https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C,
made me realize it'd be fairly easy to use that same method
for other languages too.
So, I spent some time these last two weekends making it work
to put out Javascript.
See below for
On 2012-02-27 04:51, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C,
made me realize it'd be fairly easy to use that same method
for other languages too.
So, I spent some time these last two weekends making it w
Cool!
Can you call custom (external, from 3rd party libs) JS functions from
there?
You should port jquery syntax sugar :)
Il giorno lun, 27/02/2012 alle 09.48 +0100, Jacob Carlborg ha scritto:
> On 2012-02-27 04:51, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zi
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:yfmgvgprfpiquakiy...@forum.dlang.org...
> https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
>
> Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C,
> made me realize it'd be fairly easy to use that same method
> for other languages too.
>
> So, I spe
Does this mean I can do node.js in D? :)
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 03:51:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C,
made me realize it'd be fairly easy to use that same method
for other languag
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 09:46:51 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Can you call custom (external, from 3rd party libs)
JS functions from there?
Yes, just make:
extern(js) void function_name_here(...);
and you can call it. For jQuery, you'd probably want
to define an extern(js) class JQuery {}
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 11:32:52 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
How come you didn't do this as a proper fork/branch of dmd?
At first, I downloaded a zip of your fork just to take a
look at it - I had no intention of actually modifying it.
But, then I started to play around and never cleaned
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 12:10:17 UTC, node wrote:
Does this mean I can do node.js in D? :)
Probably. When I did my testing, I ran the code in
dmdscript and later, firefox. The javascript it outputs
is pretty basic so I imagine it will work in any
engine.
To access the library, you can d
Il giorno lun, 27/02/2012 alle 16.09 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe ha scritto:
> On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 09:46:51 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> > Can you call custom (external, from 3rd party libs)
> > JS functions from there?
>
> Yes, just make:
>
> extern(js) void function_name_here(...);
Good
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 15:39:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
About jquery: i mean what about a d function similar to $()
jquery
function for better elements handling (instead of
getElementById() )
Have you seen my dom library? :P
It's all server side but it is just awesome. Lots of
con
Il giorno lun, 27/02/2012 alle 16.55 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe ha scritto:
> On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 15:39:50 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> > About jquery: i mean what about a d function similar to $()
> > jquery
> > function for better elements handling (instead of
> > getElementById() )
>
>
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:cjalubgkkdpdacsig...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 11:32:52 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> How come you didn't do this as a proper fork/branch of dmd?
>
> At first, I downloaded a zip of your fork just to take a
> look at it - I had no int
On 27/02/12 16:16, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 27 February 2012 at 11:32:52 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
How come you didn't do this as a proper fork/branch of dmd?
At first, I downloaded a zip of your fork just to take a
look at it - I had no intention of actually modifying it.
But, then I
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 09:30:41 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
CTFE is entirely implemented in interpret.c. Treatment of the
runtime part of (__ctfe) is in the glue layer, that's probably
what you saw.
Outstanding!
As a side note, I've been looking at dmdscript when I want
a detailed refe
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C,
made me realize it'd be fairly easy to use that same method
for other languages too.
So, I spent some time these last two weekends making it work
to put out Javasc
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 19:27:57 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
Can it compile a function to native code and JS simultaneously?
I want to execute the same code on both client and server side.
You'd have to run dmd twice because it exits before getting
to the backend when doing js.
But you
Fuck. Yes.
Combined with HTML5 and such, this might be an awesome way to
write web-based games.
Please do more!
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 19:27:57 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Can it compile a function to native code and JS simultaneously? I want
to execute the same code on both client and server side.
You'd have to run dmd twice because it exits before getting
to the backend wh
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 02:42:38 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
44 KB - that's not bad!
It actually gets better: 9kb if you trim the mangled names
down to size (I've written a mangle name trimmer and an
unused function cutter; hello world is about 200 bytes.).
The reason it didn't work
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The reason it didn't work before wasn't just dollar, but also
ref params. This was a bit of a pain.. without pointers, how
can I implement this?
