doesn't make any sense anyway
... > I don't see a reason for us to ever need to do that
Sorry, but this thinking has no place in type system design. This is
precisely how you
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 23:01:50 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 22:39:22 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
The problem Walter pointed to is that due to integer
promotion, arithmetic operands of types smaller than int are
converted to int, hence even if you use bytes a
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 07:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Whereas A struct is always stored __packed__ and aligned to 4
byte boundaries
struct S // size: 20
{
ubyte m1; // offset: 0
ulong m2; // offset: 4
ubyte m3; // offset: 12
ubyte m4; // offset: 16
}
Do you plan to keep it li
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 23:50:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/11/17 7:21 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:18:51PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
3. The only controversial part I see is that `break` doesn't
break
from th
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 07:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
long story short:
This is now fixed.
and
ABI bugs are HELL!
Cheers,
Stefan
As being a newbie, could you please point to a post describing
what you are doin
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 09:46:39 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 07:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Whereas A struct is always stored __packed__ and aligned to 4
byte boundaries
struct S // size: 20
{
ubyte m1; // offset: 0
ulong m2; // offset: 4
ubyte m3; // offset
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 09:57:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 07:58:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
long story short:
This is now fixed.
and
ABI bugs are HELL!
Cheers,
Stefan
As being
On 11.07.2017 09:50, Daniel N wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 08:53:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As promised, since there has been zero feedback on DIP 1010, "Static
foreach", in either the Draft or Preliminary review rounds, I'm going
to skip the normal two-week feedback cycle on the Formal re
On 7/12/17 4:23 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12.07.2017 01:18, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 7/10/17 4:53 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
As promised, since there has been zero feedback on DIP 1010, "Static
foreach", in either the Draft or Preliminary review rounds, I'm going
to skip the normal two-week f
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 09:38:13 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 23:01:50 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 22:39:22 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
The problem Walter pointed to is that due to integer
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for clar
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 21:30:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/10/2017 1:52 PM, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 20:19:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/10/2017 12:46 PM, Luís Marques wrote:
I'm curious how that implementation addresses the issues I
brought up:
I'm not real
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 10:57:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Perhaps the deprecation path should include a removal of
straight foreach over a tuple working (use static foreach
explicitly). This would make the distinction even more obvious.
I'd also vote for gradual removal of foreac
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
[...]
So the first version 0.0.1 of this in the Wiki, please help to
update!
https://wiki.dlang.org/Lan
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:40:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
[...]
So the first version 0.0.1 o
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 13:11:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:40:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 1
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:40:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
[...]
So the first version 0.0.1 o
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 09:32:32 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09.07.2017 23:45, Meta wrote:
...
Another case that we should probably just statically disallow:
... > This obviously doesn't make any sense anyway
... > I don't see a reason for us to ever need to do that
Sorry, but this thinking
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 13:11:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:40:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 1
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 13:18:54 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:40:21 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 18:16:12 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 U
On 12/07/2017 3:14 PM, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
Please post events (even without date) you think are important.
First release of your IDE/Plugin or whatever made you more comfortable
using D.
Since when is the IRC channel in use?
Since like 2003 when it was registered on Freenode.
On 07/12/2017 05:32 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09.07.2017 23:45, Meta wrote:
...
Another case that we should probably just statically disallow:
... > This obviously doesn't make any sense anyway
... > I don't see a reason for us to ever need to do that
Sorry, but this thinking has no place in type
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 14:16:48 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 12/07/2017 3:14 PM, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
Please post events (even without date) you think are important.
First release of your IDE/Plugin or whatever made you more
comfortable using D.
Since when is the IRC channel
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 14:14:02 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
Please post events (even without date) you think are important.
I see a lot of changes from 2.020 to 2.031. That period looks
like there are a lot of things going on.
On 07/11/2017 03:46 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
So, adding the error may be nice, but it would make generic code a
little more verbose.
Ideas? People OK with that?
A compelling argument is that the rule exposed two bugs in Phobos. -- Andrei
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 21:36:05 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
I was able to get my C# to D convert to convert about 25% of
the .net library v4.6
[...]
Would you please publish your C# to D converter? I really need it!
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 20:45:01 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 17:29:01 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Dear all,
I am a D-language amateur from China, and just want to
share you with a slides from me that post on MesosCon Asia
2017(Beijing):
https://mesosconasia2017.sched.com/
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 17:29:01 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Dear all,
I am a D-language amateur from China, and just want to share
you with a slides from me that post on MesosCon Asia
2017(Beijing):
https://mesosconasia2017.sched.com/event/AZc6/dmesos-not-only-a-re-implementation-of-mesos-ce-f
Am Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:21:33 -0600
schrieb Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
:
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:00:51 PM MDT Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > @mleise: OP is using the testing repos where the PIE enforcement
> > already landed [1], but libphobos.a isn't built with -fPIC on
> > Arch y
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[ ... ]
Another ABI issue just pooped on my Wednesday.
this time it manifests while doing concatenation inside a template
the test failing is (test/runnable/template8.d)
This is again hard to debug because I have to piece toget
On 7/12/17 11:00 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 07/11/2017 03:46 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
So, adding the error may be nice, but it would make generic code a
little more verbose.
Ideas? People OK with that?
A compelling argument is that the rule exposed two bugs in Phobos. --
Andrei
Th
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 18:57:12 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 at 21:05:51 UTC, Stefan Koch
wrote:
[ ... ]
Another ABI issue just pooped on my Wednesday.
this time it manifests while doing concatenation inside a
template
the test failing is (test/runnable/templ
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 20:12:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
...
Which means this may cause a bunch of nuisance errors.
It's a trade-off between nuisance in some cases (the Phobos ones
can be solved with val = abs(val), or with static if), and
possibly catching bugs in other cases.
On 7/11/2017 12:46 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
So, adding the error may be nice, but it would make generic code a little more
verbose.
The particular issue you were having appears to be a bug in the compiler (I
already filed it as a bug report). Being a bug, we need more evidence that
adding an
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 21:05:28 UTC, watcher wrote:
stop advertising yourself and polluting this thread.
seek help - no down-payments in Germany!!
I am not sure what you mean ...
I assume it's a joke ?
If you are indeed offering help, you can reproduce this by
checking out
https://gi
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:23:53AM +, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 21:05:28 UTC, watcher wrote:
> >
> > stop advertising yourself and polluting this thread.
> > seek help - no down-payments in Germany!!
>
> I am not sure what you mean ...
> I assume it'
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 18:45:34 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 07/10/2017 02:16 PM, Joakim wrote:
I'm actually skeptical of cloud- I think mobile p2p will eat
most of the cloud-
I've been REALLY hoping p2p will
eat...cloud^H^H^H^H^Hcentralized internet services[1], but if I
we
40 matches
Mail list logo
