Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2009-09-01 Thread SuperQ
bernt;453318 Wrote: 802.11g devices works better with a MIMO AP\Router. Not for speed but for range and signal strength. If you have dropouts it's probably because of weak signal strength or interference, not bandwidth. I replaced my 802.11g router with a N router with 3 antennas and

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2009-08-31 Thread Osamede
I've been looking at buying an N router for almost a year now and could not conclude that any of them were finished products or worth the time over a godo G router. Real N is supposed to be 3-radio devices with 3 antennas. Try finding those on the market. Basically you cant. This does need to

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2009-08-31 Thread bernt
802.11g devices works better with a MIMO AP\Router. Not for speed but for range and signal strength. If you have dropouts it's probably because of weak signal strength or interference, not bandwidth. I replaced my 802.11g router with a N router with 3 antennas and that made a huge difference

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2009-01-02 Thread funkstar
bgriffis;377323 Wrote: Recommendation * In order to keep costs down while still offering these benefits to those who want/need it, the best scenario would be if Logitech offered a replacement mini-PCI Wifi to support 802.11n. I'm sure they could sell this device at a nice profit and

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-30 Thread bgriffis
Thanks for all your replies. There were some other good reasons given for why 802.11n (or Draft N currently) should be added to devices. Summary of Benefits * 5 GHz operation avoids interference from microwaves, phones, etc. * Gives ability for people to use Greenfield mode for increased

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-30 Thread CatBus
bgriffis;377323 Wrote: Everything I've read indicates that current hardware will be firmware upgradeable to be compliant with the final 802.11n spec Everything I've read says this too. But the spec is being written by those who stand to profit more if the final spec is NOT firmware

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-30 Thread Pat Farrell
CatBus wrote: bgriffis;377323 Wrote: Everything I've read indicates that current hardware will be firmware upgradeable to be compliant with the final 802.11n spec Everything I've read says this too. But the spec is being written by those who stand to profit more if the final spec is NOT

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-26 Thread pablolie
iPhone;375006 Wrote: Slim Devices has made it more then clear on this Forum that they *Do Not Intend* to go to N anytime soon or in the near future. Could that change tomorrow, sure. Past reasons for not moving to N: There is not a standardized official specification at this time. It

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-26 Thread Mitch Harding
It would also be beneficial to folks using their Slim Devices are wireless bridges. On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:05 PM, pablolie pablolie.3l21qn1230343...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote: iPhone;375006 Wrote: Slim Devices has made it more then clear on this Forum that they *Do Not Intend*

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-24 Thread funkstar
chrisla;374989 Wrote: 802.11a is also 5Ghz. I think the squeezebox does that? Streaming MP3s does not take much bandwidth. Wonder if it would work? No, 802.11b and 802.11g only. -- funkstar funkstar's Profile:

[slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread bgriffis
Can anyone comment on future support for 802.11n? Specifically I am referring to any new devices planned that will include 5 GHz 802.11n WiFi. I'd like to buy a Squeezebox for the kitchen, but the problem is that when the microwave is turned on there is a lot of interference on the 2.4 GHz

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread Pat Farrell
bgriffis wrote: Can anyone comment on future support for 802.11n? SlimDevices/Logitech never comment on future products. I'd like everything on my network to be 802.11n within 18 months. Do you think that the spec will be real by then? And of course, 11p will be stared as soon as 11n is

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread CatBus
You'll need to wait 11 months or so before it's even possible to make an 802.11n device, and that's if the ratification process stays on schedule. However if you start shopping 18 months from now, I'd say you're likely to find 802.11n devices on the market, possibly even some from SlimDevices.

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread Chris Laplante
802.11a is also 5Ghz. I think the squeezebox does that? Streaming MP3s does not take much bandwidth. Wonder if it would work? -Chris On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, CatBus catbus.3kvzon1230061...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote: You'll need to wait 11 months or so before it's even

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread iPhone
CatBus;374985 Wrote: You'll need to wait 11 months or so before it's even possible to make an 802.11n device, and that's if the ratification process stays on schedule. However if you start shopping 18 months from now, I'd say you're likely to find 802.11n devices on the market, possibly

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread CatBus
iPhone;375006 Wrote: Most importantly, its not really needed for what the Squeezeboxes do at this time. I disagree here. Sure, if bandwidth were the only consideration, they don't even need to use 802.11g. But there's range considerations too. Considering that they've got new portable

Re: [slim] 802.11n Devices

2008-12-23 Thread Peter
CatBus wrote: iPhone;375006 Wrote: Most importantly, its not really needed for what the Squeezeboxes do at this time. I disagree here. Sure, if bandwidth were the only consideration, they don't even need to use 802.11g. But there's range considerations too. Considering that