Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread kh6ty
Hi Jose, That can be done, of course, but there is also often a need in emcomm for everyone to be on the same RF frequency, so in order to do that with SSB, everyone needs to be on the same tone frequency, and with VHF FM especially, voice communications has to be on the same frequency (i.e. "

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread Jose A. Amador
Just one more comment, being on agreement with the previous postings... on a "linear transponder" (as a SSB transceiver becomes usually on HF between your antenna and your soundcard) just rock the transceiver's dial to make the tones fall in the proper place in the spectrum. FLdigi has a swe

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread kh6ty
Simon, The default here in South Carolina NAVY MARS is also 500 Hz. They use fldigi or MixW, or Pawel's program, and like to adhere to the standards in any event. What I don't really understand is how you can successfully use a center frequency of 1500 HZ with a 2000 Hz-wide MT63 signal. Even

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
- Original Message - From: "kh6ty" > > The standard for MT63 is to start at 500 Hz. Fldigi follows the accepted > standard. Anyone wishing to use fldigi and flarq together on MT63 will > have to follow the standard and only use MT63-1000 or MT63-2000 as other > versions have too much late

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread kh6ty
'"I really think the fldigi 3.11.6 works much better. I keep both versions installed in different directories." This may be your problem. Fldigi configuration files of any version are kept in fldigi.files. You cannot run but one version without reinstalling another. The standard for MT63 is to

[digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-12 Thread Howard Z.
Stelios, I'm sorry if I made you feel bad. If you are a moderator, you can delete my posting. I'm feeling a bit more optimistic today - it's nice to get 8 hours of sleep. It has been frustrating attempting to use fldigi 3.12.3 I mostly use DM780 rather than fldigi. The Flarq is the exciting n

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread Stelios Bounanos
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:02:29 -, "Howard Z." said: [...] > OK, then there is Olivia. Nobody in our group wants to use > Fldigi/Flarq because we are forced to use a custom mode. Olivia is not a custom mode. It is well supported and most (all?) useful bandwidth/tones pairs can be set v

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread kh6ty
See if Dave can help you, w...@bellsouth.net or go to NBEMSham. It should not be that hard! You do not beacon first, but you first establish contact in the mode and then ask the other station to send an flarq beacon. His callsign should appear in your flarq and then you just press Connect. 73

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions- ALE is the answer

2009-08-11 Thread Andrew O'Brien
While awaiting Winmor, the only real alternatives are NBEMS/FLARQ, ALE, or PSKMAIL. ALE is, in my opinion, the best conceptually. It is "free" and does not need any fancy modems. It does require a network of stations world-wide and a fairly hefty (good SNR) signal to make a "link". There is

[digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread Howard Z.
Well, IMHO, EasyPal has great potential for sending all file types - text, pictures, etc.. with error-correction/partial-retransmits. The problem with EasyPal - it seems only people with 500+ watt amplifiers can transmit reliably via NVIS antennas to the majority of users listening in the regi

[digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread John Taylor
Thanks again Simon, Please understand, I appreciate your viewpoint. Please also understand, there are other viewpoints equally as valid. That is the whole purpose of this thread to begin with, to try to solicit suggestions for "existing" programs to try to resolve an existing problem. One of th

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
- Original Message - From: "John Taylor" > > ... it does involve official emergency communications. > Then surely the official part should put some money into the project if it's so important? I honestly implore you *not* to fragment current EMS activity and instead focus your resourc

[digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread John Taylor
Thanks Skip, As I replied to Simon, we have been trying the NBEMS modes of FLdigi and FLarq for a while now. We are able to communicate via fldigi in virtually every mode, but have yet to establish a connection with flarq. Any ideas are welcome ... John KE5HAM --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.c

[digitalradio] Re: Soliciting suggestions

2009-08-11 Thread John Taylor
Thanks Simon, "WE" have been trying the NBEMS for a week or so now. "WE" have been able to operate peer-to-peer from within Fldigi in virtually every mode, but have yet to be able to make a connection using Flarq. Try as we will, it just has not happened no matter what. The "WE" is not really