On 25 March 2014 00:12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:08:05PM +, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> [...]
>> >Sorry, I didn't read this thread about Ramon yet (I'm just going through
>> >these posts). I'll look it up now.
>>
>> Oh you mean this guy?:
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/csusa
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:04:16 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
There is a little bit too much elitism IMO.
I can't see this anywhere, could you elaborate?
I could. >;-}
All the major contributors to D are always helpful towards
newbies, especially in D.learn.
Yes, bearophile, John Colvi
I didn't have a problem with most of his posts, but constantly
waving around that "windoze" flamebait at every possible
opportunity (and then feigning innocence about it) was the real
problem. And I'm even saying that as someone who does carry a
lot of hatred toward windows (among many other th
On 3/24/2014 8:12 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:08:05PM +, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
[...]
Sorry, I didn't read this thread about Ramon yet (I'm just going through
these posts). I'll look it up now.
Oh you mean this guy?:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/csusavszritzlaqds...@for
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:08:05PM +, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
[...]
> >Sorry, I didn't read this thread about Ramon yet (I'm just going through
> >these posts). I'll look it up now.
>
> Oh you mean this guy?:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/csusavszritzlaqds...@forum.dlang.org
>
> That guy reall
on
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:06:27 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:04:16 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 22:24:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 13:31:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
D community is single most friendly
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:04:16 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 22:24:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 13:31:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
D community is single most friendly and helpful place I have
ever seen in the internet.
All communitie
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 22:24:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 13:31:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
D community is single most friendly and helpful place I have
ever seen in the internet.
All communities rate themselves that way, I think it is
somewhere in the middle
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 13:31:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
D community is single most friendly and helpful place I have
ever seen in the internet.
All communities rate themselves that way, I think it is somewhere
in the middle. Meaning: there is room for improvement.
There is a little bit too
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 07:35:20 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I followed the forums lurking at the time. Ramon is/was very
enthusiatic about D, and shared that enthusiasm with great
force. It is kind of sad when the community does not back up
that enthusiasm and direct it in a direction
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 21:42:46 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Tomato, tomato. I just found it slightly amusing that this is
where the conversation went, not trying to call anyone or say
Yeah, I agree that it is somewhat interesting. I guess it is a
topic that is in a way fascinating because it eas
oo late that my message could be interpreted in a
way I didn't intend.
However, I do question the public slandering of Ramon in a thread about
appropriateness of posts. I don't think there is any cultural bias in that.
Yeah... I think I would have been ok with that had he been using an
in what is appropriate using racial terms as an
example.
However, I do question the public slandering of Ramon in a thread
about appropriateness of posts. I don't think there is any
cultural bias in that.
I just want to point out that somehow the thread about how we need to
maintain a professional attitude in the forums deteriorated into
discussing in depth racism.
We literally couldn't have picked a better thread to highjack. =P
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:35:53 -0400, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 23:18:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Sometimes, the only way to win is to not play.
T
+1. You should add this to your list of quotes.
-WOPR, War Games
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 07:51:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I find that interesting. This is the first I've ever heard of
"caucasian" being even potentially offensive.
Well, I am not offended by the term, I dislike it. I am offended
by having to provide racial information. I am not sur
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 23:18:55 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Sometimes, the only way to win is to not play.
T
+1. You should add this to your list of quotes.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:41:26PM +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 19 March 2014 19:43, Meta wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 17:43:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >>
> >> Same here. I do remember that wasn't the peak of it. That happened
> >> when I tried to explain something as a "c
On 19 March 2014 19:43, Meta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 17:43:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>> Same here. I do remember that wasn't the peak of it. That happened when I
>> tried to explain something as a "cultural difference". Probably it was taken
>> as "cultural inferiority/
On 3/19/2014 12:43 PM, Meta wrote:
There was the whole "windoze" debacle
with him as well.
The "windoze" thing was tired and old in 1990. So was Micro$oft.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 17:43:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Same here. I do remember that wasn't the peak of it. That
happened when I tried to explain something as a "cultural
difference". Probably it was taken as "cultural
inferiority/superiority".
Andrei
More like feigned idio
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 17:43:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Same here. I do remember that wasn't the peak of it. That
happened when I tried to explain something as a "cultural
difference". Probably it was taken as "cultural
inferiority/superiority".
