I have problems on increasing the width of the outline in my images. When I
copy an image from Microsoft Word or an MHTML Document and paste it to
LibreOffice, it becomes into an imageless frame.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instruc
Hi,
Larry Gusaas wrote on 2010-10-19 21.09:
The following is from http://gmane.org/post-details.php . Note "the MAIL
FROM envelope has to be someth...@gmane.org. It is currently the address
that Gmane is subscribed to".
I still don't get it - if I now whitelist *...@gmane.org for sending, thi
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.18:
(including lists) for the long run...
Anyway, at a minimum, I would dearly love to see simple list specific
pages for subscribing/unsubscribing. Mailman generates these out of the
box, so its not like this should be a lot of work - unless mlmmj does
Hi,
Harold Fuchs wrote on 2010-10-21 01.14:
Can the Reply-to header not be fixed (by the list manager software or by
an associated script) to include the OP if that OP is not subscribed?
if someone submits a patch for mlmmj, our mailing lists software, then
yes. Otherwise no.
FLorian
--
Fl
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 19.44:
Bummer... my point is that non-subbed posters should simply be sent a
REJECT message with instructions on how to subscribe - or better, a nice
instructive web page with detailed instructions on the lists, and a
subscribe option directly on the web pa
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 22.33:
*That* is TOTALLY RIDICULOUS, and is the reason*why* there are so many
complaints about unsubscribing.
I'm sorry to say, but for those who cannot work with mailing lists, we
will set-up a forum. It is not possible to fulfill all wishes. I see
t
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.08:
Well, as a blanket statement that isn't true of mailman...
One example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-us...@python.org/msg37624.html
MM3 is going to be mucho better in this regard...
at least with the current Mailman stable release (2.1),
> > If we had a similar page for OOo, it would make an
> > enormous difference there, as well.
>
> Why not - http://oucv.org/oooext.html
>
> I did not setup that nabble archive, and can't change settings - if you
> back up there to the openoffice level you are actually looking at a flat
> view
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:55 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
Howdy Barbara
>
> I don't have anything against forums (though I hope we can avoid having two
> top-level ones, as for
> OOo, and careful planning is needed in determining the subforums). The main
> difference, which is a
> positive
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:54:11AM +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> It is unfortunate indeed that your first experience with the Libreoffice
> community has left you feeling this way, and whilst I agree that such
> fledgling communities often lack in diplomacy and professionalism w
On 10/20/2010 05:40 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
Why are we expending so much time and energy to produce the best office
software, if we're not going to
+1
Miguel Ángel
On 21/10/10 2:40, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
> a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
>
> Why are we expending so much time and energy to produce the best office
> software, if w
I would tend to agree with this. I have pretty much stayed out of this one
cause I am not sure that anything that is said would change their minds I
constantly answered question about use that was just emailed to me abot OOo
because someone found my email on the contact page and they. Could not
On 10/19/2010 1:16 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 00:27 , Barbara Duprey wrote:
Does this mean you're a (the?) moderator for this list? Not having that
Delivered-To header definitely does complicate things! I'm amazed that anybody
is posting here unsubscribed at this point, I'd ex
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
Why are we expending so much time and energy to produce the best office
software, if we're not going to do our best to support our customers at
their own l
As nearly nobody can read all the mails here thoroughly, I just repeat
what I read:
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 2010-10-19 8:11 AM, Xi Embalsado wrote:
WOW! I could never fit a size 50 to a size 2! Well at least don't go
to the Microsoft Office size (600MB) Better make things in separate
langua
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2010/10/20 11:40 AM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Gmane has most of the Document Foundations lists (except developer and
announce) set as public. If you subscribe to this list through gmane the
message will be sent but will not get po
Hi Charles, all,
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 2010-10-20 5:05 PM, Jon Hawkins wrote:
This unsubscribe/confirm procedure is basically the same procedure
someone used when they subscribed,
If the link at the bottom of the email was an actual unsubscribe link
instead of the info link, I'd agree...
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:21 +0200, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> Am Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:44:32 -0400
> schrieb Drew Jensen :
>
> > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:18 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> > > I've been asked at the German Lists (Oracle developers discussed
> > > heavily
> > > on this lis
On 2010-10-20 5:05 PM, Jon Hawkins wrote:
> This unsubscribe/confirm procedure is basically the same procedure
> someone used when they subscribed,
If the link at the bottom of the email was an actual unsubscribe link
instead of the info link, I'd agree...
