Assuming you're using v5, it is activated via a macro instruction rsid.
For use on receive, go to Program Options, Modes + IDs, the Reed Solomon (RSID)
tab, and Enable RSID detection.
You can also activate a RSID transmit button as well, if you don't want to
program it into the macros.
The only problem is that Mr Henderson is mistaken in one regard. Per Part 97,
spread spectrum is not authorized on 6m or 2m. The rules specifically state
(section 97.305(b)) no SS modulation emission may be transmitted on any
frequency where SS is not specifically authorized.. A review of
There are some known European users in that range, but without a recording, it
would difficult to say for certain what it is and where is it coming from.
However, keep in mind that while this frequency range is assigned to amateur
radio exclusively in Region 2, that is not the case in Europe
Also available in Fldigi.
On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Tony wrote:
All in all, FSK-Hell does offer better readability over Feld Hell. Click
on the link below to see an on-air and example of how the modes
compared. FSK-Hell is available in IZ8BLY's Hellschreiber (FM-Hell),
DM780, MixW and
But the original question was regarding various windows digi software, so
the answer should address things like: Ham Radio Deluxe, DX Lab Suite,
EasyPAL, etc. Listing off a group of Linux software doesn't answer the
question.
That being said, WSJT, WSPR, Fldigi CQRLog and others are all GREAT
Ubuntu is Linux, and will NOT run Windows programs normally. Some will run
using a windows emulator called WINE, which emulates some Windows functions,
but not all.
I didn't know about any of those programs in particular; but a quick check
of the wine website indicates the following:
MMSSTV -
Ubuntu is an operating system, like Windows. It DOES NOT run Windows
programs natively.
The programs that Peter mentioned were ALL linux (Ubuntu) programs.
Linux has most necessary drivers for most hardware out there. It would
handle the sound card, modem, speaker, etc the same way Windows
Great idea. Just remember, the Windows way of doing things doesn't always
translate into Ubuntu. Give Ubuntu a good period of time, learn to use it,
and you will not regret it.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, n0alo n0...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you everyone for the very usefull
Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?
Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can block,
or the software that sends out false reports that you can't? In any case, it
is doing who knows what in the background.
The fact that Jose has now coded
Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his
website?
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:
Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
agent at FCC:
ROS is not Spread Spectrum because the 3khz HF standard channel is
maintained.
I think that a lot of people are missing the point with ROS and Spread Spectrum
here in the US.
The author defined it as Spread Spectrum, only changing it to FSK144 (or
whatever) after being told that SS was not allowed below 1.25m in the US. The
FCC rules don't mention bandwidth in
Sigi,
Have to agree with you here.
Since Spread Spectrum is not authorized in the US below 220MHz, and since
CHIP 64/128 is Spread Spectrum, no one in the US can use MultiPSK since it
includes CHIP??? Well, of course, that isn't the case. Logic would have
to prevail, but with the negativity
lets move on, there are other digital methods, why not just
use those?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wright hfradio...@gmail.com hfradiopro%40gmail.com
Sent: Jul 12, 2010 7:25 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re
ROS 1.0 (the last)http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/07/11/ros-1-0-the-last/
11
July, 2010 by José Alberto Nieto Ros
I’ve been reading too many derogatory comments towards me in Digital Group
and ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP so I understand that it is not worth further evolve
this software.
So, ROS 1.0
Yes, he is spotting on 14112but a lot of those spots were on 14115 and
14103 which he is not monitoring.
Dave
K3DCW
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:40 AM, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Steinar,
I believe you are reporting ( spotting ) stations at 14.112
because you are using ROS with your
I'm not sure if it still requires it, but many early users gladly gave over
their gmail account passwords (required at the time) to the program without
question, so why would they care (or even know) if it did anything else?
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com wrote:
As
Just goes to show that he reads the boards and keeps track of what is going
on.
Now, how easy would it be to program a button to disable the function with
one toggle in the software? Very easy! Then he could open it to everyone
to decide whether they want the reporting or not. Since he won't
The discussion of the persona-non-grata list was started here:
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742highlight=ros. It starts
getting pretty interesting around page 4 or 5.
In March, the list consisted of the following calls: *
digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Dave
Wright hfradio...@... wrote:
The discussion of the persona-non-grata list was started here:
http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=239742highlight=ros. It starts
getting pretty interesting around page 4 or 5.
In March, the list consisted of the following calls
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Dave
Wright hfradio...@... wrote:
So, did you actually transmit using another op's call sign? Or, did you
just
plug them in and say that it works? As I recall, the non-grata ops could
enter their calls during setup
The hall of shame consists of users that dared to criticize ROS as being too
wide, being spread spectrum (illegal here in the US below 1.2m) or numerous
other offenses that have never been explained.
Personally, I'm in there because I made a post on QRZ asking to be in there so
that I could
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Siegfried Jackstien
siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:
His interest is making a software that gets over the ocean under the
noiselevel with a few watts and a simple antenna !
For what purpose? If he's not a ham, then it isn't to support the amateur
Just another part of the mystery, I guess Andy...a lot about ROS makes no
sense one way or another.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one thing about Jose that does not make sense... if he is as
devious and untrustworthy ass some suggest...and he
Andy,
Just two-cents worth here. ALE400 forces the user into one software package
and operating system at the expense of others. Of course, there is
virtualization technologies to help with that, but unless ALE400 gets more
widely adopted it likely isn't the answer as a specified signal of
On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
Rick Ellison writes:
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit all publicly-documented data modes
So, has Pactor III every been publicly-documented???
Dave
K3DCW
Real radio bounces
if
they are going to get mode specific.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Dave Wright hfradio...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
Rick Ellison writes:
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit
The ARRL deadline for comments/suggestions was April 5th. I wonder why
Bonnie waited until the very last minute to submit her suggestion to the
ARRL? Could it be that she anticipated a backlash against the 15%+ proposal
(her suggested band plan gives 50% of 30m to fast/automatic stations!) from
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2010/03/04/11377/?nc=1
I'm with you, Skip. While I appreciate the effort Jose put into this mode, I
won't be using it on HF.
The article quoted as justification of the legality of ROS was written by
the Italian developer of Chip64 who is not under the jurisdiction of the
FCC. The ARRL lists it only as a technical
Ask and you shall receive.
So I bring you an article about SS, and no one has based his opinion on
real fact. where is the Part 97 that clearly stated that amateur radio can
not use SS.
This is stated in:
§97.305 Authorized emission types, Paragraph (b) which states: (b) A station
may
If you rename the new port to one of the old ports that is now unused,
you'll have no problems.
Dave
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:12 PM, graham787 g0...@hotmail.com wrote:
Windows device manager is showing all the com ports 1 12 are in use ..
but i only have 3 usb to serial devices and 1 usb
Really? That's your response?
You do realize that any answer would be purely a guess, without some
information from you such as specific frequencies, times or perhaps a
recording.
However, in the interest in trying to be helpful, and going without any info
from you other than some general
32 matches
Mail list logo
