On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 12:33:21 UTC, Everlast wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 12:32:33 UTC, Andre Pany
wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 06:47:00 UTC, Everlast wrote:
[...]
You showed as a painful issue in our eco system which we can
work on, thank you.
You do
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 20:12:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/13/18 3:53 PM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 13:15:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/13/18 8:55 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...]
But it doesn't scale if you use OS processes, it's too
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 18:09:21 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
wrote:
I wrote a blog post about working on Advent of Code in D. You
can read it here:
http://jordi.inversethought.com/blog/advent-of-d/
Really nice, thank you.
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 07:33:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 19:30:52 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 18:46:50 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/24/18 7:00 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[...]
Wow, that's insane. I would be
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 19:23:26 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 17:30:50 UTC, Jim King wrote:
[...]
Another option if you are on linux is to use eventfd. Then you
can trigger it with simple write on eventfd descriptor.
As far as waiting goes it’s either
On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 16:51:59 UTC, Jim King wrote:
I am trying to add graceful shutdown support to a test harness.
In the test harness, a server class consumes a thread to
accept connections and service them. In order to stop the
server, it has to be interrupted. This interruption
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:20:22 UTC, Henrik wrote:
I have worked with C in embedded systems for many years now,
and for our modern Linux systems we are using a combination of
C and Java today. Java for parts where memory safety is more
important than speed/determinism, and C for the
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:20:22 UTC, Henrik wrote:
Does anyone know if D is using the vtable implementation for
virtual functions just like most C++ compilers? If yes, can
someone explain the advantages of this strategy? A function
pointer in C is regarded as expensive because of missing
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 20:57:23 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 16:52:00 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
[...]
The odd man out is C++ [1], assignment has higher precedence
because of right to left evaluation.
Your reference [1] is not even a witness to your claim. The
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 16:47:59 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 10:03:33 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 07:22:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
[...]
To summarize: C++ works as expected and C prevents the
assigment because the conditional operator
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 10:03:33 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 07:22:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
You may find an in-depth discussion of the C++ case in
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7499400/ternary-conditional-and-assignment-operator-precedence
My formulation was
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 14:28:54 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 03:35:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
...
I don't have any problem with that part either. The following
makes sense to me. I may have even used it in the past (likely
in C++):
(cond ? a : b) = foo;
...
For
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 14:28:05 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 09:56:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
true?stt="AA":stt="BB";-///Out:BB
[...]
Assignment takes precendence over the ternary operator.
That's not true. Not in D and not in C/C++
The
On Sunday, 8 April 2012 at 09:46:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 8 April 2012 at 05:56:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Walter and I discussed today about using the small string
optimization in string and other arrays of immutable small
objects.
On 64 bit machines, string
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 10:49:22 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 10:04:04 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
This seems really sudden, april fool's joke? Not really sure,
as there are real problems with this(this)...
What I was wondering too. I mean, breaking changes just don't
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
How close are you to finish this?
85 to 90% maybe.
Ok, so it will take 90% of the total to get to
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:29:22 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:19:39 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 20:33:40 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 23 March 2018 at 17:31:09 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
[...]
If @safe doesn't protect against buffer overflows then chuck
the whole thing out the window and start over.
[...]
zlib sources are included in phobos. It
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 21:07:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
Not strictly true. My old C++98 project no longer compiled
with the latest g++, because it contained things allowed in
C++98 that
On Thursday, 28 June 2018 at 01:34:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 17:59:42 Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 6/27/2018 5:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 17:26:36 Manu via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> I guess people
On Friday, 5 October 2018 at 16:02:49 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 06:43:02 UTC, Gopan wrote:
I have seen people enclosing the function logic inside a
while(1) merely to stick on to single return at the end.
while(1)
{
...
break; //otherwise
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 14:35:34 UTC, James Japherson
wrote:
Took me about an hour to track this one down!
