The RIAA claims ripping your own CDs is illegal!
http://www.dailytidings.com/2007/1229/stories/1229_etc_music.php
Regards,
Kim
--
krochat
--
Acourate -> Inguz DSP -> SB3 -> GW Labs DSP (96kHz upsampler) -> Apogee
Big Ben -> TacT RCS 2.2X -> 2x TacT S2150 -> Vandersteen 3a Signature +
Tac
krochat;252794 Wrote:
> The RIAA claims ripping your own CDs is illegal!
>
> http://www.dailytidings.com/2007/1229/stories/1229_etc_music.php
>
> Regards,
> Kim
Too late, already a thread on this :)
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41522
--
funkstar
--
krochat;252794 Wrote:
> The RIAA claims ripping your own CDs is illegal!
Phew!
Good job I ripped someone elses then. :)
--
bonze
QNAP TS-101 (2.1.1 build 0827T) - SlimServer 6.5.4
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter 7.0
3 x wireless SB3
---
bonze;252799 Wrote:
> Phew!
> Good job I ripped someone elses then. :)
LOL. you nearly made me cover my keyboard with tea :o)
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View
We are supposed to be concerned and feel guilt about sharing music files
while people at the very top of our government are stealing elections
and billions of dollars?
TD
--
tyler_durden
tyler_durden's Profile: http://for
krochat;252794 Wrote:
> The RIAA claims ripping your own CDs is illegal!
The RIAA thinks everything is illegal except itself. It sues everybody
and anything to try to justify its existence. They came into my wife's
business and said they were going to sue her if she did not stop
playing CDs over
iPhone;252857 Wrote:
> The RIAA thinks everything is illegal except itself. It sues everybody
> and anything to try to justify its existence. Like all sh1t, this too will
> pass and common sense will prevail in the
long term with or without the them. I'm just surprised its taking so
long for re
Sorry to burst your bubble.
All these internet articles are nonsense spread out by a
misunderstanding and desire to attack the RIAA.
The case was about ripping and then ***sharing*** files, not just
ripping them for personal use.
The judgment is here
http://www.ilrweb.com/viewILRPDF.asp?filenam
As I've mentioned on a couple of other threads, the position in the UK
is exactly that - it is technically illegal even to rip your own CDs to
make a portable copy or backup. We have no concept of "fair use" at
law.
The BPI said in 2006 that they would not pursue consumers "-if they
copy their
Siduhe;252892 Wrote:
> (snip)
> One small glimmer of hope in Europe is a recent study published on the
> Copyright Directive (by the European Commission) which points some of
> these issues out and concludes that the Directive has given
> rights-holders "-near-absolute control over acts [digital
There's a blurb on Ars Technica about CD sales dropping 20% this
Christmas and it also pointed out some things I'd been thinking about.
I won't argue that file sharing is a bad thing, and in the
pre-litigation days I would've said that the artist and label deserved
their compensation for their wo
4mula1;252946 Wrote:
> Sure, a lot of albums have a few dud tracks and a couple of gems and it
> can be a little frustrating plopping down the full price of a CD and
> only end up with a couple tracks you like, but that's how it's been
> since the beginning.
With one very important difference -
krochat;252794 Wrote:
> The RIAA claims ripping your own CDs is illegal!
>
> http://www.dailytidings.com/2007/1229/stories/1229_etc_music.php
>
> Regards,
> Kim
Keep your powder dry!
--
earthbased
earthbased's Profile:
egd;253011 Wrote:
> With one very important difference - in the beginning the concept of the
> album was just that - albums generally encompassed a theme and were
> meant to be enjoyed in their entirety to fully appreciate the artist's
> work whereas today's mass-market, one hit wonder crap lends
In the days before recording technology existed, musicians were paid to
perform.
Then recording technology was invented and the record industry was
born. Now musicians could get paid for making a recording and selling
copies (actually, the record company could get paid- the musician got
screwed,
tyler_durden;253216 Wrote:
> You wanna eat? You gotta play! There are a number of examples where this is
> recognised by musicians.
The highest profile example is probably Madonna who has signed a
contract with a concert promoter rather than renew with a label.
--
egd
Thecus N5200PRO >> T
tyler_durden wrote:
> In the days before recording technology existed, musicians were paid to
> perform.
This has been true for thousands of years. Musicians traveled from town
to town, entertained and got paid.
In advanced economies, the rich (austrian princes, etc.) would pay to
keep musician
tyler_durden;253216 Wrote:
> Sure, if I could package little bits of my work and sell copies I be
> happy to do it, but I can't, and neither can most people.
> TD
Except that software is exactly what you describe, and it does make
money this way
--
y360
---
y360;253359 Wrote:
> Except that software is exactly what you describe, and it does make
> money this way
The only reason that work's at all is because it is possible to apply
security measures to the media, and a lot of people are not
sufficiently knowledgeable or motivated to seek ways to circ
I think it comes down to something very simple - respecting the artist.
As someone who creates copyrighted works for a living (software in my
case, but it's the same as music, painting or literature - all of which
my family is involved with) I strongly believe that if someone creates
something of
radish;253472 Wrote:
> I do not believe it's a legitimate option for me to say "I value this
> thing you made enough to make a copy and enjoy it, but not enough to
> compensate you"... Have I misunderstood your point or are you implying that
> you should
not be able to rip a CD you have purcha
egd;253792 Wrote:
> Have I misunderstood your point or are you implying that you should not
> be able to rip a CD you have purchased, so as to make the tracks
> available to slimserver and perhaps even create mp3 tracks to copy to
> your portable music player?
Oops :) No, that's not my view at
There's a short bit at Ars Technica regarding Radiohead's In Rainbows
pay what you like experiment and the band have said they made more in
digital distrubution money from In Rainbows than all of their other
works combined, forever.
Apparently many contracts in the days before downloading tracks
What is different about what a musician does that makes it worth more
money than what a 3rd grade teacher does? Or a plumber? Or what I
do?
Musicians at at the mercy of supply and demand like any other
commodity. For a few years record companies were able to control the
supply and the price/pa
24 matches
Mail list logo