I see a common response to anyone who dares to suggest that
SqueezeCenter is less than perfect is well if you don't provide the
full details we can't fix it.
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7525
Reported 16/03/08
Confirmed 26/03/08
Since then, nothing despite two requests for an
rbz5416;308495 Wrote:
I see a common response to anyone who dares to suggest that
SqueezeCenter is less than perfect is well if you don't provide the
full details we can't fix it.
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7525
Reported 16/03/08
Confirmed 26/03/08
Since then,
rbz5416 wrote:
Brown nosers need not post telling me it works for them - I'm not
interested. I AM interested in why this bug report appears to be being
completely ignored.
Displaying attitude like that will not help your cause.
Bugs are prioritised and dealt with accordingly. I do not work
Patrick Dixon;308499 Wrote:
You can of course buy more SB3s as they are not dependent on SC7.Not a
chance. If Logitech aren't committed to the product line, why
should I be?
Patrick Dixon;308499 Wrote:
I'm sure if you look through all the bugs you'll find that there are
quite a few things
interested. I AM interested in why this bug report appears to be being
completely ignored.
It's not being completely ignored. But you might understand that fixing
networking issues might be more important. We have to prioritize our ressources.
--
Michael
rbz5416 wrote:
Patrick Dixon;308499 Wrote:
You can of course buy more SB3s as they are not dependent on SC7.
Not a chance. If Logitech aren't committed to the product line, why
should I be?
So, you have a relatively obscure issue that probably doesn't affect
many users and which is
Zzz
Unsubscribes.
--
rbz5416
rbz5416's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12089
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48496
On 4-Jun-08, at 7:31 AM, rbz5416 wrote:
Zzz
Unsubscribes.
and luckily, the bug will still be tracked, reviewed periodically and
perhaps eventually fixed. However, with Softsqueeze planned for
deprecation, it is not the highest priority.
(btw, it does work for me jut fine).
-kdf
I think you linked to the wrong bug in your post. Following your link
led to a bug where the problem was confirmed within a few weeks, and a
workaround was provided by SlimDevices staff until a better fix becomes
available.
I'm sure SlimDevices hasn't always been this responsive (although they
rbz5416 wrote:
Zzz
Unsubscribes.
By!
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
I also filed a reproducible bug which affects ALL users of Softsqueeze
SqueezeCenter 7.xx and Music services.
All my attempts to get a developer to acknowledge and fix the problem
have been blatantly ignored. I even made sure the problem I'm
reporting can be reproduced by 2nd tier support staff
Robin Bowes;308600 Wrote:
rbz5416 wrote:
Zzz
Unsubscribes.
By!
R.
I'm still waiting for a fix to my filed bug report.
SC7 simply will not function on my computer (my computer pic
enclosed).
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/c64/h/complete.jpg
--
toby10
Donno if it makes any difference, but if you have a look at
http://svn.slimdevices.com/viewvc.cgi/7.0/?view=log
you can see every single code change, each of them have a bug field.
The field refes to the bug the change fixes. I'd say they fix MANY
bugs. Many of the N/A fields are also actually
I also filed a reproducible bug which affects ALL users of Softsqueeze
SqueezeCenter 7.xx and Music services.
All my attempts to get a developer to acknowledge and fix the problem
have been blatantly ignored. I even made sure the problem I'm
reporting can be reproduced by 2nd tier support
Has anyone filed a bug to a company such as Microsoft or Apple, where
you actually pay for the software, and got it fixed within a few months
?
My experience so far is that Logitech (together with the community
developers) often fix things faster than most other companies, this is
the case even
Thanks for your invaluable information :rolleyes:
erland;308638 Wrote:
Has anyone filed a bug to a company such as Microsoft or Apple, where
you actually pay for the software, and got it fixed within a few months
?
My experience so far is that Logitech (together with the community
Roll your eyes as you like, but he's absolutely correct.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:24 PM, mkanet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your invaluable information :rolleyes:
erland;308638 Wrote:
Has anyone filed a bug to a company such as Microsoft or Apple, where
you actually pay for the
mkanet;308611 Wrote:
...I know that some people who only use SqueezeBoxes dont want to hear
this, but Logitech needs to face it that there's still a large number
of people who use SoftSqueeze for its significant advantages over
hardware based Squeezeboxes...
Ok first off- I'm pretty sure
Yeah well some people never learn...they want to moan about not getting
their fave bug fixed when they are using freeware and have made NO
investment in the bug fixers salaries...geesh, it makes my blood boil.
I've bought software costing hundred's of £'s and had to wait YEARS to
get bugs
Ok first off- I'm pretty sure they've stopped development on
Softsqueeze because they're working on releasing a much more fully
featured (and less buggy hopefully) squeezeplay for the desktop. (I
might be wrong)
You're right. It has been aid several times (I won't use the term announced
Hello,
I somewhat agree with the original poster: I bought a SqueezeBox to
pick up my iTunes Library, including the all important Internet radio
stations. The server never picked up the radio stations, and I use a
workaround since Februray 2007. This workaround is not too complicated
for me, but
toby10;308619 Wrote:
I'm still waiting for a fix to my filed bug report.
SC7 simply will not function on my computer (my computer pic
enclosed).
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/c64/h/complete.jpg
LOL!
...
--
Patrick Dixon
www.at-tunes.co.uk
22 matches
Mail list logo