The info link should be second, and the
On 10/20/2010 01:33 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 4:16 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 10/20/2010 11:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
I have little sympathy for anyone not being able to unsubscribe if they
aren't willing to actually read the first 12 words (!) of the message
coming back from
On 2010-10-20 4:16 PM, Jon Hamkins wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 11:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> That is not instructions on how to unsubscribe, that is instructions on
>> how to send a message to get a 'help' response that will include
>> instructions on how to unsubscribe (*and* subscribe, and a bunc
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
>> > Here is an interesting one - let's say that you did not actively work on
>> > translations (yet) and you have not started working at the booth in
>> > fairs and expos (yet..:) - but you started with your own initiative by
>> > creating a Fa
Hi,
On 10/20/2010 11:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
That is not instructions on how to unsubscribe, that is instructions on
how to send a message to get a 'help' response that will include
instructions on how to unsubscribe (*and* subscribe, and a bunch of
other stuff), and because it is so long
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 22:01 +0200, Mike Dupont wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:45 +0200, Mike Dupont wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:19 PM, BRM wrote:
> >>
> >> You can define contribution as documents or commits to a repository or
>
Hi Drew,
Am Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:44:32 -0400
schrieb Drew Jensen :
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:18 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> > I've been asked at the German Lists (Oracle developers discussed
> > heavily
> > on this list within the last two weeks)
>
> Hi just so I'm clear - you mean an Oracl
On 10/20/2010 11:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
That is not instructions on how to unsubscribe, that is instructions on
how to send a message to get a 'help' response that will include
instructions on how to unsubscribe (*and* subscribe, and a bunch of
other stuff), and because it is so long, many
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:45 +0200, Mike Dupont wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:19 PM, BRM wrote:
>> > - Original Message
>> >
>> >> From: Drew Jensen
>> >> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
>> >> > Il 20/
On 2010-10-20 2:10 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Actually, the way I see it, and I am also subscribed to the OOo list,
> the complaints are that the subscribed users could not answer back to
> the non-subscribed users. This is the resounding complaint on the list.
Yes, I know - and it is *caused* by the
- Original Message
> From: Drew Jensen
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:30 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:16:37 -0400,
> > Drew Jensen a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > > > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
On 2010-10-20 3:14 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> My understanding is that Gmane version of the list is recognized as
> subscribed to this list. Only people that are subscribed to Gmane
> version of list can post through it.
>
> Unsubscribed posters are still not allowed to post.
Hmmm... ok, maybe as
On 2010-10-20 2:59 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> ACTION REQUIRED: Unsubscribe confirmation
Better:
ACTION REQUIRED: you MUST reply to this message to confirm your
unsubscribe request
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscr
On 2010/10/20 12:56 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 2:41 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Or allow posts to this list from people who have subscribe through Gmane
to be posted to the list without having to double subscribe.
My understanding is that in order for posts from gmane to be allowed
fr
On 2010-10-20 2:24 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-20 11:25, Howard Barr a écrit :
>> On 20/10/2010 04:02, � wrote:
>>> looking for instructions on how to unsubscribe
> The instructions are at the bottom of all emails. Look at the bottom of
> this email below.
That is not instructions on how to
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 14:48 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-20 14:10, Drew Jensen a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:16 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> >>> Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> 1. what will it cost i
On 2010-10-20 2:41 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>
> Or allow posts to this list from people who have subscribe through Gmane
> to be posted to the list without having to double subscribe.
My understanding is that in order for posts from gmane to be allowed
from users who are not themselves subscribers
Le 2010-10-20 14:41, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
On 2010/10/20 11:40 AM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Gmane has most of the Document Foundations lists (except developer and
announce) set as public. If you subscribe to this list through gmane the
message will be s
Le 2010-10-20 14:10, Drew Jensen a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:16 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
derived works.
2. what i
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:45 +0200, Mike Dupont wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:19 PM, BRM wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
> >> From: Drew Jensen
> >> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> >> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> >> > > 1. what will
On 2010/10/20 11:40 AM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-10-20 12:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Gmane has most of the Document Foundations lists (except developer and
announce) set as public. If you subscribe to this list through gmane the
message will be sent but will not get posted to the list. No
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:30 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:16:37 -0400,
> Drew Jensen a écrit :
>
> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > > > 1. what will it cost if you have to re
Hello,
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:16:37 -0400,
Drew Jensen a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and
> > > all derived works.
> > > 2. what if you jus
Le 2010-10-20 11:25, Howard Barr a écrit :
On 20/10/2010 04:02, � wrote:
looking for instructions on how to unsubscribe
Hi Howard
The instructions are at the bottom of all emails. Look at the bottom of
this email below.
