JT8 is proposed as a possible alternative to JT4. Modulation is 8-FSK at 2.857
baud. FEC uses convolutional codes with K=14, r=1/4, K=15, r=1/6, or K=16,
r=1/8, depending on message length. Synchronization uses 8×8 Costas arrays at
the beginning and end of a transmission, followed by two
It is a very NARROW mode
On 7/21/10, Russell Blair russell_blai...@yahoo.com wrote:
THIS IS NOT TO START A BIG THING...I was using one of the new modes today
WSJT8
Beta and was informed that the bandwidth exceeded to limits on HF... My
question
What is the bandwidth ?
Russell NC5O
1-
Julian,
This regulation was made years ago and just covers all spread
spectrum. In the FCC's opinion, ROS is spread spectrum, both by
description by the author and lab analysis. So, they had no choice but
to uphold the current ruling.
If someone wants to redefine spread spectrum on HF as
Who is to decide what is harmful to the general population or not - the
individual looking out for himself, or the public looking out for
everyone (in the form of a republic) including that individual?
73, Skip KH6TY
On 7/20/2010 4:34 AM, g4ilo wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Julian,
For example, five years ago, Winlink attempted to get the FCC to allow
then to use Pactor-III ALL OVER the phone bands, with the argument that
the bandwidth was no greater than a phone signal.
Do you think that should have been allowed for the benefit of that 1% of
the US ham
BINGO!!! I invoke Godwin's Law!!!
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Dave
NK7Z
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
AA0OI aa...@yahoo.com thus spake:
Spoken like a good Nazi
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
SO ! that whats in my swimming pool.. I'll have to add more chlorine..
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 9:58:44 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better
...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 10:17:08 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
Apparently it's perfectly fine to break the rules because what the big bad
government doesn't know won't hurt them. At least according to some people. I
That right they would..
I hold a Exta Class ham license
I hold Commercial Pilots License, single engine land , multi engine land ,
Insturment rated, CFI, CFII, Multi Engine Instructor. with over 20,000 hrs
I hold a Captians Liscense for over 600,000 tons
I Owned my own company teaching
Dave:
Very good,, I could have done worse and call him O'Bama !
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Dave Cole d...@nk7z.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 7:43:51 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
BINGO!!! I invoke Godwin's
Andy asked me not to call you a Nazi,, that it was personal,, so I retract it,,,
You O'bama You.
Thomas Jefferson said, that at some time our government would become so out of
hand that we the people would have to take back control of it..
(The second amendment ain't about hunting)
Sit back and
: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating ROS In USA
Andy asked me not to call you a Nazi,, that it was personal,, so I retract it,,,
You O'bama You.
Thomas Jefferson said, that at some time our government would become so out of
hand that we the people would have to take back control
That sounds like fun, and useful too.
ve3bdr in kanuckistan
From: kb2hsh
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:16 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: DominoEX On VHF FM
Good morning all...
This has been interesting me since I read about it in QST last year. I,
Actually, the Nazi's did obey the law. (That is not a defense of their
actions.) They just changed the law to make whatever they wanted to do
legal, or did it outside of Germany where the law did not apply.
- 73 -
Rud Merriam K5RUD
http://mysticlakesoftware.com/
-Original
Part Numbers Options:
SignaLink USB Part Numbers (please specify when ordering):
a.. SLUSB4R - For 4-Pin Round Mic Connector
b.. SLUSB8R - For 8-Pin Round Mic Connector
c.. SLUSBRJ1 - For RJ-11 Mic Connector
d.. SLUSBRJ4 - For RJ-45 Mic Connector
e.. SLUSB5PD - For 5-pin DIN Data /
You'd better care about our politics,, if we go under, so does the rest of the
world !
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Rudy Benner ben...@vianet.ca
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 9:24:46 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating ROS
This is interesting, but I am curious, are you bragging or complaining?
Bob, W5XR
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of AA0OI
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:58 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating ROS
right, I still can't copy over 63 wpm code and that I learned in 1971..
Garrett / AA0OI
From: k8yzk k8...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 1:47:02 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Operating ROS In USA
Well with everything
WOMEN ?!
