It's in with a bunch of settings that appear to be on/off, but that
doesn't make sense with 'cpu='
I'm wondering if it's number of CPUs, priority, or something else.
Anybody know, before I start experimenting?
--
bobkoure
3o4Titties;602192 Wrote:
> It's all about Slacker Radio.
>
> Their algorithms are far more advanced and their library of licensed
> music is far FAR more vast then either Music IP or Pandora.
musicip is not a library of music.
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFO
Slacker is only available in the US and you cant take it on holiday with
you.
--
cparker
www.spicefly.com - Spicefly SugarCube - Taking Squeezebox and MusicIP to
the next level. A hassle free non-stop journey through your music
library using MusicIP. Plus the finest MusicIP installation guid
It's all about Slacker Radio.
Their algorithms are far more advanced and their library of licensed
music is far FAR more vast then either Music IP or Pandora.
--
3o4Titties
3o4Titties's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices
excalibur;549498 Wrote:
> So in short, can I just leave the DB with my former folder-structure and
> rest assured that MusicIP/GenpuID will locate the new path for my songs
> and correct them in the DB? After all they have been analyzed and
> stored in DB (which is what takes a really long time.P
Excaliber, I pm'd you with my email address, thanks.
--
dbinder101
dbinder101's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=36997
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48270
___
Give me your e-mail and I'll send it to you.
--
excalibur
excalibur's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33971
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48270
_
I just converted from Win 7 to Ubuntu and am having trouble with Genpuid
1.4 I run the command
genpuid XXX -logex -m3lib=/home/default.m3lib -r /musicdrive
However, the output contains the following:
Checking files to be processed...
Songs to be scanned: 11
** Stopping Processing
And then it
Hi,
It seems you guys are the most knowledgeable on MusicIP after the
demise of the old dedicated forum. So I have a question to you lot.
Over the last 10 days I have analyzed close to 7000 songs with GenpuID
to the default.m3lib DB.
I have since then moved some songs around, and do now see tha
Hi guys,
I seem to have forgotten to actually commend Andrew from Vortexbox.
This Fedora distro really is a match made in heaven for the SBS.
I 'downgraded' from a QNAP 209 II Pro (500MHz CPU 256MB RAM), with QNAP
OS, that needed a special QPKG package to be able to install
Squeeze-server at all
Thanks Aubuti,
But I found out it was because I used GenpuID v. 1.4. Apparantly it
doesn't work on my system. I tried with v. 1.2, which was quick in
doing the analysis. I think its there.
The log-file says - check. Everything green. So I think I got it.
--
excalibur
-
excalibur;545785 Wrote:
> I start genpuid with this command
> sudo /opt/genpuid/genpuid 57aae6071e74345f69143baa210bda87 -logex
> -m3lib="/var/cache/musicip/cache/default.m3lib" -r "/storage/music/"
> -archive
That looks like one problem, although I can't guarantee it's the only
problem. The loca
excalibur;545724 Wrote:
> Running GenpuID on a Vortexbox. There is no problem running it from the
> web-GUI, but to archive fingerprints in TAGs I'd prefer to run it with
> GenpuID. But when I do in the /opt/genpuid/log.txt I see that I have a
> problem from the first automated script run this mo
aubuti;545728 Wrote:
> Could you show what genpuid command you/Vortexbox are using? Otherwise
> it's a little hard for people who don't use Vortexbox to troubleshoot.
>
Thanks for your help.
I start genpuid with this command
sudo /opt/genpuid/genpuid 57aae6071e74345f69143baa210bda87 -logex
-m3
Running GenpuID on a Vortexbox. There is no problem running it from the
web-GUI, but to archive fingerprints in TAGs I'd prefer to run it with
GenpuID. But when I do in the /opt/genpuid/log.txt I see that I have a
problem from the first automated script run this morning;
*
[2] Fingerprin
Wirrunna;324819 Wrote:
> RonnieQ, I have added this to bug 4366 >>->
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4366 <-<< . It would be
> helpful if you could also upload a track that causes the noise.
Thanks. Will do. Just waiting on a token from the bugzilla site in
order to upload an attac
Siduhe;324496 Wrote:
> itm, apologies for not going back over all your posts on this topic, but
> are you running the headless version of MusicIP?