Marc
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instru
Le 2010-10-20 13:40, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-20 12:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Gmane has most of the Document Foundations lists (except developer and
announce) set as public. If you subscribe to this list through gmane the
message will be sent but will not get posted to the list. No b
Le 2010-10-20 13:55, Charles Marcus a écrit :
The bottom line is, allowing non-subscribers to post (moderated or not)
just creates never-ending confusion - as evidence in support, see the
never-ending comments about it on the OOo lists where someone is
*constantly* being told that their respons
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:16 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
> > > derived works.
> > > 2. what if you just remove the co
On 2010-10-20 1:51 PM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but I don't have any sympathy with someone who wants free
>> help, but isn't willing to do the bare minimum of subscribing to an
>> email list in order to get it.
> Errm. It's not just the subscribing. In addition tha
On 2010-10-20 1:41 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-20 10:49, Charles Marcus a écrit :
>> I'm sorry, but I don't have any sympathy with someone who wants free
>> help, but isn't willing to do the bare minimum of subscribing to an
>> email list in order to get it.
> Well, the free help is not free
Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm sorry, but I don't have any sympathy with someone who wants free
help, but isn't willing to do the bare minimum of subscribing to an
email list in order to get it.
Errm. It's not just the subscribing. In addition that poor user who only
wants one question answere
Il 20/10/2010 19:14, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 19:04 +0200:
Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200:
Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
You might find the first packages at
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:19 PM, BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Drew Jensen
>> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
>> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
>> > > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
>> > > der
On 2010-10-20 12:40 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.20:
>>> ***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF
>>> lists was intentional or not*** perhaps someone involved in their
>>> set-up would comment.
>> If this is true, please don't change
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:18 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> I've been asked at the German Lists (Oracle developers discussed
> heavily
> on this list within the last two weeks)
Hi just so I'm clear - you mean an Oracle developer is discussing things
on the German lists, yes?
--
E-mail to disc
Le 2010-10-20 10:49, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-20 10:26 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-20 08:20, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-20 5:03 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF lists was
intentional or not*** perhaps someone involve
On 2010-10-20 12:32 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> Gmane has most of the Document Foundations lists (except developer and
> announce) set as public. If you subscribe to this list through gmane the
> message will be sent but will not get posted to the list. No bounce
> message will be sent to the poster.
- Original Message
> From: Drew Jensen
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
> > > derived works.
> > > 2. what if you just remove the cod
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:00 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> Maybe you could just get yourselves sponsored as an Apache Software
> Foundation project
+1
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://ww
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
> > derived works.
> > 2. what if you just remove the code
>
> Contributions are not only code. There are a lot of inta
Petr Mladek píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 19:04 +0200:
> Carlo Strata píše v Út 19. 10. 2010 v 18:25 +0200:
> > Il 15/10/2010 12:50, Petr Mladek ha scritto:
> > > You might find the first packages at
> > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/LibreOffice:/Unstable/
> > >
>
> > I'm preparing my not
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-20 14.20:
***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF lists was
> intentional or not*** perhaps someone involved in their set-up would
> comment.
If this is true, please don't change it. Allowing post was one of the
biggest annoyances on
On 2010/10/20 3:03 AM Harold Fuchs wrote:
The following is verbatim from the Gmane page on Posting (go to www.gmane.com and click the
link "Posting" on the left hand side):
begin quote ===
Read-only groups
Some groups are read-only. These are typically groups for announcements, publicati
Le 2010-10-20 11:25, BRM a écrit :
Someone said:
Second - the current idea is that organizsations could join indirectly
through their member's (staff) contributions. This idea works quite well
for e.g. Gnome foundation. There are other models and we need to find
something to make organizati
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:25 PM, BRM wrote:
> Again, I'm just trying to point out that there may be another aspect in how
> TDF
> was put together that may be making Oracle feel shunned even though they were
> invited.
>
> It's kind of like forking Android, inviting Google to join, and then sayin
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:57:43 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
> > derived works.
> > 2. what if you just remove the code
>
> Contributions are not only code. There are a lot o
Ciao Gianluca,
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:01:55 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Il 19/10/2010 18.11, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>
> > Well, I think that the split between these two visions is somewhat
> > articifical. To be frank I don't think I ever had thought about this
> > tha
- Original Message
> From: Andre Schnabel
> > Perhaps there is another issue at play here.
