On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:16:16 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Your an idiot, I know about how operator precedence works far
more than you do. Wanna bet? how much? Your house? your wife?
Your life? It's about doing things correctly, you seem to fail
to understand, not your fault,
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:57:21 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
Please try to be civil. It's fine if you're unhappy about some
aspect of how D works and want to discuss it, but we do not
condone personal attacks here.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:32:06 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:32:29 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh
wrote:
Btw, is that a bit weird that range is not supported in glob
pattern :) Is there a design reason for this?
That is strange. But then again, every glob
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 02:16:16 EntangledQuanta via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:17:53 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC,
> EntangledQuanta
>
>
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Please try to be civil. It's fine if you're unhappy about some
aspect of how D works and want to discuss it, but we do not
condone personal attacks here.
- Jonathan M Davis
He seemed to be threatening the guy's life
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:16:16 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Your an idiot, I know about how operator precedence works far
more than you do. Wanna bet? how much? Your house? your wife?
Your life? It's about doing things correctly, you seem to fail
to understand, not your fault,
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 02:16:16 EntangledQuanta via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:17:53 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Yeah, that is really logical! No wonder D sucks and has so
>
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 22:11:44 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 19:16:05 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
The D community preaches all this safety shit but when it
comes down to it they don't seem to really care(look at the
other responses like like "Hey, C
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:17:53 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Yeah, that is really logical! No wonder D sucks and has so
many bugs! Always wants me to be explicit about the stuff it
won't figure out but it implicitly does stuff
On 19/09/2017 9:22 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta wrote:
writeln(x + ((_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0));
writeln(x + (_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0);
The first returns x + w/2 and the second returns w/2!
Yeah, it sucks to have bugs
On 9/19/17 8:04 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 19:35:15 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 9/19/17 7:28 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 22:44:06 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:52:57 UTC,
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 19:35:15 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 9/19/17 7:28 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 22:44:06 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:52:57 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday,
On 9/19/17 7:28 PM, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 22:44:06 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:52:57 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:47:02 UTC, greatsam4sure wrote:
double value = 20.89766554373733;
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 22:44:06 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:52:57 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:47:02 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
double value = 20.89766554373733;
writeln(value);
//Output =20.8977
How do I output the
On 9/19/17 6:44 PM, greatsam4sure wrote:
I don't want to use write,writefln or format. I just want to change the
default
It's not a bad idea for an enhancement request -- provide default format
specifiers for a given type.
Currently, there isn't a mechanism for that.
-Steve
On 9/19/17 4:28 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
Could be a bit simpler than that, depending on your needs:
bool opEquals(Object other) const nothrow @nogc
{
auto f = cast(typeof(this)) other;
if (f is null) return false;
return this.tupleof == other.tupleof;
}
That doesn't compare
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:04:36 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:28:22 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh
wrote:
Hi,
I want to read two fields from STDIN
string key;
double value;
line_st.formattedRead!"%s %f"(key, value);
Well it's so different from C. I would
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:52:57 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:47:02 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
double value = 20.89766554373733;
writeln(value);
//Output =20.8977
How do I output the whole value without using writfln,write or
format. How do I change
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 19:16:05 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
The D community preaches all this safety shit but when it comes
down to it they don't seem to really care(look at the other
responses like like "Hey, C does it" or "Hey, look up the
operator precedence"... as if those
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:47:02 UTC, greatsam4sure
wrote:
double value = 20.89766554373733;
writeln(value);
//Output =20.8977
How do I output the whole value without using writfln,write or
format. How do I change this default
The default when printing floating-point numbers is to
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Yeah, that is really logical! No wonder D sucks and has so many
bugs! Always wants me to be explicit about the stuff it won't
figure out but it implicitly does stuff that makes no sense.
The whole point of the parenthesis is
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 20:00:40 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
If you want to help, I suggest trying to come up with a DIP
that addresses it while being conscious of how to avoid
breaking an enormous amount of code. I suspect it's a hard and
maybe impossible problem but if you are up
double value = 20.89766554373733;
writeln(value);
//Output =20.8977
How do I output the whole value without using writfln,write or
format. How do I change this default
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:18:04 UTC, drug wrote:
19.09.2017 15:38, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
On 9/19/17 8:01 AM, drug wrote:
I iterate over struct members and check against equality
depending on member type. is there more simple/cleaner/better
way to achieve this functionality?
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
writeln(x + ((_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0));
writeln(x + (_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0);
The first returns x + w/2 and the second returns w/2!
Yeah, it sucks to have bugs like this crop up. I have enough
On 19.09.2017 13:47, Timothy Foster wrote:
I'm trying to compile my project as a Win64 application but this is
happening:
Building C:\Users\me\test\test.exe...
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.17
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2013 All rights reserved.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 19:16:05 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
[snip]
I'm just glad there is at least one sane person that decided to
chime in... was quite surprised actually. I find it quite
pathetic when someone tries to justify a wrong by pointing to
other wrongs. It takes away all
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:28:22 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:
Hi,
I want to read two fields from STDIN
string key;
double value;
line_st.formattedRead!"%s %f"(key, value);
Well it's so different from C. I would use this:
---
auto t = line_st.split.join (' ');
On 9/19/17 1:40 PM, EntangledQuanta wrote:
The first returns x + w/2 and the second returns w/2!
Did you mean (x + w) / 2 or x + (w / 2)? Stop being ambiguous!