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Ted Bear w7...@juno.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 2:21:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
Holy Moly.. When you guys going to drop the ROS subject and get back to
Well, I think that is correct, but I seem to be getting my butt kicked all day,
so I decided to send you enough data to figure it out and come out smelling
rosy for a change. I think I get the Bonehead Award today. Don't forget that
you will need a cable for the receive, that part is easy.
If
Whatever.
From: AA0OI
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:26 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating ROS In USA
You'd better care about our politics,, if we go under, so does the rest of the
world !
Garrett / AA0OI
Tony,
Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum was
very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done on
http://contestia.blogspot.com/p/pathsim_09.html ?
73, Skip KH6TY
On 7/19/2010 9:42 PM, Tony wrote:
All,
Post a notification to the Greenkeys mailing list.
__
GreenKeys mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/greenkeys
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:greenk...@mailman.qth.net
Mark T. Regan,
I sure am glad I grew up! MAN! Get a life!
From: Ted Bear w7...@juno.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 3:21:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
Holy Moly.. When you guys going to drop the ROS subject and
The IMD shouldnt be a significant problem unless something is overdriven.
However, you see that with PSK31 and to a lesser extent RTTY fairly often on
the bands, although most of what i see is 60 cycle hum and audio harmonics
related to that, rather than just pure overdrive. AFSK, etc., is
Andy, it seems to be time for a poll.
1. I wish to continue reading discussions of ROS
2. Enough already, lets talk about something else!
Care to guess what the vote would be?
Bill
On 7/20/2010 4:51 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
Me again. In addition to a prohibition on personal attacks , this
- Original Message
From: g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:29:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia vs. RTTY vs. PSK spectrum efficiency
Just because a mode is better doesn't mean that people will want to use it,
though, and I
Thank you.
From: jon_g4fut
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:22 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Yaesu FT-690
Rudi,
No kicking from me...instead I'll defend you for the excellent information you
sent... :-)
Cheers
Jon
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
PSK63 was developed as an intended RTTY contesting mode replacement, not
for conversation. PSK31 is too slow for contesting and has a preamble
and a postamble that slows turnovers down, so the idea was that 100 wpm
PSK63 would, overall, including faster turnovers than PSK31, be as fast
as RTTY
not have guessed I'd get a kick out of it. I mean, I
still prefer other digital modes, but RTTY once in a while can be fun too, I've
discovered.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: Ralph Mowery
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:03 PM
Subject: Re
Will be interesting to compare this effort to the NUE-PSK, which takes a
different appoach. They have a modem that plugs directly into a transceiver's
Data port eliminating the need for PCs and soundcards, but they are now working
on a NUE-SDR transceiver that either will fit as a card inside
and can be remotely located
and
is mode agnostic. Both approaches have their own advantages.
From: J. Moen j...@jwmoen.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 8:50:07 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] directly modulate computer /thus eliminating
From: J. Moen j...@jwmoen.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 8:33:06 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia vs. RTTY vs. PSK spectrum efficiency
I completely understand the lure of the old mechanical teleprinters. But I
. This diversity is why Ham Radio is so
interesting
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: Gary Edwards
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] directly modulate computer /thus eliminating
transceiver audio input
. This diversity is why Ham Radio is
so interesting
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
*From:* Gary Edwards gfe00...@yahoo.com
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:25 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] directly modulate computer /thus eliminating
transceiver
:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] directly modulate computer /thus eliminating
transceiver audio input
NUE PSK is great for back packing and mobile operation so long as only PSK
31 or RTTY is of interest. Computers offer a richer display with more options
and the ability
On 7/20/2010 3:54 PM, KH6TY wrote:
Our on-air tests show that ROS 16 baud, 2200 Hz wide spread spectrum
was very poor on UHF under Doppler spreading. Can you confirm this with
flutter tests like Jaak has done.
