Myself I run the excellent VMware software to host many O/S. There is a free
VMware server which you can use to test various LINUX variants, this is what
I do.
I currently have a VISTA rc2 system as there are new soundcard API's which I
must support.
Performance is not bad as long as you
I'm sure its fine for IT stuff, but do you find the fidelity of
execution under VMware to be acceptable when testing multi-threaded
real-time systems, Simon?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Myself I run the excellent
DX Central is also down. Must be something going around...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
What's the status of telnet://cluster.dynalias.org ? I'm getting
connection
refused (nothing listening on port 23).
We have had APRS integrated for quite a while.
Position reports and message handling is supported.
For instance Rein had QSO's from Spain on 30 meters
that was gated through my server in Stockholm and then
gated out on 2 meters APRS in Holland. Message flow
back and forth was quite similar to a
Would have to rewire, as all jacks on the Audigy card are in use.
Would have to unplug something to plug in an external mic, which I don't
have, any way hi! The USB headset is what I used when talking to you on
Skype. It has good tone and level for this.
I believe I had the mixer
My node is unable to link to DX-Central at this moment,
12:14 Error: Authoritative Answer Host not found
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:07 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: cluster.dynalias.org
DX Central is also down. Must be
He is a member if this group.
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From: kd4e
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PAX 2 with Linux?
Now this is a truly exciting Web site!
http://pskmail.wikispaces.com/
Will have to
The most recent QST magazine that I received yesterday, had a very nice
article on PSKmail by Steve, WB8IMY, who is the editor and also a
digital enthusiast of many years.
He has detailed instructions on how you could run PSKmail even if you
only had a Windows OS computer by running a live CD
I actually enjoy the Linux vs. Windows debate, but will not continue it
here.
I have been using Unix/Linux mostly for the last 20 years, and 2 years ago,
got rid of my last windows installation. I will never go back..
I have an ICOM 720A and an ICOM 756 Pro II and have the serial to CIV
From 16:30 to 19:30 UTC, beaconing on dial freq 14074 USB, every 3 minutes,
responder on.
please leave reception reports on the responder (use the connect function) or
here.
Thanks
John
VE5MU
From a throughput perspective, I'm sure DBMS and app servers run
fine. From a testing perspective, however, I'm not sure that running
digital mode software in a virtualized environment would yield the
same behavior as running it in the native environment that most users
will employ. I have
FLDIGI is good software, available from Dave w1hkj ( w1hkj.com).
FLDIGI needs hamlib, but that available from debian apt-get. Kbuntu
will retrieve and install hamlib for you. Dave also has a precompiled
binary , makes installation easy.
I have used 3 of his other pgms- all work fine-
Baleares island is very inviting, especially since we have had temps down to
-25C, currently -10C
Any idea what frequency they are using for all this? Would it be worth chosing
one which we could use ? We do not have any band/baud restrictions here
(Canada)for this type of transmission so
Michael P. Brininstool wrote:
I actually enjoy the Linux vs. Windows debate, but will not continue it
here.
I have been using Unix/Linux mostly for the last 20 years, and 2 years ago,
got rid of my last windows installation. I will never go back..
I have an ICOM 720A and an ICOM 756
Hello John,
Baleares island is very inviting, especially since we have had temps down to
-25C
Baleares or Siberia?
The main frequency for HF 300 bauds Packet transmissions is:
* 10150 KHz LSB
* AF around 1000 Hz.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To:
ok ... set up on 10150 beaconing now... will leave it run for the rest of the
day here and see what shows up
73's
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lindecker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
I have that server under my desk here and I wondered
why it was working so hard, I guess I know why now :-)
I only have abt 5 Mbps upstream so this could take a
while for some. Great that there was an article on
pskmail, Rein has done a great job and pskmail is
ready for a bigger crowd. Its
There are other digital automatic users besides the email Winlink 2K
systems you cite. The National Traffic System (certainly a part of ham
radio, and has been around for over 50 years) uses the automatic section
of 80 meters for passing traffic thru the NTS Digital system. The FCC
new rule
Michael P. Brininstool wrote:
I actually enjoy the Linux vs. Windows debate, but will not continue it
here.
