Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread timoni grone
In any case, once one learns that they are a 0 / 1, they must then find the proper mapping. Which one is off, and which is on? 0 should be off, 1 should be on, but I can't say whether that transfers across cultures. I understand that the concept of zero has different backgrounds across the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Alexander Livingstone
There seem to be two things here: 1) When should we set/accept/challenge standards? 2) How much how people have to learn to interact with these abstract ideas that are so new in our evolution, and how much should be metaphor? Personally, I would want to go with the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Bryan Minihan
-Original Message- Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon At least one person thought that it was a cannonball-bomb with a fuse. Other people wondered have wondered if the icon looked on or off. -- Jody Tate Web Developer - UW Network Systems http://staff.washington.edu/jtate

[IxDA Discuss] power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Michele Marut
Some great user research on power icons was done by the group who developed the IEEE 1621, the Power Control User Interface standard. (offical name:*Standard for User Interface Elements in Power Control of Electronic Devices Employed in Office/Consumer Environments)* ** See

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Alex, great questions, and more importantly, what I would consider the proper attitude. And I also like how you have presented your perspective as a personal one and not pretend to speak for entire populations or all of humankind. I think this is one good way to make progress in a contentious

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Until I joined this conversation I had not noticed the difference between the power on/off and standby symbols. Yes, now I can see the difference, but I had no idea before that the two were significantly different. And I was trained as a (mechanical) engineer. It's far too subtle a difference

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Andrei Herasimchuk
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Murli Nagasundaram wrote: Until I moved to the US from India in 1986, I don't recall having encountered the 0/1 power symbol more than a couple of times. Given that the symbols were defined in the early 1970s, and it's now 2008 where they've finally seen the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Dan Saffer
On Feb 29, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Bill DeRouchey wrote: I'd rather spend time trying to rethink the Setup or Configure icon that is usually displayed as gears or a wrench/spanner. To me, the latter implies that my product is broken and I need to fix it. That's definitely the wrong metaphor. There

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Shaun Bergmann
I think it's flippin me the bird. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Murli Nagasundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Until I joined this conversation I had not noticed the difference between the power on/off and standby symbols. Yes, now I can see the difference, but I had no idea before that the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Shaun Bergmann
Some great user research on power icons was done by the group who developed the IEEE 1621, the Power Control User Interface standard. (offical name:*Standard for User Interface Elements in Power Control of Electronic Devices Employed in Office/Consumer Environments) * I printed out

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Abi Jones
How about the Save icon? It's often still a 3.25 floppy disk, which probably befuddles the heck out of anyone born after, say 1985. :) A few years ago, when I was still a teacher, our school had PCs that used floppy disks. It was really nice to hold up a floppy disk as a visual reference for

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Weixi Yen
I'd argue that it is a global standard for populations using *computers* to access the internet, which makes it very safe globally in any web application. Alot of this argument revolves around the battle between idealists and realists. Realist: There's no better way to do this... Idealist: You

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-29 Thread Jeff Seager
One of my favorite books on this or any subject is Man and His Symbols, by Carl Jung, dealing with universal archetypes. Abi said: The more I try to come up with a visual model for 'save' the more I think about synapses in a brain, firing away. Or a piggy bank. Or a squirrel. Or (ducking) Jesus

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Morten Hjerde
Whether correctly implemented or not, it's the last of the above symbols (the 'standby toggle') that we see most commonly applied to refer to 'power'. Not 100% sure about most commonly. But I'd accept commonly. The standby symbol is often seen on computers and monitors and interpreted by

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Compare with the definitive origins of the Peace Symbol. http://www.docspopuli.org/articles/PeaceSymbolArticle.html How many know that it is stylized representation of the composite semaphore signs for the letters 'N' and 'D', as in 'Nuclear Disarmament'? Or that at one point, the Christian

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Loren Baxter
This may be the simplest form of an engineering driven interface ever encountered. 1 vs 0? Closed vs open circuit? Show that symbol to someone in an undeveloped country and it loses its meaning. It's certainly easy to think of a more intuitive symbol using natural phenomena rather than

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Morten Hjerde
Why would it lose its meaning in an underdeveloped country?? I think you would have to travel pretty far to find a country where people didn't know the meaning of 0 and 1. And if you where even able to find a country that didn't know 0 from 1, didn't have engineers and didn't have electricity

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Katie Albers
Considering I have actual relatives who would never in a million years make the connection between on/off and 1/0, (and they are not stupid, old, uneducated or otherwise outlying cases) I think it's foolish to believe that this symbol is as universally comprehensible as you would like to

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Jim Drew
Gee, that's helpful. Standby — even if a user knew that's what it meant — is only marginally more useful than closed circuit (again, if the user even knows that's what if symbol means, and then what the term itself means). And thus, what it means isn't of any use here. To the majority of

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread jody tate
This is relevant to a reorganization of my division at the University of Washington. We were formerly the artist known as Computing and Communications. We're now UW Technology. The fun, however, has been the new logo incorporating a power icon. It appears here with all the requisite

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Gretchen Anderson
Thought Bill DeRouchey's Language of Interaction was relevant here: http://www.languageofinteraction.com/ As he points out designers/IxDers are the curators of the language of interaction, and our usage of symbols is part of the process of teaching them to people. A triangle for Play is only the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
Until I moved to the US from India in 1986, I don't recall having encountered the 0/1 power symbol more than a couple of times. Even today, the symbol is quite rare except on computers and some other digital products. Many educated people in India could probably guess at the meaning of the

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-28 Thread Murli Nagasundaram
I'm guessing you eat donuts and muffins for breakfast and take your coffee black -- isn't that what everybody does? ;-) Growing up in India, we used to use this thing that apparently came on wires -- though I have never actually see it with my eyes, I kinda believe the wise people who assured us

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Shaun Bergmann
Interesting. Unless I was designing something with the understanding that my ENTIRE audience was comprised of electrical engineers, I doubt I would think this is a very good design. Which brings me back to 'How did this awful thing get to be so widespread and popular? Was there a particular

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Scott McDaniel
That is interesting, because even knowing what it is, my mind has to close the circuit on what does that mean? -which I guess brings up the question if widespread use translates to true usability, or just dancing-bear familiarity. Scott On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Shaun Bergmann [EMAIL

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Bruce Esrig
Bill DeRouchey asked this question just a few weeks ago and got some pretty authoritative answers. It traces back, most recently, to a harmonized standard that has been given different numbers by ISO and the IEEE. You can see the comments from industrial designers at

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Shaun Bergmann
Thanks Bruce! that's exactly what I was looking for. The source art for all the icons was extremely specific, and to be used in its exact form and for its prescribed purpose. Circle used discretely was for off; bar used discretely was for on; bar inside the circle was reserved for controls that

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Morten Hjerde
Id say that the only awful thing about about the power symbol is that it is misused by designers who presumably don't like the look of it. Its like saying I don't like the letter A because visually it doesn't say a to me. The symbol is a standard. Power as such does not have any visual

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Power icon

2008-02-27 Thread Shaun Bergmann
What an interesting little journey into the depths of the ISO/IEEE Power Control User Interface standard this topic started. The links that have been posted here have been great, and I'm glad to see this topic has been visited time and time again in various forums over the years, and that I'm not