On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 19:18:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 7:23 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 10/13/14, 5:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:29 AM, "岩倉 澪" wrote:
Are there good reasons not to add something like this to the
language,
or is it
simply a matter of doi
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 05:46:56 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 03:47:31 +
Cliff via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This is a great feature where we lack a really solid IDE
experience (which would have intellisense and auto-completion
that could be accurate and
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 03:34:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2014 2:45 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/3/14, 9:26 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
yes. DMD attempts to 'guess' what identifier i mistyped
drives me
crazy. just shut up and stop after "unknown identifier", you
r
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:43:45 UTC, Vladimir Kazanov
wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 17:17:53 UTC, Cliff wrote:
What has steered you down the path of writing your own parser
generator as opposed to using an existing one such as ANTLR?
Were there properties you wanted that it
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 15:47:04 UTC, Vladimir Kazanov
wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 15:01:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Cool, GLL is the way to go IMO, but I am also looking at
Earley-parsers. What is the advantage of GLL over Earley if
you use a parser generator? I think
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 18:37:50 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 17:53:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
But Sean's idea only takes strings into account. Strings
aren't the only
allocated resource Phobos needs to deal with. So extrapolating
from that
i
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 21:19:44 UTC, Ethan wrote:
Hello. AAA developer (Remedy) here using D. Custom tech, with a
custom binding solution written originally by Manu and
continued by myself.
A GC itself is not a bad thing. The implementation, however, is.
With a codebase like ours
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 20:58:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I do not condone adding file/line to exception *messages*.
Catch blocks
can print / translate those messages, which can be made
user-friendly,
but if the program failed to catch an exception, you're already
screwe
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 19:47:15 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I wanted to bring this over from D.learn, because I've never
seen this before, and it's an interesting solution to creating
a property without much boilerplate.
So here it is:
class Foo
{
union
{
private int
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 07:56:57 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:56:24 +
You do know that your email is in plain text in the news
message header? :p
Actually I did not, as I am not presently using a newsreader to
access the forums, just the web page. I keep forgetti
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 23:04:55 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 22:56:56 UTC, Sean Kelly
wrote:
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 22:49:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/25/14, 2:10 PM, eles wrote:
Why not, for God's sake, stripFront and stripBack?
Becaus
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 18:51:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
You don't know if
recompiling after checking out a previous release of your code
will
actually give you the same binaries that you shipped 2 months
ago.
To be clear, even if nothing changed, re-running the bui
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 17:42:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-09-25 16:23, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's the hallmark of make-based projects.
This was Ninja actually. But how would the build system know
I've updated the compiler?
The compiler is an input to the
Actually you can't do this for D properly without enlisting the
help of the compiler. Scoped import is a very interesting
conditional dependency (it is realized only if the template is
instantiated).
Also, lazy opening of imports is almost guaranteed to have a
huge good impact on build times.
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 23:20:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:02:51PM +, Cliff via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 22:49:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:18:29PM +, At
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 22:49:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:18:29PM +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
If I were to write a build system today that had to spell out
all of
its commands, I'd go with tup or Ninja. That CMake has s
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 20:12:40 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:36:05PM +, Cliff via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 19:26:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
>On 2014-09-24 12:16, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>>I'
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 19:26:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-09-24 12:16, Walter Bright wrote:
I've never heard of a non-trivial project that didn't have
constant
breakage of its build system. All kinds of reasons - add a
file, forget
to add it to the manifest. Change the fil
The study doesn't analyze D, but the relationships between
languages may be interesting and in some cases surprising.
http://se.inf.ethz.ch/people/nanz/research/rosettacode.html
NOTE: The link contains only a summary, there is a pointer to the
full paper there however.
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 05:44:15 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:59:53 -0700
Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I understand quite thoroughly why c++ support is a big win
i believe it's not.
so-called "enterprise" will not choose D for many reasons
On Sunday, 21 September 2014 at 23:32:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 21 September 2014 at 20:57:24 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
No improvements to the GC can fix this. @nogc needs to be
usable, whether you are a GC fan or not.
True.
To fix this, we need to add a pile of hack that take car
On Sunday, 21 September 2014 at 04:59:12 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 21.09.2014 04:50, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 9/20/14, 7:10 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Rust looked a lot more exciting when I didn't know much
about it.
I didn't remember ever seeing you excited about Ru
On Friday, 19 September 2014 at 19:22:22 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:07:16 +
Cliff via Digitalmars-d wrote:
that's why dedicating people to work solely on build scripts and
infrastructure is good, yet almost nobody does that. ah,
"enterprise
On Friday, 19 September 2014 at 18:56:20 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:38:20 +
Scott Wilson via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
That CTFE is used randomly everywhere?
CTFE *can* be used alot. this is one of D killer features (our
regexp
engine, for example, not only v
I feel like this whole thread's diversion onto the relative
merits of GitHub is pretty pointless. Would it be difficult to
write a small automation tool that users could run (maybe
distributed as part of the DMD package or something) that lets
them submit patches/PRs mostly automatically? Or hav
On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 17:13:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
As for how it works on Windows, I have no idea at all. It's
probably
completely different from Posix, which is more reason to leave
it up to
plugin framework implementors to implement, rather than
hard-coding
On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 at 21:21:08 UTC, Martin Drasar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 16.9.2014 20:07, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Dlang on 4chan
http://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/44196390/dlang
Yeah, and the discussion is just in line with typical 4chan
discussions :-)
A1) Andrei
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 22:47:57 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 22:39:55 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
Issues like threading behavior and (a)synchronicity guarantees
are part of the API, though, and need to be clarified as part
of the std.logger design.
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 22:39:55 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 22:33:46 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
and you can do all that with std.logger.
again, the idea of std.logger is not to give you everything,
because nobody knows what that even is, the idea
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 18:24:07 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Ah, so you avoid recursion issues by separating the calls to
error() et altera from the actual process of writing to disk
or sending via the network.
Behind error() there would be a fixed implementation
controlled by the author of
On Sunday, 14 September 2014 at 07:22:52 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:34:16 +
schrieb "Robert burner Schadek" :
On Friday, 12 September 2014 at 16:08:42 UTC, Marco Leise
wrote:
>
> Remember that the stdlog is __gshared? Imagine we set the
> LogLevel to off and while execu
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 20:27:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:13 PM, Cliff wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 19:47:25 UTC, Casper Færgemand
wrote:
How would this even work?
It looks like this applies only to the inference of
immutability
based on the structure of the type
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 19:47:25 UTC, Casper Færgemand
wrote:
How would this even work?
It looks like this applies only to the inference of immutability
based on the structure of the type and its methods, as opposed to
a declaration of immutability.
33 matches
Mail list logo
