On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 05:39:05 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I understand that Walter's DIPs have been put through the
process just like the others, but with regard to the specific
issue in this thread
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097), the
accompanying PR
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 05:04:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Whatever the status of DIP 1000, I would point out that that
one of Walter's DIPs is in Community Review right now after
sitting in the PR queue in Draft Review for a while. Once this
review stage is done, it will go back into
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 04:49:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
It is hypocritical an arrogant to believe that only our ideas
have flaws and require scrutiny.
Sorry, that was poorly stated and conveyed the wrong intent. It
should read:
It is hypocritical an arrogant to believe that
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 22:00:31 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 19:25:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
With the NNTP, git, and bugzilla, we all have backups under
our control.
I just don't see why it is a concern[1]:
"So we set out to look for a new home for our
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 02:18:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Furthermore, I find it hypocritical that some of us are put
through a disproportionately burdensome DIP process requiring
thorough documentation, multiple peer reviews, excessive
delays, and judgement that defaults to "no" for
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 04:23:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The reality of the matter is that the DIP system is a formal
way to propose language changes in order to convince Walter and
Andrei that those changes should be implemented, whereas if
Walter or Andrei writes the DIP,
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:56:06 PM MDT Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:56:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
> > I'm aware, but we don't have any other process for people to
> > show their support for a DIP, do we?
> >
> >
> > And for DMD/Druntime/Phobos etc.
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:18:15 PM MDT Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 01:07:28 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
> > But what bothers me the most...
>
> Something else that rubs me the wrong way is that DIP 1000 is
> currently in a status of `DRAFT`:
>
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:31:02 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
The problem is that the code we write doesn't deal directly
with pointers - see the recent confusion in this forum over
where `scope` on the left applies to the `this` pointer or the
one returned by the member function.
Kagamin
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 01:07:28 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
But what bothers me the most...
Something else that rubs me the wrong way is that DIP 1000 is
currently in a status of `DRAFT`:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/README.md
What the heck is going on here?
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 01:48:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 20:29:34 UTC, Emil wrote:
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 18:11:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
[...]
Tried it on an Acer Chromebook R13 running Version
69.0.3497.35 (Official Build) dev (32-bit). I have
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 20:29:34 UTC, Emil wrote:
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 18:11:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
[...]
Tried it on an Acer Chromebook R13 running Version 69.0.3497.35
(Official Build) dev (32-bit). I have no previous experience
with llvm.
[...]
Looks like your
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 21:17:25 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I don't have merge rights. I took a look anyway and it mostly
looks ok, but I'm not familiar enough with that part of the
codebase.
It's not the implementation that's preventing it from being
merged. It's the idea itself, weak
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:56:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
I'm aware, but we don't have any other process for people to
show their support for a DIP, do we?
And for DMD/Druntime/Phobos etc. having a bunch of +1 helps a
PR to move faster as we as reviewers can thus realize that this
is sth.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--- Comment #9 from Mike Franklin ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #8)
> Just because Phobos follows the convention of putting the "return" parameter
> as the first parameter, does that mean the language should require it?
I
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 21:29:38 UTC, Andrey wrote:
Hello,
This is a code:
import std.stdio;
struct Test
{
static Test opCall()
{
Test test;
test.handler =
return test;
}
void one() const { writeln("In handler: Address = ", ,
"; Text = ", text); }
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #9 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #8)
> > @safe code can mess with it
>
> No it can't, that's the point of @safe. Mess with it how?
@safe applies to functions/methods, not variables/fields. You can't forbid
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 19:25:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
With the NNTP, git, and bugzilla, we all have backups under our
control.
I just don't see why it is a concern[1]:
"So we set out to look for a new home for our data dumps, and
today we’re happy to announce that the Internet
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 21:33:13 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 06:53:18 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
Many of those new comers who ask about the forum software ..
they never stick, they dont complain, or question,
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:46:31 PM MDT Jim Balter via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> That's a lot of detail. The bottom line is that the warning in
> the spec is completely wrong and should be removed -- using
> property functions is not discouraged, nor is @property.
> @property should be
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 18:44:15 UTC, Jim Balter wrote:
Python is not statically typed; D is. Why are you talking about
Python? You asked whether D's auto is like C#'s var ... it is,
but it doesn't have C#'s pointless restriction of not being
allowed for non-local declarations.
I think
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 06:53:18 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
Many of those new comers who ask about the forum software ..
they never stick, they dont complain, or question, or try to
change for the better, they simply leave
I think this
On 08/21/2018 03:27 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If you examine how the code for variant works, it's quite clever. It
establishes a "handler" that is generated with full compile-time type
info available when the value is *assigned*, but then cast to a function
taking a void pointer and an
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #8 from Atila Neves ---
> @safe code can mess with it
No it can't, that's the point of @safe. Mess with it how?
