On Sat, 31 May 2014 18:56:17 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 05/30/2014 02:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
in which case
static if(cond) {
immutable:
}
int x;
should not create x as immutable if cond is true. The current
behavior is not consistent with attribute either.
On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:27:08 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/30/2014 5:37 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 21:15:21 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:06:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static if
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 18:12:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I think you've misunderstood him. You say in the article D
does not provide decltype, he is saying that this is
misleading: D does but it's just called typeof instead.
No, I understood and had adjusted the article with D does not
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 04:21:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I've got two posts complete[1]. Since C++ and D are exactly the
same for the majority of the code I'm only showing D and talk
of C++'s choice. While the rules governing D's behavior are
fairly simple I feel that I've expanded on the
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 07:32:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
What do you mean D does not provide a decltype?
typeof(cx) my_cx2 = cx;
I'll blame this on my poor knowledge of C++, at this time typeof
in C++ does not appear to compile, in the way I'm trying to use
it. I thought using typeof in C++
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 17:49:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 07:32:22 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
What do you mean D does not provide a decltype?
typeof(cx) my_cx2 = cx;
I'll blame this on my poor knowledge of C++, at this time
typeof in C++ does not appear to
On 05/30/2014 02:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
in which case
static if(cond) {
immutable:
}
int x;
should not create x as immutable if cond is true. The current
behavior is not consistent with attribute either.
Ugh, that is really bad. It shouldn't do that. Is that intentional?
On 5/30/2014 5:37 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 21:15:21 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:06:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static if is certainly NOT an attribute, it doesn't make any sense.
Well... it sorta does. static
On Tue, 27 May 2014 22:40:00 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at first.
Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could
On Thu, 29 May 2014 20:40:10 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/29/2014 11:25 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Agreed. The simple dream of automatically decoding UTF and staying
Unicode
correct is a failure.
Yes. Attempting to hide the fact that strings are UTF-8 is
On 5/29/14, 9:21 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 07:21:56 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
I've got two posts complete[1]. Since C++ and D are exactly
On 5/30/14, 3:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/29/14, 9:21 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 07:21:56 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
I've got
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 04:21:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
1. http://he-the-great.livejournal.com/52333.html
Note that in the following code:
import core.memory : GC;
int* pxprime = cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof);
version(none) assert(pxprime); // possibly zero
GC.malloc
On Thu, 29 May 2014 21:15:21 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:06:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static if is certainly NOT an attribute, it doesn't make any sense.
Well... it sorta does. static if does not introduce a new scope, even
with {},
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 10:56:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Nice! I'll post it tomorrow on reddit and friends. You have an
unmatched
brace after assert(a2[].all!(x = x == 0));.
Andrei
Actually a bunch of unmatched braces (formatter eats the
closing one?) and at least one ;; instead
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 11:31:18 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 04:21:18 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
1. http://he-the-great.livejournal.com/52333.html
Note that in the following code:
import core.memory : GC;
int* pxprime = cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof);
On 5/29/14, 9:21 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 07:21:56 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
I've got two posts complete[1]. Since C++ and D are exactly
On 05/29/2014 05:35 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 16:07:08 -0700
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned in his
talk are actually the result
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:23:26 +0200
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
In any case, simply reversing the order for static array types using
an ad-hoc rewrite rule would be a huge wart, even more severe than
the other points you raised, and we
On 05/29/2014 12:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
So, unfortunately, I think that we're stuck.
You make it sound like there is a problem. ;)
I don't see much of an argument for why it makes any sense for static
array
dimensions be read from right-to-left in
On 28/05/2014 2:05 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at
first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 03:29:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
1. The order of the dimensions of multi-dimensional static
arrays is backwards
in comparison to what most everyone expects.
int[4][5][6] foo;
is the same as
int foo[6][5][4];
and has the
On Thu, 29 May 2014 01:31:44 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 05/29/2014 12:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
So, unfortunately, I think that we're stuck.
You make it sound like there is a problem. ;)
I
On 2014-05-28 16:56, Jesse Phillips wrote:
D doesn't have global scope. C++ does not do TLS but that isn't relevant
to the no cost position that C++ is taking.
Since C++11 there's thread_local.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:40:26 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
When he explained why C++ inferred a const int type as int, he
tripped me up because D does drop const for value types.
Hmm, this bit me (doesn't compile):
void f(in char[] s)
{
auto s1=s;
s1=s;
}
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 02:38:56 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Hoping someone can confirm or deny this thought.
int x2prime = void; // (at global scope)
Since x2prime is module variable, I would expect that the
compiler will always initialize this to 0 since there isn't
really a
Jesse Phillips, el 29 de May a las 02:38 me escribiste:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 04:48:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right now
it just has
On Thu, 29 May 2014 04:57:14 -0400, Alix Pexton
alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote:
On 28/05/2014 2:05 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it
On Wed, 28 May 2014 22:38:55 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 04:48:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 10:01:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
??? C, C++, and D all have multi-dimensional arrays. e.g.
int a[5][6]; // C/C++
int[6][5] a; // D
int** a; // C/C++
int[][] a; // D
int* a[5]; // C/C++
int[5][] a; // D
On 2014-05-29 03:29, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
1. The order of the dimensions of multi-dimensional static arrays is backwards
in comparison to what most everyone expects.
int[4][5][6] foo;
is the same as
int foo[6][5][4];
and has the same dimensions as
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:11:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
IIRC, the entire section of global TLS data is initialized, and
is all contiguous memory, so it would be anti-performant to
initialize all but 4 bytes.
int x2;
float f2;
These are both TLS and they init to
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 10:41:59 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:40:26 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
When he explained why C++ inferred a const int type as int, he
tripped me up because D does drop const for value types.
