On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Peter Harpending
wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote:
To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP.
Holding
funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small
benefit
-- and it's someth
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote:
> To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding
> funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit
> -- and it's something that we could transition to later anyway.
>
> Imagine w
To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP.
Holding funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a
small benefit -- and it's something that we could transition to later
anyway.
Imagine we're doing arrears, because that's the easier way. Then,
because we t
I had always just assumed that when you funded an account it was charged at
the time. I guess I hadn't considered other possibilities. I'm not sure I
know enough to actually make a decision on this, and think some
professional help would be useful.
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Bryan Richter
On 05/06/2016 06:55 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> [moving to discuss list]
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 05/06/2016 12:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:31:52AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
In short, I read your comments abo
[moving to discuss list]
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:57:41PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 12:10 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:31:52AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> In short, I read your comments above as though you have assumed we are
> >> holding mo
