On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:50 AM, BCSn...@anon.com wrote:
Hello grauzone,
BCS wrote:
Reply to Jacob,
I've read posts in several threads complaining about the C
compatibility, the latest was the % operator. Other complains are
that you can use the C syntax for pointers, arrays and function
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Jarrett
Billingsleyjarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:37 PM, bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Daniel Keep:
Because:
struct NonNullable(T)
{
T ptr;
alias ptr this;
this(T ptr)
{
assert(ptr !is
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Steven
Schveighofferschvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:22:30 -0400, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
With apologies to Bruno Medeiros
All this talk about getting D2 finished (and other things like what comes
next) makes me
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Julian Salazar wrote:
It's been rehashed here several times (not to rag on you, just to point out
that it isn't something that's been overlooked). To sum up, I've worked a
lot with both styles - #ifdef, and
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Leandro Lucarellallu...@gmail.com wrote:
Kagamin, el 9 de julio a las 09:46 me escribiste:
DiP2 is here. Check it.
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DiPs
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DiP2
ps code markup is not very nice.
It would be very
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:02 AM, dsimchadsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
- opImplicitCast
I think alias this should render that
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
But from where I sit it looked like Walter didn't really convince
anyone. To me this seems like a point where D is overly patronizing,
to use the phrase from a recent post.
You could argue
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
I do think you make a convincing argument that in general lots of
micro ifdefs everywhere is not the right approach.
But I remain unconvinced that potential for abuse is a good reason
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Robert Clipsham:
But LLVM offers many interesting things that are hard to do with DMD's
back-end, often such things are already implemented in LLVM (maybe not fully
refined yet, but they are working on it) and they
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
The same goes for version (!X) ..., I think it should be available, there
are cases when the use is valid and you have to do artificial hacks like
version (X) else It's like Java not
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
You do realize you're being patronizing, right? I have so much
experience with these things, and I know the right way to write code,
and you don't, so I'm not going to give you this thing you
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
It's not about protecting idiots. It's about making the better way to do
things the easier and more natural way, and making the worse more
difficult.
Making the better
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Donnos...@nospam.com wrote:
Michiel Helvensteijn wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
void main()
{
foreach_reverse (i; 0.7 .. 100.7)
{
write(i, );
}
}
The last number printed is -0.3.
A question if I may.
Why does D allow
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
According to the python pep, the integer / divide semantics changed from
C style to match what the floating point / does. While this makes
sense for a language that is
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov:
I think I completely misunderstood how to use it.
Yes, it's too much complex. It tries to do many different things in the most
efficient way possible, the result is a high complexity in usage.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
If it's internal to the parse tree can't you make the syntax whatever you
want?
Something like (expr1 __exprSequencer expr2) should do just fine, right?
No reason it has to be a precious one
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Don wrote:
The other thing that's desperately missing from D is multi-dimensional
indexing.
What are the limitations of multiple-argument []?
Andrei
I don't know what Don had in mind, but
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
If it's internal to the parse tree can't you make the syntax whatever
you
want?
Something
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
I think what Jerome is getting at is that we could be getting more
mileage out of the xpr1..xpr2 syntax. It would be useful syntax for
more than just integral, dense ranges in foreach and slices
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
It's handy when you want to prefix one expression to another, as in:
(foo(), x +
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Michiel
Helvensteijnm.helvensteijn.rem...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading the Case Range Statement topic with some interest.
It has occurred to me that all those problems would be solved if array
indices started with 1 instead of 0. Just let arrays be
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
So, the correct way to define an inclusive range is with +1 except
when it's with nextUp, unless you're talking about the right end of the
range where it is inclusive by default
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Tim Matthewstim.matthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Existing actual or perceived inconsistencies are not an argument for
adding more of them.
Seriously?
d00d. Does that really need explanation? Two wrongs don't make a
right is all he's
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Derek Parnellde...@psych.ward wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:01:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
To me they look the same, but if people are happier with wasting
vertical space, sure.
I think I've finally worked out why I don't like this syntax. Consider
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, BCSn...@anon.com wrote:
Hello Ary,
Well, it should work! const means, once a value is assigned to that
variable, it never changes again. The compiler can do static analysis
to verify this. And that's why it works. And that's why D should also
work this way,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
BCS wrote:
I IS running fine on 3 or 4 multicore machines around here.