>
> If so, there are a couple of things I can suggest - first, you may need
> to do a full clear and rescan in Squeezecenter for files which have
> r
itm, apologies for not going back over all your posts on this topic, but
are you running the headless version of MusicIP?
If so, there are a couple of things I can suggest - first, you may need
to do a full clear and rescan in Squeezecenter for files which have
recently been analysed but not vali
maggior;324428 Wrote:
> That's surprising. Are your files all tagged properly? I think all
> that matters is that the artist and track name be correct.
>
> Here are the stats of my library from the MiP web page:
> Total songs 20,377
> Mixable songs 14,511
> Songs to validate 20,377
Has anyone tried this plugin ?
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49226
It works like a "Freestyle" mix from just one song.
--
Wirrunna
A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.
Wirrunna's Profile: http:
itm;324322 Wrote:
> It's just that none of my tracks have the Music IP icon against them,
> and my music library is only showing those tracks (and artists) which
> have been processed - i.e. only a fraction of my collection so far. So
> I suppose I'll have to wait awhile if I want full visibility
I'm not keen on archiving the MusicIP fingerprint data to tags on
tracks.
I tried it about a year ago and found that it stopped AAC and ALAC
tracks playing on an iPod shuffle. The way that MusicIP added the tags
changed the order of track atoms that the shuffle was expecting. It
took me a long ti
maggior;323676 Wrote:
> No, you don't - that's my point.
It's just that none of my tracks have the Music IP icon against them,
and my music library is only showing those tracks (and artists) which
have been processed - i.e. only a fraction of my collection so far. So
I suppose I'll have to wait
egd;324216 Wrote:
> Good thing you had made a backup (always recommended). You should
> report this to Whicken from the MiP development team. I'm sure he'll
> give it the attention it deserves. Worth pointing out that I've
> archived analysis to mp3 and FLAC and never had any issues whatsoever
RoonieQ;324187 Wrote:
> Well, after choosing to archive all of my ALAC files, the newly archived
> (modified) files all possess a loud audible click at the end of each
> file when played. Not good.
>
> Fortunately, I of course made a complete backup of said files prior to
> the archiving proces
tamanaco;324207 Wrote:
> From the begining I decided not to allow MusicIP to write (archive) its
> data in my FLAC files. It's still an evolving technology. As far as I
> know, it is still in beta. Instead I choose to use the separated
> default.m3lib MusicIP reference index. This way is very eas
RoonieQ;324187 Wrote:
> Well, after choosing to archive all of my ALAC files, the newly archived
> (modified) files all possess a loud audible click at the end of each
> file when played. Not good.
>
> Fortunately, I of course made a complete backup of said files prior to
> the archiving proces
egd;320851 Wrote:
> If MiP supports it then archive it, the rationale being the same as for
> any other files.
Well, after choosing to archive all of my ALAC files, the newly
archived (modified) files all possess a loud audible click at the end
of each file when played. Not good.
Fortunately,
Harry G;323613 Wrote:
> If, without full analysis, it mixes just from tags, how does this differ
> from simply generating a random mix of a genre?
>
> BTW: Because of its slowness, I'm suspicious about how the analysis is
> actually done. I have a feeling there's this big locked room in India
>
maggior;323540 Wrote:
> Too many people get hung up on the analysis part of this. You can start
> using MIP before doing the lengthy analysis. I have not done the full
> analysis and I use MIP all of the time.
>
> Initially, it will based mixes strictly on your tags. This works quite
> well.
Presumably you have to wait until the validation is complete before you
can start using it?
--
itm
itm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17437
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth
itm;323263 Wrote:
> I've got a library of 70,000 tracks (which don't include podcasts), and
> the current MIP estimate is 28 weeks to analyse them all. I'm not sure
> I can wait 6 months for this!!
Too many people get hung up on the analysis part of this. You can
start using MIP before doing th
Thank you all for the encouragements and cautions. I will proceed as
suggested.
I agree that backup is crucial. This is part of the reason I'm moving
everything to a raid server AND keeping my backups. Let me add that I
think it a good idea (just like with real work)to keep the backups off
site.
Harry G;323226 Wrote:
> Is it safe to tag tens of thousands of flac files at the same time in
> this manner?