Skip,
My path tests show that ROS is less tolerant to Doppler spread than
Olivia
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] directly modulate computer /thus eliminating
transceiver audio input
It'd be pretty cool if that nue-psk device was a little more like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80_Model_100 With the built in keyboard. Is it
very cumbersome to have
Your definition might be called what good SS is and the way ROS does SS might
be called what bad SS is. But how wide is PSK31? Is ROS wider? So ROS is
wider than needed to convey intelligence.
What's sad is that one country's regulations (and they affect me since I live
there) focus on the
The definition given although likely accurate is not relevent to the discussion
because it's NOT the definition used by the FCC.
Although none of us (US hams) are going to be deported to Siberia (unless
there's some sort of agreement between the US and USSR that I'm not aware of),
we CAN be
On 07/19/10 11:48 am, g4ilo wrote:
Your definition might be called what good SS is and the way ROS does SS
might be called what bad SS is. But how wide is PSK31? Is ROS wider? So
ROS is wider than needed to convey intelligence.
So is RTTY. But it isn't SS.
Your point is well taken, but
, July 19, 2010 12:32:53 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
The definition given although likely accurate is not relevent to the discussion
because it's NOT the definition used by the FCC.
Although none of us (US hams) are going to be deported to Siberia (unless
Julian:
I apologize for my county men,, forgive them for they know not what they ARE
TALKING about.
If they would all just shut up and use it,, NO ONE,, including the Federal
Communist Committee, would even care..
Lately my country men seem to like to start wars that we can not win.. (we
A smart man picks his fights carefully. Comparing this discussion to the fight
for our freedom is absurd.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
- Original Message - From: AA0OI
Julian:
I apologize for my county men,, forgive them for they know not what they ARE
TALKING about.
If they would all
Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 5:30:15 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
A smart man picks his fights carefully. Comparing this discussion to the fight
for our freedom is absurd.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
The hell with the rules and law, right Garrett?
John, W0JAB
At 05:48 PM 7/19/2010, you wrote:
What is absurd is that its a fight in the first place.. do you ever just back
up and look at what is being said?? Your all acting like this is life or
death..ITS NOT..I have been using it all
All the QRM makers operating on three fixed frequencies, what a Lovely
Thought
la5vna Steinar
On 18.07.2010 16:29, g4ilo wrote:
And the hundreds of people who take part in the major RTTY contests
would all operate on three fixed frequencies how, exactly?
Julian, G4ILO
--- In
The reason to use DominoEx is only for FM DX communications. It is
slower than MT63, but much more sensitive, so you still get good copy
way below limiting and quieting. For that reason, on our local FM
digital net, we use DominoEx 8 and with horizontally polarized antennas,
include everyone
: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 5:30:15 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
A smart man picks his fights carefully. Comparing this discussion to the fight
for our freedom is absurd.
Jeff -- KE7ACY
no,but if I did ,, no one except nit pickers would care.
Garrett / AA0OI
From: bg...@comcast.net bg...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 7:12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
pse speak
into your computer
have you ever operated in a digital mode on hf with a wider bandwidth
than a voice signal?
- Original Message -
From: AA0OI aa...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 5:48:34 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger
forbidden to fly)
I'm sure everyone drives the speed limit too..
Just use common sense..
Garrett / AA0OI
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 6:03:07 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back
sorry, your not worth answering..
and check back about 2 weeks ago when I said, ..Let it die
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 6:02:56 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back
Dave,
I forgot to point out that we use Contestia 64/1000 on SSB, not FM, for
that 200 mile path. When using FM, DominoEx works just as well, but of
course, the overall range is less on FM. Essentially, if you can work a
VHF or UHF station on SSB phone, you can work the same station on FM
, 2010 6:03:07 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
The hell with the rules and law, right Garrett?
John, W0JAB
At 05:48 PM 7/19/2010, you wrote:
What is absurd is that its a fight in the first place.. do you ever
just back up and look at what is being said?? Your
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
I think there are valid reasons for the FCC only allowing spread spectrum
above 222 Mhz (where there is plenty of room!). A single spread spectrum signal
on HF
actually, this could be a good development because I still have a
funny feeling that they would balk at the idea of calling it illegal.
