I definitely agree, that was a workable search setup even if it was a
bit slow and awkward. At least it found 89% of what I was looking for.
Dr. Cadwell
Robert merman wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search
Robert Derman wrote:
> Many times I have thought that OOo should dump Collab.net for another
> vendor.
Or at least regular software.
/Lars
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this
"Lars Nooden" wrote in message
news:4ac8d774.9090...@openoffice.org
> Robin Laing wrote:
>
>> Do you have RFE's or Bug numbers for reference? If they are not
>> reported, they cannot/will not be fixed.
>
> @Twayne:
> The UI for the bug reporter is absolutely tedious. However, even
> though it's
Hi Drew,
> Ok - IMO, the problem may be that on that same page, right at top, is a
> link "proceed" in bold and greenso I'm guessing folks hit the page,
> mutter because they wanted to submit an issue and don't like having
> another page in the middle there, take 3 seconds to see the nice B
Thorsten Behrens wrote (7-10-2009 13:54)
Cor Nouws wrote:
But I see, somewhere in your lines above, 'UI'. I did not think along
that line, but had the idea people request a whole new tracker system ...
An more simple IU for quick search, would make it easier to use, yes.
yeah, and you put it
Drew Jensen wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which
really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all i
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this
Hi Frank, all,
Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb:
[...]
We once had a search box at
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html which really
queried the issue database, that is, you enter one or more terms, and
all issues containing this term in the summary (not
Hi Thorsten,
> yeah, and you put it mildly -
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi is an abomination; and the
> most important fields, namely summary/description entry, are all the
> way down to the bottom ...
>
> All that stuff at the top, like type/component/status, is more than
> irrelev
Cor Nouws wrote:
> But I see, somewhere in your lines above, 'UI'. I did not think along
> that line, but had the idea people request a whole new tracker system ...
> An more simple IU for quick search, would make it easier to use, yes.
>
Hi Cor,
yeah, and you put it mildly -
http://qa.openoffic
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for writing,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (7-10-2009 11:23)
Cor Nouws wrote:
But since appr. 35% of entered issues is not correct (duplicate,
invalid, works for me, wontfix)(*) I doubt that making it more easy to
enter issues really will help the project.
[...]
Hi Cor,
I
Cor Nouws wrote:
> But since appr. 35% of entered issues is not correct (duplicate,
> invalid, works for me, wontfix)(*) I doubt that making it more easy to
> enter issues really will help the project.
>
> [...]
>
Hi Cor,
I concur with Patrick & others that artificially limiting the inflow
of
Good Day Folks:
While I do not often post I joined this list to learn and help where
I could. I too agree that thee bug tracking system is untenable. Over
the past three years I have attempted to report s, count 'em 6 issues,
two in just the past year. At _/*NO TIME*/_ was I able to even fin
Dear Cor, and Others,
My feeling about the duplicate is that it would be reduced a lot if
finding equivalent bugs is simplified. Moreover, voting would be easier,
and thus probably help to set up priorities based on quality (user
experience). At this moment, the way priority is established for
Mike Scott wrote (6-10-2009 9:47)
Robert Derman wrote:
For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than
worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to
report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with
something totally different, th
Robert Derman wrote:
For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than
worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to
report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with
something totally different, the only way we will ever get a worki
Twayne wrote:
"Lars Nooden" wrote in message
news:4ac8d774.9090...@openoffice.org
Robin Laing wrote:
Do you have RFE's or Bug numbers for reference? If they are not
reported, they cannot/will not be fixed.
@Twayne:
The UI for the bug reporter is absolutely tedious. However,
"Lars Nooden" wrote in message
news:4ac8d774.9090...@openoffice.org
> Robin Laing wrote:
>
>> Do you have RFE's or Bug numbers for reference? If they are not
>> reported, they cannot/will not be fixed.
>
> @Twayne:
> The UI for the bug reporter is absolutely tedious. However, even
> though it's
19 matches
Mail list logo