I did it when I first setup MusicIP. Tedious as hell making sure it did
(this was under windows, so I made a current backup for each file tree,
used MP3Tag to generate a tag-summary file f
itm;323263 Wrote:
> I've got a library of 70,000 tracks (which don't include podcasts), and
> the current MIP estimate is 28 weeks to analyse them all. I'm not sure
> I can wait 6 months for this!!
if your library is properly tagged and not too esoteric it shouldn't
take too long to analyze. Mi
I've got a library of 70,000 tracks (which don't include podcasts), and
the current MIP estimate is 28 weeks to analyse them all. I'm not sure
I can wait 6 months for this!!
--
itm
itm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.
Harry G;323226 Wrote:
> Is it safe to tag tens of thousands of flac files at the same time in
> this manner? Any conflict with ReplayGain?
>
> Any problem in doing so on an XP machine and then moving the tagged
> music files to a Linux box that will from then on be my SC server?
>
> Trying out
Robin Bowes;307685 Wrote:
>
> How do I write the analysis info to the file tags?
egd;307855 Wrote:
> Select all tracks you want to affect, right click and select Archive
> Analysis. On the Linux GUI you may have to go through a menu to do it,
> I've not used it in a very long time
Is
I've been happily using MusicIp for a few months now but I'm still
trying to come to grips with the way the software creates a playlist. I
understand that, when using MusicIp with SqueezeCenter, it is the
settings within SqueezeCenter that dictates the outcome of the mix.
However, whatever song I
A sincere thank you to all the posters in this thread! Based on all the
information gathered here I finally have a working MusicIP/Squeeze
Centre setup with 28000+ tracks. Woohoo!
Much appreciated.
--
pufnstuf
pufnstuf's
schiegl;321682 Wrote:
> Hi,
> Did you see the file jive_7.1_r2704.bin?
> kind regards,
> Markus
I did not. Sorry, but thank you! Getting it now.
(I was looking in
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/latest/7.1/ )
--
whatboutbob
--
pippin;320862 Wrote:
> My little server took about 5 Weeks to analyze my library (four of which
> I was not at home, so fine...).
> I had some "esoteric" stuff there, too (own recordings, audio books)
> and it took about all of the time for 25% of the library. The other 75%
> went through within
Hi,
whatboutbob;321660 Wrote:
>
> Is there a jive file for 7.1 that I'm missing?
schiegl;321587 Wrote:
> ... SBC version from http://update.slimdevices.com/update/firmware/7.1/
> As your SC version is really up-to-date you should use the latest SBC
> version, too.
>
Did you see the file jiv
whatboutbob;321648 Wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. How does one manually update the SBC? I've seen
> the question asked in other threads but am yet to see a response.
Ok, never mind. Managed to upgrade to 7.0.1 r2502m via SD card. Hasn't
resolved the issue though. Still can't generate playlists f
Thanks for the reply. How does one manually update the SBC? I've seen
the question asked in other threads but am yet to see a response.
--
whatboutbob
whatboutbob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=
whatboutbob;321561 Wrote:
>
>
> Now I can create musicip playlists via SC (*7.1* - 21927) but I no
> longer get the option via the duet controller (which says *v 7.0.1*
> r2448 - and software updates don't work).
>
I don't think mixing those two versions is supported. I'd try an
updated versi
dagnammit...i had musicip working nicely and then i had some odd network
issues (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50012).
Now I can create musicip playlists via SC (7.1 - 21927) but I no longer
get the option via the duet controller (which says v 7.0.1 r2448 - and
software updates d
ModelCitizen;320850 Wrote:
>
> Anyway, what's this got to do with MusicIP (on which I have given
> up after three weeks I'd only managed to scan half of my
> collection)?
>
> MC
Well, functionally speaking... nothing. But given that MusicIP
generates different playlists, somewhat based on
egd;320867 Wrote:
> Not AFAIK...MiP has no way of knowing whether or not you've actually
> listened to a playlist it has generated.
http://www.musicip.com/mixer/httpprotocol.jsp
MusipIP does support Playcount (see get Playcount in the link above),
and you can create a filter which limits (or re
Not AFAIK...MiP has no way of knowing whether or not you've actually
listened to a playlist it has generated.
--
egd
Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variable,
monkeys can be taught to cut code, and world peace is utterly
unrealistic...
Integrating MusicIP with S
BTW, does MIP track how often you play something?