A + (B == 0) ? 0 : C;
D is evaluating it as
(A + (B == 0)) ? 0 : C;
As it should.
The whole point of the parenthesis was to associate.
I usually explicitly associate
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 23:17:15 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 21:57:00 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:09:14 PM MDT Jonathan Marler
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 14:35:34 UTC, James Japherson
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 23:17:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, October 11, 2018 8:35:34 AM MDT James Japherson
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Certainly, major languages like C, C++, Java, and C# all do it
the way that D does, and they all have the same kind of
precedence for
On Friday, 12 October 2018 at 13:15:22 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/12/18 6:06 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 23:17:15 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
[...]
That's https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14186
Wow, interesting that C precedence is different from
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 17:01:46 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 16:31:33 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
Imagine a simple algorithm that does logic on very long
numbers, split into bytes. One multi-threaded implementation
may use 4 threads. The first operating
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 16:24:39 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Thu., 18 Oct. 2018, 5:05 am Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d, < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 22:56:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
>> If something might be used by someone else
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:24:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-10-21 19:29, Russel Winder wrote:
But who apart from Eclipse and JetBrains uses Java for desktop
GUI
applications?
There's probably a ton of business/enterprise applications that
are written in Java.
But I don't
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 22:56:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
If something might be used by someone else it's better not to
touch it, unless one has confirmation it is not used by
someone else.
This is what shared has to enforce.
Yes. But how can the compiler statically verify this?
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 18:55:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 09/26/2018 06:00 AM, Anonymouse wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 13:03:30 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
I'm playing with a branch of DMD that would warn on unused
imports:
Would just like to say that I
On Saturday, 6 October 2018 at 05:36:59 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
On Friday, 5 October 2018 at 19:04:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 10/04/2018 11:40 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
[...]
It's not *my* statement about newer/older. If you recall the
programming atmosphere around
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:24:14 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:00:33 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I've learned this the hard way, and I've had to learn it
several times because I am a slow learner. I've posted this
before, and repeat it because bears
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 02:12:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
On 09/24/2018 08:17 AM, 0xEAB wrote:
> - Non-idiomatic translations of tech terms [2]
This is something I had heard from a Digital Research
programmer in early 90s:
English message was something like "No memory left" and
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 13:26:14 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
2. There are no rules about what *encoding* is acceptable, it's
implementation defined. So various compilers have different
rules as to what will be accepted in the actual source code. In
fact, I read somewhere that not
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 12:37:13 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 22:49:26 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
To elaborate:
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 22:40:45 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
If *YOU* are OK with the consequences of complexity,
implement this in
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 15:25:55 UTC, Joakim wrote:
You've probably heard of the possibly apocryphal story of how
Blackberry and Nokia engineers disassembled the first iPhone
and dismissed it because it only got a day of battery life,
while their devices lasted much longer. They
On Friday, 5 August 2016 at 08:32:42 UTC, kink wrote:
On Thursday, 4 August 2016 at 21:03:52 UTC, Mark "J" Twain
wrote:
How can I construct a va_list for vsprintf when all I have is
the a list of pointers to the data, without their type info?
A va_list seems to be a packed struct of values
On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 06:59:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 03:33:04 Ivy Encarnacion via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
A pure function cannot call any function that is not pure [...]
I've read that a lot but it's not true. A pure function can call
On Sunday, 29 January 2017 at 01:53:01 UTC, KP wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone using Oracle's Pro*C with D?
Thanks,
KP
Not yet, but would like to too.
On Thursday, 23 February 2017 at 18:35:29 UTC, Profile Anaysis
wrote:
[...]
option 1 is the one I was shooting for. does the static if
(audio) just check for the existence of audio, or does it also
check to see if audio is true as well?