Hmm, this bit me (doesn't compile):
void f(in
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 11:08:03 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think void means you don't know what the
value is, not is a random value or a value different from
the
default (which is impossible for stack values, at least if the
idea
behind void is to avoid the extra runtime cost ;).
On 05/29/2014 03:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 01:31:44 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
Note that there is no such thing as a multi-dimensional array in C,
C++, or D. Hence, there is no reading from any direction; there is a
On Thu, 29 May 2014 10:20:39 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:11:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
IIRC, the entire section of global TLS data is initialized, and is all
contiguous memory, so it would be anti-performant to initialize
On Thu, 29 May 2014 07:32:48 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 05/29/2014 03:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I don't see how you could argue that they don't have
multi-dimensional arrays.
Their specs don't
On 5/29/2014 7:28 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The language docs state, If the Initializer is void, however, the variable is
not initialized. Which I suspect is false in the case of module scope and as
Steven pointed out, other times doing special don't init is costly.
The language does not
On 5/29/2014 6:11 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
struct X
{
int a;
int b = void; // also initialized to 0.
}
This is because X must blit an init for a, and it would be silly to go through
the trouble of blitting X.init to a, but not b. Especially, for instance, if you
had an array of X
On 05/29/2014 08:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 07:32:48 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 05/29/2014 03:00 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I don't see how
On Thu, 29 May 2014 13:12:24 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/29/2014 6:11 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
struct X
{
int a;
int b = void; // also initialized to 0.
}
This is because X must blit an init for a, and it would be silly to go
through
the
Jesse Phillips, el 29 de May a las 14:28 me escribiste:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 11:08:03 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think void means you don't know what the
value is, not is a random value or a value different from the
default (which is impossible for stack values, at least if the
29-May-2014 04:58, Walter Bright пишет:
On 5/28/2014 5:35 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Could you elaborate? Using some of the examples Brian gave, which ones
do you
think are are mathematically consistent/human inconsistent and which
the inverse?
Off the top of my head:
static if (condition)
29-May-2014 02:10, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce пишет:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 06:42:41 -1000
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 5/29/2014 10:54 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Has anyone ever considered making the compiler build an 'optimized'
init-blitting function instead of just defaulting to memcpy? In other words, the
compiler knows at compile time the layout and initialization values of a struct.
What about
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:12:10 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
And no, it doesn't matter how the current frontend implements
it, because you can argue next to any decisions this way.
When issues like this come up the spec is almost always changed
to match the DMD front end instead of the
On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:11:27 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
29-May-2014 04:58, Walter Bright пишет:
On 5/28/2014 5:35 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Could you elaborate? Using some of the examples Brian gave, which ones
do you
think are are mathematically consistent/human
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:52:53 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:12:10 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
And no, it doesn't matter how the current frontend implements
it, because you can argue next to any decisions this way.
When issues like this come up the spec is
29-May-2014 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 14:11:27 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
29-May-2014 04:58, Walter Bright пишет:
On 5/28/2014 5:35 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Could you elaborate? Using some of the examples Brian gave, which ones
do you
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:24:06 -0400, Dmitry Olshansky
dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Let it be just a declaration, as simple as that. Attributes affect other
declarations in the scope, static if doesn't.
Sure it does:
private:
int a;
int b;
equivalent to
private int a;
private int b;
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:29:31 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 5/29/2014 11:11 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Static if is certainly NOT an attribute, it doesn't make any sense.
Yes, it does make sense. It was not an accident that the frontend treats
it as it does,
On 5/29/2014 11:25 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Agreed. The simple dream of automatically decoding UTF and staying Unicode
correct is a failure.
Yes. Attempting to hide the fact that strings are UTF-8 is just doomed. It's
like trying to pretend that floating point does not do rounding.
It's
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
found click More and search again)
On 5/29/2014 9:14 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 04:57:14 -0400, Alix Pexton
alix.dot.pex...@gmail.dot.com wrote:
I couldn't resist looking up this debate, and its quite a fiery one
with no clear winner! There is no clear origin to the phrase and equal
arguments for and
On 5/29/2014 3:19 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
With the reason being?
The same reason you might want to put:
@nogc:
...
at the beginning of a source module instead of:
@nogc: {
...
}
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 19:06:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Static if is certainly NOT an attribute, it doesn't make any
sense.
Well... it sorta does. static if does not introduce a new
scope, even with {}, and this only happens with attributes.
