On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:04, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > Steve Kopischke wrote:
> > > I believe this happens because the network of individuals has
> > > little in the way of recognition
> >
> > Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount
Hi Tony,
Does OO.o have a 'support' project? If not, it should have one. Its
as important a part of a software product as is development,
documentation, marketing, etc.
With a support project we could have SPVs (support project
volunteers) who volunteer themselves to answer problems and, because
Rigel wrote:
Another idea is to actualy take some of the most important issues posed to
the
users list(s), as it may come out in the future, and post the solutions on a
web page seperate from the users list itself.
http://documentation.openoffice.org click on FAQs.
--
Peter Kupfer -- Using OOo si
Cor Nouws wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Steve Kopischke wrote:
I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little
in the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition
volunteers get?
Hi Steve, Daniël, others,
Some lists have a (bi) weekly s
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Steve Kopischke wrote:
I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
get?
Let's forget about details like feasibility and practicality. Let's just
Oh! Traffic is the problem! Oh :) I thought it was more a matter of the help
staff sifting through and finding what was relevant to theme and what wasn't.
If it's over-crowding, then sure, setup extra lists, and the support team can
sign up for the lists that work for them
Another idea is to actu
Rigel wrote:
> If we had individual e-mail addresses for individual components, we could
> easily juggle them all that way. When they get sent to the server, it changes
> the subject line to fit the address the e-mail was directed to, ex:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc, and instead
Actualy Alex, I was thinking about binding e-mail addresses.
If our present setup can already do that, then great! perhaps something to try
out :) I've elaborated more below.
If we had individual e-mail addresses for individual components, we could
easily juggle them all that way. When they get s
I think any Mailman will do that too, you don't really need another proprietary
technology to bind a forum with a mailing list. You just need to read the
manual on how to set the gateway between them.
--
Alexandro Colorado
Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish
http://es.openoffice.org/
Mensaje ci
Hi daniel. Sun already has the technology to bind various forums into a single
cohesive hole, while making the interface for each look entirely independant.
That means while the user is sending info off to a Writer forum, the only thing
in the e-mail that changes is the subject line that includes "
Steve Kopischke wrote:
> Excellent idea. Do you have a URL?
http://www.theINGOTs.org
The INGOTs is an amazing project. Ian gave a talk about this a few weeks
ago. I encourage you to read the logs and see the slides:
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/conference/logs/20-Mar-2005-INGOT.html
Chee
Ian Lynch said the following:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Steve Kopischke wrote:
I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
get?
They can
Ian Lynch wrote:
> > Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
> > get?
>
> They can become INGOT assessors. They even get a certificate :-) Any
> active community member who can operate OpenOffice.org competently and
> who has spent 100 hours on community develo
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Steve Kopischke wrote:
I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
get?
They
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:28 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Steve Kopischke wrote:
>
> > I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
> > the way of recognition
>
> Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
> get?
They can become INGOT
On 12 Apr 2005 at 17:14, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Diane Mackay wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am writing to point out some of a recent users list thread and to
> > open the discussion here. There has been a huge discussion ongoing
> > for about three days
> [snip]
>
> Hi Diane,
>
> I tend to skip long p
Diane Mackay wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to point out some of a recent users list thread and to open
the
discussion here. There has been a huge discussion ongoing for about
three days
[snip]
Hi Diane,
I tend to skip long posts.
So it does not bother me in a sence that it is a waste of my time.
Is it
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Steve Kopischke wrote:
I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
get?
Hi Steve, Daniël, others,
Some lists have a (bi) weekly standard mail. Wit
Steve Kopischke wrote:
> I believe this happens because the network of individuals has little in
> the way of recognition
Can you think of any idea to improve the ammount of recognition volunteers
get?
Let's forget about details like feasibility and practicality. Let's just
brainstorm some id
Ric Hayman said the following:
Diane Mackay wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to point out some of a recent users list thread and to
open the
discussion here. There has been a huge discussion ongoing for about
three days
on the users list, and I believe threads like this are detrimental to
the value
of su
Diane Mackay wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to point out some of a recent users list thread and to open
the
discussion here. There has been a huge discussion ongoing for about
three days
on the users list, and I believe threads like this are detrimental to
the value
of support provided to the OpenOffic
Hi,
I am writing to point out some of a recent users list thread and to open the
discussion here. There has been a huge discussion ongoing for about three days
on the users list, and I believe threads like this are detrimental to the value
of support provided to the OpenOffice.org user: not because
22 matches
Mail list logo
