On 2012-04-12 22:53, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
The outline and package panes should be combined IMHO. Perhaps something
like (ascii art):
---
+
atk
Component
---
MyClass
getStruct
contains
...
...
FooClass
setBar
...
---
Where clicking on atk would show all atk
On 04/12/2012 10:53 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:35:40 -0700
Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have to update some chapters... ;)
Oh noes...when we'll get new ones. :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Those who are on this path are resolute in purpose,
and their aim is one. O beloved child of the Kurus,
the intelligence
2.059 is red
I'm drunk too
It's friday night
thank you too
...
Not sure if that means I should drink more or less. Gonna go with
more, my spelling is way to good.
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 08:02:09 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
2.059 is red
I'm drunk too
It's friday night
thank you too
...
Not sure if that means I should drink more or less. Gonna go
with more, my spelling is way to good.
Well nopw I' m more drunk. 2.059 is workfing fine. :D
Le dimanche 01 avril 2012 à 21:23 +0200, Artur Skawina a écrit :
What's new?
- Now, in addition to
GLib, GModule, GObject, Gio, GdkPixbuf, Pango, PangoCairo, PangoFT, Gdk,
Atk and Gtk+
there are also bindings for
Clutter, ClutterX11, Cogl, CoglPango and Mx.
- Struct
Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 22:46 +0100, george a écrit :
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 12:27:06 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
I have do a D 2 port to my dscience project:
https://gitorious.org/dscience/dscience
Any help are welcome
It would be interesting if you would hook up with the
Le lundi 12 mars 2012 à 18:42 +0100, Paul D. Anderson a écrit :
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 12:27:06 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
I have do a D 2 port to my dscience project:
https://gitorious.org/dscience/dscience
Any help are welcome
I'm willing to help but I've got a couple of
On 2012-04-13 10:02, Bernard Helyer wrote:
2.059 is red
I'm drunk too
It's friday night
thank you too
...
Not sure if that means I should drink more or less. Gonna go with more,
my spelling is way to good.
The answer to that question is always more :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 04/12/2012 01:04 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/The-D-Programming-Language
and on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s5492/the_d_programming_language_walter_bright_langnext/
DMD actually implements pure as 'no reading
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On 13-04-2012 07:53, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Hi! Thanks for the feedback, I'll have a go at fixing the
problems. As for IE issues, I only tested it with IE9. As for the
older IE versions, well, developers are the target users of the
documentation. And they are usually tech savvy people so I would
expect that they use reasonably up to
Strive to make toHash, toString, opEquals and opCmp
functions pure, nothrow, const and @safe. Soon, this will
become a requirement.
man, that's a lot of decorations.
This kind of thing makes me thing we should have opposites:
impure, maythrow, mutable, and @system. And virtual, while
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On 4/13/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
Damn. One could spend a good hour or so reading the bug fixes.
Awesome. Does anyone have a comparison to the previous release?
On 13-04-2012 18:47, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Strive to make toHash, toString, opEquals and opCmp functions pure,
nothrow, const and @safe. Soon, this will become a requirement.
man, that's a lot of decorations.
This kind of thing makes me thing we should have opposites:
impure, maythrow,
On 13/04/2012 17:41, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It would be nice if at least it functions correctly in IE8, but I
don't have it on my machine. Is there a way to test it without
installing it on the system(I don't want it to replace IE9
basically)?
http://browsershots.org/ - Just check the
It would be nice if at least it functions correctly in IE8, but I
don't have it on my machine. Is there a way to test it without
installing it on the system(I don't want it to replace IE9
basically)?
http://utilu.com/IECollection/
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 06:26:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-04-12 22:53, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
The outline and package panes should be combined IMHO. Perhaps
something
like (ascii art):
---
+
atk
Component
---
MyClass
getStruct
contains
...
...
FooClass
On 2012-04-13 18:41, Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Hi! Thanks for the feedback, I'll have a go at fixing the problems. As
for IE issues, I only tested it with IE9. As for the older IE versions,
well, developers are the target users of the documentation. And they are
usually tech savvy people so I
On 4/13/2012 7:25 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/12/2012 01:04 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/The-D-Programming-Language
and on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s5492/the_d_programming_language_walter_bright_langnext/
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:oznqhjdcwecwmjmyc...@forum.dlang.org...
