Re: Next focus: PROCESS

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 20:39:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 20:32:42 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 10:29:55 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: Second point is about merging master into staging - why not just rewrite it with master bra

Re: Compilation strategy

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 18:44:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:30:52PM +0100, RenatoUtsch wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 18:00:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: [...] >So perhaps one possible middle ground would be to link >packages >separately, but co

Re: Compilation strategy

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 18:24:50 UTC, jerro wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 17:31:19 UTC, RenatoUtsch wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 17:05:59 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:55:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: A quick straw poll. Do people

Re: Compilation strategy

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 18:00:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:31:17PM +0100, RenatoUtsch wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 17:05:59 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote: >On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:55:39 UTC, Russel Winder >wrote: >>A quick str

Re: Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:16:11 UTC, SomeDude wrote: On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 01:26:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/13/2012 5:10 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: Remedy adopting D Saying that would be premature and incorrect at the moment. We still have to ensure that Remedy wins wit

Re: Compilation strategy

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 17:05:59 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote: On Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 16:55:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: A quick straw poll. Do people prefer to have all sources compiled in a single compiler call, or (more like C++) separate compilation of each object followe

Re: Next focus: PROCESS

2012-12-15 Thread RenatoUtsch
staging branch will never be frozen, so development will never stop, as someone was saying on the forums that was a bad idea. And, when the new LTS release is made (2 years after the older LTS), the older LTS will be mantained for more one year, what means that each LTS will be mantained

Re: Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

2012-12-13 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 23:47:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/13/2012 1:44 PM, deadalnix wrote: You are engaging the whole community into something you dropped here by surprise and then claiming that some people uses. We don't even know who they are ! How can we support your point

Re: Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

2012-12-13 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 21:37:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/13/2012 12:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2012-12-13 18:27, Iain Buclaw wrote: I am confused at this commit also. Walter argues that people are already using it so it can't just be removed. I say, they're using an un

Re: Next focus: PROCESS

2012-12-13 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 15:44:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: On 12/13/2012 10:07 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: That makes a _lot_ more sense than the unstable => testing => stable model. I like the idea of having an LTS release at some interval (probably 1 year) where that bran

Re: GDC is this a bug or a feature?

2012-11-11 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Sunday, 11 November 2012 at 10:39:41 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: |> gdc -o lib_helloWorld.so -shared helloWorld.os /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/libgphobos2.a(object_.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_D11TypeInfo_Pv6__initZ' can not be used when making a shared object; r

Re: Make [was Re: SCons and gdc]

2012-10-27 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Saturday, 27 October 2012 at 03:33:37 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 04:11:02AM +0200, RenatoUtsch wrote: On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 22:15:13 UTC, Rob T wrote: [...] >At this point I'm considering looking at those old build tools >written in D, perhaps I can p

Re: Make [was Re: SCons and gdc]

2012-10-26 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 22:15:13 UTC, Rob T wrote: I'm trying to do a very simple build, but with scons I find myself spending much more time with it (and getting nowhere) than the actual coding, and that tells me that it's no better and may be even worse than Make. As an example of the

Re: dlang.org slow?

2012-10-26 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 08:40:56 UTC, RenatoUtsch wrote: On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 08:18:30 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote: H. S. Teoh wrote: Is it just me, or has dlang.org been really slow today? Is something wrong with the site that needs our attention? It takes almost 2 whole minutes

Re: dlang.org slow?

2012-10-26 Thread RenatoUtsch
On Friday, 26 October 2012 at 08:18:30 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote: H. S. Teoh wrote: Is it just me, or has dlang.org been really slow today? Is something wrong with the site that needs our attention? It takes almost 2 whole minutes to load a page -- at first I thought my office network screwed u

Re: Is there any way to create something like this?

2012-10-22 Thread RenatoUtsch
That static version you made Adam was just perfect for what I need! Thanks for the help! Renato On Sunday, 21 October 2012 at 15:19:24 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Sunday, 21 October 2012 at 13:10:16 UTC, RenatoUtsch wrote: Is there any way to make the GeneralLibrary class and the

Re: Is there any way to create something like this?

2012-10-21 Thread RenatoUtsch
Sorry, the code is wrong, the fixed code is: void main() { GeneralLibrary library = createLibrary("1.0"); GeneralLibrary library11 = createLibrary("1.1"); GeneralLibrary library12 = createLibrary("1.2"); GeneralLibrary library2 = createLibrary("2.0"); library.func1(); // Shou

Is there any way to create something like this?

2012-10-21 Thread RenatoUtsch
Hello, I was trying to imagine how to do a thing such the one as below (or similar), because it would be great for the project I am creating... Is there any way to create some kind of object that resembles different objects (like a superclass with the subclasses, but with transparent access