> Why shouldn't this compile? There's no `scope` anywhere now (except maybe an
> inferred one)
Function template =>
Hello,
This is a code:
import std.stdio;
struct Test
{
static Test opCall()
{
Test test;
test.handler =
return test;
}
void one() const { writeln("In handler: Address = ", ,
"; Text = ", text); }
void execute()
{
text = "Inited!";
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 19:36:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/21/2018 7:31 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
The problem is that the code we write doesn't deal directly
with pointers - see the recent confusion in this forum over
where `scope` on the left applies to the `this` pointer or the
one
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #7 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #6)
> What's @trusted is that I'm calling `free` on the same pointer I allocated
> in the constructor, and the other thing needing checking is the postblit.
If you want to keep
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 18:11:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Today I have added basic support for D language (ldc and dub)
to chromebrew: https://github.com/skycocker/chromebrew/pull/1717
So if you have ChromeBook with Chrome OS (developer mode is
needed for chromebrew), you can try it,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #6 from Atila Neves ---
I typed the code from memory and made a mistake. Yes, it's supposed to be
`.ptr`. There's no way I can call core.stdc.stdlib.free without @trusted
_somewhere_, since `free` isn't @safe - free(42) is obviously
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #8
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 00:49:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:32:17 PM MDT QueenSvetlana via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
In the D Style Guide, it says:
Properties
https://dlang.org/dstyle.html#properties
Functions should be property functions whenever
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 12:22:42 PM MDT QueenSvetlana via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:55:11 UTC, JN wrote:
> > class Foo
> > {
> >
> > auto bar;
> >
> > }
> >
> > because now the compiler doesn't know what type 'bar' is
> > supposed to be.
>
> Just to
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 9:04:31 AM MDT Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 8/20/18 9:15 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
> > I tend to use type inference liberally, almost always with
> > const/immutbale locals, though I tend to use auto only when the type
> > name is longer than
On 8/21/2018 7:31 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
The problem is that the code we write doesn't deal directly with pointers - see
the recent confusion in this forum over where `scope` on the left applies to the
`this` pointer or the one returned by the member function.
That's what I was saying :-)
On 8/21/2018 7:18 AM, Seb wrote:
some rely on stackoverflow, some have an active wiki
There are a few good points to move D.learn to Stack Overflow and that's
actually one thing that we have talked about a few times and somehow never has
happened. In the D survey there was a 2:1 "consensus"
On 8/21/18 3:11 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 08/21/2018 03:03 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 00:27:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
Suppose I've wrapped a Variant in a struct/class which ensures the
Variant *only* ever contains types which satisfy
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #5 from ag0aep6g ---
(In reply to Atila Neves from comment #4)
> I made a mistake when I posted the code. This compiles but shouldn't (the
> only difference is removing `scope` from the destructor).
[...]
> @safe:
>
> const(int)*
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 16:08:07 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 12:52:19 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An article comparing the above languages as per the DoD
language requirements [0].
http://jedbarber.id.au/steelman.html
[0] -
On 08/21/2018 03:03 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 00:27:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa)
wrote:
Suppose I've wrapped a Variant in a struct/class which ensures the
Variant *only* ever contains types which satisfy a particular
constraint (for example: isInputRange, or
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 08:34:56 UTC, Andrey wrote:
Hello,
Here is a code that you can execute using online compiler
https://run.dlang.io/:
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
ushort first = 5;
ushort second = 1000;
ushort result = first + second;
writeln(result);
}
I hae
On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 17:10:13 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
The problem is downloading "install.sh" directly to
"~/dlang/install.sh". This causes the install script to think
that it has already downloaded the "d-keyring.gpg" so it never
downloads it, causing the "invalid signature"
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 18:18:25 UTC, QueenSvetlana wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 16:15:32 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Only if someone
likes "Type x = new Type()" instead of "auto x = new Type()" I
would say they're clearly wrong.
As you stated it's up to the programmer to decided. I'm
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:55:11 UTC, JN wrote:
class Foo
{
auto bar;
}
because now the compiler doesn't know what type 'bar' is
supposed to be.
Just to clarify, even if I set bar in the constructor, I can't
declare it with auto first, correct? I would have to declare a
specific
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 16:15:32 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Only if someone
likes "Type x = new Type()" instead of "auto x = new Type()" I
would say they're clearly wrong.
