Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW development, for example adding
Patrick's RSID or CALL-ID features? I get asked this myself and can't answer
as I'm not on any MixW mailing lists.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw improvement is
on the logging aspect.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Simon (HB9DRV)simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:
Hi Andy,
Is there any likelihood of future MixW
Hi,
It's good to hear Nick is better - long time no news.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved, but I hear that the focus of Mixw
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Andy obrien wrote:
Nothing that I have heard. Nick is somewhat more active, as his
health has improved,
Rick W wrote:
What is the attraction of MixW now that we have so many other multimode
digital programs that are freely available with one program even open
source and cross platform?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Rick, nearly all members of Texas Army MARS and Region 6, are using
MixW. idly
MixW has (I think) support for the data modes used by satellites - that's
one thing I would like to support.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
What am I missing?
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
No, let's get back to Rick's question and ask what it is about
MixW that you find to be superior to everything else out there.
I downloaded a trial version of MixW long ago and wasn't impressed
enough to want to go further with it. What am I missing?
I can't speak for
chas,
What are the MARS operators using MixW for? Are there modes that are not
available on other programs that they find compelling?
I downloaded MixW again today, but it looks about the same as it did in
past years. It is a fairly clean interface (albeit, that is a subjective
thing for an
I think MARS uses MixW mostly for MT63. Here in South Carolina, in Navy
MARS, we are standardizing on using fldigi for MT63, and before that
some people used MixW and some used Nino's program. It all boils down to
whicher user interface is easier to use, or to train people to use. If
everyone
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD, a lot of logging programs won't. I
just click on a callsign and the logging info fills right
It is all about the visual simplicity of its interface . . . elegant in its
minimalism. And I say that truly as a complement. Although I like HRD and
MultiPSK both for other reasons, MixW is easier to use. More pleasing to the
eyes especially versus MultiPSK.
Rick - KH2DF
Sent from my iPhone
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD
I think that as a digital mode application, MixW is good , but it
has lagged seriously behind other applications in the past 2-3 years.
The DX cluster operations are no-where near as good as Winwarbler
affords via the Spotcollector interface, or the opportunities DM780
has provides via HRD's
Buddy and Rick,
What you are describing seems to be flidigi more than any other program.
Have you tried this program? And unlike Windows-only programs, fldigi
works on more platforms than any other program of its type. Maybe the
RAC CD won't work on fldigi though.
Fldigi is ultra clean and
to the program.
73 Mark KQ0I
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org wrote:
From: Charles Brabham n5...@uspacket.org
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New version of Mixw
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 7:51 PM
MixW has
15 matches
Mail list logo