That's a mystery, then.
It works fine for me most of the time, but hangs about 1 out of 20
links or so. Not insurmountable for a 1-link
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Steve
Tealesteve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Trass3r Wrote:
Ary Borenszweig schrieb:
That's ddbg working wrong, not Descent. :-P
Ah, damn so no way this gets fixed.
Debugging D is a pain :(
So is ddbg dead?
Author hasn't been heard from round here
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Saaaem...@needmail.com wrote:
I've been wanting to write a D-styled data format module but just got
extremely discouraged :)
Most of the functionality I need for this is already available in D2's
std.conv.
Is it possible to add this functionality into D1's
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I agree. D has it already by the way:
Exp1 Exp2;
Doesn't that evaluate to a bool rather
2009/6/4 Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com
wrote:
and because it
supports local branches (I didn't read about how branches are managed
in
Mercurial yet, but I understand that Mercurial doesn't support
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote:
and because it
supports local branches (I didn't read about how branches are managed in
Mercurial yet, but I understand that Mercurial doesn't support local
branches).
It does through the LocalBranch extension.
2009/6/2 Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I've started. I'll give you a full report tomorrow when I have tested
it more completely, but I have to tell you that it doesn't look good for
Git. Now, I have to ask: have *you* tried Mercurial or Bazaar? And what, in
2009/6/2 Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr:
Bill Baxter wrote:
2009/6/2 Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I've started. I'll give you a full report tomorrow when I have
tested
it more completely, but I have to tell you that it doesn't look good for
Git. Now
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 13:29:39 +0400, Qian Xu quian...@stud.tu-ilmenau.de
wrote:
BCS wrote:
I'm planning on taking a crack at a Serialization template library and
I'm
looking for feed back. My thinking so far is up on
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 21:44:49 +0400, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 13:29:39 +0400, Qian Xu
quian...@stud.tu-ilmenau.de
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 01:23:58 +0400, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 21:44:49 +0400, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com
wrote
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:36 AM, BCS n...@anon.com wrote:
Hello Tim,
On Sat, 23 May 2009 08:36:44 +1200, hasen hasan.alj...@gmail.com
wrote:
If I have some questions about D, should I ask on stackoverflow
instead of here? Are there enough D'ers there?
I personally think that asking
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009 00:43:56 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
It's an awful idea. It's a non-idea. If idea had an antonym, that
would be it.
I
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
I feel like there are too many differences between input and forward
ranges for such a minor difference. Many range functions are
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I'm thinking a better design is to require any range that's forward or
better to define a function save(). Ranges that don't implement it are input
ranges; those that do, will guarantee a brand new range
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:05 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Bill Baxter (wbax...@gmail.com)'s article
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
I
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
I think you miss the point here.
Generics and code generation are two separate and orthogonal features that
where conflated together by C++.
It's kind of odd, then, that for
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
IMHO, D should have a type with low size and function call overhead like a
struct as well as reference semantics like a class.
What's wrong with a pointer to a
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Jason House (jason.james.ho...@gmail.com)'s article
IMHO, D should have a type with low size and function call
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Jesse Phillips jessekphill...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gutbro$14e...@digitalmars.com...
On Mon, 18 May 2009 21:53:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I still want to get rid of omittable parens (and function-call-as-a-lhs)
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:51 AM, div0 d...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bearophile wrote:
Alexander Pánek:
Same here.
I too don't like .56, I add a zero when I see a literal like that in the
code. But what about Walter? :-)
Bye,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
BCS n...@anon.com wrote in message
news:a6268ff5f5d8cba54f824da...@news.digitalmars.com...
Hello Nick,
I'm not a touch-typer, but I've never seen much of a point to with.
If I have to
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a recent misuse by Andrei that made its way into Phobos:
if (is(T == struct) is(T.toString))
Hmm, 'is' isn't supposed to accept values is it? But it quietly
ignores anything wrong and returns false. Is
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 12:02:30 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
I'm a bit leery about this - what if user code has a bug and I transform
that into a feature?
hm... I guess that's one way to look at it. I don't
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Johan Granberg wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello Andrei,
I think with is a very dangerous feature due to the way it hides
symbols. It essentially makes the feeblest attempt at modular
reasoning utterly
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:16 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
1. Some uber-hardcore performance freaks will not even consider D if
it
has the
slightest bit of performance overhead
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The IDE is excellent. The docs are reasonable once you figure out how
they are laid out.
