Jose A. Amador wrote:
>
> Misko,
>
> You need a JNOS executable compiled for a 286. I did so some 9 years ago
> and had my JNOS versions for DOS custom compiled. You need some Borland
> compiler, I used BC 3 back then.
>
Hello Jose, tnx for reply. Well I managed to get various installation
t
> John VE5MU wrote:
>
> The logic of setting this up with an ALE frequency basically
> on top of the beacons is competely without merit,
> and based on the distorted notion that all hams possess the
> very latest in gear to filter out an ALE TX adjacent to
> the beacon frequency.
Dear John,
I was able to work Jose briefly on 20M earlier today
Can't hear anything tonight since we have a cold front with snow moving
through, and just high static levels on
80M Will try 20M in the AM 14109.5 vfo, and maybe 80 tomorrow night.
great to see a few folks trying this mode out
John
VE
Also copied alot of data frames from you tonight on 3.587 +1500 HZ
AF, USBnice signal Jose.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I found him on 14109.5 kHz dial QRG + 1500 Hz AF, USB.
>
> Jose, CO2JA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
OK I guess that makes sense to me also. The only thing is that I normally
do NOT listen to beacons with a narrow filter. I tune across the bands with
the wide filter, as it is easier to hear stations and then after I hear
them, and discover I want to work them, I throw the narrow filter on. Its
The logic of setting this up with an ALE frequency basically on top of the
beacons is competely without merit,
and based on the distorted notion that all hams possess the very latest in gear
to filter out an ALE TX adjacent to
the beacon frequency.
That might have some truth in the developed c
??? Why are they unfound Bonnie? The beacons are used by a multitude to
see what is coming in, in the world. With inteference that close, are they
going to be useable? Certainly, at least for now, there are going to be
many less ALE users than people listening for beacons. With the many
digit
Bonnie's detailed explanation looked reasonable to me.
I often use the NCDXF propagation beacons and have rarely heard them
QRM'd by digital signals.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> In other words Tony, despite decades
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In other words Tony, despite decades of tradition of having the CW
beacons on 14100, the ALE users don't give a rat's butt for anyone
except a small number
> of ALE users.
>
> and the only reason they are doing this i
In other words Tony, despite decades of tradition of having the CW beacons on
14100, the ALE users don't give a rat's butt for anyone except a small number
of ALE users.
and the only reason they are doing this is because they can.
John
VE5MU
Subject: [digitalradio] 14100.5 kHz USB - ALE Ch
> Tony KT2Q wrote
>
> Bonnie,
>
> Not sure if it's been said before, but the
> 14100.5khz ALE data channel seems awfully close
> the NCDXF beacon frequency on 14100.0.
>
Hi Tony,
Yes, it is has been covered before in HFLINK group, and via direct
communication with IARU Region frequency coord
Bonnie,
Not sure if it's been said before, but the
14100.5khz ALE data channel seems awfully close
the NCDXF beacon frequency on 14100.0.
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:23 PM
Subject: [digitalradio]
Just a reminder:
ALE and the associated digital communications with it, always uses
FIXED audio frequencies, NEVER variable offset.
Ham stations engaged in ALE operations on 20 meters are normally
precisely on channel, calibrated +/- 20 Hz and using the
internationally coordinated frequencies:
John,
If you indicate a frequency (QRG), then you should be on that frequency.
It is precisely because everyone's offset will be different, that you
can NOT use a dial frequency without specifying that it is a dial
frequency and then it also specifying the offset you are using.
Because we hav
I'm hoping someone can help me edit and/or add my newly acquired ICOM
756P3 to the Digipan 2.0 list of CI-V setup choices. The reason I would
like to do that is because every digiprogram I have uses the 6E default
CI-V address, but that choice is simply not available within Digipan
2.0.
I real
Multipsk has a new mode 141A in test form, which can be found at
http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_19_02_2007.ZIP
So far is has been a very interesting mode, very fast throughput under moderate
signal conditions
am on tonight 3587.5 VFO listening and beaconing using 141A and short frames
(co
KV9U wrote:
>
>
> Assuming you are centered on 14109.5, there has been a Pactor 3 station
> partically on that frequency. Tried calling you now since freq is clear
> but no response. But not sure of QRG. I am dial frequency 14.108 _1500 Hz.