I have been using Unix/Linux mostly for the last 20 years, and 2 years ago,
got rid of my last windows installation. I will never go back..
I have an ICOM 720A and an ICOM 756
I've been thinking about this for quite awhile now, so I'm wondering
what everyone else would think about a mini-contest this weekend using
narrow image modes, like MFSK16 pix or MultiPSK's Run mode. Seems like
a good way to take our minds off the privileges we've lost, and
celebrate one that
David Struebel wrote:
There are other digital automatic users besides the email Winlink 2K
systems you cite. The National Traffic System (certainly a part of
ham radio, and has been around for over 50 years) uses the automatic
section of 80 meters for passing traffic thru the NTS Digital
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must we wait for the FCC to request comments on the ARRL
request or should we post our opposition immediately?
Sure do not understand why a neo-commercial digital
app (all automatic and most semi-automatic unattended
I will be on 3583 USB (up from 3581 to avoid W1AW CW) tonight 13/12/06
UTC from to around 0300 UTC. I will use DominoEX FEC 11 baud,
FEC 'ON. I will periodically send a CQ, probably at every 15 minutes .
Andy K3UK
Fredonia, NY.
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Sure do not understand why a
FYI, arunakapur441 has been banned for attempts to post spam.
Andy.
I worked Rick's weak signal and actually got fairly good copy. I had
both Multipsk and also Con's DominoEXCEC open at the same time. I
did noot match squelch settings so it may no be a good comparision.
I had no squelch set for Multipsk and DominoEXFEC was set for the
default squelch
Maybe operate SSTV or FAX on 3605 if you have an extra class license?
OK, OK just kidding.. Well, sort of just kidding:)
73,
Rick, KV9U
Andrew J. O'Brien wrote:
I assume the new regs go in to effect at midnight Eastern time, 0500 UTC DEC
15, 2006. Does anyone have a suggestion
I have it working for PTT but I am confused about a couple of factors.
Set Commander for your desired comm port, test the PTT via Commander
(config then the general tab and select TX in the PTT area.)
That should work fairly easily.
Then boot up Multipsk and go to the config area and select
You could host the last automatic digital QSO on 80m. If you ensure
that the frequency is clear at both ends beforehand, then the QSO will
be unique on two counts.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew J. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I assume the new
It's not necessarily the automatic operation that cause the problem,
although they certainly can. The biggest problem is that pactor 3
modems are basically designed for commercial use and assume that once
they have a 3 kHz channel the whole channel belongs to them for the
entire session. The
Dave,
You cannot be suggesting actually listening before transmitting?
Would be a slap in the face of tradition.
Seriously, it will be interesting to see how it all sorts out...I
will move the PAX2 station into the dustbin on 80 as I am not about
to dump that wide a signal onto the new
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave,
You cannot be suggesting actually listening before transmitting?
Would be a slap in the face of tradition.
I was parked on 3581 USB tonight and heard W1AW start up with CW. Not
a QRL? to be heard. I
Andy,
That did not do it. It says in the help files something about a DDE file. I
will check on that and see if I can find it.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:49 PM
Subject: [digitalradio]
Forget the post below I got it working.
Joe
W4JSI
- Original Message -
From: Joe Ivey
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: PTT via Commander
Andy,
That did not do it. It says in the help files
I was parked on 3581 USB tonight and heard W1AW start up with CW. Not
a QRL? to be heard. I saw someone post somwthing about it not being
reaslistic to expect W1AW to actually listen first, because
they broadcast on many frequencies at the same time. The point make
sense, but it still
Unfortunately, semi-automatic operation is problematic. The
initiating operator can know that the frequency is clear at his or
her end of the QSO, but can't know whether the frequency is clear at
the automatic station.
For example, I might connect with an automatic station in Nashville
from
36 matches
Mail list logo