I really don't get what's so great about VS. After using JDT (Eclipse Java),
I find Vs kind
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:20090518141908.gb9...@burns.springfield.home...
bearophile, el 18 de mayo a las 04:33 me escribiste:
Andrei, I agree
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
That's not an equiv of. It's completely missing the point of. Each
using costs one new scope and one level of indentation which makes it
non-scalable. Indentation is *expensive*. I think the C# folks
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
That's not an equiv of. It's completely missing the point of. Each
using costs one new scope
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
It's all a matter of perspective. I see both as begin .. end. That may be the
same reason why I think addition when I see foo(bar()) + baz(37). The extra
cruft is more or less ignored when figuring out the basics
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jason House
jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
It's all a matter of perspective. I see both as begin .. end. That may be
the same reason why I think
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
But it's not blarf. It's case. I am floored that nobody sees the
elegance of that syntax.
So your argument is that case inherently deserves a special case?
Thinking about it more, I guess you must actually be seeing
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
But it's not blarf. It's case. I am floored that nobody sees the
elegance of that syntax.
So your argument
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Derek Parnell de...@psych.ward wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 20:05:14 -0600, Rainer Deyke wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
Although non-inclusive ranges are common enough that they deserve their
own syntax, I think inclusive ranges are *also* important enough
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Rainer Deyke rain...@eldwood.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Even Perl would turn its nose at a significant semantic difference
brought by the third period.
Not true: Perl has a '..' operator and a '...' operator with distinct
but similar meanings. And
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Derek Parnell de...@psych.ward wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:02:37 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 21:47:01 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 19:31:23 -0500, Andrei
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Georg Wrede georg.wr...@iki.fi wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
Incidentally, here, or in D.learn, somebody was asking for symbolic
derivation with D templates. I think one of the excercises in SICP was to
write a lisp snippet that did just that.
You're probably
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:16 PM, grauzone n...@example.net wrote:
1. Some uber-hardcore performance freaks will not even consider D if it
has the
slightest bit of performance overhead compared to C++.
I don't understand why D should pander to C++ freaks? If they think their
language is
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Georg Wrede georg.wr...@iki.fi wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
2. I have to figure out some licensing issues. Some algorithms are clearly
public domain, while some things -- like code I've ripped off Numerical
Recipes, for instance -- is more questionable.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:36 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
The fact that DMD does not inline functions with ref parameters has come up
several times deep in threads on this NG before, but it's never really
received proper attention. After changing a few swaps in performance-critical
missing something, but that looks pretty darn straightforward.
--bb
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Bill Baxter (wbax...@gmail.com)'s article
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:36 PM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
The fact that DMD does not inline
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
A chunky fragment of TDPL will hit Rough Cuts soon enough. I'm pondering
whether I should be adding exercises to the book. Some books have them, some
don't.
Pros: As I'm writing, I've come up with some
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Georg Wrede georg.wr...@iki.fi wrote:
We don't need to copy NR. All we need is to glipse at their algorithms. And
anyway, D is so much more powerful that those algorithms would be,
implemented in another way, anyhow.
THe NR in C code is basically a translated
If I had the time I'd love to play around with automatic differentiation in D.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_differentiation
I played around with it a bit in C++ before, using the operator
overloading approach, but didn't go much beyond basic polynomials with
it.
The page above offers
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Steve Teale
steve.te...@britseyeview.com wrote:
Bill Baxter Wrote:
If I had the time I'd love to play around with automatic differentiation in
D.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_differentiation
I played around with it a bit in C++ before, using
A D-ish wrapper around PLPlot's low-level D-to-C bindings sounds great
to me too.
I frequently use the D - data file - Python matplotlib route
myself. Something more direct would be great.
--bb
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Fawzi Mohamed fmoha...@mac.com wrote:
On 2009-05-10 05:19:53
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
zsxxsz wrote:
I found D is a wonderful programming language and start to use it in my
projects. I use D2 now, but which is still unstable although it's version
is
D2.029. Can anyone tell me when D2 will
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Don wrote:
I don't think anyone expects to be able to divide an integer by an
imaginary, and then assign it to an integer. I was astonished that the
compiler accepted it.