>
> 73,
>
> Rick, KV9U
I found him on 14109.5 kHz dia
John,
I think the memory arq which takes information from previous repeated corrupted
frames will avoid to have 6 tries but only one (at least I hope so).
An average of 2 bad frames is equivalent to a gain of 3 dB on the S/N of the
averaged frame.
Speaking of S/N and errors. The minimum S/Ns th
Of course I was really only guessing at what percent errors were looked at for
the lowest SNR...actually just going by some information published in
conjunction with Patrick's and Pascal's mode information.
Perhaps one of the things that needs to be established IS how to determine the
lowest SN
the multiple repetitions of each packet worked in our favour last night, since
some took 6 tries to get thru
since conditions were so bad.
JOhn
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lindecker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: Re:
dial frequency 14109.5 plus 0ffset. Since everyone's offset may be different,
easier to understand VFO freq and look up from there
at 2000gmt back making noise
John
- Original Message -
From: KV9U
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:06 PM
Hello Kevin,
This mode comes from a test version of Multipsk. Here is information about it.
"..This test version in a ZIP test package is available in my site
http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_19_02_2007.ZIP
It contains the Multipsk test version, the help files (in English and French)
and t
I was not aware that the lowest S/N ratios allow for significant error
rates. For example, the British study had what seemed perfect data
throughput when they listed the S/N ratio below noise, although under
AWGN and that is more similar to VHF and up compared to HF.
Based upon the multitone su
Hello John,
TKS for info.
>managed to connect briefly on noisy conditions with N9DSJ, and using long
>frames. would have worked better with short frames
Yes in long frames it works better where conditions are stable (as in 28, 50 or
144 MHz). In SW, it's better to have short waves.
I've just fi
Rick,
A couple of things to consider...
Most of the published Lowest S/N (such as by Patrick, F6CTE, Pascal, F1ULT and
others is based on the signal level where you are getting about 2% errors.
The lowest S/N for MT63 is - 8 dB for 5 bauds, - 5 dB for 10 bauds and -2 dB
for 20 bauds and is ge
Assuming you are centered on 14109.5, there has been a Pactor 3 station
partically on that frequency. Tried calling you now since freq is clear
but no response. But not sure of QRG. I am dial frequency 14.108 _1500 Hz.
73,
Rick, KV9U
John Bradley wrote:
>this morning could hear CO2JA, Jose o
I did not see any response to this but each of the DominoEX modes does
have an estimated SNR
For example:
DEX4 = -14.5 dB
DEX5 = -14
DEX8 = -13.5
DEX11 = -12
DEX16 = -10.5
DEX22 = -9
Add about one 1 db better SNR for using the FEC mode.
It does seem that DEX22/FEC works better than DEX1
this morning could hear CO2JA, Jose on 14109.5 but couldn't work him with 141A.
Did work him with about 85% copy on
OLIVIA 1000/32
conditions noisy and with a little pactor QRM
will keep trying, any other takers?
John
VE5MU
at 1530Z listening on 14109.5 , short frames calling CQ or sounding
making a little noise in other words...
Not sure? give me your phone number and will call and talk you thru. have
24/7 toll free North America
John
VE5MU
Hi Kevin,
You need either:
[1] A beta I will release in a few days, or
[2] Join the HRD forums at http://forums.ham-radio.ch and join the DM780 beta
group.
DM780 is a replacement for PSK31 Deluxe, hoping to make a general beta by
Easter.
Your TS-480SAT problem - there is a special command to
Simon HB9DRV, and Members,
If you are reading.
I run your Radio control program, and have recently been trying to use your
PSK31 program that came with the install.
Using a TS-480S/AT.
The problem I am having is TX'ing. The radio switches to TX, via control PTT,
but no audio, no output power re
Just downloaded PCALE, and installed on Ham computer.
What do I do next? And I guess 14.109.5 is the frequency to listen to?
Kevin, ZL1KFM.
Get Skype and call me for free.
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2
Hi all,
Version 0.49 is out.
http://rfsm2400.narod.ru
or
http://rfsm2400.aanesland.com
*
Changes in version 0.49. *
(+) Add feature - new speed - 3200 (3,4 kHz) / 2666 (2,7 kHz) bps (with
puncturing code 2/3). Number of transeive modes for "dumb-modem": 14 -
2666 short, 15 - 2666 long.
(+) A
33 matches
Mail list logo