-Steve
in which case
static
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 07:21:56 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
I've got two posts complete[1]. Since C++ and D are exactly the
same for the majority of the code I'm
On 5/27/2014 10:40 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
When he explained why C++ inferred a const int type as int, he tripped me up
because D does drop const for value types. But D does the simple to explain
thing, may not be the expected thing (seen questions about it in D.learn), but
it is simple to
woudl be nice to have some sort of example by example comparison
or as an extension to the page http://dlang.org/cpptod.html
Am 28.05.2014 07:40, schrieb Jesse Phillips:
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:30:18 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I did a translation of most of
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
found click More and search again)
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it
at first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could care less.
when they mean:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it
at first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could care less.
when they mean:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 04:48:09 +, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 14:39:53 UTC, anonymous_me wrote:
The first line:
int x2; // (at global scope)
The x2 resides in Thread Local Storage (TLS). A __gshared would
put it in global scope.
Still initialized to int.init which is zero.
D doesn't have global scope. C++ does not do
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 08:58:34 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
I just noticed someone posted a link to the talk at gamedev[0].
I don't know who the poster is but the gamedev.net community is
pretty large; this should result in quite some extra views :)
Out of curiosity - did anyone try to
On 5/28/2014 2:28 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 06:42:41 -1000
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
On 05/28/2014 03:10 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 06:42:41 -1000
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned in his talk are
actually the result of consistencies.
I know this is a bit of a difficult thing to wrap one's head around, but having
something be mathematically consistent and humanly consistent are often at
severe odds.
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 22:42:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
However, those expectations are based on the inside-out syntax
of C. Naturally, wanting to be consistent, especially compared
to C, D should deviate from that syntax.
I don't get to read the original email, but I agree with the
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 23:07:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned
in his talk are actually the result of consistencies.
I know this is a bit of a difficult thing to wrap one's head
around, but having something be mathematically
On 5/28/2014 5:35 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Could you elaborate? Using some of the examples Brian gave, which ones do you
think are are mathematically consistent/human inconsistent and which the
inverse?
Off the top of my head:
static if (condition)
else :
... declarations ...
On 2014-05-28 13:05, Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:40:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at
first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 00:58:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Off the top of my head:
static if (condition)
else :
... declarations ...
All attributes apply to either:
1. the next statement or declaration
2. { ... }
3. : ...
That case is (3), as static if is set up as an
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 13:05:53 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
Whats wrong with If you think that, you have another thing
coming.?
I've always understood it sort of like say your Father saying:
If you think that [i.e. you can steal your little brother's
ice cream cone], then you have
On 5/28/2014 6:06 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 00:58:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Off the top of my head:
static if (condition)
else :
... declarations ...
All attributes apply to either:
1. the next statement or declaration
2. { ... }
3. : ...
That case
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 04:48:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right
now it just has some scratch notes. Feel free to let me know
everything I
Okay. That seriously got munged. Let's try that again...
On Tue, 27 May 2014 06:42:41 -1000
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
On Wed, 28 May 2014 16:07:08 -0700
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Some of the inconsistencies you mentioned and Brian mentioned in his
talk are actually the result of consistencies.
I know this is a bit of a difficult thing to wrap one's
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not found
click More and search again)
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/855022447844771
On 5/27/2014 12:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not found
click More and search again)
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
Thanks, is it possible to put it on Youtube as well? Ustream
stutters every second from where I am which makes me feel
Great, but I think this should be on youtube too, reasons for
this is the possibility to change resolution and other features
like subtitles for foreigners etc.
Matheus.
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D
needs people like himself to educate others, and that D should
focus on behaviour which makes sense not only in a particular
context, but with respect to the other contexts. (Which is what
C++ lacks greatly.)
On 5/27/14, 2:57 PM, w0rp wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself to educate others, and that D should focus on
behaviour which makes sense not only in a particular context, but with
respect to the other contexts. (Which is what C++ lacks
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself to educate others
I think you misunderstood that point ;) He was saying to make D so that we
DON'T need specialists like himself that
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:44:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Really? What I got out of it was that D doesn't need people
like him because his job is to explain the inconsistencies of
the language. By designing a consistent language in the first
place, people can readily understand it in all
On Tue, 27 May 2014 16:11:12 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 20:11:13 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com
wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points.
D needs people like himself to educate
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:16:34 UTC, Chris Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 20:11:13 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com
wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could care less.
when they mean:
I couldn't care less.
and:
If you think that, you have
On 5/27/2014 6:10 PM, Johannes Totz wrote:
On 27/05/2014 18:43, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Brian Schott, el 27 de May a las 20:03 me escribiste:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:44:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Really? What I got out of it was that D doesn't need people like
him because his job is to explain the inconsistencies of the
language. By designing a consistent language in the
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 22:10:02 UTC, Johannes Totz wrote:
Thanks, is it possible to put it on Youtube as well? Ustream
stutters
every second from where I am which makes me feel sorry for the
speaker…
http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ helps with the stutter.
+1
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
found click More and search again)
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right now it just
has some scratch notes. Feel free to let me know everything I got wrong.
That's a good idea. I think most of us did that while
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:30:18 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right
now it just
has some scratch notes. Feel free
97 matches
Mail list logo