Andrei
Talk about projection.
On 3/19/14, 10:13 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:01:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
snip
Heh, case in point - there was a gentleman going by "Ramon" at a point
in this forum who flew off the handle taking offense at something I
said (no idea what exactly that was)
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:07:54 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Of course, if I want get *really* pedantic, I'm not certain if those are
actual "majorities" (ie >50%) or simply just the largest (erm, I mean
most numerous) ethnic groups. But I don't want to get that pedantic ;)
The word you ar
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:01:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
snip
Heh, case in point - there was a gentleman going by "Ramon" at
a point in this forum who flew off the handle taking offense at
something I said (no idea what exactly that was).
"Destroy" was the offending expression
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 13:08:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 3/19/2014 6:08 AM, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 07:51:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
[...]
even though "white" is still used all the time anyway and
I've never
seen anyone get offended.
QED. "white" has no
On 3/19/2014 6:08 AM, Chris wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 07:51:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[...]
even though "white" is still used all the time anyway and I've never
seen anyone get offended.
QED. "white" has no negative connotations simply because the majority of
people are white.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 07:51:06 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
But "black" and "white" are less clear. Ever since the US civil
rights movement, "colored" has become accepted as a term that
"you just don't say" (despite still being used as the "C" in
the NAACP, confusingly enough). So "bl
On 3/18/2014 12:20 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 23:02:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
People see that software development is predominately male, and they
assume "Oh, it *MUST* be because those EVIL, SEXIST men are TRYING to
keep women out!" That genuinely pisses
On 3/18/2014 10:24 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
However, I am upset about the widespread US term "caucasian", not
because it is a bad word, but because of the Aryan connotations that has
some seriously bad vibes to it after 2WW and the nazi worship of
"scandinavian genes".
The term "cauca
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 23:02:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
People see that software development is predominately male, and
they assume "Oh, it *MUST* be because those EVIL, SEXIST men
are TRYING to keep women out!" That genuinely pisses me off,
what the hell is this, 1920? When people act
On 3/17/14, 18:02, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 6:33 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:15:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem, and should
Pervasive sexism in programm
On 3/17/14, 16:50, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:14:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You come to country, you accept its culture. It is expected attitude.
I don't see your point. That only work on a very superficial level.
You cannot expect a chinese girl to appreciate b
On Tuesday, 18 March 2014 at 13:05:31 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I think the issue there probably isn't so much "offense", but
the fact that american discussion of politics is notoriously
volatile, and in a mixed-group is pretty much guaranteed to
erupt in a flame war.
Well, it was right aft
On 3/18/2014 7:53 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If this guy comes back, you may want to have a talk with him, then. He
might have got the wrong impression from you.
http://forum.dlang.org/post/gnc2ml$14ch$1...@digitalmars.com
Heh, oh man. I don't know about anyone else, but it was the leet
On 3/18/2014 9:05 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/18/2014 2:59 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
I was once told in game chat by a US player that I could not use the
term "shit" because it was such an offensive word. I was surprised. In
scandinavia the word is so mild it basically means "ouch"
On 3/18/2014 2:59 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
I was once told not to bring up politics (George Bush) in casual game
chat by a US player, because it might be taken as offensive by someone.
I found that shocking.
I think the issue there probably isn't so much "offense", but the fact
tha
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:26:08 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 3/17/2014 10:03 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
I agree that this community doesn't seem unhealthy; and also that, in
general,
sex jokes aren't necessarily a sign of sexism. But I also think it's
smart to
establish a wide margin on com
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:12:14 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
American broadcast standards have nothing to do with american
culture, they're famously disconnected. That's the problem with
them and (I assume) what Ola was pointing out: Try not to
offend anyone (as the FCC implicitly forces br
On 17 March 2014 21:01, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> On 3/17/14, 11:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:18:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:09:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
>
>Seems
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
I don't think so. And I do agree to Walter.
On 3/17/2014 12:03 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some locker room
jokes that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
FWIW, either I completely missed the posts with the locker room jokes,
or else the problem was that none of the authors of
On 3/17/2014 7:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
...people with more many and self-importance...
s/many/money/
Every notice how typos are significantly more embarrassing in a rant? ;)
On 3/17/2014 6:45 PM, Araq wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:33:40 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:15:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem, and should
Pervasive sexism
On 3/17/2014 6:49 PM, bearophile wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
That categorizational difficulty only exists because "porn" and
"erotic art" realistically *are* the same thing, the only difference
is the speaker's positive/negative spin and the compulsion of certain
factions in the art world to feel e
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:56:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:53:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I'm not sure if it's an argument, more an observation...
Nonetheless, please do enlighten :)
"I am against offending people at all costs, so I'd better call
that guy a jerk be
On 3/17/2014 6:33 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:15:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem, and should
Pervasive sexism in programming? What a complete crock of shit.
And a
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:53:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I'm not sure if it's an argument, more an observation...
Nonetheless, please do enlighten :)
"I am against offending people at all costs, so I'd better call
that guy a jerk because he think differently"
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:13:17 UTC, Araq wrote:
From my personal experience in the UK, It's a pretty good
indicator. Not exclusively, but perhaps 80% of the time.
If only you would understand how ironic your argument is.
I'm not sure if it's an argument, more an observation...
Nonethel
Nick Sabalausky:
That categorizational difficulty only exists because "porn" and
"erotic art" realistically *are* the same thing, the only
difference is the speaker's positive/negative spin and the
compulsion of certain factions in the art world to feel
ethically insulated from the works of t
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:33:40 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:15:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem,
and should
Pervasive sexism in programming? What a complete c
On 3/17/2014 2:31 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
The difference between porn and art has defied all attempts at writing a
bureaucratic rule defining it, yet we all know which is which when we
see it.
That categorizational difficulty only exists because "porn" and "erotic
art" realistically *are* t
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 22:15:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem,
and should
Pervasive sexism in programming? What a complete crock of shit.
And all these pull request we rejected becau
On 3/17/2014 5:00 PM, Araq wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:15:52 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
Good. If "not being a jerk" is such an onerous burden, their influence
is almost certain to be harmful to the community in the long-term.
Ah so "being fed up with politicial correctness" is now the same a
On 3/17/2014 11:50 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem, and should
Pervasive sexism in programming? What a complete crock of shit.
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:29:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
From my personal experience in the UK, It's a pretty good
indicator.
UK is a class society, US is a melting pot. In order to prevent
eruptions if discontent an conflict you developed a careful
politness as safe guards (which somtime
From my personal experience in the UK, It's a pretty good
indicator. Not exclusively, but perhaps 80% of the time.
If only you would understand how ironic your argument is.
On 3/17/2014 5:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:13:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
So basically everybody adapts to american broadcast standards?
You come to country, you accept its culture. It is expected attitude.
American broadcast standards have nothing to do with
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:14:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You come to country, you accept its culture. It is expected
attitude.
I don't see your point. That only work on a very superficial
level.
You cannot expect a chinese girl to appreciate being kissed on
the street by her boyfriend, even
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:01:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
One can argue that it's all relative but that's rather
ineffective. The reality is I do work at Facebook with people
from all over the globe and though cultural adaptation is on
rare occasions an issue, it's never been conside
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:00:08 UTC, Araq wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:15:52 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 19:29:10 UTC, Araq wrote:
Yeah but it can also discourage the many people who are fed
up with political correctness.
Good. If "not being a jerk" is such a
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:01:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
One can argue that it's all relative but that's rather
ineffective. The reality is I do work at Facebook with people
from all over the globe and though cultural adaptation is on
rare occasions an issue, it's never been conside
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 21:13:06 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
So basically everybody adapts to american broadcast standards?
A fun book: The Hidden Dimension by Edward T. Hall
You come to country, you accept its culture. It is expected
attitude.
On 3/17/14, 11:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:18:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:09:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
Seems like Walter wants it seriously
professional. No joking around about D.
Jokes are
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:15:52 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 19:29:10 UTC, Araq wrote:
Yeah but it can also discourage the many people who are fed up
with political correctness.
Good. If "not being a jerk" is such an onerous burden, their
influence is almost certain to
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:04:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Exercising good judgement and common sense is all I ask.
By my common sense and good judgement that thread was perfectly
OK and I am honestly offended by the fact that someone does not
consider my cultural preferences normal in th
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:18:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:09:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
Seems like Walter wants it seriously
professional. No joking around about D.
Jokes are fine. I post plenty myself. Jokes are fin
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:04:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 11:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I mentioned in my post below, almost anything is offensive
to someone,
somewhere.
You won't find a unified view of "Inappropriate" even among a
very homogenous
group of people, let alone
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 20:14:25 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I cannot think of any case where restricting discussions of sex
will restrict anyone's ability to write code in D or talk about
the language's development.
I thank Walter for keeping these forums focused. It would be
really hard to re
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:49:07 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
As I mentioned in my post below, almost anything is offensive
to someone, somewhere.
You won't find a unified view of "Inappropriate" even among a
very homogenous group of people, let alone an ad hoc group of
collaborators and users
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 19:29:10 UTC, Araq wrote:
Yeah but it can also discourage the many people who are fed up
with political correctness.
Good. If "not being a jerk" is such an onerous burden, their
influence is almost certain to be harmful to the community in the
long-term.
-Wyatt
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 19:29:10 UTC, Araq wrote:
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem,
and should be addressed wherever it's found. If keeping sex
jokes out of an otherwise-professional forum will encourage
even one keen developer to stay a while longer in D space,
On 3/17/2014 11:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I mentioned in my post below, almost anything is offensive to someone,
somewhere.
You won't find a unified view of "Inappropriate" even among a very homogenous
group of people, let alone an ad hoc group of collaborators and users spanning
the entire gl
The pervasive sexism in our profession is a serious problem,
and should be addressed wherever it's found. If keeping sex
jokes out of an otherwise-professional forum will encourage
even one keen developer to stay a while longer in D space, then
that's a tremendously small price to pay for an in
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:18:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:09:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
Seems like Walter wants it seriously
professional. No joking around about D.
Jokes are fine. I post plenty myself. Jokes are fin
On 3/17/2014 3:55 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Perhaps we need to create a community standard guidelines related to this?
The difference between porn and art has defied all attempts at writing a
bureaucratic rule defining it, yet we all know which is which when we see it.
I.e. just use good j
On 3/17/2014 10:03 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
I agree that this community doesn't seem unhealthy; and also that, in general,
sex jokes aren't necessarily a sign of sexism. But I also think it's smart to
establish a wide margin on community practice. Correcting small, potentially
harmful behaviours
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 18:09:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
Seems like Walter wants it seriously
professional. No joking around about D.
Jokes are fine. I post plenty myself. Jokes are fine in a
professional work environment. Inappropriate jok
On 3/17/2014 3:45 AM, sclytrack wrote:
Seems like Walter wants it seriously
professional. No joking around about D.
Jokes are fine. I post plenty myself. Jokes are fine in a professional work
environment. Inappropriate jokes are not. This shouldn't be a mystery.
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 16:09:34 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 15:50:12 UTC, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age peopl
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 15:50:12 UTC, Graham Fawcett wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
The pervasive sexism in our pro
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
Obviously they don't. A forum moderator has a duty of care that
supersedes his or her personal
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
Well that's uncalled for.
Plus, he does have a sense of humor.
My guess is he mistook the "quo
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:47:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
I think that's a little unkind.
Nonetheless, I didn't really see anything particularly
problem
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:31:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:18:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some
locker room
jokes
that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
Where?
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:46:47 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:31:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:18:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some
locker room
jo
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:31:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:18:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some
locker room
jokes
that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
Where?
On 3/17/14, Namespace wrote:
> I think he means the "dlang.sexy" thread.
I guess at a certain age people lose their sense of humor.
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 10:31:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:18:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some
locker room
jokes
that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
Where?
On Monday, 17 March 2014 at 09:18:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some
locker room
jokes
that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
Where? Any specific threads?
I think he means the "dlang.sexy" th
On 3/17/14, Walter Bright wrote:
> I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some locker room
> jokes
> that continued even after I asked it be stopped.
Where? Any specific threads?
I'd hoped I'd never have to post this. There have been some locker room jokes
that continued even after I asked it be stopped. Perhaps what I wrote was
missed, so I'm elevating this to its own thread.
Please regard this forum as a professional work environment as to
appropriateness of postings
92 matches
Mail list logo
