Jacob Kaplan-Moss schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So it's a couple of days later...got time to update with your thoughts?
>>
>
> Yeah, I'm sorry; I lost track of this.
>
> Essentially I think that James is right that a systematic fix
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think we need to do something along the lines of what's in
> #7524... it's far, far from perfect, but it's probably the only way to
> go to avoid a lot of frustration.
>
>
So should #7524 get moved back to a 1.0
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it's a couple of days later...got time to update with your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm sorry; I lost track of this.
Essentially I think that James is right that a systematic fix would be
better, but I don't see what that
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quick note: Malcolm and I are in Portland in the only place in the
> city sans wifi. We've talked about this and the other exc swallowing
> issue and I have some thoughts. Please hold until I'm in a more
>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 2:26 AM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> I stand by what I said in the dev channel yesterday: this is one
> instance of a more general issue (there are lots of places where --
> because we need to import or check something -- we can end up
> "swallowing"
Quick note: Malcolm and I are in Portland in the only place in the
city sans wifi. We've talked about this and the other exc swallowing
issue and I have some thoughts. Please hold until I'm in a more
civilized location and can actually use a keyboard bigger than a few
stamps.
Jacob
Sent
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand this argument. At some point fixing this general issue
> is going to have to involve a piecemeal change of each instance where
> exceptions are currently swallowed. (Or at least each instance where the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Jonas Pfeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S.: I should have brought this up here earlier instead of causing a
> somewhat lengthy discussion on IRC, sorry for that. I hope James
> doesn't hate me after this ;)
I stand by what I said in the dev channel yesterday:
Dear Django developers,
The code importing urls.py has a flaw that is easy to fix but has the
potential to cause a lot of frustration especially for inexperienced
developers -- which I do hope will try out Django in large numbers
soon :)
The problem is this: When importing urls.py _any_