I'm just asking because I just had a look at my LastFM account and
found out that my library is dramatically dominate (in terms of # of
plays) by my iPEng test playlist (like 2500 listenings vs. xx
listenings for stuff I feel I listen to typically)
egd;320852 Wrote:
> How big and/ or esoteric is the collection? Hmm, just had a look, it's
> eclectic, but not what I'd call esoteric, looking at it your library
> shouldn't take that long to analyze.
My little server took about 5 Weeks to analyze my library (four of
which I was not at home, so
ModelCitizen;320850 Wrote:
> Anyway, what's this got to do with MusicIP (on which I have given up
> after three weeks I'd only managed to scan half of my collection)?How big
> and/ or esoteric is the collection?
--
egd
Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variab
RoonieQ;320762 Wrote:
> What's the consensus on archiving Apple lossless files once one's
> analysis is complete? I can't seem to find a clear recommendation as to
> best practice.
If MiP supports it then archive it, the rationale being the same as for
any other files.
--
egd
Internet forums
tamanaco;320793 Wrote:
> last.fm gets a new Web UI... Hmmm, is the last.fm Dashboard gone?
The last interface badly needed updting and i think the new one is
better... but it takes a bit of getting used to. It's great to be able
to see you Loved Tracks and to see the My Playlist facility expanded
last.fm gets a new Web UI... Hmmm, is the last.fm Dashboard gone?
--
tamanaco
tamanaco's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4620
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48270
What's the consensus on archiving Apple lossless files once one's
analysis is complete? I can't seem to find a clear recommendation as to
best practice.
--
RoonieQ
RoonieQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.ph
egd;320703 Wrote:
> I think this screenshot says it all...why go through two scans when one
> will do?
In my case: because every time I've tried an MIP-only scan before,
something went wrong. In particular, all my artwork disappeared.
However, that was when I could only build mixes on playlists
I think this screenshot says it all...
+---+
|Filename: Screenshot.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=5457|
+-
pippin;320236 Wrote:
> OK, the long scanning of my library is through, I'm back from vacation
> so I tested this.
> Looks fine, but I've got one issue: Some of my albums (few but
> noticable) show up with a wrong cover. There don't seem to be any
> reasons I note (the albums live in different sub
autopilot;319714 Wrote:
> How does musicIP actually work, does it just scan the Genre tags, or is
> it more intelligent than that?
It carries out an acoustic analysis of the waveform to decide on the
track's attributes. Genre is ignored in the analysis, however, you can
use Genre as an addition
How does musicIP actually work, does it just scan the Genre tags, or is
it more intelligent than that?
--
autopilot
*Server:* SC7.1b (Windows Vista 64)
*Players:* Squeezebox 3 (main room) / Squeezebox Receiver (bedroom) /
Softsqueeze (office).
*Amps:* Cambridge Audio 640a (main room) / Trends
Yes I did use that wiki entry as my start point. From there I found the
spicefly site and the relevant page on musicip.com.
I did not understand some of it and it took a while for the penny to
drop that most of it was for Linux (of which I know next to nothing). I
was able to get it working under
Mushroom_3;314544 Wrote:
> As one who has just been through the struggle to integrate MusicIP with
> Squeezecenter I would like to add support to JohnnyLightOn's post.
>
> Slim has gone to the trouble to add MusicIP support to Squeezecenter so
> why not make it easier to actually get it to work?
JohnnyLightOn;314487 Wrote:
> Integrating SC and MusicIP is way, WAY too complicated at present. It's
> crazy in its complexity and difficulty.
If what you mean is "full" integration... meaning that as you install
SC the MusicIP engine is installed, configured and "all" its functions
are fully
As one who has just been through the struggle to integrate MusicIP with
Squeezecenter I would like to add support to JohnnyLightOn's post.
Slim has gone to the trouble to add MusicIP support to Squeezecenter so
why not make it easier to actually get it to work? Letting people try,
fail and then g
JohnnyLightOn;314487 Wrote:
> Integrating SC and MusicIP is way, WAY too complicated at present. It's
> crazy in its complexity and difficulty.There's really nothing complicated
> about it, there are just a few must
have conditions that will make or break it and they're addressed in the
Wiki en
Integrating SC and MusicIP is way, WAY too complicated at present. It's
ridiculous in its complexity and its inelegance.
