Pat Farrell wrote:
Peter wrote:
Thanks, I will be switching from Vista to Ubuntu and dedicate the
machine for squeezecenter. I have seen it on a friends laptop and I
must admit it is impressive. Furthermore I will be able to remote
access from my Mac with the built in VNC in Leopard. I
I used to run Slimserver on XP but moved to Ubuntu, and am very happy
with that decision. Faster player response times and fewer 'quirky'
episodes, ie just more rock solid generally ;)
--
oktup
oktup's Profile:
Thanks, I will be switching from Vista to Ubuntu and dedicate the
machine for squeezecenter. I have seen it on a friends laptop and I
must admit it is impressive. Furthermore I will be able to remote
access from my Mac with the built in VNC in Leopard. I hope it will
resolve my issue #1 which
The SqueezeCenter interface is running a lot of javascript. So it can be
a little slow if you doing something complex. But I find it runs at a
decent speed for most operations. Try FireFox 3 if your not already
using it. It has a faster javascript engine.
--
agillis
rip, tag, get cover artÂ…
Jac;406491 Wrote:
Hi,
I have now had my duet for a while now but I am to the point of giving
up as I cannot get it to be stable to the point I would want it to be.
I have dedicated a PC (Pentium 4 at 3 Ghz running Vista) . The only
other program running is windows MS Mediacenter which
Jac wrote:
Thanks, I will be switching from Vista to Ubuntu and dedicate the
machine for squeezecenter. I have seen it on a friends laptop and I
must admit it is impressive. Furthermore I will be able to remote
access from my Mac with the built in VNC in Leopard. I hope it will
resolve my
Peter wrote:
Thanks, I will be switching from Vista to Ubuntu and dedicate the
machine for squeezecenter. I have seen it on a friends laptop and I
must admit it is impressive. Furthermore I will be able to remote
access from my Mac with the built in VNC in Leopard. I hope it will
resolve
Jac wrote:
Who can recommend the simplest setup where there would be no (very very
low) risk of the this anoying hickup to occasionaly happen. Is
Linux server, any distro. Wire the server to the router and if at all
possible wire the SB's to the router as well. Do not use
wireless between
Having never bothered with Linux, I run XP Pro and strip all of the junk
out of it. The OS, SC, iTunes, Moose and sundry plug-ins take up 6.4GB
and ran wihtout intervention on a normal hard drive until recently when
I migrated it to a OCZ 30GB SSD. Now I have less maintenance (no
defrags) and
OK,
Thanks for the comments
There seems to be mixed opinions about the having 2 AP with same SSID.
I often see my duet remote reconnecting to the AP as I often travel with
the remote where it probably connects looses signal from one of the AP
and connects to the other one. Hmmm I think I
I have used Ubuntu server for a long time and never had any kind of
trouble with it. The only thing that could be frustrating for a Linux
beginner is setting up Samba.
If I were you I would go for Vortexbox. Next time I change hardware on
my server I will install Vortexbox on it.
--
bernt
Hi,
I have now had my duet for a while now but I am to the point of giving
up as I cannot get it to be stable to the point I would want it to be.
I have dedicated a PC (Pentium 4 at 3 Ghz running Vista) . The only
other program running is windows MS Mediacenter which is connected to a
TV used
You should not run two access points with the same ID. Get one access
point and a wifi extender. Vista should be stable although sometimes
the multitasking abilities leave something to be desired. I would
recommend VortexBox it's simple and uses very low resources.
--
agillis
rip, tag, get
Jac wrote:
Who can recommend the simplest setup where there would be no (very very
low) risk of the this anoying hickup to occasionaly happen. Is
squeezecenter more stable on LINUX? or maybe on MAC.
I don't have personal experience running SqueezeCenter on anything but
Linux. I can say
agillis;406493 Wrote:
You should not run two access points with the same ID. Get one access
point and a wifi extender. Vista should be stable although sometimes
the multitasking abilities leave something to be desired. I would
recommend VortexBox it's simple and uses very low resources.
Quoting Millwood (millwood.3p29mz1237072...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com):
agillis;406493 Wrote:
You should not run two access points with the same ID. Get one access
point and a wifi extender. Vista should be stable although sometimes
the multitasking abilities leave something to be
Millwood;406528 Wrote:
Nonsense. Any large office runs multiple access points with the same
SSID.
And most probably have more sophisticated setups than a couple of
consumer-grade wireless routers blindly using the same SSID. At my job
we use radios from Tropos that are more expensive than
Over the last few years, I've been running various flavors of
SlimServer/SqueezeCenter on a couple of Linux releases (currently
Ubuntu 6.06.2 LTS) and it's been really solid (for the solid
SlimServer/Squeezecenter releases -- Squeezecenter has been quite good
through most of its life, and
The software is EXTREMELY stable on XP. I could echo the many comments
above that were made for linux. For me, slim software on XP:
Runs for month after month without being touched.
Has been trouble free for years (except for one incident that required
a reboot)
Never freezes or jams, instant
19 matches
Mail list logo