-Steve
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 19:16:05 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
()?: is not ambiguous!
The D community preaches all this safety shit but when it comes
down to it they don't seem to really care(look at the other
responses like like "Hey, C does it" or "Hey, look up the
operator
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:51:51 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
I assume someone is going to tell me that the compiler treats
it as
writeln((x + (_win[0] == '@')) ? w/2 : 0);
Yeah, that is really logical!
Yeah, I've
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
I assume someone is going to tell me that the compiler treats
it as
writeln((x + (_win[0] == '@')) ? w/2 : 0);
Yeah, that is really logical!
Yeah, I've been bitten by that in languages like C#. I wish D
didn't follow in
On 09/19/2017 11:34 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>> Pretty sure it would be exactly the same thing in C...
>
> It is (and Java and C# and pretty much every other C style language
> though the nicer implicit conversion rules means it gets
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 18:17:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Thanks for wasting some of my life... Just curious about who
will justify the behavior and what excuses they will give.
Pretty sure it would be exactly the same
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 13:32:29 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:
Btw, is that a bit weird that range is not supported in glob
pattern :) Is there a design reason for this?
That is strange. But then again, every glob library I've seen
works a little bit differently.
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
Thanks for wasting some of my life... Just curious about who
will justify the behavior and what excuses they will give.
Pretty sure it would be exactly the same thing in C...
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC, EntangledQuanta
wrote:
writeln(x + ((_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0));
writeln(x + (_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0);
The first returns x + w/2 and the second returns w/2!
WTF!!! This stupid bug has caused me considerable waste of
time.
writeln(x + ((_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0));
writeln(x + (_win[0] == '@') ? w/2 : 0);
The first returns x + w/2 and the second returns w/2!
WTF!!! This stupid bug has caused me considerable waste of time.
Thanks Walter! I know you care so much about my time!
I assume someone
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 15:27:30 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 15:12:57 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 11:03:38 UTC, Moritz
Maxeiner wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 07:39:46 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
[...]
[...]
---
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 06:35:18 UTC, Matt Jones wrote:
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:37:33 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh
wrote:
[...]
The problem with matching "[0123456789]*" is that it will match
files like "1blah" and "8stuff". It looks like glob patterns
are not robust enough to
Hi,
I want to read two fields from STDIN
string key;
double value;
line_st.formattedRead!"%s %f"(key, value);
However, if the input line contains \t and it doesn't contain any
space, the code doesn't work as expected. If there is a space, it
works well
a[space]1 #
19.09.2017 15:38, Steven Schveighoffer пишет:
On 9/19/17 8:01 AM, drug wrote:
I iterate over struct members and check against equality depending on
member type. is there more simple/cleaner/better way to achieve this
functionality? Especially without string mixins?
Why not just use tupleof
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 12:37:12 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Yes you need to add ldc2 to your PATH. So if your ldc2 binary
is in
/user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2/ldc2
you havto add /user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2 to
your PATH.
You can test this by pasting
On 9/19/17 8:01 AM, drug wrote:
I iterate over struct members and check against equality depending on
member type. is there more simple/cleaner/better way to achieve this
functionality? Especially without string mixins?
Why not just use tupleof directly instead of having to find the member
Yes you need to add ldc2 to your PATH. So if your ldc2 binary is in
/user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2/ldc2
you havto add /user/something/something/folder_where_is_ldc2 to your PATH.
You can test this by pasting this to terminal:
export
I'm more of a Windows user than a Linux user. I have the latest
DMD on my Linux install (linux mint 17.3), but I wanted to test
LDC.
I get a message that ldc2 is not found when I type ldc2 --version
or sudo ldc2 --version (I'm not on root and the existing user
does not have root privileges,
19.09.2017 15:01, drug пишет:
I iterate over struct members and check against equality depending on
member type. is there more simple/cleaner/better way to achieve this
functionality? Especially without string mixins?
oops, https://run.dlang.io/is/PbZE5i
this should be ok, can you post error when using with m64
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Timothy Foster via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to compile my project as a Win64 application but this is
> happening:
>
> Building
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 11:47:00 UTC, Timothy Foster
wrote:
I'm trying to compile my project as a Win64 application but
this is happening:
Building C:\Users\me\test\test.exe...
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.17
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2013 All rights reserved.
I iterate over struct members and check against equality depending on
member type. is there more simple/cleaner/better way to achieve this
functionality? Especially without string mixins?
I'm trying to compile my project as a Win64 application but this
is happening:
Building C:\Users\me\test\test.exe...
OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.17
Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2013 All rights reserved.
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/optlink.html
OPTLINK : Warning 183: Extension not
On Sunday, 17 September 2017 at 08:37:33 UTC, Ky-Anh Huynh wrote:
The official documentation here
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_path.html#.globMatch refers to the
wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glob_%28programming%29
. However I think the popular glob rules (man 7 glob) are not
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 at 03:30:51 UTC, Joseph wrote:
Are there any simple direct serialization libraries where I can
mark elements of a class or struct that I want serialized with
an attribute and it will take care of all the rest(including
recursive structures, arrays, etc) then
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 at 03:30:51 UTC, Joseph wrote:
Are there any simple direct serialization libraries where I can
mark elements of a class or struct that I want serialized with
an attribute and it will take care of all the rest(including
recursive structures, arrays, etc) then
54 matches
Mail list logo
