From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The option to display in upper case is better than nothing, but
readability is best optimized by letting the user choose
- the font and its associated metrics (size, bold, italic)
- the font color
- the background color
Which is what I do :-)
Robert,
fldigi on linux does CW and in my tests received as well as cwget. It allows
for AFSK and hardline keying via the key input on your radio. There was a
bug with hardline keying in the older alpha versions so it is best to run
the latest code from w1hkj.com. Of course, full source code is
thanks for the comments, Jose. i know I had lots of fun getting my AEA232 to
work well on packet.
hopefully band conditions will improve a bit so that we can try this on the air.
73's and Merry Christmas to all from western Canada (temp -10C and about 25CM
of snow right now)
John
VE5MU
Simon Brown wrote:
From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:aa6yq%40ambersoft.com
The option to display in upper case is better than nothing, but
readability is best optimized by letting the user choose
- the font and its associated metrics (size, bold, italic)
- the font
I have used Olivia, Throb, PSK63, Hell, MFSK all successfully on the low end
just below the normal PSK freqs on 20 meters. It would seem to me the best
place on all bands, using the low end of normal PSK frqs, where people would
notice you. Early on, in each of those modes, that is about the
As do I.
Aren't there some upper-case-only fonts around?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The option to display in upper case is better than nothing, but
readability is best
Hi Roger,
Coming along really well. I will very probably never use PSK31 Deluxe again.
My immediate plans are to get the SuperBrowser integrated (better said -
rewritten), then we'll add another wave of testers.
I'll announce progress here if you want.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original
Danny Douglas wrote:
I have used Olivia, Throb, PSK63, Hell, MFSK all successfully on the
low end just below the normal PSK freqs on 20 meters. It would seem
to me the best place on all bands, using the low end of normal PSK
frqs, where people would notice you. Early on, in each of
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excepting Throb (which I have never used) I seem to find most of the
A funny story: I was showing all the digital modes to a ham new
to the territory, showing him what they sound like. So I switched
to Throb,
When I was working HF packet (at 110 baud) back in the early 1980's, I found
that I did generally make my PACLEN to 40 and MAXFRAME to 1 and my ID was
k5yfw-3775 or what ever I was using. If conditions were really good, I set the
PACLEN to 76 (72-76 characters is what is recommended for
Simon Brown wrote:
Hi Roger,
Coming along really well. I will very probably never use PSK31 Deluxe
again. My immediate plans are to get the SuperBrowser integrated
(better said - rewritten), then we'll add another wave of testers.
I'll announce progress here if you want.
Simon
I don't really see DM780 as competition, rather a Windows alternative with
the detector / modulator code packaged in a DLL so that other programmers
can see how it works and hopefully make it better.
This will be my Q1/Q2 2007 project, then I have HRD work to do, then I may
look at writing my
Download 0.481 from http://rfsm2400.narod.ru/
or my side http://rfsm2400.aanesland.com/
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
I have worked Olivia on 14105-14110...also MT63, not very often, indeed.
Never checked below 14070 for digitalmaybe it could be interesting.
On 40, I have found 2 watering holes: 7070-7075 and 7035-7038
I have used Olivia and Hell on 7073.
I have worked quite a few exotic DX on 7035,
How about using PSK31 as the baseline and then transmit any other
digital mode a kHz or so up from the highest PSK31 signal that is on at
that time?
That is pretty much what I do on 80, 40, and 20.
I would very much like a spot frequency to operate on for 30 meters
which seems grossly
Rick I think that you are pretty much looking at RTTY freqs, which usually
are 2 or 3 KC above the PSK signals, and upward from there. This suggest
calling freq for other digital modes, therefore should be a bit above or
below the combination package of PSK/RTTY so as to get them out of each
Hello Everyone,
I've just been reading all the controversial comments about
transmitting PSK in upper case or lower case, speed of delivery and
losing text in conditions which are far from being good.
If your daily newspaper was printed entirely in upper case letters,
people would stop buying
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
Is it heard at night? Then I am going to guess that it is digital
radio mondial broadcast.
Bob
N4HY
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
Robert McGwier wrote:
Is it heard at night? Then I am going to guess that it is digital
radio mondial broadcast.
Bob
N4HY
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it needs to be reported to the FCC and their own government as
out of
band.
Danny Douglas N7DC
What is the signal that occupies 3990 to 4000?
It is a broadcast station.
That part of the band is shared with
But- not in this part of the world - and if it is in the Carribean, that IS
this region. Also, by law, broadcast statiions are NOT to direct
transmission to this region, in order to not intefere with licensed stations
here. Now- I know MOST of them have - including our dear own Voice of
It seems to me that the IARU Region 2 bandplan should at least be
consulted as part of the subject process..
See http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html.
73 de AA5J
Danny Douglas wrote:
As to the 160 meter band, I was taken aback by your comment about
operating
digital
You would think so, but look at the band plan, and then at who is the lead
for IARU within region 2 (ARRL). They say 1800-18930 CW, yet do not say
that on their own US Amateur Bands chart, or at least recommend it. Phone
doesnt show up on there, until 1840-1850 DX window.
One hand doesnt know
Danny,
The ARRL bandplan shows Digital Modes to be 1.800 - 1.810. They also
have an Experimental modes area at the top of the band from 1.995 -
2.000 in the Beacon bandplan area:
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html
I came across some information this week that really
The way I read this, it was not because they were on a band plan for CW, but
that they were interfering with communications that was already in use. The
band plan was just something that gave them the ability to gig them for
one more thing.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP
26 matches
Mail list logo
