Nick said
Has anyone any experience of migrating from 800 to 1024? What are the
options? Big bang is one, or you could do all the headers and footers,
and do the content as you go along. What else? Section by section? Are
there any case studies, or objective assesments of user impact
We
Hi All
I am working on a site where we are giving choose layout options (i.e 2
column or 3 column layout) as well as select feature options and the preview
depending on selections.
Here I would like to know, what should be the flow of information. Whether
user select layout option first, then
Hi ,
I would like to post some of my questions to answer. Please let me know how
could I post my questions in IXDA discussion.
Thanks
Pravat
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL
On Sep 1, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Pravat Ranjan wrote:
I would like to post some of my questions to answer. Please let me
know how
could I post my questions in IXDA discussion.
You just did.
Do it again.
Jared
Welcome to the
To clarify, when you send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any of
its legacy aliases you are sending that message out to about 7000
people around the world. There is little to no moderation except
supposedly for 1st time posters (I guess Pravat posted something else
once, probably a reply). We
Google plans to release a new browser soon, based on Webkit, but with a new
JavaScript engine, which is expected to be significantly faster than most
browsers. While there are a lot of questions about it and some interesting
discussion points, I am curious to see how, or if it changes the way
I'm surprised there hasn't been any discussion on this.
Based on the material I've read so far, this could be the coming of a new
era for browsers. I hate to toss around the idea of something being the
breaking point or next gen, but I'm really sold on this idea. If this is
properly executed, it
Dell's Global Site Design team is seeking an information architect (IA)
to help design the next generation of dell.com. The IA will be a key
member of the team responsible for the creation and maintenance of the
dell.com site architecture and taxonomy, and will have the opportunity
to participate
The only substantive story so far here is how they've botched this launch.
The site was launched, then taken down a few hours later, with only a
generic 404 up at the moment - www.google.com/chrome. And although I wasn't
cool enough to get one, apparently they mailed, in print form, comic books
Alex Jones kirjoitti 2.9.2008 kello 17:35:
An introduction to the browser in comic book form:
http://books.google.com/books?id=8UsqHohwwVYCprintsec=frontcover
I don't have an opinion about the browser before trying it, but the
booklet Scott McCloud has written and drawn for them is
Scott, you bring up some interesting points. Food for thought.
I think the main motivator here is that Google feels strapped by
technologies they do not control. Their cloud project is stymied by
browsers with other considerations or legacy (read as antiquated)
architectures.
I think their big
Regarding the comic narration in and of itself. I was impressed with
the way it was able to explain the various problems/solutions and
technology concepts... but... I was very disappointed they failed
some super basic usability principles like telling me my progress or
even allowing me to
regarding my comic book gripes, I'm referring to the link floating
around on the internets
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
as opposed to the slightly less constrained view in the original
poster's link
http://books.google.com/books?id=8UsqHohwwVYC printsec=frontcover
. . . . . . . . .
In Bill Buxton's landmark book 'Sketching User Experiences,' he not only
teaches us about sketching, he argues that sketching is the archetypal
activity of design -- an action central to design thinking and learning.
By illustrating the nuances of sketches, he illustrates how it takes the
same
@daveIxD made an interesting point earlier today which I think is worth
exploring. In a browser built from the ground-up for delivering RIAs -- we
seem to be hitting a metaphor conflict. If we are using Chrome for RIAs,
then the browse-document mental model no longer works, and neither does all
Here's some screenshots:
http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/007645.html
-uday
On Sep 2, 2008, at 10:56 AM, David Malouf wrote:
Anyway, those are my thoughts for now. Can't wait to download and
play ... Please
Wow! put on the spot, eh?
I need to learn more about all this and the way it is used. On the
one hand RIAs have taken the AIR perspective whereby the rendering
engine has no required wrapper and the applications run like they
were standard desktop applications. In some ways this model is really
It appears to be back up and available!
Woo!
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Scott Berkun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only substantive story so far here is how they've botched this launch.