I don't use the mode because I am chicken, but there are still many in
the USA that do.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Thomas F. Giella NZ4O
oooh kaay
;-)
ke4mz
- Original Message -
From: AA0OI aa...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:32:31 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
no,but if I did ,, no one except nit pickers would care.
Garrett
Spoken like a good Nazi
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O n...@tampabay.rr.com
To: digital radio eGroup digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:18:24 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
If I print any ham in the U.S.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:26:02 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
actually, this could be a good development because I still have a
funny feeling that they would balk at the idea of calling it illegal.
I don't use the mode because I am chicken
Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 6:03:07 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
The hell with the rules and law, right Garrett?
John, W0JAB
At 05:48 PM 7/19/2010, you wrote:
What is absurd
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 8:56:58 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
Spoken like a good Nazi
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O n...@tampabay.rr.com
To: digital radio eGroup digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 8:18:24 PM
Subject
?
The right way is to campaign to get the rules you don't like changed, and
until you do, follow them.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: KH6TY mailto:kh...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 5:38 PM
Subject: Re
Actually, it's less than half of a 6 Khz. wide AM signal.
--
Dave - AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: bg...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
so, for the sake
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of W2XJ
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:10 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
Skip if you call this a regulation, I agree with Garret. It is a misguided
one and a victim of unintended consequences
Message -
*From:* KH6TY kh...@comcast.net
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Monday, July 19, 2010 5:38 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
I think there are valid reasons for the FCC only allowing spread spectrum
above 222 Mhz (where
@yahoogroups.com digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Mon, July 19, 2010 6:03:07 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !
The hell with the rules and law, right Garrett?
John, W0JAB
At 05:48 PM 7/19/2010, you wrote:
What
I know this is out of fashion, but I really like PSK31, for its narrow
bandwidth and effectiveness with low power. It was the first mode I ever did
where I could have a QSO with a signal burried by the noise. I like some of
the newer modes, and am happy to see the popularity of Olivia and
in kanuckistan
From: J. Moen
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:51 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS v4.7.4 Beta
I know this is out of fashion, but I really like PSK31, for its narrow
bandwidth and effectiveness with low power. It was the first mode I
Same here , my first exposure was with the old mechanical clunkers. The paper
tape, chad, oil and the smells.. they had it all, hihi
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:57 AM
Subject: Re
6:57 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS v4.7.4 Beta
My first exposure to RTTY was an old genuine teletype machine with a crummy
interface. It was heavy, made a lot of noise, smelled great and I should never
have gotten rid of it.
As for CW, I learned it well enough to pass the exam
Well, old modes like rtty has its charm, but as the ultimate contest
mode it makes more trouble for the ham community when it is flooding the
hole band, than fix frequency modes like ROS.
The only problem with ROS is its developer, with his strange behavior.
la5vna Steinar
On
At 08:19 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote:
I dare say that if someone offered me one, I would probably take it, just for
the noise and the stink. I would charge admission. Mine had lots of roll
paper, paper tape etc,. It worked FB.
Now that an Idea for income since I have 3 of them. (1, 28 RO 2,
I'm not in anyway saying that what happened was OK but
after all it was a contest. Not like it happens all the time.
But look at the good side. Lucky it was not a CW contest.
John, W0JAB
Louisiana, Missouri
EM49lk
Pike county for the county hunters.
At 10:56 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote:
I had 3
One of 2 things come to mind.
1) a very weak station trying to get into the repeater.
2) strong RF.
At 11:18 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote:
[Attachment(s) from Mike Liller included below]
Hi all,
I know this is a little of topic, but can anyone tell me what this noise is?
We are getting this
I think cable channel E is one of the usual culprits on the leaky coax. At
least it used be when I lived on a street with cable TV. It is all DirecTV for
me now.
Rick KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 18, 2010, at 12:03 PM, KB3FXI kb3...@yahoo.com wrote:
We had some very serious interference
Let me get this right. You want a station to ask if the frequency is in use.
That is understandable except he will be on RTTY and you are on another sound
card mode. Many times stations do not even have the audio running now. They
are just looking at a digital display and clicking on the
I was taught to listen first, then transmit. Hard to listen with the AF gain
all the way down. Once one is established on a frequency, turn it down, if you
QSY, listen again.
ve3bdr
From: Ralph Mowery
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 3:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re
I think is was very gracious of you to offer. Too bad he did not
take up the offer.