I'm an expert user, have done programming, etc., and after a couple
hours of messing around with this, still haven't been able to get it to
work. Never mind why, I'm sure if
tamanaco;314365 Wrote:
> When I get new CDs I rip them to my FLAC library, then I run the MusicIP
> Windows client to validate the new added tracks, after validation I
> start the SpiceFly Web UI (at this point "Total Songs" does not equal
> "Validated Songs") and click reload cache. My last ste
maggior;314328 Wrote:
> I'm using Spicefly's web interface for headless MusicIP on Linux. On
> this webpage, I don't see a "reload cache" button. Also, I don't see
> in the API reference an API to reload the cache
> (http://www.musicip.com/mixer/httpprotocol.jsp).
>
> What is the actual API th
Nonreality;314359 Wrote:
> I'm really looking forward to figuring out a speed up and automating of
> the SC scan.That's already addressed in the Wiki - assuming of course that
> what
you're referring to is avoiding having SC rescan the entire library
when you edit/ add a track or album to your l
Nonreality;314359 Wrote:
> I'm really looking forward to figuring out a speed up and automating of
> the SC scan.
A few posts back I mentioned that maybe incorporating or adding some of
the functions of the SpiceFly Web UI in the MusicIP plugin or in the SC
basic settings page might save us a c
maggior;314340 Wrote:
> OK. I'm not validating tracks yet, I'm just using the "add tracks"
> capability. I'm more than happy with the mixes that I am getting
> without having to do the full validation.
>
> Can you execute this command without having to do validation on the
> tracks? I guess I
maggior;314340 Wrote:
> OK. I'm not validating tracks yet, I'm just using the "add tracks"
> capability. I'm more than happy with the mixes that I am getting
> without having to do the full validation.
>
> Can you execute this command without having to do validation on the
> tracks? I guess I
tamanaco;314338 Wrote:
> I think the "reload cache" button only appears in the Spicefly's web UI
> when you add (validate) new tracks. This is what happens in my Windows
> setup.
OK. I'm not validating tracks yet, I'm just using the "add tracks"
capability. I'm more than happy with the mixes t
maggior;314328 Wrote:
> I'm using Spicefly's web interface for headless MusicIP on Linux. On
> this webpage, I don't see a "reload cache" button. Rich
I think the "reload cache" button only appears in the Spicefly's web UI
when you add (validate) new tracks. This is what happens in my Windows
maggior;314328 Wrote:
> I'm using Spicefly's web interface for headless MusicIP on Linux. On
> this webpage, I don't see a "reload cache" button. Also, I don't see
> in the API reference an API to reload the cache
> (http://www.musicip.com/mixer/httpprotocol.jsp).
>
> What is the actual API th
egd;313598 Wrote:
> When you load MiP's HTTP API you should have a fourth button appear
> along with a message next to it stating that the cache has changed - if
> I recall correctly is is the "Reload Cache" button. You shouldn't have
> hit "Refresh Songs", which I'm guessing is what you've refe
egd;313957 Wrote:
> Could you elaborate on the problem you're experiencing? Headless
> doesn't write/ modify tags at all.
Well, I determined it wasn't a problem with MusicIP, but with my
tagging program.
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and
ezkcdude;313954 Wrote:
> MusicIP is screwing up my tags or something. Does anyone else run into
> this problem?Could you elaborate on the problem you're experiencing?
--
egd
Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variable,
monkeys can be taught to cut code, and world p
ezkcdude;313954 Wrote:
> MusicIP is screwing up my tags or something. Does anyone else run into
> this problem?
In what way? Changing them, or not recognising them?
Have you disabled the "fix tags" option in the MIP GUI (this is
windows, not sure the same option exists in Linux)?
--
Siduhe
MusicIP is screwing up my tags or something. Does anyone else run into
this problem?
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.
SHINYMETAL
'*Site*' (http://www.ezdiyaudio.com)| '*RSS*'
(http://www2.kumc.edu/students/ezamir/rss/ezdiya
bobkoure;313708 Wrote:
> No apologies needed. IMHO this is one of those "incremental improvements
> until it's better" things. Ahem, if you'd not followed my incorrect
> instructions its likely SC's
scan would have been a pretty snappy affair.
bobkoure;313708 Wrote:
> Any notion if it's possib
No apologies needed. IMHO this is one of those "incremental improvements
until it's better" things.
Any notion if it's possible to get the headless MusicIP to reload its
cache -without- the web interface?
There seem to be two issues being solved here:
- when using "look for new and changed music
bobkoure;313597 Wrote:
> I've tried it, it works - but I don't see any reduction in the time
> taken for MusicIP Import.