> > Yes, Oracle was invited to contribute to TDF; but the current discussion
> > on TDF
> > membership and documents on-line seem to forbid organizations.
>
> At first, we are just discussing
On 20/10/2010 04:02, � wrote:
looking for instructions on how to unsubscribe
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publ
Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and all
derived works.
2. what if you just remove the code
Contributions are not only code. There are a lot of intangibles.
Marketing, lobbying and advocating work are some examples.
--
Gi
Il 20/10/2010 12.53, Drew Jensen ha scritto:
I suppose the key part of the sentence there is the missing 'if', if you
had to make the decision. Being in the seat that did have to make the
decision is a totally different perspective from offering advice.
No doubt Charles and the others received a
On 2010-10-20 10:26 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2010-10-20 08:20, Charles Marcus a écrit :
>> On 2010-10-20 5:03 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
>>> ***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF lists was
>>> intentional or not*** perhaps someone involved in their set-up would
>>> comment.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, James Walker wrote:
> The problem as I see it is how do you define the amount of contribution each
> person gives, cause in my opinion even the users are contributors to the
> project, without the users there would be no need for the project.
I think the measureme
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:14 PM, BRM wrote:
> Oracle just spent several billion dollars buying Sun - at least part of which
> would have been for OOo and
> all its assets.
Is it buying the software, or the community, or the market?
Ok, well surly it bought the rights to the patents, and the deve
Hi,
>
> Perhaps there is another issue at play here.
> Yes, Oracle was invited to contribute to TDF; but the current discussion
> on TDF
> membership and documents on-line seem to forbid organizations.
At first, we are just discussing at the moment - everyone who wants
to have her points to be
Le 2010-10-20 08:20, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-20 5:03 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF lists was
intentional or not*** perhaps someone involved in their set-up would
comment.
If this is true, please don't change it. Allowing post
I decided I would try to convey my thoughts on this now
First I had a couple of questions
How many member do we envision being on the SC?
How many projects does the SC envision having under the TDF.
Right now I see the need for LibreOffice, and I really do see a need for a
couple other projects
Le 2010-10-20 07:30, Drew Jensen a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:33 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi Gainluca,
Well, we're now talking about *meaningful* contribution and
evaluation... ;-)
That's an important step ahead.
On the wiki a read: "all these contributions need to be non-trivial
- Original Message
> From: Gianluca Turconi
> Il 20/10/2010 5.46, M. Fioretti ha scritto:
> > The real question was "why didn't the TDF founders who have/had
> > official roles in OOo publicly resign from those roles on Sept 28th,
> > one second BEFORE announcing the birth of TDF? Wou
Le 2010-10-20 05:56, Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
Il 20/10/2010 11.34, Marc Paré ha scritto:
[...]
However, the *members* of the *Foundation* *decide*. Of course, it's so
*if* this foundation has to have a steering role in the community, only.
I agree with this concept but more like this: The
On 2010-10-20 5:03 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> ***I don't know if not allowing non-subscribers to post to TDF lists was
> intentional or not*** perhaps someone involved in their set-up would
> comment.
If this is true, please don't change it. Allowing post was one of the
biggest annoyances on the OO
On 2010-10-20 7:16 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> and should any of that happen - by all means grab a video camera and get
> it up on YouTube...be sure to post a link here.
I'll make millions... BILLIONS... and will then be in a position to buy
OOo from Oracle and donate everything to TDF... :)
--
Be
On 2010-10-20 6:09 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-19 22.37:
>> Correct, hence my suggestion to simply tweak the list server software to
>> add a custom Reply-To header (both list*and* unsubbed OP) for posts
>> from unsubbed posters.
>>
>> I have another idea...
>>
On 2010-10-20 6:10 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> LOL. Well, Mailman disqualifies itself as it doesn't support moderation
> via e-mail. The only system offering that was mlmmj, which we use.
Well, as a blanket statement that isn't true of mailman...
One example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mai
On 2010-10-20 3:33 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> Even better, let's use a mailman-like webinterface like everyone else
> does :-).
+100
Web interfaces are much less error-prone.
Just put up a page where someone can enter their email address, and
click 'subscribe' or 'unsubscribe'. Provide proper
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:33 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Gainluca,
>
>
> >
> > Well, we're now talking about *meaningful* contribution and
> > evaluation... ;-)
> >
> > That's an important step ahead.