73 de Andy K3UK
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Laurie, VK3AMA group...@vkdxer.com wrote:
Why HamSpots dropped support for ROS.
After several emails, it became clear that Mr ROS would not allow any
Tnx Thomas, well been on 50.290 mode of the morning and now on 50.200 and was
down on 50.160 So will be calling CQ on 50.200 for a hour.
Tnx Russ NC5O jt65-hf
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you
I use the free method of the FCC.
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, John Becker, WØJAB
w0...@big-river.netwrote:
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
--
Mr.C.Robinson
73 DE KF6NFW
and down, that's all
folks !!
ve3bdr in Kanuckistan.
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:42 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 6m ?
Tnx Thomas, well been on 50.290 mode of the morning and now on 50.200 and was
down on 50.160 So
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)
Facebook=
#300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
Digital Mode Club #03198
From: Rudy Benner ben...@vianet.ca
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, July 17, 2010 11:44:32 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 6m ?
Too bad, I don't see much of your call
If it was easy, you would not be interested, right?
VE3BDR
From: Russell Blair
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:15 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 6m ?
Hi Rudy, Ya I was in the DMC contest earlyer today and will be in the NAQP as
well later
Of J. Moen
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
John,
There is an FCC Registration Number (FRN) associated with your call. You
need the FRN and a password to logon to FCC's Universal Licensing System
(ULS).
Go to http
Smooth as baby's bum.
--
From: Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 2:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
I just renewed my license via ULS, as described below. I had an FRN
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
Thanks buddy, and yes, a life member
Do I need to do anything or is this an automatic happens thing they do?
John, W0JAB
HOT STICKY Missouri.
Q How do you know it's summer in
Regulatory Fee and a $5 ARRL processing fee.
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE
At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote:
And if you are an ARRL
Russ,
You can find out a lot about digital mode use on 6 meters by searching
DX Summit .
http://www.dxsummit.fi/Search.aspx
Leave the search string blank (no call sign) and set the mode to DIGI
and the band to 6M. The database goes back to 1997.
Tony -K2MO
)
Skype-Russell.Blair
Hell Field #300
DRCC #55
30m Dig-group #693
Digital Mode Club #03198
From: Tony d...@optonline.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, July 17, 2010 4:26:06 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf on 6m ?
Russ,
You can find out
Hi
Is it possible for the administrators of these Cluster Nodes to filter
out ROS spots on their servers ?
la5vna Steinar
On 16.07.2010 04:39, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:
FYI
I ran some sql over the database at HamSpots which carries 7 days of
Cluster spots.
ROS Software Auto-Spots run at
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Andy
You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.
On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
The comment in parenthesis in number 8
Yes! If you're a psychotic jerk and you want to flood the cluster with
unnecessary unwanted traffic.
- Original Message - From: Siegfried Jackstien
[snip]
If there is no page is there still a reason to send spots?
sigi
I wonder where ROS would be today if someone had been
truthful about it the first place?
That little game of banning some from using it (for unknown reasons)
was just about it for me.
John, W0JAB
On 07/15/10 01:54 pm, John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
I wonder where ROS would be today if someone had been
truthful about it the first place?
That little game of banning some from using it (for unknown reasons)
was just about it for me.
I received a few ROS transmissions within a week or two of
Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions that
don't talk to each other!
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
All
Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?
Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can block,
or the software that sends out false reports that you can't? In any case, it
is doing who knows what in the background.
The fact that Jose has now coded
I troll both places. You never know what you might find.
Rick KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:56 PM, sholtofish sho...@probikekit.com wrote:
What 40m frequency are most PSK31 QSOs in region 2?
I haven't been on for a couple of years and it used to be around 7.070 but
now
a lot of alarms
and warning signs to me.
Jim
N1SZ
PS - I know. I'm feeding Jose's need for attention
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Wright
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:45 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re
201 - 300 of 12756 matches
Mail list logo
