[digitalradio] Pactor/pactrash

2005-06-22 Thread swl0720
What is with the lids that operate this mode? They think they can just fire up any old time and freq. to pass their numbnuts ham grams? I don't know anyone who cannot make a phone call anywhere in the world for cheap these days. That includes the folks at sea. The PX sells satellite phones

Re: [digitalradio] No transmit 706 MKII G with EZ PSK

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
Does it work correctly with other PSK software? - Original Message - From: Bert Morton To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:20 PM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [digitalradio] No transmit

Re: [digitalradio] No transmit 706 MKII G with EZ PSK

2005-06-22 Thread Bert Morton
No.. - Original Message - From: Andrew J. O'Brien To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:42 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] No transmit 706 MKII G with EZ PSK Does it work correctly with other PSK software?

[digitalradio] SCS PACTOR New for Ham.Radio in Friedrichshafen

2005-06-22 Thread Bob DeHaney
Here is the announcement and I have nothing to do with SCS except a happy user: Dear PACTOR friends! Just like every year we want to invite you to visit us at the Ham-Radio exhibition in Friedrichshafen, in the south of Germany. The show takes place from 23th until 26th of June. Our

RE: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital network modes

2005-06-22 Thread Rick Williams
Mike, With all due respect, we have been doing messaging on ham radio since its inception. In fact, the ARRL was founded on this concept. To now suggest that messaging is not appropropriate, or that messaging without having operators at both endsdoes not seem reasonable.And wehave been

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital network modes

2005-06-22 Thread Mike/k1eg
- Original Message - From: Rick Williams To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 8:40 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital network modes Mike, With all due respect, we have been doing messaging on ham radio since

[digitalradio] ATTN: WG3G

2005-06-22 Thread swl0720
SOMEBODY WANTS TO TALK TO YOU REAL BAD ON 7071.2 PACTRASH WILL YOU PLEASE ANSWER THE STATION...IT DOES NOT ID AND IS CAUSING A LOT OF QRM ON THE 40M BAND...PROBABLY GOT SOME HAM GRAMS FOR YOU TO PASS ON... The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF Digital network modes

2005-06-22 Thread Dean Gibson AE7Q
You forgot to mention that most of the support calls come from people who have pirated the software. At least that was my experience when I sold software in the hobby Heathkit market (for the H-89). -- Dean On 2005-06-20 18:37, Dave Bernstein wrote: Nothing is wrong with remuneration, but

[digitalradio] HF ARQ Sound card modes

2005-06-22 Thread Rick Williams
I was recently looking at different HF digital sound card programs that can do ARQ mode. Other than using Linux to drive Pactor 1, there are at least two that I am aware of at this time. Has anyone here tried either the FNPSK program or the newest version of WinDRM and compared the ability to get

[digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread obrienaj
Rick, what message format will you want to use ? I just set-up one using the ARRL format but can do the others if you want. I have one set-up for you. Do you want the 31 or the 63 variety ? Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew J. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can

[digitalradio] Re: HF Digital network modes

2005-06-22 Thread Joel Kolstad
Say Mike, Rick I have no problem with messages but do have a problem with e- mail on HF that should be on the Internet instead. How do you define should be on the Internet? Isn't that still the same thing as saying you have a problem with voice on HF that should be on the public switched

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Pawel discussed using parallel decoders and picking the one with the best SNR...it should be fairly easy for programs that already support parallel decoding. If you can spot the bandwidth, though, that gives most of the info, and once the selection of parameters for Olivia settles down, it

RE: [digitalradio] CW

2005-06-22 Thread Rick Williams
Yes, It is legal. Keying CW with a tone is no different than AFSK for RTTY. Due to it being potentially less clean, I would not personally use it unless I had a rig that could not TX CW. But you would not find many like that. 73, Rick, KV9U -Original Message- From:

Re: [digitalradio] CW

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
I have used this form of keying, it seems "weird" because no tone is generated by my rig or the software, but it does work. People that have l have worked, when asked, say the CW is a little "mushy". I actually won a ARRL section award in a CW contest using MixW this way Andy K3UK

Re: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
Correct, the stations can received regardless of what message format is used. Just the mode 31 or 63) needs to be the same Andy K3UK - Original Message - From: Danny Douglas To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 6:41 PM Subject:

[digitalradio] 0100 plus ...FNPSK test

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
While waiting for Rick at 0200 UTC I will call a FNPSK net on 14071.5 USB with xmit freq set at 1200 Hz , I will call up the net at 0115, 0130, 0145 and 0200, using FNPSK NCS software in PSK31 mode. I have no clue what I am doing ..so join in and test this software. Andy K3UK The

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Danny Douglas
Right off the bat, I suggest you give others (including when spotting) the exact freq they will see on the waterfall, and not the freq which shows on your rigs readout. It really gets confusing for folk to spot something on 14.071 , 14.070, 14.069 etc. since when we click on that spot,

Re: [digitalradio] CW

2005-06-22 Thread Danny Douglas
I too used it for a couple of years, on and off, and ocassionally someone said I had "audio" on my tones. HI. The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go

Re: [digitalradio] CW

2005-06-22 Thread Ralph Mowery
--- mac2251 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question concerning cw using MixW or Hamscope. Is it legal or not? I have heard both sides. Anyone have the facts.Mike K9HCK As long as it is CW it is legal. If you feed a pure sine wave into a ssb transceiver the output will be

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
Thanks for the test Rick . Did SCS announce something new at Friedrichshafen ? I agree that Scamp needs a keyboard component. I am not sure about MFSK16, its been a couple of years since I experimented with it . By the way, after you faded.. V73AX popped up , CQing ! Andy K3UK -

RE: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Rick Williams
Hi Andy and list members, Yes, there was a major post this morning on here with links to two new products. I was rather expecting some comments on it, especially since what they are doing is providing a system that allows a server stations to permit a client station to access directly into the

Re: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Danny Douglas
OK Thanks. The one worry is that it runson all sorts of operating systems. but doesnt list Win 2000. Got it downloaded and will try anyway. Danny The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links To