On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 20:24:24 UTC, FoxyBrown wrote:
On Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 18:11:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 06:10:57PM +, FoxyBrown via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Create an auto pointer, handy in some cases and fits in the
language as a natural generalization.
On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 at 09:09:00 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 17:48:50 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
Oh, ok. AFAIK The decoding of indexing modes into micro-ops
(the real instructions used inside the CPU, not the actual
op-codes) has no effect on the
What does that snippet do ? What should it do?
int caca(void)
{
for(int i=0x; i!=0x8000; i++)
printf("coucou");
}
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 19:06:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/10/2017 11:49 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 05:05:59 Ali Çehreli via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On 05/09/2017 10:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> > After upgrading the
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 14:13:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/8/2017 1:55 PM, John Carter wrote:
On Saturday, 6 May 2017 at 06:26:29 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Walter: I believe memory safety will kill C.
C/C++ has been granted an extension of life by the likes of
valgrind and purify
and
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 06:28:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky
[...]
Perhaps I'm just being cynical, but my current unfounded
hypothesis is that the majority of C/C++ programmers ...
Just a nitpick, could we also please stop conflating
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 11:16:57 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
The likelihood of a randomly picked C/C++ programmer not even
knowing what a profiler is, much less having used one, is
extremely high in my experience. I worked with a lot of
embedded C programmers with several years of
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 02:13:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/08/2017 03:28 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uncompressed? Seriously? I assume that really means FLAC or
something rather than truly uncompressed, but even
still...sounds more like a bullet-list
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 17:34:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Adam Wilson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
I don't represent any company, but I have to also say that I
*appreciate* breaking changes that reveal latent bugs in my
code.
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 06:15:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
int my_func(mytype_t *input, outbuf_t *output_buf,
char *buffer, int size)
{
/* Typical lazy way of null-checking (that will blow up
* later) */
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 08:24:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/09/2017 02:10 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 02:13:19 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 05/08/2017 03:28 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Uncompressed? Seriously? I assume that really means
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 06:15:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:33:08PM +, Jerry via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
strncpy(buf, src, sizeof(buf));
Quick, without looking: what's wrong with the above line of
code?
Not so obvious, huh? The problem is that strncpy
On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 16:55:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 08:18:09AM +, Patrick Schluter via
[...]
Ouch. Haha, even I forgot about this particularly lovely
aspect of C. Hooray, freely call functions without declaring
them, and "obviously" they return int! Why not?
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 06:36:55 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 05:07:38 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/17/17 8:27 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
What will cause a shift is a
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/17/17 8:27 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:16:59PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 5/17/2017 1:46 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
It may not be the
On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 19:25:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
1) Consistency with functions without contracts.
This only applies to the "naked" version which has ugly }{ in
it. The other options people are asking about are replacing
body with a keyword, which I think you agree would
On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 11:05:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 13 May 2017 at 06:47:54 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
Atilla's library... but, as someone on Reddit said, at the
moment that is rather "unergonomic".
I'm sure that will get better over time, though. At least I
don't see why not. Most
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 at 00:05:56 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
On Saturday, 6 May 2017 at 06:26:29 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Walter: I believe memory safety will kill C.
Hi,
I think that comparing languages like D to C is not
appropriate. C is a high level assembler and has different
design
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 13:43:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 06/23/2017 08:49 AM, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
"Systems programming" may scare users away who think they're
not good enough for that kind of programming.
True.
"General-purpose programming" is a better fit, in my opinion.
In mine
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 22:12:57 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:56:29 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.06.2017 23:51, MysticZach wrote:
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 21:41:55 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
The whole double parentheses is a bit ugly to me. Is there
any problem
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 12:58:00 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 26 June 2017 at 10:14:08 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
I think it would be good for all which want to invest their
time in learning D to know more about the history and probably
the future of D.
D frontend written in
Funny. Someone replied to a post from 1988 concerning the D
language. The original thread (not read yet) from 1988 even has
messages from Walter.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/y0uGj6tHe2E%5B201-225%5D
original thread
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 07:00:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
Thanks a lot, but I was looking for small snippets (< 10 LoC)
than could be used to show the awesomeness of D at the roulette
enum E {IN = -1, V1, V2, V3, X1 }
mixin({
string code = "enum EBIT : ulong { "~
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 21:15:57 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 20:47:42 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
On Monday, 22 May 2017 at 14:49:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Conditional execution is not in the later models of ARM, I
believe.
Also does not really provide
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 20:47:42 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
On Monday, 22 May 2017 at 14:49:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Conditional execution is not in the later models of ARM, I
believe.
Also does not really provide advantages over conditional
jumps, except in rare circumstances.
That
On Friday, 19 May 2017 at 13:45:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/19/17 9:35 AM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
They do however say that the actual knowledge about Rust in
the D
community seems to be rather small, compared to the amount of
criticism
against it. And TBQH I have to agree. To
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:15:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:41:10AM +, Jesse Phillips via
(Note that this is much less of a limitation than it seems; for
example you could use std.mmfile to memory-map the file into
your address space so that it doesn't actually
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:54:46 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 06:15:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:41:10AM +, Jesse Phillips via
(Note that this is much less of a limitation than it seems;
for example you could use std.mmfile to memory-map
On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 12:15:49 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 12:28 +0100, rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
Step back a moment. C++ and Java are trying to stop programmers
using these features, in favour of using higher level
abstractions. In C++
Before even contemplating a big disrupting language split like
proposed by the OP, wouldn't it first more appropriate to write a
nice article, DIP, blog, whatever, listing the defects of the
current language that can not be solved by progressive evolution?
I haven't the impression that the
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 14:36:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 13:23:57 Joakim via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 10:42:44 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> Static libraries that are
> - compiled with dmd 2.074 (maybe previous versions too)
> - call format()
On Sunday, 20 August 2017 at 08:45:24 UTC, Rico Decho wrote:
So, editing and answering old questions is encouraged on
stackoverflow and imho it is a good thing, nothing is more
annoying than googling for a question and only finding answers
in old mailing lists that apply only to a
On Sunday, 20 August 2017 at 02:44:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, August 19, 2017 15:17:52 Ecstatic Coder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Its called necro-posting.
> I'm surprised that post isn't read-only.
Call it like you want, but I ee people putting new
answers/comments to years
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 04:17:18 UTC, A Guy With an
Opinion wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 04:12:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
A Guy With an Opinion wrote:
That is true, but I'm still unconvinced that making the
person's program likely to error is better than initializing
a number to
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 04:19:40 UTC, A Guy With an
Opinion wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 04:17:18 UTC, A Guy With an
Opinion wrote:
[...]
Also, C and C++ didn't just have undefined behavior, sometimes
it has inconsistent behavior. Sometimes int a; is actually set
to 0.
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 17:40:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...] And if you're not dealing with Asian languages, UTF-16
uses up more space than UTF-8.
Not even that in most cases. Only if you use unstructured text
can it happen that UTF-16 needs less space than UTF-8. In most
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 17:40:08 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
English and thus don't as easily hit the cases where their code
is wrong. For better or worse, UTF-16 hides it better than
UTF-8, but the problem exists in both.
To give just an example of what can go wrong with UTF-16.
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 23:16:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:04:44PM -0800, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 11/30/2017 9:23 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 03:37:26 UTC, rikki
> cattermole wrote:
> > Be aware Microsoft is alone in
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 10:35:50 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 23:16:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
That's true in theory, in practice it's not that severe as the
CJK languages are never isolated and appear embedded in a lot
of ASCII. You can read here
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 19:37:47 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/30/17 1:20 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 17:40:08 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
English and thus don't as easily hit the cases where their
code is wrong. For better or worse, UTF-16
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 19:59:29 UTC, meppl wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 05:23:53 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 11/6/17 12:20, Michael wrote:
I can't quite see why this proposal is such a big deal to
people - as
has been restated, it's just a quick change in the parser for
a
On Sunday, 19 November 2017 at 04:19:32 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 19 November 2017 at 04:04:04 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I wish there was a null for int types. At least we sort of
have one for char types, 0xFF. And there's that lovely NaN for
floating point! Too bad it's woefully
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 03:49:24 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 01:37:01 UTC, 12345swordy
wrote:
You should take your own advice first, when you insult other
people by calling them "Microsoft fanboys". Take your snark
somewhere else.
and btw. if you had
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 09:17:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/4/2017 1:54 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 04.11.2017 09:30, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/3/2017 5:29 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Note that dmd still runs on Windows XP, though it is not
officially supported. You just need
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 06:28:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
But Ken Thompson summed it all up nicely: "You can't trust code
that you did not totally create yourself."
Even that is wrong. You can trust code you create yourself only
if it was reviewed by others as involved as you. I do
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 05:13:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:13:39AM +, codephantom via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 18:42:07 UTC, Bo wrote:
> /Signed: A pissed off Windows user
I think you've summed it all up right there ;-)
But
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 01:13:00 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 at 00:09:51 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[...]
Redhat have demonstrated that it can be done. GPL is not the
obstacle. The obstacle is the desire to control/dominate a
market. There, GPL will
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 20:44:57 UTC, Jerry wrote:
It's amazing how many people are so lazy to download Visual
Studio, and some of the stupidest reason for not wanting to
download it to boot.
It has nothing to do with lazyness. If you're behind a proxy that
abomination of a installer
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 08:58:03 UTC, codephantom wrote:
but now we want free floating statements in D?
like:
--
in(a > 0)
in(b >= 0, "b cannot be negative!")
out(r; r > 0, "return must be positive")
out(; a != 0)
Now, I'm new to D (I only
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 20:28:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/5/2017 3:13 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2017 at 09:17:37 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I run dmd regularly on an XP box, but that just means dmd
itself runs on XP. (I converted the front end of DMC++ to D,
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 15:53:41 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/8/17 7:42 AM, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 11:10:16 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 10:13:28 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/8/2017 1:48 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Using emoji
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 18:11:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 12/8/17 12:09 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 15:53:41 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/8/17 7:42 AM, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 11:10:16 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 06:07:07 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 19:37:47 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/30/17 1:20 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[...]
iopipe handles this:
http://schveiguy.github.io/iopipe/iopipe/textpipe/ensureDecodeable.html
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 12:21:22 UTC, A Guy With a Question
wrote:
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 06:07:07 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 19:37:47 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/30/17 1:20 PM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[...]
iopipe handles this:
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 10:20:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/1/2017 8:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
Yup. I've presented that point of view a couple times on
HackerNews, and some Unicode people took umbrage at that. The
case they presented fell a little flat.
[...]
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 15:45:07 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Monday, 11 December 2017 at 14:22:37 UTC, Jakob Bornecrantz
wrote:
And to add more, CommonMark on the other hand has a full spec
written and several test that covers the difficult to get
right parts of
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 22:16:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 23:16:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:04:44PM -0800, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 11/30/2017 9:23 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 03:37:26 UTC, rikki
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 03:46:35 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 at 02:09:31 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
It seems to me that you have a major case of anti-windows bias
here, as I never have any issues on my main windows machine.
Actually, it's the very opposite...I'm
On Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 01:47:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/30/17 9:44 PM, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 30 October 2017 at 23:03:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
But in D, UFCS allows obj.func() to work for both member
functions and free functions, so if the client code uses the
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 23:16:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:13:23PM +, Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
Yes. Imagine if we standardized on a header-based string
encoding, and we wanted to implement a substring function over
a string
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 05:01:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 20:11:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/16/18 1:18 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 16:48:28 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 15:48:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 15:37:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 05/17/2018 09:14 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
I'm in charge at the European Commission of the biggest
translation memory in the world.
Impressive! Is that the Europarl?
No, Euramis. The central translation memory
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 02:32:05 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 02:00:17 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 00:28:42 UTC, KingJoffrey wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 19:40:18 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
[...]
If 'getting a module to respect the
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 23:05:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Sure, it can be argued that this should be unnecessary and that
the programmer should just get it right, but it's not an
altogether uncommon bug to screw up case statements and
invadvertently fall through to the next one when
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 06:32:23 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 17:31:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The IP address is included in the headers of the newsgroup.
All of them came from the same IP. I have a filter on my
thunderbird client to flag certain IPs, and his was
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 18:07:53 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 01:33:19 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
I would like to see a dependency-less Phobos-like library that
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 01:33:19 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 16:27:05 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
Let the brainstorming begin!
I would like to see a dependency-less Phobos-like library that
can be used by the DMD compiler, druntime, -betterC, and other
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 15:16:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 17 May 2018 at 13:14:46 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
This is not practical, sorry. What happens when your message
loses the header? Exactly, the rest of the message is garbled.
Why would it lose the header? TCP guarantees
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 at 13:45:54 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Sunday, 10 June 2018 at 13:16:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
memcpyD: 1 ms, 725 μs, and 1 hnsec
memcpyD2: 587 μs and 5 hnsecs
memcpyASM: 119 μs and 5 hnsecs
Still, the ASM version is much faster.
rep movsd is very CPU
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 08:16:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1015, "Deprecation and removal of implicit
conversion from integer and character literals to bool":
On Sunday, 29 April 2018 at 15:40:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-04-29 16:42, dd886k wrote:
[...]
Looks like "putchar" is inlined [1]. That means the "putchar"
you're referencing is not the one in the C standard library but
it's implemented in druntime. That means you need to link
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 12:36:40 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 11:32:26 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
A wizard-style installation with links to things and a good
flow might help a lot here. Is that possible? -- Andrei
The DMD installer is already a Wizard on
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 22:05:31 UTC, I Love Stuffing
wrote:
On Friday, 29 December 2017 at 09:46:05 UTC, JN wrote:
AFAIK Rust doesn't have templates, but generics. Generics
usually have much cleaner error messages because they are
mostly used for generic functions and classes,
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 04:14:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/4/18 10:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
(Yes, I got the flu shot, and the durned thing did not work.)
I had a flu shot once in my adult life. Never been sicker.
Won't ever get it again.
The only people I ever saw with
What happenned in december that the downloads literaly exploded
http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
An increase by nearly 4x the normal increase is surprizing to say
the least.
