We need an "outlook" type component to complete the suite. Is one available?
Are we building one?
Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would love one. How do we find out if someone is working on one?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "RJKoning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:45 PM
Subject: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
We need a
'Outlook' is most famous as a security hole masquerading as a useful
application. In that context, one must also consider the back-end which
is MS Exchange. So for that there is already a drop-in replacement:
https://www.damnvulnerablelinux.org/content/view/21/27/
However, if you mean e-
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, RJKoning wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:45:09 -0400
From: RJKoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
We need an "outlook" type component
Bret Busby wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, RJKoning wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:45:09 -0400
From: RJKoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
We need an "outlo
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 21:45 -0400, RJKoning wrote:
> We need an "outlook" type component to complete the suite. Is one available?
> Are we building one?
I'm using one to reply to you. It's called 'evolution'
--
Daniel Kasak
IT Developer
NUS Consulting Group
Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway
North Sydn
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Robin Laing wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, RJKoning wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:45:09 -0400
From: RJKoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Daniel Kasak wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:42:28 +1100
From: Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 21:45 -0400
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:52 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 21:45 -0400, RJKoning wrote:
> >
> >> We need an "outlook" type component to complete the suite. Is one
> >> available?
> >> Are we building one?
> >
> > I'm using one to reply
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kasak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:52 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Daniel K
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:11 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
> > I don't see the problem with Evolution. You asked for an email client. I
> > suggested one. If by 'integrated', you mean that you want a button
> > somewhere in OOo to create a new email, then write a StarBasic script to
> > open evolution,
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kasak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 14:11 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
> I don't see the pro
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:17 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
> >> Then why is this not being done as a default setting,
> >
> > Because I don't want it, and you haven't done it.
>
> I guess sadly that is the reason why so many, lets say average computer
> users stick to the more expensive programs, they
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kasak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:17 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
>> Then why is this not
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:52 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
> However from a TAFE aspect, teaching Beginners Courses in Computers etc. In
> reality it is not as easy as you may think. Go and ask the average person,
> not an already Computer savvy person to do what you suggest and you will
> find from
Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Robin Laing wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, RJKoning wrote:
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 21:45:09 -0400
From: RJKoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: [discuss] we need an &q
Daniel Kasak wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:52 +1000, Peter Hyde wrote:
However from a TAFE aspect, teaching Beginners Courses in Computers etc. In
reality it is not as easy as you may think. Go and ask the average person,
not an already Computer savvy person to do what you suggest and you wi
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Daniel Kasak wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:28:03 +1100
From: Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: discuss@openoffice.org
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] we need an "outlook" component to the suite
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:17 +
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 01:51 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> >>> Let me give an example. I just sent an email to a friend with an
> >>> attachment that I produced in OpenOffice. I exported it to PDF, then
> >>> switched to Evolution, and attached the PDF I just created.
> >>
> >> This my friend is why s
2008/4/4, Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 01:51 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> > >>> Let me give an example. I just sent an email to a friend with an
> > >>> attachment that I produced in OpenOffice. I exported it to PDF, then
> > >>> switched to Evolution, and attached th
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 05:50 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> He he he... I like you, I really do, I feel exactly the same in most cases,
> like "why integrating an email/calendar application when there are already a
> few good ones out there".
Well thanks :)
> BUT... I also think that we (OpenOf
On 4 Apr 2008 at 16:19, Daniel Kasak wrote:
...
> OK. I think we're approaching the point here. But a couple of
> comments ...
>
> Dumbing-down applications isn't doing anyone any favours - even those
> asking for it. Lets say for a moment that we put a 'create new email'
> button in OOo that laun
2008/4/4, Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 05:50 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > He he he... I like you, I really do, I feel exactly the same in most
> cases,
> > like "why integrating an email/calendar application when there are
> already a
> > few good ones out the
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2008/4/4, Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 05:50 +0200, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
He he he... I like you, I really do, I feel exactly the same in most
cases,
like "why integrating an email/calendar application when there are
24 matches
Mail list logo
