2007/3/6, David Larlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I got some troubles today with newforms. I use to create models fields
> with a first implicit verbose_name argument:
> email = models.EmailField("E-mail")
>
> Unfortunately newforms fields have quite similar argument (label) but
> it's not the
Please, check this: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3775
On 21 maalis, 06:25, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For the possibly 3.2 people who don't also subscribe to django-users, I
> just posted this
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/98e6857..
On Wed, Mar 21, Karsu wrote:
>
> Please, check this: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3775
I don't think the patch--as it is--is a good idea, but what's your problem?
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100
htt
Hello everybody,
Is there any update about the SQL Alchemy integration ?
I have checked out the sqlalchemy branch but there is not reference to SQL
Alchemy in it.
Cheers,
Emeka
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Hi,
I'm running a developmental Django machine with the following specs:
- Windows XP
- Apache
- Mod_python
- Django 0.95
And it appears that one of the Apache-related Windows service
httpd.exe keeps on growing in memory. Has anyone encountered this
problem or even know how to remedy it?
Than
On Wed, Mar 21, Emeka Mosanya wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Is there any update about the SQL Alchemy integration ?
> I have checked out the sqlalchemy branch but there is not reference to SQL
> Alchemy in it.
I think this branch has only seen merges from trunk.
Michael
--
noris network AG -
On 3/21/07, Moses Ting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a developmental Django machine with the following specs:
>
> - Windows XP
> - Apache
> - Mod_python
> - Django 0.95
>
> And it appears that one of the Apache-related Windows service
> httpd.exe keeps on growing in memory. H
I underestand that mysql_old is compatible support for people who
can't upgrade MySQLdb immediately. Without this patch I can't use
django with mysql with older version than MySQLdb-1.2.1p2.
If I try to use mysql_old and run python manage.py syncdb it will
raise ImportError? "MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or n
On 3/21/07, Emeka Mosanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any update about the SQL Alchemy integration ?
> I have checked out the sqlalchemy branch but there is not reference to SQL
> Alchemy in it.
It's sleeping right now. The upcoming refactoring of Django's QuerySet
mechanism looks like
Hi,
Django has anonymous sessions, tracked by cookies. The session can not be
accessed from a different machine for the same user, which drastically
reduces the usefulness of sessions. Another approach to save something
persistently for a user it to update the UserProfile model and create a new
ro
On Wed, Mar 21, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Django has anonymous sessions, tracked by cookies. The session can not be
> accessed from a different machine for the same user
What do you mean with 'accessed from a different machine'? Another server
(in a load balancer or similar), or another c
On 3/21/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Django has anonymous sessions, tracked by cookies. The session can not
> be
> > accessed from a different machine for the same user
>
> What do you mean with 'accessed from a different
But if you want reliable persistance you are going to have to store it in
the DB at some stage anyway.
And why not store it AND put it in the session each time you create a new
session?
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:51:27 -, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/21/07, Michael Radz
> It's sleeping right now. The upcoming refactoring of Django's QuerySet
> mechanism looks like it'll make working with other ORMs a bit easier,
> so if someone wants to come back and revisit it then it'd be a bit
> less of an ambitious project ;)
Is there any place (e.g. a trac page) where inter
On Wed, Mar 21, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> On 3/21/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 21, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Django has anonymous sessions, tracked by cookies. The session can not
> > be
> > > accessed from a different machine for the same u
On 3/21/07, jbronn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any place (e.g. a trac page) where interested parties can
> check out the progress on the QuerySet refactor? Since I recently
> completed PostGIS integration for the GeoDjango branch (will be
> committed to SVN branch pending Jeremy Dunck's
On 3/21/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
...
> If you find altering the database tables is a problem, you could use a user
class User(...
class Message(...
class UserMessagePref(...):
user = FK(User)
message = FK(Message)
muted = Boolean()
No? Or is it that you don'
Howdy, folks,
I'm in the process of migrating a Django project from MySQL to
PostgreSQL and think I may have stumbled across a nasty bug. It
relates to ManytoMany fields and the way in which syncdb creates the
database tables to handle this.
For full details, please see the ticket at:
http://co
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:03 -0700, Karsu wrote:
> I underestand that mysql_old is compatible support for people who
> can't upgrade MySQLdb immediately. Without this patch I can't use
> django with mysql with older version than MySQLdb-1.2.1p2.
>
> If I try to use mysql_old and run python manage.
Moses Ting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a developmental Django machine with the following specs:
>
> - Windows XP
> - Apache
> - Mod_python
> - Django 0.95
>
> And it appears that one of the Apache-related Windows service
> httpd.exe keeps on growing in memory. Has anyone encountered this
> prob
I am under 4697 of
http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/branches/boulder-oracle-sprint/
Before reporting this message as a ticked, I would like to be sure if
it is my mistake or a bug exists.
Into an x model, I defined next field:
caracter = models.CharField('Campo Character',
ma
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 18:10 +, jbronn wrote:
> > It's sleeping right now. The upcoming refactoring of Django's QuerySet
> > mechanism looks like it'll make working with other ORMs a bit easier,
> > so if someone wants to come back and revisit it then it'd be a bit
> > less of an ambitious proj
22 matches
Mail list logo