After thinking on it for almost an hour, I decided on passing
lambdas instead:
void a(ref b) { b = 10; }
int c = 5;
a(c);
assert
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 03:24:17 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
What about passing values within object?
Yeah, that's one of the first things I thought of, but
what about a more complex thing:
d = a(c) + 4;
where will the c=wrapper.value go?
It can't go at the end of the function call
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 03:24:17 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
What about passing values within object?
Yeah, that's one of the first things I thought of, but
what about a more complex thing:
d = a(c) + 4;
where will the c=wrapper.value go?
It can't go at the end
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 04:02:54 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
but this implies that all value variables must be initialized
with new Wrapper(x).
Yeah. I don't like that because it means you pay for something
that you aren't necessarily going to use.
Now, it could follow the variable an
On 02/28/2012 08:56 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 19:27:57 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Can it compile a function to native code and JS simultaneously? I want
to execute the same code on both client and server side.
You'd have to run dmd twice because it exits before g
On 29/02/2012 03:11, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 02:42:38 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
44 KB - that's not bad!
It actually gets better: 9kb if you trim the mangled names
down to size (I've written a mangle name trimmer and an
unused function cutter; hello world is abou
On 29/02/2012 09:18, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 29/02/2012 03:11, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 02:42:38 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
44 KB - that's not bad!
It actually gets better: 9kb if you trim the mangled names
down to size (I've written a mangle name trimmer and a
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 09:27:53 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
Pretty impressive! It did spit out 86 warnings though...
A lot of it is probably the same kind of thing my
"linker" does. (I call it that, but it doesn't actually
*link* anything.)
I get down to 6 KB running it through that
I found the std.algorithm problem. I skipped outputting
templated structs because it crashes my compiler.
For some reason.
microd.d(130): Error: variable t forward declaration
Segmentation fault.
Poo.
Function templates work fine, though.
> Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C
Link please.
On 29/02/2012 16:56, Bystroushaak wrote:
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C
Link please.
https://github.com/yebblies/dmd/tree/microd
--
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire subset of D
convertible to Javascript?
What use cases do you have in mind?
Andrei
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire subset of D
convertible to Javascript?
What use cases do you have in mind?
Andrei
A
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 15:46:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
microd.d(130): Error: variable t forward declaration
Segmentation fault.
And that's fixed... and handling if(__ctfe)... and
boom! It worked. Generated 70 KB of javascript though,
a lot of it is obvious garbage - global variab
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 17:32:42 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
So the idea is to make an entire subset of
D convertible to Javascript?
What use cases do you have in mind?
Andrei
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
But, wrapping might be fun. I could probably do & 0xff
if and only if D otherwise forces it to be a ubyte. But,
what about the bit pattern of negative numbers?
Take a look at WebGL's Typed Arrays. They allow explicit size integers
and binary operators. The disadvantage is
"Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
news:jilnie$1fsr$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>> https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
>> [snip]
>>
>> That's interesting. So the idea is to make an e
Sorry if I sent twice, it is so easy to hit the
wrong button on things.
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 17:32:42 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
So the idea is to make an entire subset of D convertible to
Javascript?
Yeah, and I'm pretty much there - I just built a
little sort program with
Thx.
On 29.2.2012 18:03, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 29/02/2012 16:56, Bystroushaak wrote:
>>> Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C
>>
>> Link please.
>
> https://github.com/yebblies/dmd/tree/microd
>
On 29.02.2012 21:58, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...]
4) This is an insane idea, but one that came to mind.
I'm testing this by piping the generated JS into
dmdscript.
dmd runs insanely fast when compiling this code. Phobos
is kinda slow to compile, but you don't have to use it
here. Write D1 style c
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 19:10:27 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
If you are serious about dmd I would recommend it, as I've
spent weeks to figure out proper try/catch/finally
implementation and fix closures that were broken.
Indeed, I still have a copy of your zip from before.
I tried
On 29.02.2012 23:40, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 19:10:27 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
If you are serious about dmd I would recommend it, as I've spent weeks
to figure out proper try/catch/finally implementation and fix closures
that were broken.
Indeed, I still have
I probably should have been working today but instead
spent a good amount of time on this again.
New zip:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs-0.3.zip
(I haven't cleaned up the github fork yet)
To give you an idea of what is working, check out
my tests.d file:
http://arsdne
On 2012-03-01 06:20, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I probably should have been working today but instead
spent a good amount of time on this again.
BTW, how do you fit D's class based object model in JavaScript's
prototype based object model?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
2012/2/29 Adam D. Ruppe
> 4) This is an insane idea, but one that came to mind.
> I'm testing this by piping the generated JS into
> dmdscript.
>
> dmd runs insanely fast when compiling this code. Phobos
> is kinda slow to compile, but you don't have to use it
> here. Write D1 style code and dmd
I love how this started as interesting and turned into awesome.
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
"Bystroushaak" wrote in message
news:mailman.239.1330541205.24984.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> Thx.
>
> On 29.2.2012 18:03, Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> On 29/02/2012 16:56, Bystroushaak wrote:
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C
>>>
>>> Link please.
>>
>> https:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 07:14:02 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, how do you fit D's class based object model in
JavaScript's prototype based object model?
Short answer is each D object in JS has a virtual
function array and implements array as properties
attached to the object. The JS cons
Am 29.02.2012, 18:32 Uhr, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu
:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire subset of D
convertible to Javascript?
What use cases do you have in mind?
A
On 01/03/2012 05:20, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I probably should have been working today but instead
spent a good amount of time on this again.
New zip:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs-0.3.zip
(I haven't cleaned up the github fork yet)
To give you an idea of what is working
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 16:29:10 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote:
Perhaps it would be better to have a dedicated function for
that though.
eval() :)
I considered doing asm {} for javascript, but that'd be a
pretty invasive change to the compiler, so I decided against
it; I want to keep most th
On 2/29/12 11:58 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Sorry if I sent twice, it is so easy to hit the
wrong button on things.
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 17:32:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So the idea is to make an entire subset of D convertible to Javascript?
Yeah, and I'm pretty much there
On 2/29/12 2:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire subset of D
convertible to Javascript?
W
On 03/01/2012 07:04 PM, Ary Manzana wrote:
I think it's cool you can convert D to JS, but I don't see why anyone
would want to do it.
1. JS is a superior language:
[snip.]
Nope.
On 01-03-2012 19:04, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 18:56:07 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Valid argument. Maybe we can make the D -> JS converter help in
some way here?
I don't know yet. assert() in your D code, while a far cry
from a real debugger, does have the decency to give file
and line number in your browse
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 17:35:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The motivation sounds great. I think one area of focus going
forward might be defining precisely the subset of D supported
(e.g. I suppose pointer semantics would be difficult).
Right. I'm not sure exactly what is and is not
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 18:04:35 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
6. Javascript objects have some built-in properties that are
different from D. So implementing those in D would make their
performance worse (but you can always hard-code those functions
into the compiler and translate them directly
On 2012-03-01 16:07, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 07:14:02 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, how do you fit D's class based object model in JavaScript's
prototype based object model?
Short answer is each D object in JS has a virtual
function array and implements array as pro
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>
> Some integer semantics might be hard too. ubyte is ok, but byte
> is different because 127+1 isn't as simple as x & 0xff
>
> I'll have to think about that. Again, it surely *can*
> be done, but I'd rather than an error than it generating
> h
On 2012-03-01 19:04, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interesting. So the idea is to make an entire
On 2012-03-01 19:56, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 01-03-2012 19:04, Ary Manzana wrote:
3. With JS you don't have to compile and run your code (well, I guess
you could make something smart in D for that).
? The D -> JS converter just translates it. It's no different from
running e.g. the Coffe
I've played with gdc, but it's pretty complicated. I have few ADM 5120
routers with debwrt and it would be nice to be able compile D2 code
there, but so far, it was just fail.
C run pretty much everywhere and metacompiler D2C would be nice..
On 1.3.2012 09:05, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Bystroushaak
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 19:49:46 UTC, Bill Baxter wrote:
Might TypedArrays help you implement some number type semantics?
Yeah, I think so. I do have compatibility concerns though;
it'd be a pity of something taking a ubyte means it doesn't
work in IE8 anymore.
I'll have to play with it t
"Bystroushaak" wrote in message
news:mailman.281.1330632834.24984.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> I've played with gdc, but it's pretty complicated. I have few ADM 5120
> routers with debwrt and it would be nice to be able compile D2 code
> there, but so far, it was just fail.
>
> C run
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 08:01:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
hehe. I already found it ok though; I've been using
D on the server for... will be two years in a couple
weeks.
Javascript isn't bad if you use it sparingly, and
in the last y
This will go nicely with the web framework I'm building in D. I'm
borrowing heavily from silverlight. Here's a teaser (sorry,
neglected to comment the code...)
Here's a sample code file (CGI script for apache, I'm new to
these web technologies):
http://pastebin.com/SpfmfpmS
and here's what t
"Ary Manzana" wrote in message
news:jiodnj$ric$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I think it's cool you can convert D to JS, but I don't see why anyone
> would want to do it.
>
> 1. JS is a superior language: variables are dynamic and are not bound to
> just one single type during their lifetime. JS o
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:uvagboafiyjrhvywp...@forum.dlang.org...
>
> but I'd rather than an error than it generating
> horribly inefficient javascript for simple operations.
>
You make it sound as if there's another kind of JS.
On 2012-02-29 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
news:jilnie$1fsr$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
https://github.com/downloads/adamdruppe/dtojs/dtojs.zip
[snip]
That's interest
On 2012-03-02 03:28, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 08:01:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
As far as I can tell, we have variable lifetime! (JS's garbage
collector is still a question, and some of the variables are
global -
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:13:41 +0100
schrieb Bystroushaak :
> I've played with gdc, but it's pretty complicated. I have few ADM 5120
> routers with debwrt and it would be nice to be able compile D2 code
> there, but so far, it was just fail.
>
ADM 5120 is MIPS, right? Are you trying to build a cro
On 02/03/2012 02:28, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
3) The JS language doesn't have block scoping like D.
Have you considered faking scopes in JS using anonymous functions?
var foo;
(function(a, b){
var foo; // not the same as the foo outside the func!
// do stuff
}(x, y)); // inv
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jipus9$v81$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2012-03-02 03:28, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 08:01:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>> Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
>>
>> As far as I can tell, we have variable lifetime
On 2012-03-02 10:57, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jipus9$v81$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-03-02 03:28, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 08:01:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
As far as I ca
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jiq8kb$1ht0$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>
>> CommaExp's containing Declarations
>
> Is he saying "var a, b, c;" is invalid JavaScript code?
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
It's invalid if it's a comma expression.
eg.
auto x = (auto a = 3, a);
Which dmd creates _e
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 05:58:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
You make it sound as if there's another kind of JS.
Horribly inefficient relative to the environment :P
I just don't want 100 kb of crap to download just to
write a hello world.
A lot of people prefer to use gzipped sizes, but I
I think once you get past the horror that is building gcc for your target
> platform, the big issue remaining is that druntime needs to be ported.
There is actually gdc package in debwrt, but it is D1 :(
You'll hit the same issue with a D->C translator, so it might be better just
to work on th
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 09:33:44 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
Have you considered faking scopes in JS using anonymous
functions?
Yeah, though right now I'm trusting the D compiler to
keep it straight, and it is doing a pretty good job
while being really simple to code.
What happens is all the lo
Here's one of the nicer things to do:
http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.d
http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.html
we can do little browser games in D.
If you look at game.js:
http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.js
you can see it is similar in size to the original
D file (this is after running tools/gcfunctio
> ADM 5120 is MIPS, right? Are you trying to build a cross compiler or a
> compiler running on the MIPS itself?
Compiler running on the MIPS.
> And MIPS is probably also affected by GDC issue 120, so you have to
> configure like this:
> DFLAGS="-fno-section-anchors" ./configure [configure argume
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jiptfu$qrg$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 2012-02-29 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
>> news:jilnie$1fsr$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/26/12 9:51 PM, Adam D. Ruppe
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:arowwzayimwhzmqah...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 05:58:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> You make it sound as if there's another kind of JS.
>
> Horribly inefficient relative to the environment :P
>
> I just don't want 100 kb of crap to do
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 18:28:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suggestion: Allow all D features even if it
requires...inefficient-er...boilerplate, BUT then have a system
[...]
Eh. A problem there is those pragmas or whatever would be
unrecognized by the real dmd. A command line switch, maybe
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:wplwmjdlvvqcokxyk...@forum.dlang.org...
> Here's one of the nicer things to do:
>
> http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.d
> http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.html
>
> we can do little browser games in D.
>
> If you look at game.js:
> http://arsdnet.net/dtojs/game.js
>
Am 29.02.2012, 04:11 Uhr, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe :
sort can be a wrapper of Array.prototype.sort() from Javascript,
thus letting us leave out the implementation. Odds are the native
method will be faster anyway.
That's right, although at least Google tries to implement the predefined
functions
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:omhitgvibquioulpc...@forum.dlang.org...
>
> If I add a way to instead put those var declarations in
> function scope, it is cleaner - no globals - and the same
> thing Javascript itself would do anyway!
>
>
> I'll have to redo the string buffering to make tha
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 00:56:48 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Something like this should work:
Awesome, it does! Thanks.
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:sazpaicrjwzchqcfw...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 18:28:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Suggestion: Allow all D features even if it
>> requires...inefficient-er...boilerplate, BUT then have a system [...]
>
> Eh. A problem there is those
On 2012-03-02 15:57, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 09:33:44 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
Have you considered faking scopes in JS using anonymous functions?
Yeah, though right now I'm trusting the D compiler to
keep it straight, and it is doing a pretty good job
while being really
On 2012-03-02 15:38, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 05:58:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
You make it sound as if there's another kind of JS.
Horribly inefficient relative to the environment :P
I just don't want 100 kb of crap to download just to
write a hello world.
A lot of
On 03/03/2012 12:12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-02 15:57, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 09:33:44 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
Have you considered faking scopes in JS using anonymous functions?
Yeah, though right now I'm trusting the D compiler to
keep it straight, and it is
On 2012-03-02 19:13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jiptfu$qrg$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-02-29 18:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Alex Rønne Petersen" wrote in message
news:jilnie$1fsr$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 29-02-2012 18:32, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2012-03-03 06:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:sazpaicrjwzchqcfw...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 18:28:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suggestion: Allow all D features even if it
requires...inefficient-er...boilerplate, BUT then have a system
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:jit2r7$rlu$2...@digitalmars.com...
>> I thought unrecognized pragmas were supposed to just be ignored? (Or
>> maybe I
>> have it backwards?)
>>
>>
>
> No, they're not:
>
> "Compilers must diagnose an error for unrecognized Pragmas, even if they
> are vendo
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 12:12:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Wouldn't you save a lot of characters by properly scoping the
variables instead of using unique names?
There's no such thing as proper scoping in Javascript.
The next best thing is the nested functions, but that's
really just tra
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 12:10:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
No, we don't want to do it like Dart:
17260 lines of code for Hello World.
Wow. I thought I was a bit on the bloated side with
~100 lines of boilerplate (before running the unused
function stripper).
$ ../dmd -md object.d
DMD v2.
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 16:29:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
There's no such thing as proper scoping in Javascript.
Let me expand a bit. consider this D:
if(1) {
int a = 3;
}
In JS, right now, that'd output:
if(1) {
var mangled_a = 3;
}
which, to the interpreter, is:
var mangled
On 2012-03-03 17:29, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 12:12:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Wouldn't you save a lot of characters by properly scoping the
variables instead of using unique names?
There's no such thing as proper scoping in Javascript.
The next best thing is the n
On 4 March 2012 05:40, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 12:10:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>> No, we don't want to do it like Dart:
>> 17260 lines of code for Hello World.
>
>
> Wow. I thought I was a bit on the bloated side with
> ~100 lines of boilerplate (before running t
On 3/3/12, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Oh another thing: global variables in D are module scoped.
Could export help?
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