Strive to make toHash, toString, opEquals and opCmp functions pure,
nothrow, const and @safe. Soon, this will become a requirement.
man, that's a lot of decorations.
Must be time for
On 13/04/2012 22:10, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
!nothrow
nonothrow. May as well drop nothrow and use !throw if we're doing that!
--
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/
On 4/14/12, Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote:
On 13/04/2012 22:10, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
!nothrow
nonothrow. May as well drop nothrow and use !throw if we're doing that!
Might as well rename it to something else. It's called nothrow, but
it can actually throw a Throwable, but
On 13/04/2012 23:30, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/14/12, Robert Clipshamrob...@octarineparrot.com wrote:
On 13/04/2012 22:10, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
!nothrow
nonothrow. May as well drop nothrow and use !throw if we're doing that!
Might as well rename it to something else. It's called
On 4/14/12, Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote:
It can't throw a Throwable
Well now I'm confused. According to TDPL p307:
nothrow promises that the function won't throw an Exception. The
function is still allowed to throw the graver Throwable class.
And yet this is an error:
On 14-04-2012 01:49, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/14/12, Robert Clipshamrob...@octarineparrot.com wrote:
It can't throw a Throwable
Well now I'm confused. According to TDPL p307:
nothrow promises that the function won't throw an Exception. The
function is still allowed to throw the graver
On 4/12/2012 10:53 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On 4/14/12, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like an error in TDPL. AFAIK nothrow means may only throw
Error.
But Error is a subclass of Throwable.
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 02:13:45 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/14/12, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like an error in TDPL. AFAIK nothrow means may only throw
Error.
But Error is a subclass of Throwable.
A nothrow function cannot throw anything derived from
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
This program doesn't work.
import std.stdio;
void main() {
writeln(1);
}
I get this:
C:\jpro\dpro2\smalldmd dmd59.d
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.12
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2010 All rights reserved.
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/optlink.html
dmd59.obj(dmd59)
Error 42:
Never mind, I installed wrong, I was still was using 58's lib
files.
-joelcnz
On 04/13/2012 05:47 PM, Tyro[17] wrote:
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
On 4/13/2012 5:47 PM, Tyro[17] wrote:
The requested URL /dmd.2.059.dmg was not found on this server.
Hmm, I overlooked that one.
On 14-04-2012 02:13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/14/12, Alex Rønne Petersenxtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like an error in TDPL. AFAIK nothrow means may only throw
Error.
But Error is a subclass of Throwable.
Which is why I said it's probably an error in TDPL. :P
--
- Alex
On 14-04-2012 03:45, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 14-04-2012 02:13, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/14/12, Alex Rønne Petersenxtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds like an error in TDPL. AFAIK nothrow means may only throw
Error.
But Error is a subclass of Throwable.
Which is why I said it's
Gah, I just ruined by night by actually
trying to use this release.
78 lines of template instantiation error spam
on code that worked perfectly on 2.058 :(
Including such gems as:
.../phobos/std/conv.d(244): Error: template std.conv.toImpl does
not match any function template declaration
On 4/13/2012 7:24 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Gah, I just ruined by night by actually
trying to use this release.
Sorry about that, but the beta has been out for a week and a half, and we fixed
every reported regression since 2.058.
The best I can suggest is to file a bug report and we'll try
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.074.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
On Wednesday, 11 April 2012 at 23:05:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2012/The-D-Programming-Language
and on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/s5492/the_d_programming_language_walter_bright_langnext/
:) So if I got this
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 01:23:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/13/2012 05:47 PM, Tyro[17] wrote:
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 01:34:25 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/13/2012 5:47 PM, Tyro[17] wrote:
The requested URL /dmd.2.059.dmg was not found on this server.
Hmm, I overlooked that one.
Any idea of when it will be available? And by the way, thank you
and
everyone else for all your
Tyro[17] nos...@home.com wrote in message
news:rjhmnaxxiglqftwxh...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 05:54:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Another big pile of bug fixes. More contributors than ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 02:24:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Gah, I just ruined by night by actually
trying to use this release.
78 lines of template instantiation error spam
on code that worked perfectly on 2.058 :(
I think I've finally narrowed down the cause of seas of errors
46 matches
Mail list logo