Yes, but it checks at compile time. So the code
On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 21:25:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/15/2016 6:54 AM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
okay nice, so that code would not compile but code such as:
void test() {
scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated
auto rnd2 = rnd;
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 23:44:47 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 at 20:00:32 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
For this I found out how to clone the dependencies, sorry about
that... (Only from the command line... Anyone recommends better
free Windows Git gui clients than GitHub
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 15:50:26 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 19 November 2016 at 15:40:38 UTC, Ryan wrote:
Wouldn't this just be the same as
auto hasConsole = cast(bool) GetConsoleCP(); ?
Yes, it is in D, though the habit often comes from C where
things are different. But
On Sunday, 11 December 2016 at 11:33:40 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 11 December 2016 at 07:52:28 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Basile B. via
Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>
wrote:
[...]
Why is #line obsolete? I use it a lot
On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 21:31:31 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hello folks,
The default dmd.conf settings for 64-bit environments include
the -fPIC flag (for good reason), but the settings for 32-bit
environments do not. Any particular reason for this?
Thanks & best wishes,
On Saturday, 8 April 2017 at 21:31:31 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hello folks,
The default dmd.conf settings for 64-bit environments include
the -fPIC flag (for good reason), but the settings for 32-bit
environments do not. Any particular reason for this?
Thanks & best wishes,
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 19:34:44 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 15:36:22 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[...]
Wow, dmd builds in 12 seconds on a single linux/x64 core, can't
wait to see what that time is when the backend is
On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 17:42:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/24/17 11:45 AM, Houdini wrote:
On Monday, 24 July 2017 at 15:41:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Because types with inheritance generally don't work right if
you pass by value (i.e. the slicing problem).
structs
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 12:10:14 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 07:19:03 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
version 2.067 that still had the C++ frontend took more than
100 seconds.
I can hardly believe it. I remember versions 2.05x building in
about 11 seconds.
1
On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 00:35:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:13:45AM +, Era Scarecrow via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 06:20:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> I don't think there's a way to change how the FPU works --
> the hardware is
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 05:38:56 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 3 July 2017 at 03:57:25 UTC, Basile B wrote:
6.251 has no perfect double representation. It's real value is:
I almost wonder if a BCD, fixed length or alternative for
floating point should be an option... Either
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 22:11:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The latest WAT I found in D is this one, see if you can figure
it out:
char ch;
wchar wch;
dchar dch;
pragma(msg, typeof(true ? ch : ch));// char - OK
pragma(msg, typeof(true ? ch : wch));
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 11:48:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 29 April 2017 at 11:24:36 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
C99 says "if an int can represent all values of the original
type, the value is converted to an int; otherwise, it is
converted to an unsigned int."
On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 13:56:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 11:19:14 bachmeier via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 22:38:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [...]
That seems perfectly reasonable to me. Couldn't the function
return both the path
On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 05:30:40 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 13:56:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
As your solution doesn't inherently solve the race condition
associated with temporary files, you could still generate the
name with a wrapper around
On Friday, 26 May 2017 at 09:59:26 UTC, zakk wrote:
Hello everyone,
I just started using D and I am a bit puzzled by the syntax of
the sort function is std.algorithm.sorting, which is
sort!(comparingFunction)(list)
where comparingFunction is often a lambda expression. For
instance in the
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 21:18:42 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/26/17 11:20 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 26 May 2017 at 14:41:39 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
[...]
This version also has the advantage of being (discounting any
bugs in
iopipe) correct for arbitrary unicode in all
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 14:25:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 12:21:02 UTC, piotrklos wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 06:00:57 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 29 May 2017 at 20:36:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
For what it's worth, I see "Compute" used
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 09:07:16 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 18:06:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
D-GPU is very misleading to people who use the GPU for its
original purpose, which is graphics programming. One could
assume D-GPU being an alternative to
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 04:39:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 16:03:54 H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
If you're really trying to make it fast, there may be something
that you can do with SIMD. IIRC, Brian
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 at 23:03:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:46:17PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:13:04 H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I did some digging around, and it seems that wc is using
>
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 09:41:58 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:36:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:19:48PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 11:09:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
> 1. Get shared libs to work in D (the
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 23:41:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:02:38PM +, Nitram via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
After reading
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/05/24/faster-command-line-tools-in-d/ , i was wondering how fast one can do a simple "wc -l" in D.
