I use Win-test, try the demo version.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mhz14071 wrote:
>
>
> I am unsuccessful in getting N1MM to work with my setup.
> I am looking for comments, on other contest logging programs
> that would work using USB to Navigator with internal Winkey
> 73
> Stan
I am unsuccessful in getting N1MM to work with my setup.
I am looking for comments, on other contest logging programs
that would work using USB to Navigator with internal Winkey
73
Stan N1ZX
All,
That "ancient" digital mode seems to increase in popularity each year despite
what they say. It was a battle trying to find a clear 20 meter frequency to run
in this weekends WPX CW contest.
Was nice to see the 10 meter F2 opening to New Zealand (ZL1BYZ / ZL2IFB) and
wished I had more tha
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 1:16 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] CW - last resort?
Here's some food for thought for digimode only ops.
DE NNN0ASA ZUJ CMB06-08:
RR NOALL
DE NNN0ASA 050
R 292200Z MAY 2008
FM CHNA
Here's some food for thought for digimode only ops.
DE NNN0ASA ZUJ CMB06-08:
RR NOALL
DE NNN0ASA 050
R 292200Z MAY 2008
FM CHNAVMARCORMARS WILLIAMSBURG VA
TO ALNAVMARCORMARS
INFO ZEN/CHIEF ARMY MARS FT HUACHUCA AZ
ZEN/CHIEF AIR FORCE MARS SCOTT AFB IL
BT
UNCLAS
SUBJ: CHNAVMARCORMARS BCST 06-08
With the non-paid version of Multipsk you only have 5 minutes to test
the enhanced CW mode. I admit that I did not try a very serious test,
but just trying it out once, it did not seem that different to me, but
then again it would be needed to test against different conditions.
With the MRP40 p
> http://www.polar-electric.com/Morse/MRP40-EN/
>There is a trial version that works for a short time so you an see how
>well it can receive CW compared to most any other program. If anyone
>knows of a freeware program that can compete, I would appreciate knowing.
Have you compared it to Multipsk
Well, since Brad brought up contesting, I find Writelog better at
decoding CW than MixW. Writelog also has a DX "contest", so you could do
CW with that. Writelog does not decode CW below 20 wpm though, and the
cost is $30/year.
73, Jim VA3JNO
Brad Gillis wrote:
>
>
> There is a varity of
Robert Meuser wrote:
>
>
> Speaking of keyboards and the like, does anyone have a suggestion for
> software to send and receive morse?
CW only, to send, CwType. It is a russian program, but widely
customizable. I use it very seldom nowadays, but I liked it a lot.
It has a character table that a
Robert,
fldigi on linux does CW and in my tests received as well as cwget. It allows
for AFSK and hardline keying via the key input on your radio. There was a
bug with hardline keying in the older alpha versions so it is best to run
the latest code from w1hkj.com. Of course, full source code is a
Robert,
After reading Rick's glowing assessment of the MRP4-EN I gave it another try.
I am afraid I can not give it the same rating. I ran CWget and Hamscope at the
same time
both with near 100% copy while the MRP40-EN got 50% at best. At times it would
get 100%
(so I must have it setup right) a
There is only one really superior receiving software program but it
costs $60:
> http://www.polar-electric.com/Morse/MRP40-EN/
There is a trial version that works for a short time so you an see how
well it can receive CW compared to most any other program. If anyone
knows of a freeware program
There is a varity of Software that will send and receive CW.
Try Hamscope, MultiPsk, MixW or CWType.
It is not as much fun as a real key or paddle but gets the job done during a
contest when there are a lot of operators doing 30+wpm.
I dubbed around a bit before I discovered my radio had to be
The most available options are...
Multipsk
MixW
- Original Message -
From: Robert Meuser
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW software?
Speaking of keyboards and the like, does anyone have a suggestion
Speaking of keyboards and the like, does anyone have a suggestion for
software to send and receive morse?
Simon Brown wrote:
>My own eyesight dropped off a tad 2 or 3 years ago, it's very good indeed
>except when reading a book with small print. I'll take all this into
>consideration.
>
>Is
Here in VK interest in CW has been increasing one we no-coders got HF
privileges. The code practice beacons are an invaluable resource for those
learning. On-air code practice sessions take place and have increasing
number of participants, including those who did not require the code to get
on HF
]
- Original Message -
From: "David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:54 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] cw
> now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
> area that they themselves recommend for cw.
>
>
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
> now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
> area that they themselves recommend for cw.
> david/wd4kpd
Effective today there is no more Morse Code
requirement so the ARRL should suspend CW
broadcasts immediately and release that spectr
now would be a good time to get the arrl cw practice down in the
area that they themselves recommend for cw.
david/wd4kpd
I somewhat support the idea of using CW throughout the amateur bands. I
realize that it is sometimes used in special cases, such as on voice
nets where one station might be on CW, but that is not common.
Based upon the actions of the NTS traffic nets though, it seems very
clear that most radio
The first thing you need to do is to learn the characters by ear. You just
need lots of repetitions and lots of drilling. Have a look here
http://c2.com/morse/ - it is good stuff. Once you know the characters find a
HF or VHF morse beacon somewhere (3699 East-coast Australia, w1aw in the
USA) and
I have started using a new program and It doesnt like me very much. I
am trying to learn code and have started using this CWget. Can anyone
help?
rface and macro facility are used with
all supported modes.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:29 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [di
Have you tried "CW Type"? Is recv companion program is CW Get.
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:48 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW program???
> What does everyone recommend to copy
WinWarbler sends but is not yet ready to receive CW, Personally I havent
found one CW program that can copy CW worth the medium its written on.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 7:28 AM
Subject:
MixW does a good job, so does Hamcope. Ham radio Deluxe "may" add CW
capability later this year. I think Winwarbler may do CW these days,
not sure.
Andy K3UK
On 3/7/06, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does everyone recommend to copy and transmit CW?
> I use TRX-Manager as well as Ham Radi
What does everyone recommend to copy and transmit CW?
I use TRX-Manager as well as Ham Radio Deluxe to control the radio.
I dont want to use a TNC just the computer itself.
Thanks
NB2A
Tom
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The Mi
Thomas Giella KN4LF wrote:
> *Adriano,*
> **
> *Unforunately none of the other free or fee based CW decoding softwares
> work any better than Hamscope and MixW. The only software on the market
> that can accuratley decode weak CW signals with QRN and QSB present is the *
> *http://www.polar-elec
--- Migliari Adriano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can Somebody provide me with web site address from
> where i can download a
> FREE
> CW (Transmit and Receive) program??
> I tried MIXW and Hamscope but in RX does not
> satisfy me.
>
>
The CW mode is very difficult to copy on a computer
c
Adriano,
Unforunately none of the other free or fee
based CW decoding softwares work any better than Hamscope and MixW. The only
software on the market that can accuratley decode weak CW signals with QRN and
QSB present is the
http://www.polar-electric.com/Morse/MRP40-EN
and it costs ar
1- forum digitalradio"
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 4:06 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW (Transmit and Receive) program??
> Can Somebody provide me with web site address from where i can download a
> FREE
> CW (Transmit and Receive) program??
> I tried MIXW and Hamscope but
Can Somebody provide me with web site address from where i can download a
FREE
CW (Transmit and Receive) program??
I tried MIXW and Hamscope but in RX does not satisfy me.
Thanks.
Cordiali Saluti/Best Regards
Adriano Migliari
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB: www.webalice.it/ik2cbd (AGWPE
Check http://www.mrx.com.au/
Interesting-- Andy
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
To me CW is "the" original digital
mode.
Personally I neglected CW for several years
because of my extensive involvement in the digital modes. Recently I did come
back to CW and mainly on 160 meters as that's the mode that most of the DX uses.
The first thing I discovered was that my cod
SURE !
On a side note did it get to you when they
all but did away with the code? DID IT DID IT
At 12:04 PM 2/5/06, you wrote:
>Although Morse code is not the "digital" mode this group usually
>focuses on, I wonder if any of the members are interested in CW
>operations and the occasional sked
NO
From:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of obrienaj
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006
1:04 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] CW ?
Although Morse code is not
the "digital" mode this group usually
foc
bject: [digitalradio] CW ?
Although Morse code is not the "digital" mode this group
usually focuses on, I wonder if any of the members are interested in CW
operations and the occasional sked ? By some miracle, a few years
ago, I managed to pass the 13 WPM code test in the USA. I mus
D]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW ?