> >
> > On the wiki a read: "all these contributions need to be non-trivial and
> > la
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> LOL :)
>
> Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-19 22.36:
> > Heh... I guess that day will come around the same time that hell freezes
> > over, pigs fly and monkeys come out of my butt...;)
and should any of that happen - by all means gr
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:31 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> Il 20/10/2010 5.46, M. Fioretti ha scritto:
> > The real question was "why didn't the TDF founders who have/had
> > official roles in OOo publicly resign from those roles on Sept 28th,
> > one second BEFORE announcing the birth of TDF? Wo
Andras Timar píše v Ne 17. 10. 2010 v 23:34 +0200:
> 2010/10/17 Andrea Pescetti :
> > Andras Timar wrote:
> >> 2010/10/17 Andrea Pescetti:
> >> > Being the maintainer of the Italian dictionary package, I'm sad to see
> >> > LibreOffice trashing my work (and doing the same with other
> >> > communit
Hi,
Sebastian Spaeth wrote on 2010-10-20 09.33:
On that matter, can't we filter out mails with subject "unsubscribe" and
redirect them to discuss+unsubscribe dynamically? Even I failed to
unsubscribe from this list yesterday, so this is really a tricky and
fragile thing.
hm, it's a bit risky,
Hi,
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-19 22.37:
Correct, hence my suggestion to simply tweak the list server software to
add a custom Reply-To header (both list*and* unsubbed OP) for posts
from unsubbed posters.
I have another idea...
Instead of individual list subscriptions, why not create a m
LOL :)
Charles Marcus wrote on 2010-10-19 22.36:
Heh... I guess that day will come around the same time that hell freezes
over, pigs fly and monkeys come out of my butt...;)
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobil
Il 20/10/2010 11.34, Marc Paré ha scritto:
[...]
However, the *members* of the *Foundation* *decide*. Of course, it's so
*if* this foundation has to have a steering role in the community, only.
I agree with this concept but more like this: The Document Foundation
would have more of a steering
Le 2010-10-20 04:41, Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
Il 20/10/2010 9.53, Sebastian Spaeth ha scritto:
[...]
There is no reason why there could not be a proper foundation that acts
as custodian for e.g. technical infrastructure, and holds eventual
trademarks and decides on licensing policies for the
Hi,
I agree with Manfred here (I'll try to translate his points) ;)
2010/10/20 Manfred Usselmann :
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:58:07 -0400
> Marc Paré wrote:
>
>> Le 2010-10-19 20:53, Drew Jensen a écrit :
>> > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 09:37 +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>> >
>> > Howdy Jean-Ch
Le 2010-10-20 03:55, Manfred Usselmann a écrit :
Keine Ahnung, was das heisst? Ich denke, die Mischung verschiedener
Sprachen in einem Diskussionsstrang macht überhaupt keinen Sinn und
führt letztendlich nur zu Verwirrung und Chaos.
Englisch sollte die Hauptsprache auf der Liste bleiben, weil es
"Harold Fuchs" wrote in message
news:i9m7k5$ut...@dough.gmane.org...
"Larry Gusaas" wrote in message
news:i9lgl4$a5...@dough.gmane.org...
On 2010/10/19 4:27 PM Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 10/19/2010 10:55 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
Wrong. The purpose of gmane is to receive and write messages wit
Il 20/10/2010 10.33, Andre Schnabel ha scritto:
Ok, so may we agree to the general idea to this process (contribute ->
apply for membership -> contributions gets evaluated -> membership gets
approved or denied) but need to find a good definition what amount / time
of contributions qualify for a
Il 20/10/2010 9.53, Sebastian Spaeth ha scritto:
[...]
There is no reason why there could not be a proper foundation that acts
as custodian for e.g. technical infrastructure, and holds eventual
trademarks and decides on licensing policies for these etc. and a wider
council that is composed of a
Hi Gainluca,
>
> Well, we're now talking about *meaningful* contribution and
> evaluation... ;-)
>
> That's an important step ahead.
>
> On the wiki a read: "all these contributions need to be non-trivial and
> last for a certain time frame".
>
> Then, there's a desperate need for a clear d
Il 20/10/2010 5.46, M. Fioretti ha scritto:
The real question was "why didn't the TDF founders who have/had
official roles in OOo publicly resign from those roles on Sept 28th,
one second BEFORE announcing the birth of TDF? Would'nt it have been
much more proper, considering that creating TDF is
Þann mið 20.okt 2010 07:24, skrifaði Sebastian Spaeth:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:07:47 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
If you would like to monitor what is happening here in the future you
may want a web interface to the mailing lists - I will be leaving this
page up
http://oucv.org/tdf.html
Drew
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