As you stated it's up to the programmer to decided. I'm in favor
of Type x = new Type() because when it comes to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 13:42:31 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
int[] escape(scope int[] r)
{
return r; //error, can't return scoped argument
}
...
int[] escape(T)(scope int[] r)
{
return r; //ok! `scope` silently promoted to `return`
}
You can't have strictly scoped parameter in a
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:52:17 UTC, QueenSvetlana wrote:
So I can't declare class level variables with auto, correct?
only local method variables?
One difference between D's auto and C#'s var or C++'s auto is
that the latter languages allow automatically typed declarations
only for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18609
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 12:31:20 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
What Dub does is what it calls "platform probing" [3]. It
creates a temporary .d file containing various `pragma (msg,
..)` statements that output information to stderr during
compilation. Of course the question is
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 10:11:42 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Many thanks for your effort!
And hope the subsequent LDC releases with LLVM 7.0 will be
mature enough on AArch64 and RISC-V for production environment.
Who is actually running AArch64 or RISC-V in a "production
environment?" Maybe a few
gmail gives the reason: "Lots of messages from k3.1azy.net were
identified as spam in the past."
Not sure what can be done. Just an FYI.
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 at 16:51:18 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I understand that common Windows users have a very different
thread
model than linux developers, hence the crappy Anti-Virus
rootkits.
I'd expect the Windows dev audience we're targeting with D to
be a bit
more capable than
On 8/20/18 9:15 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
I tend to use type inference liberally, almost always with
const/immutbale locals, though I tend to use auto only when the type
name is longer than four characters. For me, it's a nice way to save
keystrokes. Some take a dim view of that approach and
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:47:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:32:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
How and where to vote?
At the pull request via +1 and the upcoming "official"
discussion of the PR.
Except that there's no voting process for DIPs. The Community
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
Atila Neves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||atila.ne...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
On 8/21/18 10:08 AM, Ali wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 05:30:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask 10 people, and you'll get 10 different answers on what a better
forum would be.
Actually I think we can get 8 out of those 10 to agree,
rust, ocaml, fsharp, nim, scala, clojure .. all use
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 00:09:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/20/2018 6:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I would, but I have no idea how dip1000 is supposed to work. I
think only you understand it. Even looking at the PR that you
have been citing over and over, I can't make heads or
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 11:28:39 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:57:15 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 09:50:46 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:55:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC,
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:18:40 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 09:52:01 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
[...]
What are the specific problems solved by using better software?
Well, most software projects, have different
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:08:01 UTC, Ali wrote:
[...]
But what I really meant, is that out of those who leaves, there
is possible a very small percentage who left, because they
couldnt communicate effectively with the community,
Are you serious? This forum software is the most
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:08:58 UTC, Andrey wrote:
Hello,
I have a function:
string format(string pattern, T...)(T value)
{
auto writer = appender!string();
writer.formattedWrite!pattern(convertToUnderlyingType(value));
//Tuple!T(value).expand.to!(OriginalType!T)
return
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 09:52:01 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
What are the specific problems solved or opportunities
realised by moving to a real forum?
What are the specific problems solved by using better software?
Well, most
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 05:30:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ask 10 people, and you'll get 10 different answers on what a
better forum would be.
Actually I think we can get 8 out of those 10 to agree,
rust, ocaml, fsharp, nim, scala, clojure .. all use
https://www.discourse.org/
I think
On 8/21/18 9:42 AM, Kagamin wrote:
except for templated functions:
int[] escape(scope int[] r)
{
return r; //error, can't return scoped argument
}
int[] escape(return int[] r)
{
return r; //ok, just as planned
}
int[] escape(return scope int[] r)
{
return r; //ok, `return
...except for templated functions:
int[] escape(scope int[] r)
{
return r; //error, can't return scoped argument
}
int[] escape(return int[] r)
{
return r; //ok, just as planned
}
int[] escape(return scope int[] r)
{
return r; //ok, `return scope` reduced to just `return`
}
int[]
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
--- Comment #4 from anonymous4 ---
@safe:
struct A(T)
{
int[] r;
this(int[] q){r=q;}
}
int[] escape(T)(int[] r)
{
return A!int(r).r;
}
int[] f()
{
int[6] xs = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
return xs.escape!int;
}
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
--- Comment #3 from anonymous4 ---
Reduced:
@safe:
struct A(alias fun)
{
int[] r;
this(int[] q){r=q;}
}
template m(alias fun)
{
auto m(int[] r)
{
return A!fun(r);
}
}
auto foo() {
int[6] xs = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 18:59:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Hi Russel,
So the questions are:
1. How does Dub find the compiler version number, in this case
2.081, given that neither DMD or LDC seem to have a way of
delivering only the version number.