> Although Morse code is not the "digital" mode this group usually
> focuses on, I wonder if any of the members are interested in CW
> operations and the occasional sked ? By some miracle, a few years
Although Morse code is not the "digital" mode this group usually
focuses on, I wonder if any of the members are interested in CW
operations and the occasional sked ? By some miracle, a few years
ago, I managed to pass the 13 WPM code test in the USA. I must have
eaten good brain food that par
5 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW ID of Olivia/Contestia tone setting
> MultiPSK has the tones at the beginning of the transmission that
> identify the upper and lower limits... maybe the software authors
> could agree upon and put into the packages something that could
> identify the mode? L
MultiPSK has the tones at the beginning of the transmission that
identify the upper and lower limits... maybe the software authors
could agree upon and put into the packages something that could
identify the mode? Low-Mid-High for Olivia, High-Mid-Low for RTTYM,
and Mid-Low-High for Contestia? Tha
While we are all learning how to recognize the
difference in RTTYM, Olivia, MFSK16, and Contestia and the many variations in
tone settings, I have programmed my CQ macro to end with slow CW that will help
someone learn what settings to use.
I end my CQ with, for example, C 16 , or
R
>Petit (W6GHM) in 1975. The standard is 12 wpm. It exists in two forms (CCW
>OOK and now in CCW FSK which is much more powerful). It can been decoded by
>humans and programs. To test it, try MultiPSK.
>
>73
>Patrick
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bill Ayco
t;Bill Aycock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
> Forgive the intrusion from a non-expert (in both CW and other digital
> modes), but what seems to me to be an obvious Charac
Forgive the intrusion from a non-expert (in both CW and other digital
modes), but what seems to me to be an obvious Characteristic of many
digital modes is being ignored where CW is being placed in comparison.
Most (ALL?) the newer digital modes are being both decoded and encoded
by rigid, well
about.
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Gibson AE7Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
> Modern communications technology has decoders that can rapidly adapt to
> c
Modern communications technology has decoders that can rapidly adapt to
changing clock rates (floppy/CD/DVD drives are a good example). A more
significant problem with Morse is rapidly varying signal levels in real
life communications. However, if the technological effort that goes into
other c
oise ratios...a big program!
- Original Message -
From:
F.R.
Ashley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:35
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CW decoding
comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)
Multipsk
6 YRS A G ON WA
Multipsk
6 YRS A G ON WA A SE LF E MPL OYE D RAD I O ES T V RE PAI R
MAN=NW JUSTA BEA C H BUMHEE HEE= OKON WX ES OVE R HR T O O MU CH OF T HE WIT
ET STUFF SO SU RE WISH WE CUD S EE SE N D SUM OUTTOUH EI= B EEN VT E T AE ITEL
YES HAD TO CUT
So, which of the three w
I tuned a moderate (S2) signal with some QSB on
twenty meters and loaded up MixW, then Multupsk and then Hamscope. Tried
to match the squelch settings as best I can (MixW is tricky to
do).
Here is the result
MixW (2.0
algorithm)
E M P L O YE D RA D I O ES T V RE P A I R M AN = NW
--- mac2251 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question concerning cw using MixW or
> Hamscope. Is it legal or
> not? I have heard both sides. Anyone have the
> facts.Mike K9HCK
>
>
>
As long as it is CW it is legal. If you feed a pure
sine wave into a ssb transceiver the output w
I too used it for a couple of years, on and off,
and ocassionally someone said I had "audio" on my tones. HI.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:ht
this way
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:39
PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] CW
Yes,It is legal. Keying CW with a tone is no
different than AFSK for RTTY. Dueto it being potenti
gitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mac2251
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 17:18
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] CW
I have a question concerning cw using MixW or Hamscope. Is it legal or
not? I have heard both sides. Anyone have the facts.
I have used mixw cw for several years. It better be legal. Why should it
not be? Maybe you are talking about the audio cw? If so, yes that is also
legal, and has been used for years by several different programs.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Versio
I have a question concerning cw using MixW or Hamscope. Is it legal or
not? I have heard both sides. Anyone have the facts.Mike K9HCK
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yah
56 matches
Mail list logo