On Saturday, 23 December 2017 at 21:04:52 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
Bad data, one off spike, or something else?
OOps, hadn't seen this thread. Sorry.
On Sunday, 24 December 2017 at 15:00:09 UTC, Dylan Graham wrote:
On Saturday, 23 December 2017 at 08:15:04 UTC, Dan Partelly
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 December 2017 at 01:12:53 UTC, Dylan Graham
wrote:
language it should be, not the language some C++ programmer
wants but is never going to use
On Sunday, 24 December 2017 at 22:21:28 UTC, Tony wrote:
On Sunday, 24 December 2017 at 22:04:00 UTC, Dan Partelly wrote:
1995. A dark year. Two of the crappiest language ever devised
by man arrived. Both gained traction. Java, through marketing.
PhP though tribalism.
What makes Java a
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 16:48:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 16:41:04 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Furthermore, I'd ask, if it's possible today, why do we need a
__traits to do it?
It is an enormous pain to do it now well, sort of,
actually, the
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 at 18:31:28 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/18/18 11:48 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...]
This is how I'd imagine doing something like this. I don't see
it being a huge pain, just an extra build step.
[...]
Did you mean not really harmful?
But in any
On Monday, 5 February 2018 at 14:50:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 2/5/18 1:27 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 02:34:31PM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
I don't have a hard time with braces. It tends to be worse
with
parentheses. Generally
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 03:17:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/11/2018 6:26 PM, Elie Morisse wrote:
Wow, you converted DMC++'s front-end to D?
Yes, it's just frustrating for me to work on C++ code anymore.
:-)
To chime in on that, Calypso i.e the LDC+Clang equivalent of
what you
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 18:44:08 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 18:21:55 UTC, Bo wrote:
* scope() .. just call it "defer" just as every other language
now does. It only confuses people who come from other
languages. Its now almost a standard. By using scope people
have
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 22:01:44 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 17:56:29 UTC, Biocyberman wrote:
Speaking on behalf of myself, after additional inputs from
many excellent and respectful users in this 'forum'. I can say
that, on the scale of 1 (least geeky) to 10
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 04:41:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 04:18:29AM +, MattCoder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 13:47:16 UTC, biocyberman wrote:
> 1. No post editing...
You should be grateful for this, because I hate systems like:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 18:46:50 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/24/18 7:00 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 04:41:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
[...]
Last week I saw a video showing how a forum was shutdown
because it was alledgedly full of racists.
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 01:53:42 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:40:16 UTC, bauss wrote:
I should probably have put an example usage to show how it's
used:
This makes we want to go back and program in C again ;-)
(but thanks for taking the
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 18:32:37 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Monday, 1 January 2018 at 02:02:03 UTC, rjframe wrote:
That's probably not the best method of effecting change.
It killed off the discussion nicely, indeed.
I am just going to share my thoughts a little. Github, in my
opinion,
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 04:49:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 04:23:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The reality of the matter is that the DIP system is a formal
way to propose language changes in order to convince Walter
and Andrei that those changes
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 06:53:18 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 03:42:21 UTC, Ali wrote:
Many of those new comers who ask about the forum software ..
they never stick, they dont complain, or question, or try to
change for the better, they simply leave
I think this
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:15:37 UTC, spikespaz wrote:
I needed a truncate function on the `std.stdio.File` object, so
I made this function. Does it look okay? Are there any
cross-platform improvements you can think of that should be
added?
import std.stdio: File;
void truncate(File
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 19:39:10 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
He gets different results with and without optimization
because without optimization the result of the calculation is
spilled to the i unsigned int and then reloaded for the print
call. This save and reload truncated the value to
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 19:24:05 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 15:08:35 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:41:17 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:08:26 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I am not C++ expert so this seems
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 20:59:22 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 19:24:05 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 15:08:35 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:41:17 UTC, Ecstatic Coder
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:41:17 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:08:26 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I am not C++ expert so this seems wierd to me:
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char c = 0xFF;
std::string
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 14:08:26 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I am not C++ expert so this seems wierd to me:
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char c = 0xFF;
std::string sData = {c,c,c,c};
unsigned int i =
On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 04:21:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, September 1, 2018 9:18:17 PM MDT Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d wrote:
So honestly, I don't find it at all surprising when an
application can't handle not being able to write to disk.
Ideally, it
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 01:06:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 16:36:20 UTC, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
My syntax for parameters that may get aliased to another
parameter is to write the parameter number that may escape it
in its scope attribute:
On Sunday, 2
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 15:34:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:28:38 AM MDT H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 09:18:24AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
> 3rd party libraries are usually the real
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 12:36:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 11:29:15 UTC, Josphe Brigmo
wrote:
Um, I didn't say don't use Git!
Your illogic is that you believe that one can have only one or
the other when one can have both. Hence, you are excluding a
101 - 200 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