size_t
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 at 15:00:50 UTC, Timoses wrote:
Hey there,
I'm wondering how I can use a template function within my mixin:
```
ubyte[] value = x[33, 3a,3f, d4];
foreach (type; TypeTuple!("int", "unsigned
int", "byte"))
{
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 15:56:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-04 07:44, Jesse Phillips wrote:
What is your expected behavior? Throw an exception? You can't
really
append an absolute path to another.
Of course you can. I expect buildPath("/foo", "/bar") to result
in "/foo/bar".
On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 16:49:14 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
I think Andrei has a nice way to do opCmp for integers that's
a simple subtraction and negation or something like that.
[...]
In
On Saturday, 6 May 2017 at 10:15:03 UTC, k-five wrote:
Although I am not sure but it may Range in D, has the same
concept that C++ has on iterator, like InputIterator or
OutputIterator, since I realized that the output of [ filter ]
does not have RandomAccessRange so I can not use input[ 0
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 at 13:16:16 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 at 10:33:25 UTC, k-five wrote:
Although I found D for being more better, nicer,and fun than
C++ is, but there is a few questions on Stack-Over-Flow,
videos on Youtube, and some other forums in my country. So,
why
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 at 12:29:20 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 at 10:33:25 UTC, k-five wrote:
[...]
Because everyone is asking this question instead of actually
doing something about it :)
To be fair, D has a good amount of usage even today, it's just
not being
It looks like the good people of Sociomantic have already posted
videos of the Dconf2017 on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC54uUlXuGhigMsdaNtP6THQ
Enjoy.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:34:13 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Thanks for wasting some of my life... Just curious about who
will justify the behavior and
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:34:13 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Thanks for wasting some of my life... Just curious about who
will justify the behavior and
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 22:10:43 UTC, Biotronic wrote:
On Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:39:14 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Is there a way to create a 24-bit int? One that for all
practical purposes acts as such? This is for 24-bit stuff like
audio. It would respect endianness, allow for
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 06:44:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Object exists primarily because D didn't originally have
templates, and when you don't have templates, having a single
base class is the only way to have a function accept any class,
and for something like a container,
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 04:49:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 04:38:29AM +, Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
Signal handlers can potentially be invoked while inside a
non-reentrant libc or OS function, so trying to do anything
that (indirectly
On Monday, 4 December 2017 at 11:51:42 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 12/03/2017 03:05 PM, bitwise wrote:
One thing to keep in mind: Any time you're talking about moving
anything from one repo to another, there's exactly two basic
primitives there: push and pull. Both of them are
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 16:38:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 11:55:17 UTC, codephantom wrote:
[...]
Well, in another thread he talked about the Tango split, so not
sure where he is coming from.
[...]
No, the starting point for C++ was that
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 09:43:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 06:32:55 UTC, lobo wrote:
"[snip]...Then came the day we discovered that a person we
incautiously gave commit privileges to had fucked up the
games’s AI core. It became apparent that I was
On Monday, 4 December 2017 at 01:54:57 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:22:47 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before
(yeah, my mistake).
Who hasn't ;)
me.
Happened to me last time because i tried a
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 15:12:22 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/6/17 4:34 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 09:24:33 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
UTF-32 on the other hand is guaranteed to have a code unit be
a full code point.
I don't think the
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 09:24:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
a full code point (IIRC, 1 - 6 code units for UTF-8 and 1 - 2
for UTF-16),
YDNRC, 1 - 4 code units for UTF-8. Unicode is defined only up to
U+10. Everything above is illegal.
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 09:34:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 at 09:24:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
UTF-32 on the other hand is guaranteed to have a code unit be
a full code point.