The __VERSION__ [1]
MS has resource compiler too:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/menurc/resource-compiler
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 13:42:58 UTC, spikespaz wrote:
I would also like to know how to add a PNG or ICO file to my
compiled executable. I have icons in the resolutions of 16, 32,
64, 128, 256. Currently I'm adding them in using GitHub's
RCEDIT tool (https://github.com/electron/rcedit)
I mean if one method in structure is trusted, other methods need
manual verification too.
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:57:15 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Also, if I have to remember to annotate correctly, surely this
is a massive hole in @safe dip1000?
In general, safety works per method and doesn't help much in
building safe data structures, those are trusted as a whole. EMSI
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:57:15 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Never mind, I forgot to use -dip1000. Ok, cool, so _why_ does
it work as intended now? Also, if I have to remember to
annotate correctly, surely this is a massive hole in @safe
dip1000?
It thought dip1000 was impenetrable, but if
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:57:15 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 09:50:46 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:55:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 12:56:42 UTC,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18051
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/6a0a91a8135cc0ce10253c23e788b0782bce165e
Use version(TestComplex) as a workaround against issue
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/1798119abff6b7226ad65ce57339a26f0ab0bf4e
Fix issue 19162
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 09:50:46 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:55:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 12:56:42 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
[...]
I need `return` for what exactly? Your code
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #4 from Atila Neves ---
I made a mistake when I posted the code. This compiles but shouldn't (the only
difference is removing `scope` from the destructor).
I also surrounded the call to `free` with @trusted instead of the whole
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 20:01:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.082.0 release, ♥ to
the 47 contributors for this release.
[...]
Could I pretty please get this absolutely non-controversial
regression fix in before the release?
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 02:30:16 UTC, binghoo dang wrote:
hi,
I thinks D need an ORM library for Sqlite/Mysql/PostgreSQL,
entity currently support all the three targets, but entity's
API is too complex and cumbersome for using.
Is there a more light-weight and simpler implementation
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:55:54 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 12:56:42 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
[...]
I need `return` for what exactly? Your code still compiles,
and my point is it shouldn't. It sure isn't
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
--- Comment #2 from Atila Neves ---
I used dmd 2.081.2. I just tried it again and it compiles. Just in case there's
something wrong with the Arch Linux package, I used dmd.081.2 from install.sh.
Same result. I also tried the 2.082.0 beta 1. Same
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19175
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:21:41 UTC, tiensonqin wrote:
now it's fixed,
Thank you!
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:32:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
How and where to vote?
At the pull request via +1 and the upcoming "official"
discussion of the PR.
Except that there's no voting process for DIPs. The Community
Review is not intended as a way to vote, simply to provide
feedback
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 06:29:12 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:45:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
... yet. Though you can vote for this DIP and show your
support there:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/71
It even comes with an implementation in DMD already:
On Friday, 17 August 2018 at 11:29:46 UTC, zabruk wrote:
https://lambdahackers.com/@b4asile/why-d-is-a-good-choice-for-writing-a-toy-language-4vapyvas5a
Can anyone explain me the purpose of javascript on this page?
Especialy various mouse click event handlers, those break
common well-known
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:42 +, binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[…]
>
> SQLAlchemy is very great, and I remember that
> in D wiki has mentioned this, but the status is "Proposed Project
> Mentors: TBA".
SQLAlchemy is how SQL building and ORM should be done, in Python. For
Hello,
I have a function:
string format(string pattern, T...)(T value)
{
auto writer = appender!string();
writer.formattedWrite!pattern(convertToUnderlyingType(value));
//Tuple!T(value).expand.to!(OriginalType!T)
return writer.data;
}
The "value" in this function can be any type
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 00:27:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Suppose I've wrapped a Variant in a struct/class which ensures
the Variant *only* ever contains types which satisfy a
particular constraint (for example: isInputRange, or hasLength,
etc...).
Is there a way to call a
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
Many of those new comers who ask about the forum software ..
they never stick, they dont complain, or question, or try to
change for the better, they simply leave
I think this is the best forum I have ever used, it's a big
contributing
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:45:25 UTC, Seb wrote:
... yet. Though you can vote for this DIP and show your support
there:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/71
It even comes with an implementation in DMD already:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8460
How and where to vote?
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18545
--- Comment #1 from FeepingCreature ---
It turns out what's happening here is that cast() constNullable is equivalent
to Nullable(constNullable)... which implicitly casts to constNullable.get.
alias get this strikes again!
Nullable should maybe
On 08/20/2018 10:57 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Runtime reflection is theoretically possible in D, but it requires
generating the appropriate stuff for every type involved so that the runtime
stuff has something to work with. Java built all of that into the language
and has the JVM to boot,
96 matches
Mail list logo