The site was launched, then taken down a few hours later, with only a
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Will Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@daveIxD made an interesting point earlier today which I think is worth
exploring. In a browser built from the ground-up for delivering RIAs -- we
seem to be hitting a metaphor conflict. If we are using Chrome for RIAs,
then
pauric wrote:
this is 2008 folks...
http://www.pageflip.hu/
dont tell me you're planning on the future of browsing with 90's
story navigation.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Except the cool kids have iPhones in 2008. The entire Flash navigation
at that site is rendered as a tiny
I agree with Scott, gaining a significant amount of marketshare will
take time - Google will not be an exception. Everybody will still
need to keep developing for IE and Firefox.
But direct application integration is really the opportunity that
Google has here, as Dave pointed out. If Google
Karri: But direct application integration is really the opportunity
that Google has here, as Dave pointed out. If Google manages to do
that really, really well, then the road to gaining a significant
share of the market may become shorter than I would otherwise
expect.
I dont buy that spefic
On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:32 PM, David Malouf wrote:
I need to learn more about all this and the way it is used. On the
one hand RIAs have taken the AIR perspective whereby the rendering
engine has no required wrapper and the applications run like they
were standard desktop applications. In some
You have to distinguish Touch UI and non touch UI.
iPhone UI change standards of mobile design and offer high level of
user experience.
It is possible to have very close UI with other browsers such as
Opera Mobile, Netfront 3.5 or S60.
It implies specific developpments but why a iPhone user would
The download is up on the site now - http://www.google.com/chrome
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List
Hi Will,
I don't think we'll be seeing the disposal of the back/forward model
anytime soon.
The available documentation seems to indicate that there are specialized
non-browser-like capsules available in which users can choose to run web
apps. This reminds me of the Prism project
Hi Naveen,
If you have the chance try a user test for that decision. :-)
regards
Scott
- Original Message
From: Naveen Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 4:26:25 AM
Subject: [IxDA Discuss] Change layout and add features
Hi All
I am
A browser from google coming to life tomorrow
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/fresh-take-on-browser.html
Drausio
_
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
http://www.nngroup.com/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=32489
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this
Google is announcing Chrome here in Brazil.
Cris Dias is live streaming the session (in portuguese):
http://www.qik.com/crisdias
BR,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Will Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@daveIxD made an interesting point earlier today which I think is worth
exploring. In a
I flipped through the comic and I did notice a mention that an application
can open in its own window without the standard browser controls.Perhaps the
real question is whether the browser will recognize with model of display
is most appropriate, or the designers/developers have the ability to
Online:
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Ricardo Seiji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google is announcing Chrome here in Brazil.
Cris Dias is live streaming the session (in portuguese):
http://www.qik.com/crisdias
BR,
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Will Evans
http://www.google.com/chrome
Mary M Deaton
Deaton Interactive Design
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
The download is now available.
Happy surfing...
- david grubman
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Will Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
@daveIxD made an interesting point earlier today which I think is worth
exploring. In a browser built from the ground-up for delivering RIAs --
we
seem to
Unless Chrome gains significant market share, I doubt we'll need to
alter the way we develop web apps much. That said, it is still a good
idea for developers to take a look under the hood for two reasons. 1)
We'll be better prepared to mobilize our apps to Chrome when and if
it becomes more
Hi Everyone,
I hope that you had a great summer.
The next IxDA - Dallas/Ft. Worth meeting will be Tuesday, September
23rd at 7pm at Rockfish in Las Colinas (SE Corner of MacArthur and
Kinwest, (972) 574-4111).We will be having a social with a
seeded-topic discussion. And dinner is
Whatever the arguments on the direction of Chrome/Google or it's viability with
new users based on new usability conventions, it is fast! All that stuff about
seperate memory blocks for different processes isn't just hype. I just ran it
on Yahoo Mail, which can really slow down Firefox/IE
It would be nice if it was available on Mac right now so I could try
it. I won't even open Windows for an exciting new app like this.
Playing devil's advocate:
1. Do we really need a new Web browser (or Web application launcher)?
I think, and a lot of HTML/CSS folks might agree that we already
On Sep 2, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Josh Viney wrote:
1. Do we really need a new Web browser (or Web application launcher)?
I think, and a lot of HTML/CSS folks might agree that we already have
a few too many. Chrome better be really designer/developer friendly.
As long as Google keeps it web
39 matches
Mail list logo