There actually is a reason -
SDL via Derelict is probably the easiest thing to get working quickly.
I think SDL has some kind of simple line drawing API.
SDL for opening the window with drawing done by GL wouldn't be hard
either, if you already know the GL api.
Neither will give you high-quality antialiased lines, though.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:15 AM, John C johnch_a...@hotmail.com wrote:
BCS Wrote:
I find my self in need of a line drawing package. I need to pop a window
and draw lines and points. Text would be nice but I can live without it.
Most importantly, I need something that is dirt simple to get
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I guess at that point the would-be D user would be entitled to make me a
lavaliere out of my
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Rainer Deyke wrote:
Robert Jacques wrote:
Precisely, so it's always passed by reference and doesn't need to
support copying.
All containers need to support copying.
Speaking of which, I'm thinking of
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 5:36 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Bill Baxter:
Much more often the discussion on the numpy list takes the form of
how do I make this loop faster becuase loops are slow in Python so
you have to come up with clever transformations to turn your loop
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:12:41 -0400, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:36:55 -0400, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org
wrote:
== Quote from
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Before reading your post, I was going to say that I'd expect 4, would
accept 1, and consider 2 or 3 to be buggy! Notice how under your new
proposal everyone would
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Paul D. Anderson
paul.d.removethis.ander...@comcast.andthis.net wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
BCS a...@pathlink.com wrote in message
news:78ccfa2d3e7918cb909fe7a39...@news.digitalmars.com...
Reply to Denis,
I'd be fine depricating /**/.
You mean,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1179.1240349493.22690.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Paul D. Anderson
paul.d.removethis.ander...@comcast.andthis.net wrote:
Nick
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Frank Torte frankt123...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul D. Anderson Wrote:
Is there an active project to develop arbitrary-precision floating point
numbers for D?
I've got a little extra time at the moment and would like to contribute if I
can. I've done some work
More agreement here.
--bb
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:gridbr$mv...@digitalmars.com...
I like contract programming, it helps me avoid bugs. This is an example
from the docs:
long squareRoot(long x)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
b) the features and functions that should be included.
I'd say NaNs and unordered comparisons. In other words, it should support
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:41:39 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jussi Jumppanen wrote:
Jason House Wrote:
For example, as an emacs user, I can easilly program for an hour without
touching
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Warning: semi-rant ahead. Feel free to ignore. :)
[...]
Windows is a pain in the arse, and there isn't a day that goes by where
I don't wish I could get rid of it from my life.
There is a tracker for DSSS bugs on dsource. You should probably
attach these to a ticket there too, to make sure they are not lost in
newsgroup limbo. (But I agree posting something about it here too was
a good thing to do)
--bb
2009/4/7 davidl dav...@nospam.org:
fix dsss incorrect abort by
Hi there folks,
Back when Gregor was dragging his feet getting DSSS 0.76 out the door,
I build my own release of it because some bug in 0.75 was causing me
troubles.
As I recall, Gregor subsequently never actually release a 0.76 but
jumped straight to 0.77. But 0.77 has some kind of change that
I'm pretty sure this used to work:
hg clone http://hg.dsource.org/proects/dwt-win dwt-win
But now I get the error:
abort: requirement '!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN' not supported!
Did something change with the Dwt-win repository?
Did something change with the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure this used to work:
hg clone http://hg.dsource.org/proects/dwt-win dwt-win
Duh, I'm blind. Trying to working on too many different proects at
the same time.
Actually I found the error by going back
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Georg Wrede wrote:
There's been a lot of talk about Scala when various new aspects of D have
been discussed. I stumbled upon a video where exactly those things are
talked about.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:21 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:21 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:21 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:21 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
2009/3/30
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sergey Gromov snake.sc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:21 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I guess I can't bring myself to dislike tuple(1, 2) in D.
I'd actually be a heck of a lot happier with that than Tuple!(1,2).
Especially if using it didn't require any explicit import.
--bb
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:15 AM, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Bill Baxter (wbax...@gmail.com)'s article
We're going to vote complex types off the island, right? Maybe we
could get rid of associative arrays as a built-in too.
Aren't builtin complex types on the way out
501 - 600 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