I don't think the standard says that? Isn't this only because
the
On Friday, 1 December 2017 at 18:56:50 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
Hi everyone,
I made a public survey (everyone can look at the responses) and
it would be great if you took some time and answered it. I
think it will greatly benefit D as a whole if we had more
anonymous data on users. I'm also
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 23:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OK, so at dconf I spoke with a few very smart guys about how I
can use mmap to make a zero-copy buffer. And I implemented this
on the plane ride home.
[...]
They can be problematic with some CPU's and OS's. For modern
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 16:06:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
Oh, there had been an epic forum thread about the use of GNU grep
for BSD. i don't remember the details but it was long and heated
(it was so epic that I even read it as I normaly don't care at
all for BSD stuff).
On Wednesday, 13 June 2018 at 06:46:43 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I had a little fun today kicking the crap out of C's memcpy
with a D implementation.
https://github.com/JinShil/memcpyD
Request for help: I don't have a Linux system running on real
hardware at this time, nor do I have a wide
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 00:15:35 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Thursday, 14 June 2018 at 20:35:23 UTC, baz wrote:
[...]
Correct! D already has features like `a[] = b[]` so there is no
reason to call `memcpy` directly; that is a job for the
druntime.
`memcpyD` is intended to be an
On Thursday, 31 May 2018 at 18:33:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 05/31/2018 09:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Should be fairly simple to follow, just realize that the
image is a 2d
> block for each char and that's why there's all those
multiplies and
> divides.
I remember doing similar things
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 12:58:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 at 12:40:05 UTC, phs wrote:
Although, it's a little bit strange because I have never had
this issue with my C++ development.
The c++ compiler and runtime libraries are common enough that
the antivirus
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 18:13:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:50:34PM +, jmh530 via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Be careful with that:
class C { int x; }
immutable C c = new C(5);
auto i = c.x;
C y = cast(C) c;
y.x = 10;
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 12:10:14 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 07:19:03 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
version 2.067 that still had the C++ frontend took more than
100 seconds.
I can hardly believe it. I remember versions 2.05x building in
about 11 seconds.
My
On Monday, 15 January 2018 at 04:27:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, January 15, 2018 03:14:02 Tony via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Monday, 15 January 2018 at 02:09:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
> Unicode has three main variants, UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32.
> The size of a code
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 06:25:52 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 30/01/2018 5:47 AM, thedeemon wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 at 03:07:38 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
But since Windows is the only platform mentioned or desired
for, everything you need is in WinAPI!
It's like
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 15:38:19 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 3 February 2018 at 15:30:10 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
okay solved:
module runnable;
__gshared static msg = "betterC\n";
__gshared static len = 8;
extern(C) int main(int argc, char** args)
{
asm
{
On Sunday, 11 February 2018 at 15:11:55 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 February 2018 at 20:30:54 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Other languages like Rust or C# (or Java) have bounds check.
Plus we probably lose it in release mode, which is the mode
where lurking bugs are discovered
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 20:10:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 15:22:32 Kagamin via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 16:50:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> The core problem is that entity references get replaced with
> more XML
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 22:00:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 21:18:12 Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
[...]
Well, if dxml just passes the entity references along unparsed
beyond validating that the entity reference itself contains
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 08:52:21 UTC, Timothee Cour
wrote:
you should also mention an important point:
current syntax disallows importing a simple module foo (with no
package), eg:
import std.stdio:write,foo; // there's no way to specify a
module `foo` import std.stdio:write & foo;
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 13:42:45 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 12:06:23 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
Absolutely. D scripting is the trojan horse that enables
introduction of it in hostile environment. Runnable compiled
source code is nice.
scripting
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 09:48:33 UTC, Norm wrote:
[snip]
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 04:06:23 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
Third, making D more and more like a quick scripting/hacking
language (by removing or hiding so called 'noise', is not a
good idea in my opinion. That too
201 - 300 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