>
> I ran the script above, then the musicIP refresh, then reload cache,
> then "look for new and changed music" in SC.
> Or should I have not run refresh?
> I'm pretty sure "
Here's a first cut at a windows script
Code:
setlocal
set key=1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef
set cache="C:\Documents and Settings\YOUR_NAME\Application
Data\MusicIP\MusicIP Mixer\default.m3lib"
set musicdir="D:\MUSIC"
"%~dp0genpuid.exe" %key% -m3lib=%cache%
bobkoure;313512 Wrote:
> We are not worthy :)
Actually I think I'm the dumbass in this equation - when I think of how
much money has been spent on just the music, let alone the storage, I'm
hard pressed to justify it, yet I keep going back for more. Guess it
beats gambling, drugs and prositu
egd;313164 Wrote:
> Having a 90k+ track library is enough incentive to seek to solve the
> problem :)
We are not worthy :)
More seriously, yeah, I'm only in the 40k range, it's a bit cumbrous -
and less than half what you're dealing with.
I'll take on writing the windows script(s).
Anyone
Wiki has now been updated to include improved method of incorporating
new/ changed albums/ tracks etc.
--
egd
Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variable,
monkeys can be taught to cut code, and world peace is utterly
unrealistic...
--
Yep - I'll give that a go when I get a moment.
Stuart
egd wrote:
hickinbottoms;313153 Wrote:
I started to write up some notes about GenPuid on the wiki:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Automating_MusicIP_with_GenPuid
It's not finished, but should be understandable from th
bobkoure;313125 Wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to both figure that one out - and to post
> it!Having a 90k+ track library is enough incentive to seek to solve the
problem :)
I tired of SC rescan running for over an hour everytime I added or
edited anything in my library.
--
egd
Interne
hickinbottoms;313153 Wrote:
> I started to write up some notes about GenPuid on the wiki:
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Automating_MusicIP_with_GenPuid
>
> It's not finished, but should be understandable from the notes. GenPuid
>
> seems to work well from my tests, and is a good candi
I started to write up some notes about GenPuid on the wiki:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Automating_MusicIP_with_GenPuid
It's not finished, but should be understandable from the notes. GenPuid
seems to work well from my tests, and is a good candidate for automating
the whole import/scan
Thanks for taking the time to both figure that one out - ant to post
it!
I just got a copy of genpuid.
Getting a copy is a bit more involved than just downloading something;
go 'here' (http://musicbrainz.org/doc/genpuid) for a step-by-step at
MusicBrainz.
--
bobkoure
-
chinablues;312134 Wrote:
> Never mind the MusicIP scanner & how long that takes (never been a
> problem for me), the thing that bugs me is the SC scanner interface
> with Music IP when I'm scanning new or changed music. Here SC scanner
> zips through the music folders mostly correctly picking up
>AFAIK it uses MiP to tell it what files are in the library, but still
>collects tag data from the files themselves. Your 2nd para would be to
>do with the inner workings of the MiP/ SC integration plugin, of which I
>have no knowledge.
Yes, I believe the scanner always asks MiP for a list of all
Philip Meyer;312414 Wrote:
> I consider the SC music library as my master library. At the moment, it
> tries to read every song from MusicIP, and merge the MusicIP data into
> the SC library.
>
> When I do a rescan for new and changed files, I would prefer it if it
> only requested the mixable
lork;312845 Wrote:
> FWIW, I actually did have to use sudo, despite being in the same
> directory as the file. It refused to do a plain cp, so I sudo'd it and
> it worked. Maybe has to do with the permissions on .MusicMagic ? It must be
> to do with permissions but I've no idea why, unless you
trkster;312522 Wrote:
>
> I can get MIP to work (& create mixes), but every time I restart my
> server I have to go though the MIP "add tracks" routine
Read 'MusicIP Headless Mode on Vista'
(http://spicefly.com/content/view/59/32/) at Spicefly's site - scan
down to the section labeled *How to ti
Hey, egd-
FWIW, I actually did have to use sudo, despite being in the same
directory as the file. It refused to do a plain cp, so I sudo'd it and
it worked. Maybe has to do with the permissions on .MusicMagic ?
Also just FYI, after I did the
http://localhost:10002/api/flush
command you suggest,
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo