Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

In our case, nesting won't help (if project XXX selects "OGC" as its standards support in the wordpress backend, the reader of our site will assume that all OGC standards are met by project XXX - so yes I agree that the best thing is to delete the single "OGC" option. As for other

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

Hi Jeff, 2017-08-22 18:27 GMT+02:00 Jeff McKenna : > Hi Martin! I've created a 'martinl' account for you on wordpress. Will > email you the credentials :) thanks! Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

Note that the issue here is not nested or not; the issue is that we must be careful with the use of the word "standard" on our new site. -jeff On 2017-08-22 3:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: Never mind, you can have nesting, so OGC can contain WFS, WMS, WCS, etc... -- Jody Garnett On 22 August

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

Yes, am aware, I was doing that as I was editing them. If my memory is correct, I believe that was PostGIS. Likely their editor should be contacted and have them select which "standards" they use. -jeff On 2017-08-22 3:09 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: You can click on the number, in this case

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

Thanks Patrick - look like Jeffrey stepped up and added the page for you. My invitation to join the incubation program is just that - an invitation. World Wind is welcome to join OSGeo when you have time and resources to apply. Almost all the projects entering incubation are in a mature state

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

On mardi 22 août 2017 14:07:04 CEST Jeff McKenna wrote: > Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We > should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into > wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But > that is all my own

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

For the beta website we all have the same permissions, when this goes live I hope we can cut this down :) Many of the standards did not make sense to me, but made sense to the geoserver-dev team (for example I had forgotten about web context service as implemented by deegree). We should also

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

Many of these don't make any sense to me, if you ask me my opinion. We should be using the list of OGC standards and entering them into wordpress, and not allowing editors to edit/add new non-standards. But that is all my own opinion :) Then we can link to these standards. As of now anyone

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

Thanks jeff, I just noticed that work had been done in the GeoServer meeting :) We also spotted one standard "OGC" which does not make sense. Do you think it is worthwhile linking to these standards? -- Jody Garnett On 22 August 2017 at 09:42, Jeff McKenna

[OSGeo-Discuss] regarding Standards on the beta website

Since we have so many website 'editors' (currently 84), please if you do create a new "standard" (double-quote use is on purpose, as many of these are not actual standards) when you are editing your project page, please let me know and I will edit the new standard and add a description - I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

On 2017-08-22 4:35 AM, Martin Landa wrote: I would like to have a login to wordpress (GRASS project) if possible. My OSGeoID [1]. Thanks in advance! Martin [1] http://www.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/ldap_web_search.py?query=martinl Hi Martin! I've created a 'martinl' account for you on wordpress.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

That was actually the original requirement Jeff. I am having a hard time explaining to get Interactive that the sort order "core contributor" changes based on project. Even though we used the geoserver and qgis pages as an example. It is kind of working since they have that association for "core

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:58 Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Polimi wrote: > >> 1) in my opinion the size matters and it is not in se something negative >> to be a small startup or company instead of a big one.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:27 Polimi wrote: > Thank you all for your proposals and discussion. I' m currently in > holidays and therefore I want just to propose some short comments. > 1) in my opinion the size matters and it is not in se something negative > to be a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

In fact this should be implemented. Not sure how we overlooked this. Jachym can you file an issue for this? On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 00:37 Jachym Cepicky wrote: > Eh, new idea just came to my mind: What about adding possibility to assign > people to service providers

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

JeffM, It seems you are making a leap from asking service providers how big they are to this alienating them or somehow excluding ones of a certain size (big or small it's not clear). Can you explain the thoughts behind your argument here? I think the rest of us are saying that everyone should be

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

As member of a mini-micro-company, I will also add my 2 cents. [...] > From the standpoint of an organization looking for a provider, size may also > be important, a larger company > typically has a better financial footing (mandatory in certain types of > contracts), and possibly a more

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Polimi wrote: > 1) in my opinion the size matters and it is not in se something negative > to be a small startup or company instead of a big one. Anyway, as JeffJ > said, if somebody is alienated we can skip it. We have just to better >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Thank you all for your proposals and discussion. I' m currently in holidays and therefore I want just to propose some short comments. 1) in my opinion the size matters and it is not in se something negative to be a small startup or company instead of a big one. Anyway, as JeffJ said, if

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi Jody, For the MapServer project Service Providers page[1] that was created recently, we do not alienate or 'filter' out companies by size (of any number); instead we use the following options: 1. Core Contributors Core Contributor organizations have project Committers and/or PSC

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Makes sense. So you can see on the service providers who are the ones with more contributors. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > Eh, new idea just came to my mind: What about adding possibility to assign > people to service providers (companies in

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Collaborate or be less! Helsinki will challenge your mettle. . .

Hi Patrick, Thanks for these excellent updates and apologies for the delay in reply as I was away on family holidays and just back and catching up with all mails. Thanks to all the students and mentors for their work on these excellent projects whose ideas will benefit all

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Eh, new idea just came to my mind: What about adding possibility to assign people to service providers (companies in general) as we can assign to projects? After all, it's all about people, isn't it? Again, maybe it is in cotradiction with some principle, I'm missing J út 22. 8. 2017 v 2:58

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

Hi Jeffrey, 2017-08-22 2:14 GMT+02:00 Jeffrey Johnson : > Also, please feel free to contact me if you would like a login and > have not been given one yet. Again note these will be migrated to > OSGeo LDAP accounts once we move the site to production. They are > temporary

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

I'd prefer to move these discussions to a separate mailing list (such as marketing or the webcom list). Especially now that a long thread like "proposal for the listing of projects" tends to move to a completely different subject (if/howto distinguish service providers by size) My 2 cents,